{"id":"nsw:act-2005-077","name":"Defamation Act 2005","slug":"defamation-act-2005","collection":"act","jurisdiction":"nsw","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":"77 of 2005","makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":104749,"registerId":"nsw-act-2005-077-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-03","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"Part 1","sectionType":"part","heading":"Preliminary","content":"# Part 1 Preliminary\n\nPart 1 Preliminary","sortOrder":0},{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Name of Act","content":"#### 1 Name of Act\n\n1 Name of Act\n\n> This Act is the [Defamation Act 2005](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2005-077).","sortOrder":1},{"sectionNumber":"2","sectionType":"section","heading":"Commencement","content":"#### 2 Commencement\n\n2 Commencement\n\n> This Act commences on 1 January 2006.","sortOrder":2},{"sectionNumber":"3","sectionType":"section","heading":"Objects of Act","content":"#### 3 Objects of Act\n\n3 Objects of Act\n\n> The objects of this Act are—\n> \n> > (a) to enact provisions to promote uniform laws of defamation in Australia, and\n> \n> > (b) to ensure that the law of defamation does not place unreasonable limits on freedom of expression and, in particular, on the publication and discussion of matters of public interest and importance, and\n> \n> > (c) to provide effective and fair remedies for persons whose reputations are harmed by the publication of defamatory matter, and\n> \n> > (d) to promote speedy and non-litigious methods of resolving disputes about the publication of defamatory matter.","sortOrder":3},{"sectionNumber":"4","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions","content":"#### 4 Definitions\n\n4 Definitions\n\n> In this Act—\n> \n> access prevention step, in relation to the publication of digital matter, means a step—\n> \n> > (a) to remove the matter, or\n> \n> > (b) to block, disable or otherwise prevent access, whether by some or all persons, to the matter.\n> \n> applicable period for an offer to make amends is defined by section 14.\n> \n> associated entity has the same meaning as in section 50AAA of the [Corporations Act 2001](http://www.legislation.gov.au/) of the Commonwealth.\n> \n> Australian court means any court established by or under a law of an Australian jurisdiction (including a court conducting committal proceedings for an indictable offence).\n> \n> Australian jurisdiction means—\n> \n> > (a) a State, or\n> \n> > (b) a Territory, or\n> \n> > (c) the Commonwealth.\n> \n> Australian tribunal means any tribunal (other than a court) established by or under a law of an Australian jurisdiction that has the power to take evidence from witnesses before it on oath or affirmation (including a Royal Commission or other special commission of inquiry).\n> \n> caching service is defined for Part 2, Division 2A by section 10B.\n> \n> concerns notice is defined by section 12A.\n> \n> conduit service is defined for Part 2, Division 2A by section 10B.\n> \n> country includes—\n> \n> > (a) a federation and a state, territory, province or other part of a federation, and\n> \n> > (b) an Australian jurisdiction.\n> \n> digital intermediary, in relation to the publication of digital matter, means a person, other than an author, originator or poster of the matter, who provides or administers the online service by means of which the matter is published.\n> \n> Note—\n> \n> There may be more than 1 digital intermediary in relation to the publication of the same digital matter.\n> \n> digital matter means matter published in electronic form by means of an online service.\n> \n> document means any record of information, and includes—\n> \n> > (a) anything on which there is writing, and\n> \n> > (b) anything on which there are marks, figures, symbols or perforations having a meaning for persons qualified to interpret them, and\n> \n> > (c) anything from which sounds, images or writings can be reproduced with or without the aid of anything else, and\n> \n> > (d) a map, plan, drawing or photograph.\n> \n> electronic communication includes a communication of information in the form of data, text, images or sound (or any combination of these) by means of guided or unguided electromagnetic energy, or both.\n> \n> excluded corporation means an excluded corporation referred to in section 9.\n> \n> further particulars notice means a further particulars notice referred to in section 12A(3).\n> \n> general law means the common law and equity.\n> \n> Health Practitioner Regulation National Law means—\n> \n> > (a) the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law—\n> > \n> > > (i) as in force from time to time, set out in the Schedule to the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009 of Queensland, and\n> > \n> > > (ii) as it applies (including with any modifications) as a law of New South Wales or another State or Territory, or\n> \n> > (b) the law of another State or Territory that substantially corresponds to the law referred to in paragraph (a).\n> \n> matter includes—\n> \n> > (a) an article, report, advertisement or other thing communicated by means of a newspaper, magazine or other periodical, and\n> \n> > (b) a program, report, advertisement or other thing communicated by means of television, radio, the Internet or any other form of electronic communication, and\n> \n> > (c) a letter, note or other writing, and\n> \n> > (d) a picture, gesture or oral utterance, and\n> \n> > (e) any other thing by means of which something may be communicated to a person.\n> \n> offer to make amends means an offer to make amends under Division 1 of Part 3.\n> \n> online service means a service provided to a person, whether or not it is requested or it is for a fee or reward, to enable the person to use the internet, including, without limitation, a service enabling a person—\n> \n> > (a) to access or connect to the internet, or\n> \n> > (b) to use the internet to do 1 or more of the following—\n> > \n> > > (i) send or receive content,\n> > \n> > > (ii) store content,\n> > \n> > > (iii) index content,\n> > \n> > > (iv) search for content,\n> > \n> > > (v) share content,\n> > \n> > > (vi) interact with other persons.\n> \n> Examples of an online service—\n> \n> > 1 An internet-based social media platform.\n> \n> > 2 A forum created or administered by a person using a facility provided by an internet-based social media platform that enables users to share content or interact with other users about a topic.\n> \n> > 3 A website or other internet-based platform that enables knowledge to be shared by or with its users.\n> \n> parliamentary body means—\n> \n> > (a) a parliament or legislature of any country, or\n> \n> > (b) a house of a parliament or legislature of any country, or\n> \n> > (c) a committee of a parliament or legislature of any country, or\n> \n> > (d) a committee of a house or houses of a parliament or legislature of any country.\n> \n> poster, in relation to the publication of digital matter, means a person who uses the online service by means of which the matter is published for the purpose of communicating the matter to 1 or more other persons.\n> \n> search engine is defined for Part 2, Division 2A by section 10B.\n> \n> search engine provider is defined for Part 2, Division 2A by section 10B.\n> \n> search result is defined for Part 2, Division 2A by section 10B.\n> \n> storage service is defined for Part 2, Division 2A by section 10B.\n> \n> substantially true means true in substance or not materially different from the truth.\n> \n> Territory means the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory.\n> \n> this jurisdiction means New South Wales.\n> \n> **s 4:** Am 2017 No 50, Sch 5.7; 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[1\\]; 2023 No 36, Sch 1\\[1\\].","sortOrder":4},{"sectionNumber":"4A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Examples and notes","content":"#### 4A Examples and notes\n\n4A Examples and notes\n\n> > (1) An example or note at the foot of a provision forms part of this Act.\n> \n> > (2) An example in this Act—\n> > \n> > > (a) is not exhaustive, and\n> > \n> > > (b) may extend, but does not limit, the meaning of the provision to which it relates.\n> \n> **s 4A:** Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1\\[2\\].","sortOrder":5},{"sectionNumber":"5","sectionType":"section","heading":"Act to bind Crown","content":"#### 5 Act to bind Crown\n\n5 Act to bind Crown\n\n> This Act binds the Crown in right of this jurisdiction and, in so far as the legislative power of the Parliament of this jurisdiction permits, the Crown in all its other capacities.","sortOrder":6},{"sectionNumber":"Part 2","sectionType":"part","heading":"General principles","content":"# Part 2 General principles\n\nPart 2 General principles","sortOrder":7},{"sectionNumber":"Division 1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Defamation and the general law","content":"## Division 1 Defamation and the general law\n\nDivision 1 Defamation and the general law","sortOrder":8},{"sectionNumber":"6","sectionType":"section","heading":"Tort of defamation","content":"#### 6 Tort of defamation\n\n6 Tort of defamation\n\n> > (1) This Act relates to the tort of defamation at general law.\n> \n> > (2) This Act does not affect the operation of the general law in relation to the tort of defamation except to the extent that this Act provides otherwise (whether expressly or by necessary implication).\n> \n> > (3) Without limiting subsection (2), the general law as it is from time to time applies for the purposes of this Act as if the following legislation had never been enacted—\n> > \n> > > (a) the [Defamation Act 1958](/view/pdf/asmade/act-1958-39),\n> > \n> > > (b) the [Defamation Act 1974](/view/html/repealed/current/act-1974-018).","sortOrder":9},{"sectionNumber":"7","sectionType":"section","heading":"Distinction between slander and libel abolished","content":"#### 7 Distinction between slander and libel abolished\n\n7 Distinction between slander and libel abolished\n\n> > (1) The distinction at general law between slander and libel is abolished.\n> \n> > (2) Accordingly, the publication of defamatory matter of any kind is actionable without proof of special damage.","sortOrder":10},{"sectionNumber":"Division 2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Causes of action for defamation","content":"## Division 2 Causes of action for defamation\n\nDivision 2 Causes of action for defamation","sortOrder":11},{"sectionNumber":"8","sectionType":"section","heading":"Single cause of action for multiple defamatory imputations in same matter","content":"#### 8 Single cause of action for multiple defamatory imputations in same matter\n\n8 Single cause of action for multiple defamatory imputations in same matter\n\n> A person has a single cause of action for defamation in relation to the publication of defamatory matter about the person even if more than one defamatory imputation about the person is carried by the matter.","sortOrder":12},{"sectionNumber":"9","sectionType":"section","heading":"Certain corporations do not have cause of action for defamation","content":"#### 9 Certain corporations do not have cause of action for defamation\n\n9 Certain corporations do not have cause of action for defamation\n\n> > (1) A corporation has no cause of action for defamation in relation to the publication of defamatory matter about the corporation unless it was an excluded corporation at the time of the publication.\n> \n> > (2) A corporation is an excluded corporation if—\n> > \n> > > (a) the objects for which it is formed do not include obtaining financial gain for its members or corporators, or\n> > \n> > > (b) it has fewer than 10 employees and is not an associated entity of another corporation,\n> > \n> > and the corporation is not a public body.\n> \n> > (3) In counting employees for the purposes of subsection (2) (b), part-time employees are to be taken into account as an appropriate fraction of a full-time equivalent.\n> \n> > (4) (Repealed)\n> \n> > (5) Subsection (1) does not affect any cause of action for defamation that an individual associated with a corporation has in relation to the publication of defamatory matter about the individual even if the publication of the same matter also defames the corporation.\n> \n> > (6) In this section—\n> > \n> > corporation includes any body corporate or corporation constituted by or under a law of any country (including by exercise of a prerogative right), whether or not a public body.\n> > \n> > employee, in relation to a corporation, includes any individual (whether or not an independent contractor) who is—\n> > \n> > > (a) engaged in the day to day operations of the corporation other than as a volunteer, and\n> > \n> > > (b) subject to the control and direction of the corporation.\n> > \n> > public body means a local government body or other governmental or public authority constituted by or under a law of any country.\n> \n> **s 9:** Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[2\\]–\\[4\\].","sortOrder":13},{"sectionNumber":"10","sectionType":"section","heading":"No cause of action for defamation of, or against, deceased persons","content":"#### 10 No cause of action for defamation of, or against, deceased persons\n\n10 No cause of action for defamation of, or against, deceased persons\n\n> > (1) A person (including a personal representative of a deceased person) cannot assert, continue or enforce a cause of action for defamation in relation to—\n> > \n> > > (a) the publication of defamatory matter about a deceased person (whether published before or after his or her death), or\n> > \n> > > (b) the publication of defamatory matter by a person who has died since publishing the matter.\n> \n> > (2) Subsection (1) does not prevent a court, if it considers it in the interests of justice to do so, from determining the question of costs for proceedings discontinued because of the subsection.\n> \n> **s 10:** Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[5\\].","sortOrder":14},{"sectionNumber":"10A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Serious harm element of cause of action for defamation","content":"#### 10A Serious harm element of cause of action for defamation\n\n10A Serious harm element of cause of action for defamation\n\n> > (1) It is an element (the serious harm element) of a cause of action for defamation that the publication of defamatory matter about a person has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to the reputation of the person.\n> \n> > (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), harm to the reputation of an excluded corporation is not serious harm unless it has caused, or is likely to cause, the corporation serious financial loss.\n> \n> > (3) The judicial officer (and not the jury) in defamation proceedings is to determine whether the serious harm element is established.\n> \n> > (4) Without limiting subsection (3), the judicial officer may (whether on the application of a party or on the judicial officer’s own motion)—\n> > \n> > > (a) determine whether the serious harm element is established at any time before the trial for the proceedings commences or during the trial, and\n> > \n> > > (b) make any orders the judicial officer considers appropriate concerning the determination of the issue (including dismissing the proceedings if satisfied the element is not established).\n> \n> > (5) If a party applies for the serious harm element to be determined before the trial for the proceedings commences, the judicial officer is to determine the issue as soon as practicable before the trial commences unless satisfied that there are special circumstances justifying the postponement of the determination to a later stage of the proceedings (including during the trial).\n> \n> > (6) The matters a judicial officer may take into account in deciding whether there are special circumstances for the purposes of subsection (5) include (but are not limited to) the following—\n> > \n> > > (a) the cost implications for the parties,\n> > \n> > > (b) the resources available to the court at the time,\n> > \n> > > (c) the extent to which establishing the serious harm element is linked to other issues for determination during the trial for the proceedings.\n> \n> > (7) Without limiting subsection (5), the judicial officer may determine the serious harm element is not established on the pleadings without the need for further evidence if satisfied that the pleaded particulars are insufficient to establish the element.\n> \n> > (8) Nothing in this section limits the powers that a judicial officer may have apart from this section to dismiss defamation proceedings (whether before or after the trial commences).\n> \n> **s 10A:** Ins 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[6\\].","sortOrder":15},{"sectionNumber":"Division 2A","sectionType":"division","heading":"Exemptions from liability for digital intermediaries","content":"## Division 2A Exemptions from liability for digital intermediaries\n\nDivision 2A Exemptions from liability for digital intermediaries\n\n**pt 2, div 2A:** Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1\\[3\\].","sortOrder":16},{"sectionNumber":"10B","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions","content":"#### 10B Definitions\n\n10B Definitions\n\n> In this division—\n> \n> caching service means an online service whose principal function is to provide automatic, intermediate and temporary storage of content for the purpose of making the onward electronic transmission of the content more efficient for its users.\n> \n> Example of a caching service—\n> \n> A service for temporarily and automatically storing files that are most frequently downloaded by users of a website to speed up the download time for the files.\n> \n> conduit service means an online service whose principal function is to enable its users to access or use networks or other infrastructure to connect to, or send or receive data by means of, the internet.\n> \n> Examples of a conduit service—\n> \n> > 1 A service provided by an internet service provider enabling its users to connect to the internet.\n> \n> > 2 An internet-based service enabling its users to send emails or send text messages to other persons.\n> \n> search engine means a software application or system designed to enable its users to search for content on the internet.\n> \n> search engine provider for a search engine means a person who maintains, or provides users with access to the search functions of, the search engine.\n> \n> search result means a result generated by a search engine that is limited to identifying a webpage on which content is located by reference to 1 or more of the following—\n> \n> > (a) the title of the webpage,\n> \n> > (b) a hyperlink to the webpage,\n> \n> > (c) an extract from the webpage,\n> \n> > (d) an image from the webpage.\n> \n> storage service means an online service, other than a caching service, whose principal function is to enable its users to store content remotely.\n> \n> Example of a storage service—\n> \n> An internet-based cloud service enabling its users to store documents, videos or photographs for later retrieval.\n> \n> **s 10B:** Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1\\[3\\].","sortOrder":17},{"sectionNumber":"10C","sectionType":"section","heading":"Exemption for digital intermediaries providing caching, conduit or storage services","content":"#### 10C Exemption for digital intermediaries providing caching, conduit or storage services\n\n10C Exemption for digital intermediaries providing caching, conduit or storage services\n\n> > (1) A digital intermediary is not liable for defamation for the publication of digital matter if the intermediary proves—\n> > \n> > > (a) the matter was published using 1 or more of the following services provided by the intermediary—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) a caching service,\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) a conduit service,\n> > > \n> > > > (iii) a storage service, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the intermediary’s role in the publication was limited to providing 1 or more of the services mentioned in paragraph (a), and\n> > \n> > > (c) the intermediary did not do any of the following—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) initiate the steps required to publish the matter,\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) select any of the recipients of the matter,\n> > > \n> > > > (iii) encourage the poster of the matter to publish the matter,\n> > > \n> > > > (iv) edit the content of the matter, whether before or after it was published,\n> > > \n> > > > (v) promote the matter, whether before or after it was published.\n> \n> > (2) Subsection (1)(c) does not apply in relation to action taken because it is required by or under a law of an Australian jurisdiction or an order of an Australian court or Australian tribunal.\n> > \n> > Example—\n> > \n> > Action taken to comply with a code of conduct or other document regulating conduct that a digital intermediary is required to comply with by a law of an Australian jurisdiction.\n> \n> > (3) Subsection (1) applies regardless of whether the digital intermediary knew, or ought reasonably to have known, the digital matter was defamatory.\n> \n> **s 10C:** Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1\\[3\\].","sortOrder":18},{"sectionNumber":"10D","sectionType":"section","heading":"Exemption for search engine providers","content":"#### 10D Exemption for search engine providers\n\n10D Exemption for search engine providers\n\n> > (1) A search engine provider for a search engine is not liable for defamation for—\n> > \n> > > (a) the publication of digital matter comprised of search results if the provider’s role was limited to providing an automated process for the user of the search engine to generate the results, or\n> > \n> > > (b) the publication of digital matter to which the search results provide a hyperlink if the provider’s role in the publication of the matter is limited to the role mentioned in paragraph (a).\n> \n> > (2) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to search results, or to digital matter to which the search results provide hyperlinks, to the extent the results are promoted or prioritised by the search engine provider because of a payment or other benefit given to the provider by or on behalf of a third party.\n> \n> > (3) Subsection (1) applies regardless of whether the search engine provider knew, or ought reasonably to have known, the digital matter was defamatory.\n> \n> **s 10D:** Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1\\[3\\].","sortOrder":19},{"sectionNumber":"10E","sectionType":"section","heading":"Early determination of digital intermediary exemptions","content":"#### 10E Early determination of digital intermediary exemptions\n\n10E Early determination of digital intermediary exemptions\n\n> > (1) The judicial officer in defamation proceedings—\n> > \n> > > (a) is to determine whether a defendant has a digital intermediary exemption, and\n> > \n> > > (b) is to determine whether a digital intermediary exemption is established as soon as practicable before the trial for the proceedings commences unless satisfied that there are good reasons to postpone the determination to a later stage of the proceedings, and\n> > \n> > > (c) may make any orders the judicial officer considers appropriate concerning the determination of the issue, including dismissing the proceedings if satisfied the digital intermediary exemption is established.\n> \n> > (2) Without limiting subsection (1)—\n> > \n> > > (a) the following matters are relevant in deciding whether there are good reasons to postpone the determination of whether a digital intermediary exemption is established to a later stage of the proceedings—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) the cost implications for the parties,\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) the resources available to the court at the time,\n> > > \n> > > > (iii) the extent to which technical or scientific issues are raised in the proceedings,\n> > > \n> > > > (iv) the extent to which establishing the digital intermediary exemption is linked to other issues for determination during the trial for the proceedings, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the judicial officer may determine a digital intermediary exemption is established on the pleadings without the need for further evidence if satisfied that the pleaded particulars are sufficient to establish the exemption.\n> \n> > (3) Nothing in this section limits the powers that a judicial officer may have apart from this section to dismiss defamation proceedings, whether before or after the trial for the proceedings commences.\n> \n> > (4) In this section—\n> > \n> > digital intermediary exemption means an exemption from liability for defamation mentioned in section 10C or 10D.\n> \n> **s 10E:** Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1\\[3\\].","sortOrder":20},{"sectionNumber":"Division 3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Choice of law","content":"## Division 3 Choice of law\n\nDivision 3 Choice of law","sortOrder":21},{"sectionNumber":"11","sectionType":"section","heading":"Choice of law for defamation proceedings","content":"#### 11 Choice of law for defamation proceedings\n\n11 Choice of law for defamation proceedings\n\n> > (1) If a matter is published wholly within a particular Australian jurisdictional area, the substantive law that is applicable in that area must be applied in this jurisdiction to determine any cause of action for defamation based on the publication.\n> \n> > (2) If there is a multiple publication of matter in more than one Australian jurisdictional area, the substantive law applicable in the Australian jurisdictional area with which the harm occasioned by the publication as a whole has its closest connection must be applied in this jurisdiction to determine each cause of action for defamation based on the publication.\n> \n> > (3) In determining the Australian jurisdictional area with which the harm occasioned by a publication of matter has its closest connection, a court may take into account—\n> > \n> > > (a) the place at the time of publication where the plaintiff was ordinarily resident or, in the case of a corporation that may assert a cause of action for defamation, the place where the corporation had its principal place of business at that time, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the extent of publication in each relevant Australian jurisdictional area, and\n> > \n> > > (c) the extent of harm sustained by the plaintiff in each relevant Australian jurisdictional area, and\n> > \n> > > (d) any other matter that the court considers relevant.\n> \n> > (4) For the purposes of this section, the substantive law applicable in an Australian jurisdictional area does not include any law prescribing rules for choice of law that differ from the rules prescribed by this section.\n> \n> > (5) In this section—\n> > \n> > Australian jurisdictional area means—\n> > \n> > > (a) the geographical area of Australia that lies within the territorial limits of a particular State (including its coastal waters), but not including any territory, place or other area referred to in paragraph (c), or\n> > \n> > > (b) the geographical area of Australia that lies within the territorial limits of a particular Territory (including its coastal waters), but not including any territory, place or other area referred to in paragraph (c), or\n> > \n> > > (c) any territory, place or other geographical area of Australia over which the Commonwealth has legislative competence but over which no State or Territory has legislative competence.\n> > \n> > geographical area of Australia includes—\n> > \n> > > (a) the territorial sea of Australia, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the external Territories of the Commonwealth.\n> > \n> > multiple publication means publication by a particular person of the same, or substantially the same, matter in substantially the same form to 2 or more persons.","sortOrder":22},{"sectionNumber":"Part 3","sectionType":"part","heading":"Resolution of civil disputes without litigation","content":"# Part 3 Resolution of civil disputes without litigation\n\nPart 3 Resolution of civil disputes without litigation","sortOrder":23},{"sectionNumber":"12","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application of Division","content":"#### 12 Application of Division\n\n12 Application of Division\n\n> > (1) This Division applies if a person (the publisher) publishes matter (the matter in question) that is, or may be, defamatory of another person (the aggrieved person).\n> \n> > (2) The provisions of this Division may be used instead of the provisions of any rules of court or any other law in relation to payment into court or offers of compromise.\n> \n> > (3) Nothing in this Division prevents a publisher or aggrieved person from making or accepting a settlement offer in relation to the publication of the matter in question otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of this Division.","sortOrder":25},{"sectionNumber":"12A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Concerns notices","content":"#### 12A Concerns notices\n\n12A Concerns notices\n\n> > (1) For the purpose of this Act, a notice is a concerns notice if—\n> > \n> > > (a) the notice—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) is in writing, and\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) specifies the location where the matter in question can be accessed (for example, a webpage address), and\n> > > \n> > > > (iii) informs the publisher of the defamatory imputations that the aggrieved person considers are or may be carried about the aggrieved person by the matter in question (the imputations of concern), and\n> > > \n> > > > (iv) informs the publisher of the harm that the person considers to be serious harm to the person’s reputation caused, or likely to be caused, by the publication of the matter in question, and\n> > > \n> > > > (v) for an aggrieved person that is an excluded corporation—also informs the publisher of the financial loss that the corporation considers to be serious financial loss caused, or likely to be caused, by the publication of the matter in question, and\n> > \n> > > (b) a copy of the matter in question is, if practicable, provided to the publisher together with the notice.\n> > \n> > Note.\n> > \n> > Section 12B requires a concerns notice to be given before proceedings for defamation can be commenced.\n> \n> > (2) For the avoidance of doubt, a document that is required to be filed or lodged to commence defamation proceedings cannot be used as a concerns notice.\n> \n> > (3) If a concerns notice fails to particularise adequately any of the information required by subsection (1)(a)(ii), (iii), (iv) or (v), the publisher may give the aggrieved person a written notice (a further particulars notice) requesting that the aggrieved person provide reasonable further particulars as specified in the further particulars notice about the information concerned.\n> \n> > (4) An aggrieved person to whom a further particulars notice is given must provide the reasonable further particulars specified in the notice within 14 days (or any further period agreed by the publisher and aggrieved person) after being given the notice.\n> \n> > (5) An aggrieved person who fails to provide the reasonable further particulars specified in a further particulars notice within the applicable period is taken not to have given the publisher a concerns notice for the purposes of this section.\n> \n> **s 12A:** Ins 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[8\\].","sortOrder":26},{"sectionNumber":"12B","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defamation proceedings cannot be commenced without concerns notice","content":"#### 12B Defamation proceedings cannot be commenced without concerns notice\n\n12B Defamation proceedings cannot be commenced without concerns notice\n\n> > (1) An aggrieved person cannot commence defamation proceedings unless—\n> > \n> > > (a) the person has given the proposed defendant a concerns notice in respect of the matter concerned, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the imputations to be relied on by the person in the proposed proceedings were particularised in the concerns notice, and\n> > \n> > > (c) the applicable period for an offer to make amends has elapsed.\n> \n> > (2) Subsection (1)(b) does not prevent reliance on—\n> > \n> > > (a) some, but not all, of the imputations particularised in a concerns notice, or\n> > \n> > > (b) imputations that are substantially the same as those particularised in a concerns notice.\n> \n> > (3) The court may grant leave for proceedings to be commenced despite non-compliance with subsection (1)(c), but only if the proposed plaintiff satisfies the court—\n> > \n> > > (a) the commencement of proceedings after the end of the applicable period for an offer to make amends contravenes the limitation law, or\n> > \n> > > (b) it is just and reasonable to grant leave.\n> \n> > (4) The commencement of proceedings contravenes the limitation law for the purposes of subsection (3)(a) if the proceedings could not be commenced after the end of the applicable period for an offer to make amends because the court will have ceased to have power to extend the limitation period.\n> \n> > (5) In this section—\n> > \n> > limitation law means the [Limitation Act 1969](/view/html/inforce/current/act-1969-031).\n> \n> **s 12B:** Ins 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[9\\].","sortOrder":27},{"sectionNumber":"13","sectionType":"section","heading":"Publisher may make offer to make amends","content":"#### 13 Publisher may make offer to make amends\n\n13 Publisher may make offer to make amends\n\n> > (1) The publisher may make an offer to make amends to the aggrieved person.\n> \n> > (2) The offer may be—\n> > \n> > > (a) in relation to the matter in question generally, or\n> > \n> > > (b) limited to any particular defamatory imputations that the publisher accepts that the matter in question carries.\n> \n> > (3) If 2 or more persons published the matter in question, an offer to make amends by one or more of them does not affect the liability of the other or others.\n> \n> > (4) An offer to make amends is taken to have been made without prejudice, unless the offer provides otherwise.","sortOrder":28},{"sectionNumber":"14","sectionType":"section","heading":"When offer to make amends may be made","content":"#### 14 When offer to make amends may be made\n\n14 When offer to make amends may be made\n\n> > (1) An offer to make amends cannot be made if—\n> > \n> > > (a) the applicable period for an offer to make amends has expired, or\n> > \n> > > (b) a defence has been served in an action brought by the aggrieved person against the publisher in relation to the matter in question.\n> \n> > (2) For the purposes of this Act, the applicable period for an offer to make amends is—\n> > \n> > > (a) if the aggrieved person has provided further particulars in response to a further particulars notice about a concerns notice after 14 days have elapsed since the concerns notice was given—14 days since the publisher was given the further particulars, or\n> > \n> > > (b) in any other case—28 days since the publisher was given a concerns notice by the aggrieved person.\n> \n> > (3) If a publisher gives more than one further particulars notice, subsection (2)(a) applies only in respect of the first notice.\n> \n> > (4), (5) (Repealed)\n> \n> **s 14:** Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[10\\] \\[11\\].","sortOrder":29},{"sectionNumber":"15","sectionType":"section","heading":"Content of offer to make amends","content":"#### 15 Content of offer to make amends\n\n15 Content of offer to make amends\n\n> > (1) An offer to make amends—\n> > \n> > > (a) must be in writing, and\n> > \n> > > (b) must be readily identifiable as an offer to make amends under this Division, and\n> > \n> > > (b1) must provide for the offer to be open for acceptance for at least 28 days commencing on the day the offer is made, and\n> > \n> > > (c) if the offer is limited to any particular defamatory imputations—must state that the offer is so limited and particularise the imputations to which the offer is limited, and\n> > \n> > > (d) must include an offer to publish, or join in publishing, a reasonable correction of, or a clarification of or additional information about, the matter in question or, if the offer is limited to any particular defamatory imputations, the imputations to which the offer is limited, and\n> > \n> > > (e) if material containing the matter has been given to someone else by the publisher or with the publisher’s knowledge—must include an offer to take, or join in taking, reasonable steps to tell the other person that the matter is or may be defamatory of the aggrieved person, and\n> > \n> > > (f) must include an offer to pay the expenses reasonably incurred by the aggrieved person before the offer was made and the expenses reasonably incurred by the aggrieved person in considering the offer.\n> > \n> > > (g) (Repealed)\n> \n> > (1A) In addition to the matters referred to in subsection (1), an offer to make amends may include any other kind of offer, or particulars of any other action taken by the publisher, to redress the harm sustained by the aggrieved person because of the matter in question, including (but not limited to)—\n> > \n> > > (a) an offer to publish, or join in publishing, an apology in relation to the matter in question or, if the offer is limited to any particular defamatory imputations, the imputations to which the offer is limited, or\n> > \n> > > (b) if the matter is digital matter—an offer to take access prevention steps in relation to the matter, or\n> > \n> > > (c) an offer to pay compensation for any economic or non-economic loss of the aggrieved person, or\n> > \n> > > (d) the particulars of any correction or apology made, or action taken, before the date of the offer.\n> \n> > (1B) If the matter in question is digital matter, an offer to take access prevention steps may be made instead of, or in addition to, either or both of the offers mentioned in subsection (1)(d) and (e).\n> \n> > (2) Without limiting subsection (1A)(c), an offer to pay compensation may comprise or include any one or more of the following—\n> > \n> > > (a) an offer to pay a stated amount,\n> > \n> > > (b) an offer to pay an amount to be agreed between the publisher and the aggrieved person,\n> > \n> > > (c) an offer to pay an amount determined by an arbitrator appointed, or agreed on, by the publisher and the aggrieved person,\n> > \n> > > (d) an offer to pay an amount determined by a court.\n> \n> > (3) If an offer to make amends is accepted, a court may, on the application of the aggrieved person or publisher, determine—\n> > \n> > > (a) if the offer provides for a court to determine the amount of compensation payable under the offer—the amount of compensation to be paid under the offer, and\n> > \n> > > (b) any other question that arises about what must be done to carry out the terms of the offer.\n> \n> > (4) The powers conferred on a court by subsection (3) are exercisable—\n> > \n> > > (a) if the aggrieved person has brought proceedings against the publisher in any court for defamation in relation to the matter in question, by that court in those proceedings, and\n> > \n> > > (b) except as provided in paragraph (a), by the Supreme Court.\n> \n> **s 15:** Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[12\\]–\\[17\\]; 2023 No 36, Sch 1\\[4\\] \\[5\\].","sortOrder":30},{"sectionNumber":"16","sectionType":"section","heading":"Withdrawal of offer to make amends","content":"#### 16 Withdrawal of offer to make amends\n\n16 Withdrawal of offer to make amends\n\n> > (1) An offer to make amends may be withdrawn before it is accepted by notice in writing given to the aggrieved person.\n> \n> > (2) A publisher who has withdrawn an offer to make amends may make a renewed offer.\n> \n> > (3) A renewed offer may (but need not) be in the same terms as the withdrawn offer.\n> \n> > (4) A renewed offer is to be treated as a new offer (including for the purposes of section 14).\n> \n> > (5) However, the time limit specified in section 14 for the making of offers to make amends does not prevent the making of a renewed offer that is not in the same terms as the withdrawn offer if—\n> > \n> > > (a) the renewed offer represents a genuine attempt by the publisher to address matters of concern raised by the aggrieved person about the withdrawn offer, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the renewed offer is made within 14 days after the withdrawal of the withdrawn offer or any other period agreed by the publisher and the aggrieved person.","sortOrder":31},{"sectionNumber":"17","sectionType":"section","heading":"Effect of acceptance of offer to make amends","content":"#### 17 Effect of acceptance of offer to make amends\n\n17 Effect of acceptance of offer to make amends\n\n> > (1) If the publisher carries out the terms of an offer to make amends (including payment of any compensation under the offer) that is accepted, the aggrieved person cannot assert, continue or enforce an action for defamation against the publisher in relation to the matter in question even if the offer was limited to any particular defamatory imputations.\n> \n> > (2) A court may (but need not)—\n> > \n> > > (a) order the publisher to pay the aggrieved person the expenses reasonably incurred by the aggrieved person as a result of accepting the offer, and\n> > \n> > > (b) order any costs incurred by the aggrieved person that form part of those expenses to be assessed on an indemnity basis.\n> \n> > (3) The powers conferred on a court by subsection (2) are exercisable—\n> > \n> > > (a) if the aggrieved person has brought proceedings against the publisher in any court for defamation in relation to the matter in question, by that court in those proceedings, and\n> > \n> > > (b) except as provided in paragraph (a), by the Supreme Court.","sortOrder":32},{"sectionNumber":"18","sectionType":"section","heading":"Effect of failure to accept reasonable offer to make amends","content":"#### 18 Effect of failure to accept reasonable offer to make amends\n\n18 Effect of failure to accept reasonable offer to make amends\n\n> > (1) If an offer to make amends is made in relation to the matter in question but is not accepted, it is a defence to an action for defamation against the publisher in relation to the matter if—\n> > \n> > > (a) the publisher made the offer as soon as reasonably practicable after the publisher was given a concerns notice in respect of the matter (and, in any event, within the applicable period for an offer to make amends), and\n> > \n> > > (b) the publisher was ready and willing, on acceptance of the offer by the aggrieved person, to carry out the terms of the offer, and\n> > \n> > > (c) in all the circumstances the offer was reasonable.\n> \n> > (2) In determining whether an offer to make amends is reasonable, a court—\n> > \n> > > (a) must have regard to any correction or apology published before any trial arising out of the matter in question, including the extent to which the correction or apology is brought to the attention of the audience of the matter in question taking into account—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) the prominence given to the correction or apology as published in comparison to the prominence given to the matter in question as published, and\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) the period that elapses between publication of the matter in question and publication of the correction or apology, and\n> > \n> > > (b) may have regard to—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) whether the aggrieved person refused to accept an offer that was limited to any particular defamatory imputations because the aggrieved person did not agree with the publisher about the imputations that the matter in question carried, and\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) any other matter that the court considers relevant.\n> \n> > (3) Despite section 22(2), the judicial officer (and not the jury) in defamation proceedings tried by jury is to determine whether a defence under this section is established.\n> \n> **s 18:** Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[18\\]–\\[20\\].","sortOrder":33},{"sectionNumber":"19","sectionType":"section","heading":"Inadmissibility of evidence of certain statements and admissions","content":"#### 19 Inadmissibility of evidence of certain statements and admissions\n\n19 Inadmissibility of evidence of certain statements and admissions\n\n> > (1) Evidence of any statement or admission made in connection with the making or acceptance of an offer to make amends is not admissible as evidence in any legal proceedings (whether criminal or civil).\n> \n> > (2) Subsection (1) does not prevent the admission of evidence in any legal proceedings in order to determine—\n> > \n> > > (a) any issue arising under, or relating to the application of, a provision of this Division, or\n> > \n> > > (b) costs in defamation proceedings.","sortOrder":34},{"sectionNumber":"20","sectionType":"section","heading":"Effect of apology on liability for defamation","content":"#### 20 Effect of apology on liability for defamation\n\n20 Effect of apology on liability for defamation\n\n> > (1) An apology made by or on behalf of a person in connection with any defamatory matter alleged to have been published by the person—\n> > \n> > > (a) does not constitute an express or implied admission of fault or liability by the person in connection with that matter, and\n> > \n> > > (b) is not relevant to the determination of fault or liability in connection with that matter.\n> \n> > (2) Evidence of an apology made by or on behalf of a person in connection with any defamatory matter alleged to have been published by the person is not admissible in any civil proceedings as evidence of the fault or liability of the person in connection with that matter.\n> \n> > (3) Nothing in this section limits the operation of section 38.","sortOrder":36},{"sectionNumber":"Part 4","sectionType":"part","heading":"Litigation of civil disputes","content":"# Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes\n\nPart 4 Litigation of civil disputes","sortOrder":37},{"sectionNumber":"21","sectionType":"section","heading":"Election for defamation proceedings to be tried by jury","content":"#### 21 Election for defamation proceedings to be tried by jury\n\n21 Election for defamation proceedings to be tried by jury\n\n> > (1) Unless the court orders otherwise, a plaintiff or defendant in defamation proceedings may elect for the proceedings to be tried by jury.\n> \n> > (1A) Without limiting subsection (1), a court may order that defamation proceedings are not to be tried by jury if—\n> > \n> > > (a) the trial requires a prolonged examination of records, or\n> > \n> > > (b) the trial involves any technical, scientific or other issue that cannot be conveniently considered and resolved by a jury.\n> \n> > (2) An election must be—\n> > \n> > > (a) made at the time and in the manner prescribed by the rules of court for the court in which the proceedings are to be tried, and\n> > \n> > > (b) accompanied by the fee (if any) prescribed by the regulations made under the [Civil Procedure Act 2005](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2005-028) for the requisition of a jury in that court.\n> \n> > (3) An election may be revoked only—\n> > \n> > > (a) with the consent of all the parties to the proceedings, or\n> > \n> > > (b) if all the parties do not consent, with the leave of the court.\n> \n> > (4) The court may, on the application of a party to the proceedings, grant leave for the purposes of subsection (3)(b) only if satisfied it is in the interests of justice for the election to be revoked.\n> \n> **s 21:** Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[21\\] \\[22\\].","sortOrder":39},{"sectionNumber":"22","sectionType":"section","heading":"Roles of judicial officers and juries in defamation proceedings","content":"#### 22 Roles of judicial officers and juries in defamation proceedings\n\n22 Roles of judicial officers and juries in defamation proceedings\n\n> > (1) This section applies to defamation proceedings that are tried by jury.\n> \n> > (2) The jury is to determine whether the defendant has published defamatory matter about the plaintiff and, if so, whether any defence raised by the defendant has been established.\n> \n> > (3) If the jury finds that the defendant has published defamatory matter about the plaintiff and that no defence has been established, the judicial officer and not the jury is to determine the amount of damages (if any) that should be awarded to the plaintiff and all unresolved issues of fact and law relating to the determination of that amount.\n> \n> > (4) If the proceedings relate to more than one cause of action for defamation, the jury must give a single verdict in relation to all causes of action on which the plaintiff relies unless the judicial officer orders otherwise.\n> \n> > (5) Nothing in this section—\n> > \n> > > (a) affects any law or practice relating to special verdicts, or\n> > \n> > > (b) requires or permits a jury to determine any issue that, at general law, is an issue to be determined by the judicial officer, or\n> > \n> > > (c) requires or permits a jury to determine any issue that another provision of this Act requires a judicial officer to determine.\n> \n> **s 22:** Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[23\\] \\[24\\].","sortOrder":40},{"sectionNumber":"23","sectionType":"section","heading":"Leave required for multiple proceedings in relation to publication of same defamatory matter","content":"#### 23 Leave required for multiple proceedings in relation to publication of same defamatory matter\n\n23 Leave required for multiple proceedings in relation to publication of same defamatory matter\n\n> > (1) This section applies to a person who has brought defamation proceedings for damages, whether in this jurisdiction or elsewhere, against a person (a previous defendant) in relation to the publication of a matter.\n> \n> > (2) The person may not bring further defamation proceedings for damages against a previous defendant or an associate of a previous defendant in relation to the same or any other publication of the same or like matter, except with the leave of the court in which the further proceedings are to be brought.\n> \n> > (3) A person is an associate of a previous defendant if, at the time of the publication to which the previous defamation proceedings related, the person was—\n> > \n> > > (a) an employee of the defendant, or\n> > \n> > > (b) a person publishing matter as a contractor of the defendant, or\n> > \n> > > (c) an associated entity of the defendant (or an employee or contractor of the associated entity).\n> \n> **s 23:** Subst 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[25\\].","sortOrder":41},{"sectionNumber":"23A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Orders for preliminary discovery about posters of digital matter","content":"#### 23A Orders for preliminary discovery about posters of digital matter\n\n23A Orders for preliminary discovery about posters of digital matter\n\n> > (1) This section applies if the court procedure law for a court allows a person seeking to bring defamation proceedings for the publication of digital matter to obtain an order for, or in the nature of, preliminary discovery for either or both of the following purposes—\n> > \n> > > (a) to obtain information to assist in identifying the posters of the matter,\n> > \n> > > (b) to obtain information to assist in locating physical or digital addresses for the posters of the matter to allow concerns notices to be given to them or defamation proceedings against them to be commenced.\n> \n> > (2) Despite anything to the contrary in the court procedure law for a court, the court must take the following matters into account before making an order mentioned in subsection (1)—\n> > \n> > > (a) the objects of this Act,\n> > \n> > > (b) privacy, safety or other public interest considerations that may arise if the order is made.\n> > \n> > Example for paragraph (b)—\n> > \n> > Evidence suggesting the poster of digital matter is in fear of domestic violence from the person seeking an order to obtain the poster’s address.\n> \n> > (3) This section does not limit the matters the court may take into account before making an order mentioned in subsection (1).\n> \n> > (4) In this section—\n> > \n> > court procedure law for a court means—\n> > \n> > > (a) rules of court for the court, or\n> > \n> > > (b) an Act or other legislation that regulates the practice or procedure of the court, or\n> > \n> > > (c) the general law concerning the inherent or implied jurisdiction or powers of the court.\n> \n> **s 23A:** Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1\\[6\\].","sortOrder":42},{"sectionNumber":"24","sectionType":"section","heading":"Scope of defences under general law and other law not limited","content":"#### 24 Scope of defences under general law and other law not limited\n\n24 Scope of defences under general law and other law not limited\n\n> > (1) A defence under this Division is additional to any other defence or exclusion of liability available to the defendant apart from this Act (including under the general law) and does not of itself vitiate, limit or abrogate any other defence or exclusion of liability.\n> \n> > (2) If a defence under this Division to the publication of defamatory matter may be defeated by proof that the publication was actuated by malice, the general law applies in defamation proceedings in which the defence is raised to determine whether a particular publication of matter was actuated by malice.\n> \n> **s 24:** Am 2005 No 98, Sch 2.14 \\[1\\].","sortOrder":44},{"sectionNumber":"25","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defence of justification","content":"#### 25 Defence of justification\n\n25 Defence of justification\n\n> It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that the defamatory imputations carried by the matter of which the plaintiff complains are substantially true.","sortOrder":45},{"sectionNumber":"26","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defence of contextual truth","content":"#### 26 Defence of contextual truth\n\n26 Defence of contextual truth\n\n> > (1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—\n> > \n> > > (a) the matter carried one or more imputations that are substantially true (contextual imputations), and\n> > \n> > > (b) any defamatory imputations of which the plaintiff complains that are not contextual imputations and are also carried by the matter do not further harm the reputation of the plaintiff because of the substantial truth of the contextual imputations.\n> \n> > (2) The contextual imputations on which the defendant may rely to establish the defence include imputations of which the plaintiff complains.\n> \n> **s 26:** Subst 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[26\\]; 2022 No 14, Sch 8.5.","sortOrder":46},{"sectionNumber":"27","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defence of absolute privilege","content":"#### 27 Defence of absolute privilege\n\n27 Defence of absolute privilege\n\n> > (1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that it was published on an occasion of absolute privilege.\n> \n> > (2) Without limiting subsection (1), matter is published on an occasion of absolute privilege if—\n> > \n> > > (a) the matter is published in the course of the proceedings of a parliamentary body, including (but not limited to)—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) the publication of a document by order, or under the authority, of the body, and\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) the publication of the debates and proceedings of the body by or under the authority of the body or any law, and\n> > > \n> > > > (iii) the publication of matter while giving evidence before the body, and\n> > > \n> > > > (iv) the publication of matter while presenting or submitting a document to the body, or\n> > \n> > > (b) the matter is published in the course of the proceedings of an Australian court or Australian tribunal, including (but not limited to)—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) the publication of matter in any document filed or lodged with, or otherwise submitted to, the court or tribunal (including any originating process), and\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) the publication of matter while giving evidence before the court or tribunal, and\n> > > \n> > > > (iii) the publication of matter in any judgment, order or other determination of the court or tribunal, or\n> > \n> > > (b1) the matter is published to a person who, at the time of the publication, is an official of a police force or service of an Australian jurisdiction and it is published to the official while the official is acting in an official capacity, or\n> > \n> > > (c) the matter is published on an occasion that, if published in another Australian jurisdiction, would be an occasion of absolute privilege in that jurisdiction under a provision of a law of the jurisdiction corresponding to this section, or\n> > \n> > > (d) the matter is published by a person or body in any circumstances specified in Schedule 1.\n> \n> > (3) In this section—\n> > \n> > official of a police force or service of an Australian jurisdiction means—\n> > \n> > > (a) an officer, employee or member of staff of the police force or service, or\n> > \n> > > (b) another person engaged to act for or on behalf of the police force or service.\n> \n> **s 27:** Am 2023 No 36, Sch 1\\[7\\] \\[8\\].","sortOrder":47},{"sectionNumber":"28","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defence for publication of public documents","content":"#### 28 Defence for publication of public documents\n\n28 Defence for publication of public documents\n\n> > (1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that the matter was contained in—\n> > \n> > > (a) a public document or a fair copy of a public document, or\n> > \n> > > (b) a fair summary of, or a fair extract from, a public document.\n> \n> > (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), if a report or other document under the law of a country would be a public document except for non-compliance with a provision of that law about—\n> > \n> > > (a) the formal requirements for the content or layout of the report or document, or\n> > \n> > > (b) the time within which the report or document is prepared, or presented, submitted, tabled or laid to or before a person or body,\n> > \n> > the report or document is a public document despite that non-compliance.\n> \n> > (3) A defence established under subsection (1) is defeated if, and only if, the plaintiff proves that the defamatory matter was not published honestly for the information of the public or the advancement of education.\n> \n> > (4) In this section, public document means—\n> > \n> > > (a) any report or paper published by a parliamentary body, or a record of votes, debates or other proceedings relating to a parliamentary body published by or under the authority of the body or any law, or\n> > \n> > > (b) any judgment, order or other determination of a court or arbitral tribunal of any country in civil proceedings and including—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) any record of the court or tribunal relating to the judgment, order or determination or to its enforcement or satisfaction, and\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) any report of the court or tribunal about its judgment, order or determination and the reasons for its judgment, order or determination, or\n> > \n> > > (c) any report or other document that under the law of any country—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) is authorised to be published, or\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) is required to be presented or submitted to, tabled in, or laid before, a parliamentary body, or\n> > \n> > > (d) any document issued by the government (including a local government) of a country, or by an officer, employee or agency of the government, for the information of the public, or\n> > \n> > > (e) any record or other document open to inspection by the public that is kept—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) by an Australian jurisdiction, or\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) by a statutory authority of an Australian jurisdiction, or\n> > > \n> > > > (iii) by an Australian court, or\n> > > \n> > > > (iv) under legislation of an Australian jurisdiction, or\n> > \n> > > (f) any other document issued, kept or published by a person, body or organisation of another Australian jurisdiction that is treated in that jurisdiction as a public document under a provision of a law of the jurisdiction corresponding to this section, or\n> > \n> > > (g) any document of a kind specified in Schedule 2.","sortOrder":48},{"sectionNumber":"29","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defences of fair report of proceedings of public concern","content":"#### 29 Defences of fair report of proceedings of public concern\n\n29 Defences of fair report of proceedings of public concern\n\n> > (1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that the matter was, or was contained in, a fair report of any proceedings of public concern.\n> \n> > (2) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—\n> > \n> > > (a) the matter was, or was contained in, an earlier published report of proceedings of public concern, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the matter was, or was contained in, a fair copy of, a fair summary of, or a fair extract from, the earlier published report, and\n> > \n> > > (c) the defendant had no knowledge that would reasonably make the defendant aware that the earlier published report was not fair.\n> \n> > (3) A defence established under subsection (1) or (2) is defeated if, and only if, the plaintiff proves that the defamatory matter was not published honestly for the information of the public or the advancement of education.\n> \n> > (4) In this section, proceedings of public concern means—\n> > \n> > > (a) any proceedings in public of a parliamentary body, or\n> > \n> > > (b) any proceedings in public of an international organisation of any countries or of the governments of any countries, or\n> > \n> > > (c) any proceedings in public of an international conference at which the governments of any countries are represented, or\n> > \n> > > (d) any proceedings in public of—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) the International Court of Justice, or any other judicial or arbitral tribunal, for the decision of any matter in dispute between nations, or\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) any other international judicial or arbitral tribunal, or\n> > \n> > > (e) any proceedings in public of a court or arbitral tribunal of any country, or\n> > \n> > > (f) any proceedings in public of an inquiry held under the law of any country or under the authority of the government of any country, or\n> > \n> > > (g) any proceedings in public of a local government body of any Australian jurisdiction, or\n> > \n> > > (h) proceedings of a learned society, or of a committee or governing body of the society, under its relevant objects, but only to the extent that the proceedings relate to a decision or adjudication made in Australia about—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) a member or members of the society, or\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) a person subject by contract or otherwise by law to control by the society, or\n> > \n> > > (i) proceedings of a sport or recreation association, or of a committee or governing body of the association, under its relevant objects, but only to the extent that the proceedings relate to a decision or adjudication made in Australia about—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) a member or members of the association, or\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) a person subject by contract or otherwise by law to control by the association, or\n> > \n> > > (j) proceedings of a trade association, or of a committee or governing body of the association, under its relevant objects, but only to the extent that the proceedings relate to a decision or adjudication made in Australia about—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) a member or members of the association, or\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) a person subject by contract or otherwise by law to control by the association, or\n> > \n> > > (k) any proceedings of a public meeting (with or without restriction on the people attending) of shareholders of a public company under the [Corporations Act 2001](http://www.legislation.gov.au/) of the Commonwealth held anywhere in Australia, or\n> > \n> > > (l) any proceedings of a public meeting (with or without restriction on the people attending) held anywhere in Australia if the proceedings relate to a matter of public interest, including the advocacy or candidature of a person for public office, or\n> > \n> > > (m) any proceedings of an ombudsman of any country if the proceedings relate to a report of the ombudsman, or\n> > \n> > > (n) any proceedings in public of a law reform body of any country, or\n> > \n> > > (o) any other proceedings conducted by, or proceedings of, a person, body or organisation of another Australian jurisdiction that are treated in that jurisdiction as proceedings of public concern under a provision of a law of the jurisdiction corresponding to this section, or\n> > \n> > > (p) any proceedings of a kind specified in Schedule 3.\n> \n> > (5) In this section—\n> > \n> > law reform body of a country means a body (however described and whether or not permanent or full-time) established by law to conduct inquiries into, and to make recommendations on, reforming the laws of that country.\n> > \n> > learned society means a body, wherever formed—\n> > \n> > > (a) the objects of which include the advancement of any art, science or religion or the advancement of learning in any field, and\n> > \n> > > (b) authorised by its constitution—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) to exercise control over, or adjudicate on, matters connected with those objects, and\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) to make findings or decisions having effect, by law or custom, in any part of Australia.\n> > \n> > ombudsman of a country means a person (however described and whether or not permanent or full-time) authorised by law to investigate complaints about the actions or other conduct of any public officials or public bodies of that country.\n> > \n> > relevant objects of a learned society, sport or recreation association or trade association means—\n> > \n> > > (a) in relation to a learned society—objects of the kind referred to in paragraph (a) of the definition of learned society in this subsection, or\n> > \n> > > (b) in relation to a sport or recreation association—objects of the kind referred to in paragraph (a) of the definition of sport or recreation association in this subsection, or\n> > \n> > > (c) in relation to a trade association—objects of the kind referred to in paragraph (a) of the definition of trade association in this subsection.\n> > \n> > sport or recreation association means a body, wherever formed—\n> > \n> > > (a) the objects of which include the promotion of any game, sport, or pastime to the playing of which or exercise of which the public is admitted as spectators or otherwise and the promotion or protection of the interests of people connected with the game, sport, or pastime, and\n> > \n> > > (b) authorised by its constitution—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) to exercise control over, or adjudicate on, matters connected with the game, sport, or pastime, and\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) to make findings or decisions having effect, by law or custom, in any part of Australia.\n> > \n> > trade association means a body, wherever formed—\n> > \n> > > (a) the objects of which include the promotion of any calling, that is to say, a trade, business, industry or profession and the promotion or protection of the interests of people engaged in any calling, and\n> > \n> > > (b) authorised by its constitution—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) to exercise control over, or adjudicate on, matters connected with a calling or the conduct of people engaged in the calling, and\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) to make findings or decisions having effect, by law or custom, in any part of Australia.","sortOrder":49},{"sectionNumber":"29A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defence of publication of matter concerning issue of public interest","content":"#### 29A Defence of publication of matter concerning issue of public interest\n\n29A Defence of publication of matter concerning issue of public interest\n\n> > (1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—\n> > \n> > > (a) the matter concerns an issue of public interest, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the defendant reasonably believed that the publication of the matter was in the public interest.\n> \n> > (2) In determining whether the defence is established, a court must take into account all of the circumstances of the case.\n> \n> > (3) Without limiting subsection (2), the court may take into account the following factors to the extent the court considers them applicable in the circumstances—\n> > \n> > > (a) the seriousness of any defamatory imputation carried by the matter published,\n> > \n> > > (b) the extent to which the matter published distinguishes between suspicions, allegations and proven facts,\n> > \n> > > (c) the extent to which the matter published relates to the performance of the public functions or activities of the person,\n> > \n> > > (d) whether it was in the public interest in the circumstances for the matter to be published expeditiously,\n> > \n> > > (e) the sources of the information in the matter published, including the integrity of the sources,\n> > \n> > > (f) if a source of the information in the matter published is a person whose identity is being kept confidential, whether there is good reason for the person’s identity to be kept confidential (including, for example, to comply with an applicable professional code or standard),\n> > \n> > > (g) whether the matter published contained the substance of the person’s side of the story and, if not, whether a reasonable attempt was made by the defendant to obtain and publish a response from the person,\n> > \n> > > (h) any other steps taken to verify the information in the matter published,\n> > \n> > > (i) the importance of freedom of expression in the discussion of issues of public interest.\n> \n> > (4) Subsection (3) does not—\n> > \n> > > (a) require each factor referred to in the subsection to be taken into account, or\n> > \n> > > (b) limit the matters that the court may take into account.\n> \n> > (5) Without affecting the application of section 22 to other defences, the jury (and not the judicial officer) in defamation proceedings tried by jury is to determine whether a defence under this section is established.\n> \n> **s 29A:** Ins 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[27\\].","sortOrder":50},{"sectionNumber":"30","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defence of qualified privilege for provision of certain information","content":"#### 30 Defence of qualified privilege for provision of certain information\n\n30 Defence of qualified privilege for provision of certain information\n\n> > (1) There is a defence of qualified privilege for the publication of defamatory matter to a person (the recipient) if the defendant proves that—\n> > \n> > > (a) the recipient has an interest or apparent interest in having information on some subject, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the matter is published to the recipient in the course of giving to the recipient information on that subject, and\n> > \n> > > (c) the conduct of the defendant in publishing that matter is reasonable in the circumstances.\n> \n> > (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a recipient has an apparent interest in having information on some subject if, and only if, at the time of the publication in question, the defendant believes on reasonable grounds that the recipient has that interest.\n> \n> > (3) In determining for the purposes of subsection (1) whether the conduct of the defendant in publishing matter about a person is reasonable in the circumstances, a court may take into account the following factors to the extent the court considers them applicable in the circumstances—\n> > \n> > > (a) the seriousness of any defamatory imputation carried by the matter published,\n> > \n> > > (b) the extent to which the matter published distinguishes between suspicions, allegations and proven facts,\n> > \n> > > (c) the nature of the business environment in which the defendant operates,\n> > \n> > > (d) whether it was appropriate in the circumstances for the matter to be published expeditiously,\n> > \n> > > (e) any other steps taken to verify the information in the matter published.\n> \n> > (3A) Subsection (3) does not—\n> > \n> > > (a) require each factor referred to in the subsection to be taken into account, or\n> > \n> > > (b) limit the matters that the court may take into account.\n> \n> > (3B) It is not necessary to prove that the matter published concerned an issue of public interest to establish the defence of qualified privilege under subsection (1).\n> \n> > (4) For the avoidance of doubt, a defence of qualified privilege under subsection (1) is defeated if the plaintiff proves that the publication of the defamatory matter was actuated by malice.\n> \n> > (5) However, a defence of qualified privilege under subsection (1) is not defeated merely because the defamatory matter was published for reward.\n> \n> > (6) Without affecting the application of section 22 to other defences, the jury (and not the judicial officer) in defamation proceedings tried by jury is to determine whether a defence under this section is established.\n> \n> **s 30:** Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[28\\] \\[29\\].","sortOrder":51},{"sectionNumber":"30A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defence of scientific or academic peer review","content":"#### 30A Defence of scientific or academic peer review\n\n30A Defence of scientific or academic peer review\n\n> > (1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—\n> > \n> > > (a) the matter was published in a scientific or academic journal (whether published in electronic form or otherwise), and\n> > \n> > > (b) the matter relates to a scientific or academic issue, and\n> > \n> > > (c) an independent review of the matter’s scientific or academic merit was carried out before the matter was published in the journal by—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) the editor of the journal if the editor has expertise in the scientific or academic issue concerned, or\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) one or more persons with expertise in the scientific or academic issue concerned.\n> \n> > (2) If there is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter in a scientific or academic journal because of subsection (1), there is also a defence to the publication of any assessment of the matter in the same journal if the defendant proves that—\n> > \n> > > (a) the assessment was written by one or more of the persons who carried out the independent review of the matter, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the assessment was written in the course of that review.\n> \n> > (3) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that the matter was contained in a fair summary of, or fair extract from, a matter or assessment for which there is a defence because of subsection (1) or (2).\n> \n> > (4) If a journal has more than one editor, a reference in this section to the editor of the journal is to be read as a reference to the editor or editors who were responsible for deciding to publish the matter concerned.\n> \n> > (5) A defence established under this section is defeated if, and only if, the plaintiff proves that the defamatory matter or assessment was not published honestly for the information of the public or the advancement of education.\n> \n> **s 30A:** Ins 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[30\\].","sortOrder":52},{"sectionNumber":"31","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defences of honest opinion","content":"#### 31 Defences of honest opinion\n\n31 Defences of honest opinion\n\n> > (1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—\n> > \n> > > (a) the matter was an expression of opinion of the defendant rather than a statement of fact, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the opinion related to a matter of public interest, and\n> > \n> > > (c) the opinion is based on proper material.\n> \n> > (2) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—\n> > \n> > > (a) the matter was an expression of opinion of an employee or agent of the defendant rather than a statement of fact, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the opinion related to a matter of public interest, and\n> > \n> > > (c) the opinion is based on proper material.\n> \n> > (3) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—\n> > \n> > > (a) the matter was an expression of opinion of a person (the commentator), other than the defendant or an employee or agent of the defendant, rather than a statement of fact, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the opinion related to a matter of public interest, and\n> > \n> > > (c) the opinion is based on proper material.\n> \n> > (4) A defence established under this section is defeated if, and only if, the plaintiff proves that—\n> > \n> > > (a) in the case of a defence under subsection (1)—the opinion was not honestly held by the defendant at the time the defamatory matter was published, or\n> > \n> > > (b) in the case of a defence under subsection (2)—the defendant did not believe that the opinion was honestly held by the employee or agent at the time the defamatory matter was published, or\n> > \n> > > (c) in the case of a defence under subsection (3)—the defendant had reasonable grounds to believe that the opinion was not honestly held by the commentator at the time the defamatory matter was published.\n> \n> > (5) For the purposes of this section, an opinion is based on proper material if—\n> > \n> > > (a) the material on which it is based is—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) set out in specific or general terms in the published matter, or\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) notorious, or\n> > > \n> > > > (iii) accessible from a reference, link or other access point included in the matter (for example, a hyperlink on a webpage), or\n> > > \n> > > > (iv) otherwise apparent from the context in which the matter is published, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the material—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) is substantially true, or\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) was published on an occasion of absolute or qualified privilege (whether under this Act or at general law), or\n> > > \n> > > > (iii) was published on an occasion that attracted the protection of a defence under this section or section 28 or 29.\n> \n> > (6) An opinion does not cease to be based on proper material only because some of the material on which it is based is not proper material if the opinion might reasonably be based on such of the material as is proper material.\n> \n> **s 31:** Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[31\\].","sortOrder":53},{"sectionNumber":"31A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defence for publications involving digital intermediaries","content":"#### 31A Defence for publications involving digital intermediaries\n\n31A Defence for publications involving digital intermediaries\n\n> > (1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory digital matter if the defendant proves—\n> > \n> > > (a) the defendant was a digital intermediary in relation to the publication, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the defendant had, at the time of the publication, an accessible complaints mechanism for the plaintiff to use, and\n> > \n> > > (c) if the plaintiff gave the defendant a written complaint under this section about the publication—reasonable access prevention steps, if steps were available, were taken in relation to the publication, whether before the complaint was given or within 7 days after the complaint was given.\n> > \n> > Note—\n> > \n> > > 1 The defendant is not required to prove paragraph (c) to establish the defence if the plaintiff has not given the defendant a complaint about the publication under this section. Subsection (3) sets out requirements for giving complaints.\n> > \n> > > 2 Subsection (6) defines accessible complaints mechanism.\n> \n> > (2) For subsection (1)(c), reasonable access prevention steps were taken in relation to the publication of digital matter if—\n> > \n> > > (a) for access prevention steps taken by the defendant—the steps taken were reasonable for the defendant to take in the circumstances, or\n> > \n> > > (b) for access prevention steps taken by another person—it was reasonable for the defendant not to take steps because of the steps already taken.\n> \n> > (3) A written complaint is given under this section about the publication of defamatory digital matter if—\n> > \n> > > (a) the complaint contained information sufficient to enable a reasonable person in the defendant’s circumstances to be made aware of the following—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) the name of the plaintiff,\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) the matter and where it could be located,\n> > > \n> > > > (iii) that the plaintiff considered the matter to be defamatory, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the complaint was given using an accessible complaints mechanism for the plaintiff to use or given to the defendant in another way permitted by section 44.\n> \n> > (4) A defence under this section is defeated only if the plaintiff proves the defendant was actuated by malice in establishing or providing the online service by means of which the digital matter was published.\n> \n> > (5) A defendant who would otherwise be a digital intermediary in relation to the publication of digital matter does not cease to be a digital intermediary for this section merely because the defendant took steps to detect or identify, or steps to remove, block, disable or otherwise prevent access by persons to, the following—\n> > \n> > > (a) defamatory or other unlawful content published, or sought to be published, by a person using the online service provided by the defendant,\n> > \n> > > (b) other content published, or sought to be published, by a person using the online service provided by the defendant that was incompatible with the terms or conditions under which the service was provided.\n> > \n> > Note—\n> > \n> > This subsection allows a defendant to rely on the defence despite the definition of digital intermediary in section 4 excluding authors, originators or posters of digital matter if the defendant’s editorial or moderating role over content published using the online service was limited to the steps mentioned in the subsection.\n> \n> > (6) In this section—\n> > \n> > accessible complaints mechanism for a plaintiff to use means an easily accessible address, location or other mechanism available for the plaintiff to use to complain to the defendant about the publication of the digital matter concerned.\n> > \n> > Examples of an accessible complaints mechanism—\n> > \n> > > 1 An email address or direct messaging address to which a complaint may be sent.\n> > \n> > > 2 A webpage, or a part of a webpage, enabling details about a complaint to be uploaded or inputted.\n> \n> **s 31A:** Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1\\[9\\].","sortOrder":54},{"sectionNumber":"32","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defence of innocent dissemination","content":"#### 32 Defence of innocent dissemination\n\n32 Defence of innocent dissemination\n\n> > (1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—\n> > \n> > > (a) the defendant published the matter merely in the capacity, or as an employee or agent, of a subordinate distributor, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the defendant neither knew, nor ought reasonably to have known, that the matter was defamatory, and\n> > \n> > > (c) the defendant’s lack of knowledge was not due to any negligence on the part of the defendant.\n> \n> > (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a person is a subordinate distributor of defamatory matter if the person—\n> > \n> > > (a) was not the first or primary distributor of the matter, and\n> > \n> > > (b) was not the author or originator of the matter, and\n> > \n> > > (c) did not have any capacity to exercise editorial control over the content of the matter (or over the publication of the matter) before it was first published.\n> \n> > (3) Without limiting subsection (2) (a), a person is not the first or primary distributor of matter merely because the person was involved in the publication of the matter in the capacity of—\n> > \n> > > (a) a bookseller, newsagent or news-vendor, or\n> > \n> > > (b) a librarian, or\n> > \n> > > (c) a wholesaler or retailer of the matter, or\n> > \n> > > (d) a provider of postal or similar services by means of which the matter is published, or\n> > \n> > > (e) a broadcaster of a live programme (whether on television, radio or otherwise) containing the matter in circumstances in which the broadcaster has no effective control over the person who makes the statements that comprise the matter, or\n> > \n> > > (f) a provider of services consisting of—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) the processing, copying, distributing or selling of any electronic medium in or on which the matter is recorded, or\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) the operation of, or the provision of any equipment, system or service, by means of which the matter is retrieved, copied, distributed or made available in electronic form, or\n> > \n> > > (g) an operator of, or a provider of access to, a communications system by means of which the matter is transmitted, or made available, by another person over whom the operator or provider has no effective control, or\n> > \n> > > (h) a person who, on the instructions or at the direction of another person, prints or produces, reprints or reproduces or distributes the matter for or on behalf of that other person.\n> \n> **s 32:** Am 2005 No 98, Sch 2.14 \\[2\\].","sortOrder":55},{"sectionNumber":"33","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"#### 33\n\n33 (Repealed)","sortOrder":56},{"sectionNumber":"34","sectionType":"section","heading":"Damages to bear rational relationship to harm","content":"#### 34 Damages to bear rational relationship to harm\n\n34 Damages to bear rational relationship to harm\n\n> In determining the amount of damages to be awarded in any defamation proceedings, the court is to ensure that there is an appropriate and rational relationship between the harm sustained by the plaintiff and the amount of damages awarded.","sortOrder":59},{"sectionNumber":"35","sectionType":"section","heading":"Damages for non-economic loss limited","content":"#### 35 Damages for non-economic loss limited\n\n35 Damages for non-economic loss limited\n\n> > (1) The maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss that may be awarded in defamation proceedings is $250,000 or any other amount adjusted in accordance with this section from time to time (the maximum damages amount) that is applicable at the time damages are awarded.\n> \n> > (2) The maximum damages amount is to be awarded only in a most serious case.\n> \n> > (2A) Subsection (1) does not limit the court’s power to award aggravated damages if an award of aggravated damages is warranted in the circumstances.\n> \n> > (2B) An award of aggravated damages is to be made separately to any award of damages for non-economic loss to which subsection (1) applies.\n> \n> > (3) The Minister is, on or before 1 July 2006 and on or before 1 July in each succeeding year, to declare, by order published in the Gazette, the amount that is to apply, as from the date specified in the order, for the purposes of subsection (1).\n> > \n> > Editorial note.\n> > \n> > For orders under this subsection, see Gazettes No 84 of 30.6.2006, p 5043 (amount declared: $259,500); No 80 of 15.6.2007, p 3793 (amount declared: $267,500); No 72 of 20.6.2008, p 5482 (amount declared $280,500); No 90 of 19.6.2009, p 3137 (amount declared: $294,500); No 79 of 18.6.2010, p 2452 (amount declared: $311,000); No 62 of 24.6.2011, p 4588 (amount declared: $324,000); No 60 of 8.6.2012, p 2369 (amount declared: $339,000); No 65 of 31.5.2013, p 2307 ($355,500); No 52 of 26.6.2015, p 1928 (amount declared: $376,500); No 50 of 17.6.2016, p 1406 (amount declared: $381,000); No 56 of 26.5.2017, p 1782 (amount declared: $389,500); No 66 of 29.6.2018, p 3970 (amount declared: $398,500); No 55 of 31.5.2019, p 1665 (amount declared: $407,500) and No 132 of 26.6.2020, p 3045 (amount declared: $421,000). From April 2021, PCO is no longer updating notes in provisions of in force titles about related gazette notices. To search for related gazette notices, please use the Gazette Search functionality.\n> \n> > (4) The amount declared is to be the amount applicable under subsection (1) (or that amount as last adjusted under this section) adjusted by the percentage change in the amount estimated by the Australian Statistician of the average weekly total earnings of full-time adults in Australia over the 4 quarters preceding the date of the declaration for which those estimates are, at that date, available.\n> \n> > (5) An amount declared for the time being under this section applies to the exclusion of the amount of $250,000 or an amount previously adjusted under this section.\n> \n> > (6) If the Australian Statistician fails or ceases to estimate the amount referred to in subsection (4), the amount declared is to be determined in accordance with the regulations.\n> \n> > (7) In adjusting an amount to be declared for the purposes of subsection (1), the amount determined in accordance with subsection (4) is to be rounded to the nearest $500.\n> \n> > (8) A declaration made or published in the Gazette after 1 July in a year and specifying a date that is before the date it is made or published as the date from which the amount declared by the order is to apply has effect as from that specified date.\n> \n> **s 35:** Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[33\\] \\[34\\].","sortOrder":60},{"sectionNumber":"36","sectionType":"section","heading":"State of mind of defendant generally not relevant to awarding damages","content":"#### 36 State of mind of defendant generally not relevant to awarding damages\n\n36 State of mind of defendant generally not relevant to awarding damages\n\n> In awarding damages for defamation, the court is to disregard the malice or other state of mind of the defendant at the time of the publication of the defamatory matter to which the proceedings relate or at any other time except to the extent that the malice or other state of mind affects the harm sustained by the plaintiff.","sortOrder":61},{"sectionNumber":"37","sectionType":"section","heading":"Exemplary or punitive damages cannot be awarded","content":"#### 37 Exemplary or punitive damages cannot be awarded\n\n37 Exemplary or punitive damages cannot be awarded\n\n> A plaintiff cannot be awarded exemplary or punitive damages for defamation.","sortOrder":62},{"sectionNumber":"38","sectionType":"section","heading":"Factors in mitigation of damages","content":"#### 38 Factors in mitigation of damages\n\n38 Factors in mitigation of damages\n\n> > (1) Evidence is admissible on behalf of the defendant, in mitigation of damages for the publication of defamatory matter, that—\n> > \n> > > (a) the defendant has made an apology to the plaintiff about the publication of the defamatory matter, or\n> > \n> > > (b) the defendant has published a correction of the defamatory matter, or\n> > \n> > > (c) the plaintiff has already recovered damages for defamation in relation to any other publication of matter having the same meaning or effect as the defamatory matter, or\n> > \n> > > (d) the plaintiff has brought proceedings for damages for defamation in relation to any other publication of matter having the same meaning or effect as the defamatory matter, or\n> > \n> > > (e) the plaintiff has received or agreed to receive compensation for defamation in relation to any other publication of matter having the same meaning or effect as the defamatory matter.\n> \n> > (2) Nothing in subsection (1) operates to limit the matters that can be taken into account by a court in mitigation of damages.","sortOrder":63},{"sectionNumber":"39","sectionType":"section","heading":"Damages for multiple causes of action may be assessed as single sum","content":"#### 39 Damages for multiple causes of action may be assessed as single sum\n\n39 Damages for multiple causes of action may be assessed as single sum\n\n> If the court in defamation proceedings finds for the plaintiff as to more than one cause of action, the judicial officer may assess damages in a single sum.","sortOrder":64},{"sectionNumber":"39A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Orders against non-party digital intermediaries concerning defamatory digital matter","content":"#### 39A Orders against non-party digital intermediaries concerning defamatory digital matter\n\n39A Orders against non-party digital intermediaries concerning defamatory digital matter\n\n> > (1) This section applies in relation to defamation proceedings for the publication of digital matter if—\n> > \n> > > (a) the plaintiff has obtained judgment for defamation against the defendant in the proceedings, or\n> > \n> > > (b) a court has granted a temporary injunction or makes another temporary order preventing the defendant from continuing to publish, or from republishing, the matter pending the determination of the proceedings, or\n> > \n> > > (c) a court has granted a final injunction or makes another final order preventing the defendant from continuing to publish, or from republishing, the matter.\n> \n> > (2) In defamation proceedings to which this section applies, the court may order a digital intermediary who is not a party to the proceedings (a non-party digital intermediary) to take access prevention steps or other steps the court considers necessary in the circumstances—\n> > \n> > > (a) to prevent or limit the continued publication or republication of the matter, or\n> > \n> > > (b) to comply with, or otherwise give effect to, the judgment, injunction or other order mentioned in subsection (1).\n> \n> > (3) Without limiting subsection (2), an order under this section may—\n> > \n> > > (a) require 1 or more steps to be taken, or\n> > \n> > > (b) require a step to be taken in relation to all, or only some, of the users of an online service.\n> \n> > (4) The court may not make an order under this section against a non-party digital intermediary unless the intermediary has been given an opportunity to be heard about whether it is appropriate for the order to be made.\n> \n> > (5) Despite subsection (4), the court may make a temporary order without giving the non-party digital intermediary an opportunity to be heard about whether it is appropriate to make the order if the court considers it necessary in the circumstances for the order to be made expeditiously pending a subsequent hearing concerning whether a further temporary order or a final order should be made.\n> \n> > (6) An order may be made under this section even if the non-party digital intermediary is not, or may not be, liable for defamation, including because of a defence, for the publication of the digital matter to which the defamation proceedings relate.\n> \n> > (7) This section does not limit other powers the court may have apart from this section to grant injunctions or make other orders requiring a non-party digital intermediary to take access prevention steps or other steps.\n> \n> **s 39A:** Ins 2023 No 36, Sch 1\\[10\\].","sortOrder":65},{"sectionNumber":"Division 4","sectionType":"division","heading":"Costs","content":"## Division 4 Costs\n\nDivision 4 Costs","sortOrder":66},{"sectionNumber":"40","sectionType":"section","heading":"Costs in defamation proceedings","content":"#### 40 Costs in defamation proceedings\n\n40 Costs in defamation proceedings\n\n> > (1) In awarding costs in defamation proceedings, the court may have regard to—\n> > \n> > > (a) the way in which the parties to the proceedings conducted their cases (including any misuse of a party’s superior financial position to hinder the early resolution of the proceedings), and\n> > \n> > > (b) any other matters that the court considers relevant.\n> \n> > (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a court must (unless the interests of justice require otherwise)—\n> > \n> > > (a) if defamation proceedings are successfully brought by a plaintiff and costs in the proceedings are to be awarded to the plaintiff—order costs of and incidental to the proceedings to be assessed on an indemnity basis if the court is satisfied that the defendant unreasonably failed to make a settlement offer or agree to a settlement offer proposed by the plaintiff, or\n> > \n> > > (b) if defamation proceedings are unsuccessfully brought by a plaintiff and costs in the proceedings are to be awarded to the defendant—order costs of and incidental to the proceedings to be assessed on an indemnity basis if the court is satisfied that the plaintiff unreasonably failed to accept a settlement offer made by the defendant.\n> \n> > (3) In this section—\n> > \n> > settlement offer means any offer to settle the proceedings made before the proceedings are determined, and includes an offer to make amends (whether made before or after the proceedings are commenced), that was a reasonable offer at the time it was made.","sortOrder":67},{"sectionNumber":"Part 5","sectionType":"part","heading":"Miscellaneous","content":"# Part 5 Miscellaneous\n\nPart 5 Miscellaneous","sortOrder":68},{"sectionNumber":"41","sectionType":"section","heading":"Proof of publication","content":"#### 41 Proof of publication\n\n41 Proof of publication\n\n> > (1) If a document appears to be printed or otherwise produced by means adapted for the production of numerous copies and there is in the document a statement to the effect that the document is printed, produced, published or distributed by or for a particular person, the statement is evidence in defamation proceedings that the document was so printed, produced, published or distributed.\n> \n> > (2) Evidence that a number or part of a document appearing to be a periodical is printed, produced, published or distributed by or for a particular person is evidence in defamation proceedings that a document appearing to be another number or part of the periodical was so printed, produced, published or distributed.\n> \n> > (3) In this section—\n> > \n> > periodical includes any newspaper, review, magazine or other printed document of which numbers or parts are published periodically.","sortOrder":69},{"sectionNumber":"42","sectionType":"section","heading":"Proof of convictions for offences","content":"#### 42 Proof of convictions for offences\n\n42 Proof of convictions for offences\n\n> > (1) If the question whether or not a person committed an offence is in question in defamation proceedings—\n> > \n> > > (a) proof that the person was convicted of the offence by an Australian court is conclusive evidence that the person committed the offence, and\n> > \n> > > (b) proof that the person was convicted of the offence by a court of any country (other than an Australian court) or a court martial of any country is evidence that the person committed the offence.\n> \n> > (2) For the purposes of this section, the contents of a document that is evidence of conviction of an offence, and the contents of an information, complaint, indictment, charge sheet or similar document on which a person is convicted of an offence, are admissible in evidence to identify the facts on which the conviction is based.\n> \n> > (3) Subsection (2) does not affect the admissibility of other evidence to identify the facts on which the conviction is based.\n> \n> > (4) In this section, conviction for an offence includes a finding of guilt but does not include—\n> > \n> > > (a) a conviction that has been set aside or quashed, or\n> > \n> > > (b) a conviction for an offence for which a person has received a pardon.","sortOrder":70},{"sectionNumber":"43","sectionType":"section","heading":"Incriminating answers, documents or things","content":"#### 43 Incriminating answers, documents or things\n\n43 Incriminating answers, documents or things\n\n> > (1) A person who is required to answer a question, or to discover or produce a document or thing, in defamation proceedings is not excused from answering the question or discovering or producing the document or thing on the ground that the answer to the question or the discovery or production of the document or thing might tend to incriminate the person of an offence of criminal defamation.\n> \n> > (2) However, any answer given to a question, or document or thing discovered or produced, by a natural person in compliance with the requirement is not admissible in evidence against the person in proceedings for criminal defamation.","sortOrder":71},{"sectionNumber":"44","sectionType":"section","heading":"Giving of notices and other documents","content":"#### 44 Giving of notices and other documents\n\n44 Giving of notices and other documents\n\n> > (1) For the purposes of this Act, a notice or other document may be given to a person (or a notice or other document may be served on a person)—\n> > \n> > > (a) in the case of a natural person—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) by delivering it to the person personally, or\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) by sending it by post to the address specified by the person for the giving or service of documents or, if no such address is specified, the residential or business address of the person last known to the person giving or serving the document, or\n> > > \n> > > > (iii) by sending it by facsimile transmission to the facsimile number of the person, or\n> > > \n> > > > (iv) by sending it by email, messaging or other electronic communication to an electronic address or location indicated by the person for giving documents to, or serving documents on, the person, or\n> > \n> > > (b) in the case of a body corporate—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) by leaving it with a person apparently of or above the age of 16 years at, or by sending it by post to, the head office, a registered office or a principal office of the body corporate or to an address specified by the body corporate for the giving or service of documents, or\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) by sending it by facsimile transmission to the facsimile number of the body corporate, or\n> > > \n> > > > (iii) by sending it by email, messaging or other electronic communication to an electronic address or location indicated by the body corporate for giving documents to, or serving documents on, the body corporate.\n> > \n> > Examples for paragraphs (a)(iv) and (b)(iii)—\n> > \n> > > 1 An email address or direct messaging address set out on an internet-based social media forum for contacting the administrator of the forum about content on the forum.\n> > \n> > > 2 An email address or direct messaging address provided by the poster of digital matter on an internet-based social media forum for contacting the poster about the content of the matter.\n> > \n> > > 3 A form on a website provided by a digital intermediary enabling a user to contact the intermediary by filling in the form or uploading documents.\n> \n> > (2) Nothing in this section affects the operation of any provision of a law or of the rules of a court authorising a document to be given or served on a person in any other manner.\n> \n> **s 44:** Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[35\\]–\\[37\\]; 2023 No 36, Sch 1\\[11\\]–\\[14\\].","sortOrder":72},{"sectionNumber":"45","sectionType":"section","heading":"Regulations","content":"#### 45 Regulations\n\n45 Regulations\n\n> The Governor may make regulations, not inconsistent with this Act, for or with respect to any matter that by this Act is required or permitted to be prescribed or that is necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to this Act.","sortOrder":73},{"sectionNumber":"46","sectionType":"section","heading":"Repeal of Defamation Act 1974 No 18","content":"#### 46 Repeal of Defamation Act 1974 No 18\n\n46 Repeal of [Defamation Act 1974 No 18](/view/html/repealed/current/act-1974-018)\n\n> The [Defamation Act 1974](/view/html/repealed/current/act-1974-018) is repealed.","sortOrder":74},{"sectionNumber":"47","sectionType":"section","heading":"Savings, transitional and other provisions","content":"#### 47 Savings, transitional and other provisions\n\n47 Savings, transitional and other provisions\n\n> Schedule 4 has effect.","sortOrder":75},{"sectionNumber":"48","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"#### 48\n\n48 (Repealed)","sortOrder":76},{"sectionNumber":"49","sectionType":"section","heading":"Review of Act","content":"#### 49 Review of Act\n\n49 Review of Act\n\n> > (1) The Minister is to review this Act to determine whether the policy objectives of the Act remain valid and whether the terms of the Act remain appropriate for securing those objectives.\n> \n> > (2) The review is to be undertaken as soon as possible after the period of 5 years from the date of assent to this Act.\n> \n> > (3) A report on the outcome of the review is to be tabled in each House of Parliament within 12 months after the end of the period of 5 years.","sortOrder":78},{"sectionNumber":"Schedule 1","sectionType":"schedule","heading":"Additional publications to which absolute privilege applies","content":"# Schedule 1 Additional publications to which absolute privilege applies\n\nSchedule 1 Additional publications to which absolute privilege applies\n\n(Section 27 (2) (d))\n\n**sch 1:** Am 2005 No 77, Sch 4, cll 3 (2), 4 (2), 5 (2); 2006 No 111, Sch 2.2 \\[1\\]; 2009 No 21, Sch 3.2 \\[1\\] \\[2\\]; 2009 No 94, Sch 2.19; 2009 No 53, Sch 1.1; 2009 No 56, Sch 2.12; 2009 No 119, Sch 2.7; 2010 No 34, Sch 2.12 \\[1\\]; 2010 No 84, Sch 2.1 \\[1\\] \\[2\\]; 2011 No 48, Sch 2.2; 2012 No 55, Sch 3.5; 2012 No 66, Sch 5.4; 2013 No 54, Sch 3.4 \\[1\\]; 2013 No 95, Schs 1.3 \\[1\\], 2.46 \\[1\\] \\[2\\], 6.1 \\[1\\], 7.1 \\[1\\], 10.5 \\[1\\]; 2015 No 7, Sch 2.12 \\[1\\] \\[2\\]; 2015 No 12, Sch 3.1; 2015 No 19, Sch 15.2 \\[1\\] \\[2\\]; 2015 No 43, Sch 4.4; 2016 No 61, Sch 6.15 \\[1\\]–\\[5\\]; 2016 No 65, Sch 3.3; 2017 No 13, Sch 7.5 \\[1\\]–\\[3\\]; 2017 No 22, Sch 4.7; 2017 No 65, Sch 2.7; 2018 No 30, Sch 5.4A (ins 2021 No 39, Sch 1\\[56\\]); 2018 No 70, Sch 4.24\\[1\\]; 2019 No 10, Sch 1.11 \\[1\\] \\[2\\]; 2022 No 8, Sch 5.2; 2023 No 52, Sch 2.1; 2025 No 15, Sch 3\\[1\\].","sortOrder":79},{"sectionNumber":"2A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Matters relating to Information Commissioner","content":"#### 2A Matters relating to Information Commissioner\n\n2A Matters relating to Information Commissioner\n\n> Without limiting section 27 (2) (a)–(c), matter that is published—\n> \n> > (a) to or by the Information Commissioner or an acting Information Commissioner in his or her capacity as the Information Commissioner or an acting Information Commissioner, or\n> \n> > (b) to any member of staff of the Information Commissioner in his or her capacity as such a member, or\n> \n> > (c) in a report under section 38 (Special report to Parliament) of the [Government Information (Information Commissioner) Act 2009](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2009-053), or\n> \n> > (d) in a copy of a report previously made public under section 38 of the [Government Information (Information Commissioner) Act 2009](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2009-053) where the copy of the report is published under the authority of the Minister for the time being administering that Act.","sortOrder":82},{"sectionNumber":"Schedule 2","sectionType":"schedule","heading":"Additional kinds of public documents","content":"# Schedule 2 Additional kinds of public documents\n\nSchedule 2 Additional kinds of public documents\n\n(Section 28 (4) (g))\n\n**sch 2:** Am 2006 No 111, Sch 2.2 \\[2\\]; 2010 No 34, Sch 2.12 \\[2\\]; 2013 No 95, Schs 1.3 \\[2\\], 2.46 \\[3\\], 6.1 \\[2\\], 7.1 \\[2\\], 10.5 \\[2\\]; 2014 No 29, Sch 4.3 \\[1\\] \\[2\\]; 2014 No 33, Sch 2.13 \\[1\\]; 2015 No 7, Sch 2.12 \\[3\\]; 2016 No 61, Sch 6.15 \\[6\\]; 2018 No 70, Sch 4.24\\[2\\]; 2020 No 18, Sch 6.1; 2025 No 15, Sch 3\\[2\\].","sortOrder":115},{"sectionNumber":"Schedule 3","sectionType":"schedule","heading":"Additional proceedings of public concern","content":"# Schedule 3 Additional proceedings of public concern\n\nSchedule 3 Additional proceedings of public concern\n\n(Section 29 (4) (p))\n\n**sch 3:** Am 2005 No 77, Sch 4, cll 3 (2), 4 (2); 2006 No 111, Sch 2.2 \\[3\\]; 2009 No 21, Sch 3.2 \\[3\\]; 2010 No 34, Sch 2.12 \\[3\\]; 2013 No 54, Sch 3.4 \\[2\\]; 2013 No 95, Schs 1.3 \\[3\\], 2.46 \\[4\\], 6.1 \\[3\\], 7.1 \\[3\\], 10.5 \\[3\\]; 2014 No 29, Sch 4.3 \\[3\\] \\[4\\]; 2014 No 33, Sch 2.13 \\[2\\]; 2015 No 7, Sch 2.12 \\[4\\]; 2015 No 43, Sch 4.4; 2016 No 61, Sch 6.15 \\[7\\]; 2018 No 70, Sch 4.24\\[3\\]; 2025 No 15, Sch 3\\[3\\].","sortOrder":124},{"sectionNumber":"Schedule 4","sectionType":"schedule","heading":"Savings, transitional and other provisions","content":"# Schedule 4 Savings, transitional and other provisions\n\nSchedule 4 Savings, transitional and other provisions\n\n(Section 47)\n\n**sch 4:** Am 2020 No 16, Sch 1\\[38\\] \\[39\\]; 2023 No 36, Sch 1\\[15\\]; 2025 No 15, Sch 3\\[4\\].","sortOrder":142},{"sectionNumber":"sch.4-pt","sectionType":"part","heading":null,"content":"# sch.4-pt","sortOrder":153},{"sectionNumber":"Schedule 5","sectionType":"schedule","heading":null,"content":"# Schedule 5\n\nSchedules 5, 6 (Repealed)\n\n**sch 5:** Rep 2006 No 58, Sch 4.\n\n**sch 6:** Rep 2006 No 58, Sch 4.","sortOrder":163}],"analysis":{"kimi_summary":{"_metrics":{"completionTokens":1125},"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The Act has expanded significantly beyond its original 2005 scope. Originally focused on modernising defamation law and harmonising across Australian states, it has grown to address: (1) digital publication and internet platforms through the 2023 amendments (Division 2A, section 31A, section 39A); (2) preliminary discovery against anonymous online posters (section 23A); (3) the 'serious harm' threshold (2020); (4) expanded absolute privilege for police communications (2023); and (5) modernised document service methods including social media and messaging platforms. The digital intermediary provisions represent a major expansion into regulating internet infrastructure, going well beyond traditional publisher liability."},"complexity_factors":["47+ defined terms in section 4 alone, with many cross-references to other legislation (Corporations Act, Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, etc.)","Multiple overlapping defences with subtle distinctions (e.g., absolute privilege vs qualified privilege vs public interest defence)","Nested conditional logic in the 'serious harm' element (section 10A) with judicial officer determination, special circumstances, and pleading-based dismissal options","Complex transitional provisions in Schedule 4 with multiple commencement dates and application rules for different amendment tranches (2005, 2020, 2023, 2025)","Extensive cross-referencing between Parts and Schedules (e.g., Schedules 1-3 expand definitions in main sections)","Conditional exemptions for digital intermediaries (Division 2A) with multiple service categories and specific exclusion criteria","Detailed procedural requirements for concerns notices and offers to make amends with strict time limits and formal content requirements","Multiple amendment layers (2020 No 16, 2023 No 36, 2025 No 15) creating patchwork application rules"],"plain_english_summary":"**What this Act does:**\n\nThis is the main law governing defamation (defamation means harming someone's reputation by publishing false statements about them) in New South Wales. It sets out when someone can sue for defamation, what defences are available, and how disputes can be resolved.\n\n**Key things the Act covers:**\n\n- **Who can sue:** Most individuals can sue, but corporations generally cannot unless they're small (under 10 employees) or non-profit. You cannot sue on behalf of someone who has died.\n\n- **What you must prove:** Since 2021, you must prove the defamatory publication caused or is likely to cause **\"serious harm\"** to your reputation. For small corporations, this means serious financial loss.\n\n- **Before going to court:** You must send a **\"concerns notice\"** to the publisher first, giving them a chance to make amends. You cannot start court proceedings until at least 28 days after this notice (or 14 days after any further details are provided).\n\n- **Offers to make amends:** Publishers can avoid liability by making a reasonable written offer to apologise, correct the record, and/or pay compensation. If you unreasonably refuse a fair offer, this can hurt your case.\n\n- **Defences available:** The Act lists numerous defences including:\n  - **Truth** (the statement was substantially true)\n  - **Contextual truth** (some parts were true and the rest didn't add damage)\n  - **Absolute privilege** (statements in Parliament, courts, or certain official proceedings)\n  - **Public documents** (fair reports of government documents)\n  - **Fair report of public proceedings** (court cases, public inquiries, etc.)\n  - **Public interest** (you reasonably believed publishing was in the public interest)\n  - **Qualified privilege** (you had a duty to inform someone who had an interest in receiving the information)\n  - **Honest opinion** (opinion based on proper material about a matter of public interest)\n  - **Scientific/academic peer review**\n  - **Innocent dissemination** (for distributors who didn't know and weren't negligent)\n  - **Digital intermediary defence** (for platforms that remove content when complained about)\n\n- **Damages:** There is a cap on non-economic damages (currently around $421,000, adjusted annually). You cannot get punitive damages. The court must ensure damages bear a rational relationship to the actual harm.\n\n- **Digital platforms:** Special rules protect \"digital intermediaries\" (like social media platforms, search engines, and internet service providers) from liability if they merely provide technical services and don't control content. Courts can also order non-party platforms to remove defamatory content.\n\n- **Jury trials:** Either side can elect for a jury trial, though the judge decides damages and some preliminary issues.\n\n**Why it matters:**\n\nThis Act tries to balance two competing interests: protecting people's reputations from false and harmful statements, while not unreasonably restricting free speech—especially on matters of public importance. The 2020 and 2023 amendments particularly strengthened protections for digital platforms and raised the threshold for bringing defamation cases (the \"serious harm\" requirement)."},"summary":{"complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The Act's original 2005 scope focused on harmonising defamation law across Australian jurisdictions and replacing older, inconsistent state-based laws. Over time — particularly through the significant 2021 reforms — its scope expanded to address digital and online publication, introduce the 'serious harm' threshold to filter out trivial claims, and grapple with platform liability for user-generated content. These changes reflect a shift from a primarily print/broadcast media framework to one that must also govern social media, online reviews, and internet publishers — a landscape that did not fully exist when the Act was first drafted."},"complexity_factors":["Balances competing fundamental rights — reputation versus free speech — requiring nuanced case-by-case analysis","Multiple defences (truth, honest opinion, qualified privilege, public interest) each with their own legal tests and conditions","2021 reforms introduced a 'serious harm' threshold that adds a preliminary legal hurdle before a case can proceed","Significant complexity around online and social media publication — who is a 'publisher' is contested and evolving through case law","Distinction between individuals and corporations regarding who has standing to sue","Interaction between the Act and pre-litigation processes (offers to make amends) that carry strategic and financial consequences","Damages framework involves multiple categories (economic, non-economic, aggravated) with caps and exceptions","The Act has been amended over 35 times since 2005, creating complexity in identifying which version applies to historical conduct","Interplay with federal law, other state Acts, and common law (judge-made law) defamation principles that pre-date the Act"],"plain_english_summary":"## Defamation Act 2005 (NSW)\n\n**What is this law about?**\n\nThis is NSW's core law on **defamation** — that is, when someone publishes false statements that damage another person's reputation. It sets out the rules for when you can sue someone for saying or writing something harmful about you, and what defences are available to the person who made the statement.\n\n**Who does it affect?**\n\n- **Individuals** who believe false, damaging things have been said or written about them (online, in newspapers, on TV, or verbally)\n- **Media organisations**, journalists, bloggers, and social media users who publish content about other people\n- **Businesses** (though companies with more than 10 employees generally cannot sue for defamation under this Act)\n- **Anyone** who shares, re-posts, or repeats a defamatory statement — they can also be held responsible\n\n**Key things this law does:**\n\n- 🛡️ **Protects reputations** by giving people a legal path to seek compensation (money) or corrections when false harmful things are said about them\n- ⚖️ **Balances free speech** by providing defences — for example, if what was said was *true*, or was a *fair comment* on a matter of public interest, or was *privileged* (like things said in parliament or court)\n- 📰 **Introduced a 'serious harm' threshold** (via 2021 reforms) — you can only sue if the publication caused, or is likely to cause, *serious harm* to your reputation. This stops trivial claims clogging the courts.\n- 💻 **Addresses online publication** — including who is responsible when defamatory content appears on social media platforms or websites\n- 🤝 **Encourages early resolution** — there are pre-court processes (like offers to make amends) designed to settle disputes without full litigation\n- 💰 **Caps damages** for non-economic loss (general hurt and embarrassment), though additional damages can be awarded in serious cases\n- ⏰ **Sets a time limit** — you generally have **one year** from publication to bring a claim\n\n**Why does it matter to you?**\n\nIf someone publishes something false and damaging about you — whether it's a review, a social media post, a news article, or a rumour — this Act determines whether you have a legal remedy and how to pursue it. Equally, if you're worried about something you've written or said about someone else, this Act tells you what defences might protect you.\n\n**Note:** While this is the NSW version, all Australian states and territories have adopted near-identical uniform defamation laws, so the rules apply consistently across the country."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":8,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The Act’s scope has been materially expanded by later amendments recorded in the schedules and Part 3 of Schedule 4. Notable post‑enactment additions include the statutory ‘serious harm’ element and related early‑determination powers (s 10A, inserted 2020), a distinct exemption and definitions regime for digital intermediaries including caching, conduit and storage services and search engine providers (ss 10B–10E, ins 2023), a digital‑intermediary‑specific defence tied to accessible complaints mechanisms and removal steps (s 31A, ins 2023), and provisions enabling courts to order non‑party digital intermediaries to take access‑prevention steps (s 39A, ins 2023). The schedules and transitional clauses set out how these amendments apply to pre‑ and post‑commencement actions (Schedule 4, sch.4-pt Divs 3–5, clauses 7–14). These insertions change the Act’s practical reach with respect to online publication and pre‑action procedure compared with the original text."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple interacting substantive defences (truth, contextual truth, public-interest, qualified privilege, honest opinion, peer review, innocent dissemination) with different proof burdens and defeat conditions (ss 25–32, 30A, 31A).","Procedural pre-action regime requiring precise notices, time limits, and further particulars that can bar proceedings if not complied with (ss 12A, 12B, 14).","Layered digital-intermediary regime: new definitions, exemptions, a separate intermediary defence, early judicial determination rules, and non-party intermediary remedial orders (ss 10B–10E, 31A, 39A).","Judicial gatekeeping roles and split responsibilities between judicial officers and juries for particular issues (ss 10A, 10E, 21–22, 29A(5), 30(6), 31A(5)).","Cross-jurisdictional choice-of-law rules for multi-state publications (s 11) and many schedule clauses that extend absolute privilege/other rules to specific statutory bodies, increasing localization complexity (Schedules 1–3).","Annual indexed cap on non-economic damages with administrative implementation by the Minister (s 35) and interplay with aggravated damages (s 35(2A)–(2B)).","Numerous temporal and transitional provisions and amendments (Schedules and sch.4 provisions) that affect which rules apply to pre- and post-commencement actions.","Multiple judicial discretions (to dismiss, order remedies against non-parties, grant leave for multiple proceedings) requiring case-by-case determinations (ss 10A(4), 10E(1)(c), 23, 39A(4))."],"plain_english_summary":"What this law does, mechanically\n\n- Establishes the local law of defamation and how courts handle defamation claims in this jurisdiction (s 6). It replaces earlier defamation statutes and makes the common law subject to the Act where the Act so provides (s 6).\n\n- Abolishes the old distinction between slander and libel so any published defamatory matter can be actionable without proof of special damage (s 7).\n\n- Treats multiple defamatory imputations carried in the same publication as a single cause of action (s 8). Certain corporations cannot sue for defamation unless they meet the statutory test (s 9). No one can bring or continue a defamation claim for or by a deceased person (s 10).\n\n- Adds a statutory threshold that the publication must have caused, or be likely to cause, \"serious harm\" to the plaintiff’s reputation before a cause of action exists; the court (judicial officer) decides whether that threshold is met and may determine it early in proceedings (s 10A).\n\n- Sets rules for choice of applicable substantive law when publications cross Australian jurisdictions (s 11).\n\n- Introduces a pre-action, paper-based process aimed at resolving matters without litigation: an aggrieved person generally must give a written \"concerns notice\" to the publisher specifying the imputations and alleged serious harm before starting proceedings (ss 12, 12A, 12B). The publisher may respond by making a time-limited written \"offer to make amends\" that must include certain elements (correction/clarification, offers to notify third parties, payment for reasonable expenses, and may include apology, access-prevention steps for digital matter, or compensation) (ss 13–15). The Act sets out how offers can be withdrawn, renewed and what effect acceptance or unreasonable refusal has in later proceedings (ss 16–19).\n\n- Prescribes a suite of statutory defences and their boundaries: justification (truth) (s 25); contextual truth (s 26); absolute privilege for specified official contexts (s 27 and Schedule 1); publication of public documents and fair reports of proceedings (ss 28–29); a public-interest defence that requires a reasonable belief publication was in the public interest and lists factors courts may consider (s 29A); qualified privilege in appropriate information-sharing relationships (s 30); peer-review protection for scientific/academic journals (s 30A); honest opinion (s 31); innocent dissemination for certain subordinate distributors (s 32).\n\n- Creates a set of exemptions and a related defence specifically for \"digital intermediaries\" (online services): definitions for caching, conduit, storage services, search engines and search engine providers (s 10B); an exemption from liability where the intermediary’s role is limited to those passive functions and it did not initiate, select recipients, encourage, edit or promote the content (s 10C); a specific exemption for search engine providers where the search result generation is automated and not paid-for promotion (s 10D). The judicial officer is to determine whether these digital intermediary exemptions apply, and may do so early and on pleadings if appropriate (ss 10C–10E). Separately, a statutory defence applies where a digital intermediary had an accessible complaints mechanism and took reasonable access-prevention steps when required (s 31A).\n\n- Empowers courts to make orders against non-party digital intermediaries (for example, to take access-prevention steps) to give effect to judgments or injunctions about digital matter, but the intermediary must ordinarily be given an opportunity to be heard (s 39A).\n\n- Caps non-economic damages by reference to a maximum amount that the Minister updates annually; courts must ensure awards bear a rational relationship to the harm (ss 34–35). Exemplary or punitive damages are excluded (s 37). The Act identifies matters that can mitigate damages, including apologies and corrections (s 38).\n\n- Provides procedural rules about jury trials, allocation of fact/fault questions between jury and judge, leave for multiple proceedings against related defendants, preliminary discovery to identify online posters, and costs consequences where parties unreasonably refuse or fail to accept reasonable settlement offers (ss 21–23, 23A, 22, 40).\n\n- Modernises how statutory notices and court documents can be given or served by expressly allowing electronic delivery methods where an address or contact point is indicated (s 44).\n\nWhy the law says it was made (official purpose claims) and the mechanical test of those claims\n\n- The Act states its objects as promoting uniform defamation laws across Australia, protecting freedom of expression about matters of public interest, providing effective and fair remedies for reputational harm, and promoting speedy, non-litigious dispute resolution (s 3).\n\n- Mechanically, the Act implements those objects primarily by (a) harmonising substantive elements and defences (Parts 2 and 4); (b) requiring pre-action concerns notices and encouraging offers to make amends to settle disputes without litigation (Part 3, Division 1, ss 12–19); and (c) creating statutory defences reflecting public-interest and media-related contexts (ss 29A, 31). The statutes limiting damages (s 35) and providing early judicial determination powers for threshold issues (ss 10A, 10E) are procedural mechanisms intended to limit unnecessary trials and unmeritorious cases.\n\nWho pays, who decides, and what behaviour changes as a result (mechanisms, with sections cited)\n\n- Plaintiffs (aggrieved persons) bring proceedings and must usually give a concerns notice before suing (ss 12A, 12B). Plaintiffs bear proving elements of their cause of action, including the serious-harm element (s 10A(1)–(3)).\n\n- Publishers (defendants) may avoid litigation costs and liability by making offers to make amends (ss 13–15); if an offer is accepted and carried out, the plaintiff cannot continue a defamation action about that matter (s 17). If a reasonable offer is refused, refusal can be a defence in later proceedings (s 18).\n\n- Digital intermediaries are provided statutory routes to avoid liability if they meet the passive-role or complaints-and-removal requirements (ss 10C, 10D, 31A). Search engines lose the exemption where search results are promoted or prioritised for payment or other benefit (s 10D(2)). This creates incentives for intermediaries to (i) limit editorial involvement where they wish the exemption to apply (s 10C(1)(c)); (ii) operate accessible complaints mechanisms and respond to complaints within statutory timeframes if relying on s 31A; and (iii) consider disclosure or labelling of paid-for promotion to avoid losing s 10D protection.\n\n- Judicial officers (not juries) are assigned particular gatekeeping roles: they determine whether the serious-harm element is established (s 10A(3)) and whether a digital intermediary exemption is established (s 10E(1)(a)). They may decide these issues before trial and can dismiss proceedings on that basis (ss 10A(4)–(5), 10E(1)(c)). Juries retain roles for fact-finding on publication and certain defences where specified (ss 22, 29A(5), 30(6), 31A(5)).\n\nCosts and incentives affecting parties and intermediaries\n\n- The concerns-notice and offer-to-make-amends process imposes a pre-litigation information and timing cost on both aggrieved persons and publishers (ss 12A, 12B, 14). That process is intended to produce settlements and reduce litigation, but it creates administrative compliance burden (preparing detailed particulars, responding to further particulars within 14 days) and timing constraints that can affect limitation issues (ss 12A(3)–(5), 14(2), 12B(3)–(4)).\n\n- Publishers face potential indemnity-costs consequences where they unreasonably refuse reasonable settlement offers or plaintiffs unreasonably refuse offers by defendants (s 40(2)). This encourages negotiation but changes the litigation risk calculus.\n\n- Digital intermediaries face operational costs to maintain accessible complaints mechanisms and to take reasonable access-prevention steps within statutory timeframes if they wish to rely on s 31A (s 31A(1)–(3), (6)). They also have an incentive to avoid editorial actions that would negate the passive-role exemption (s 10C(1)(c)). Search engines that accept payment to prioritise results face exposure because the s 10D exemption does not apply to results promoted for payment (s 10D(2)).\n\nTrade-offs, opportunity costs and implementation risks suggested by the text (mechanisms, not judgments)\n\n- Trade-off between access to justice and early filtering: the \"serious harm\" threshold and judicial power to determine it early (s 10A) reduce the number of weak claims proceeding to full trial, but they require courts to conduct preliminary hearings and allocate resources to threshold determinations (s 10A(4)–(6)). Courts are given discretion to balance cost and resources when deciding timing (s 10A(5)–(6); 10E(1)(b), 10E(2)(a)).\n\n- Administrative burden and potential delays: the concerns-notice regime requires specific information and gives publishers an ability to request further particulars; failure to comply can defeat the notice (s 12A(1)–(5)). The timing rules for offers (s 14) and the 28-day minimum acceptance window (s 15(1)(b1)) impose fixed procedural timelines.\n\n- Incentives for intermediaries to limit editorial involvement: the exemptions in ss 10C and 10D are conditioned on the intermediary’s limited role and lack of editorial action (s 10C(1)(b)–(c); s 10D(1)–(2)). That produces a mechanical incentive to keep certain functions automated or passive and to maintain clear separation between paid promotion and organic results.\n\n- Orders against non-party intermediaries: courts may order non-party intermediaries to take access-prevention steps even if the intermediary is not liable for defamation (s 39A(2)–(6)). That creates implementation complexity because the court must balance the intermediary’s operations and the need to give the intermediary an opportunity to be heard (s 39A(4)–(5)).\n\nConcentrated benefits and diffuse costs indicated by the text\n\n- Concentrated benefits: the Act gives clear procedural and liability protections to digital intermediaries that structure their services to meet the exemptions (ss 10C–10D, 31A). Plaintiffs benefit from pre-action notice requirements that can produce corrective remedies or offers to make amends without litigation (ss 12–17).\n\n- Diffuse costs: the pre-action and complaints mechanisms impose administrative burdens on individuals, small publishers, and intermediaries who must manage notices, maintain complaint channels, and keep records to show compliance. Courts are also allocated additional gatekeeping tasks (ss 10A, 10E), which bear on judicial resource allocation.\n\nOther practical points of operation and discretion\n\n- The Act binds the Crown to the extent possible (s 5).\n\n- Many statutory defences are expressly subject to defeat if publication was not made “honestly for the information of the public or the advancement of education,” or if malice is proved; the general law continues to apply where the Act does not displace it (ss 24, 27(3), 28(3), 30(4), 31(4), 31A(4)).\n\n- The Minister must declare the damages cap amount yearly by Gazette notice and the cap is adjusted by a defined earnings index (s 35(3)–(4)).\n\n- The Act contains multiple transitional and savings provisions dealing with amendments made in 2020, 2023 and later, and identifies how those amendments apply to pre- and post-commencement actions and ongoing proceedings (Schedule 4, sch.4-pt Divs 3–5, clauses 7–14).\n\nSource references: main operative provisions cited above are from Parts 1–5, Divisions and Schedules of the Defamation Act 2005 as appearing in the provided text (not exhaustive)."},"issue_detection":{"absurdities":[],"contradictions":[]}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/defamation-act-2005","history":"/api/acts/defamation-act-2005/history","analysis":"/api/acts/defamation-act-2005/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/defamation-act-2005/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/defamation-act-2005/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/defamation-act-2005/documents"}}