{"id":"crown-proceedings-act-1958","name":"Crown Proceedings Act 1958","slug":"crown-proceedings-act-1958","collection":"act","jurisdiction":"vic","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":177696,"registerId":"vic-crown-proceedings-act-1958-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-05","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Crown Proceedings Act 1958","content":"Version No. 054\n\n**Crown Proceedings Act 1958**\n\n**No. 6232 of 1958**\n\nVersion incorporating amendments as at  \n25 March 2024\n\n**table of provisions**\n\n*Section Page*\n\n1 Short title, commencement and division 1\n\n2 Repeal 1\n\n2A Definitions 2\n\nPart I—Recovery of debts and property by the Crown 3\n\n3 Mode of recovering Crown debts 3\n\n4 Fines to be recoverable by judgment 3\n\n5 Recovery of moneys payable under forfeited recognisances 3\n\n6 Breach of bail 9\n\n7 Other debts and duties to be recoverable by Crown suit 13\n\n8 Bail bonds in Crown suits assignable 14\n\n9 Proceedings indorsed on writ may be taken 15\n\n10 Form of information 15\n\n11 Proceedings to be the same as in actions 15\n\n12 Persons may defend in forma pauperis 16\n\n13 Appeal for new trial etc. 16\n\n14 Suits relating to land or goods 16\n\n15 Execution in detinue and ejectment 17\n\n16 Execution in other cases 17\n\n17 Property of Crown debtors bound as property of subjects' debtors 17\n\n18 Title of the cause and costs of suit 18\n\nPart II—Civil proceedings by and against the Crown 19\n\n20 Application to causes of action arising after 1 January 1956 19\n\n21 Definition 19\n\n22 In what courts proceedings to be taken by or against the Crown 19\n\n23 Liability of the Crown in contract 19\n\n24 Proceedings by Crown 21\n\n25 Rights of parties 21\n\n26 Certificate for payment of judgment by Crown 21\n\n27 Scope of this Part 22\n\nSchedules 23\n\nFirst Schedule 23\n\nSecond Schedule 24\n\nThird Schedule 25\n\nSeventh Schedule 26\n\nEighth Schedule 27\n\nNinth Schedule 28\n\nEndnotes 29\n\n1 General information 29\n\n2 Table of Amendments 31\n\n3 Explanatory details 34\n\n**Version No.** **054**\n\n**Crown Proceedings Act 1958**\n\n**No. 6232 of 1958**\n\nVersion incorporating amendments as at  \n25 March 2024\n\nAn Act to consolidate the Law relating to the Protection and Recovery of Crown Property and to Civil Proceedings by and against the Crown.\n\n**BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly of Victoria in this present Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same as follows (that is to say):**\n\n\t1 Short title, commencement and division\n\nThis Act may be cited as the **Crown Proceedings Act 1958**, and shall come into operation on a day to be fixed by proclamation of the Governor in Council published in the Government Gazette, and is divided into Parts as follows:\n\nPart I—Recovery of Debts and Property by the Crown ss 3–19\n\nPart II—Civil Proceedings by and against the Crown ss 20–27.\n\n\t2 Repeal\n\n(1) The Acts mentioned in the First Schedule to the extent thereby expressed to be repealed are hereby repealed accordingly.\n\n(2) Except as in this Act expressly or by necessary implication provided—\n\n(a) all persons things and circumstances appointed or created by or under either of the repealed Acts or existing or continuing under either of such Acts immediately before the commencement of this Act shall under and subject to this Act continue to have the same status operation and effect as they respectively would have had if such Acts had not been so repealed;\n\n(b) in particular and without affecting the generality of the foregoing paragraph such repeal shall not disturb the continuity of status operation or effect of any rule summons writ proceeding information fiat certificate judgment order decree fine arrest recognisance bond assignment satisfaction appeal penalty liability or right made issued presented granted given entered imposed accrued incurred or acquired or existing or continuing by or under either of such repealed Acts before the commencement of this Act.\n\nS. 2A inserted by No. 37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 43.1).\n\n\t2A Definitions\n\nIn this Act—\n\nS. 2A def. of *bail guarantor* inserted by No. 28/2023 s. 64(1).\n\n***bail guarantor*** has the same meaning as in the **Bail Act 1977**;\n\n***police officer*** has the same meaning as in the **Victoria Police Act 2013**.\n\nPart I—Recovery of debts and property by the Crown\n\nNo. 3665 s. 3.\n\nS. 3 amended by No. 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.1).\n\n\t3 Mode of recovering Crown debts\n\nAll debts damages duties sums of money land or goods due payable or belonging to His Majesty shall be sued for and recovered by the means and in the manner hereinafter mentioned.\n\nNo. 3665 s. 4.\n\nS. 4  \namended by Nos 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.1(a)(b)), 74/2000 s. 3(Sch. 1 item 32), 33/2018 s. 88.\n\n\t4 Fines to be recoverable by judgment\n\nWhen any fine is imposed upon any person otherwise than by a judgment or conviction of some court, the judge or the magistrate by whom such fine is imposed if the same is not immediately paid shall by writing in the form contained in the Second Schedule to this Act or to the like effect certify that fact together with the name and place of abode or business of the person on whom such fine has been so imposed and the cause and amount of such fine; and shall deliver or send by the post to a law officer such writing, and upon receipt thereof the law officer shall cause a final judgment to be signed in the Supreme Court for the amount of such fine and $10[[1]](#endnote-2) for costs; and every such judgment may be in the form contained in the Third Schedule to this Act or to the like effect, and no writ of error or appeal shall lie or be had therefrom.\n\nS. 5 substituted by No. 7900 s. 2, amended by No. 8124 s. 2(a)(b).\n\n\t5 Recovery of moneys payable under forfeited recognisances\n\nS. 5(1) amended by Nos 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.2(a)), 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.2).\n\n(1) Where a court is satisfied that a person has failed to observe a condition of a recognisance to His Majesty the court shall declare the recognisance to be forfeited and shall order that the amount of the recognisance be paid to the proper officer of the court forthwith or within such time as the court allows and that in default of payment of that amount in accordance with the order—\n\n(a) in the case of a principal—that he be imprisoned for the term (not exceeding two years) fixed by the order; and\n\nS. 5(1)(b) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.2(b)(i)(ii)).\n\n(b) in the case of a surety—that the amount be obtained by seizing and selling the property of the surety and in default, in whole or in part, that the surety be imprisoned for the term (not exceeding two years) fixed by the order.\n\nS. 5(2) amended by Nos 9008 s. 2(1)(Sch. item 3(a)(i)), 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.3(a)(b)).\n\n(2) Every order under subsection (1) shall be in writing in the prescribed form, shall be signed by the judge or magistrate presiding and shall be delivered to the proper officer of the court.\n\nS. 5(2A) inserted by No. 8124 s. 3, amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.4(a)(b)).\n\n(2A) Where a court makes an order under subsection (1) in the absence of a principal the proper officer of the court shall send by post addressed to the principal and to each of the sureties (if any) at the respective addresses shown in the recognisance a notice in writing signed by the proper officer setting forth—\n\n(a) particulars of the order made against the principal and each of the sureties (if any); and\n\nS. 5(2A)(b) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.4(c)).\n\n(b) a statement that a warrant to imprison, a warrant of seizure and sale or a warrant to seize property (as the case requires) will issue after the expiration of twenty-eight days unless—\n\n(i) the amount due under the order is paid;\n\n(ii) an order is made for the payment of the amount by instalments; or\n\n(iii) application is made under subsection (3) for rescission or variation of the order.\n\nS. 5(2B) inserted by No. 8124 s. 3.\n\n(2B) Where a court makes an order under subsection (1) in the absence of a principal no warrant shall issue for the recovery of moneys due under the order until after the expiration of twenty-eight days from the day the order is made.\n\nS. 5(3) amended by No. 8124 s. 4(1).\n\nS. 5(3)(a) amended by Nos 16/1986 s. 30, 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.1(a)(b)), 57/1989 s. 3 (Sch. item 48.5(a)(i)(ii)) (as amended by No. 34/1990 s. 5(Sch. 4 item 45)).\n\n(3) (a) Where a recognisance has been forfeited under subsection (1) any principal or surety may at any time within twenty-eight days after the making of the order or, if the order was made in the absence of the principal or surety, within twenty-eight days after the order first comes to his notice apply to the court that made the order to vary or rescind the order on the ground that it would be unjust to require him to pay the amount of the recognisance having regard to all the circumstances of the case and the court may vary or rescind the order and cancel any warrant issued in the case under the provisions of this section before the warrant so issued is executed.\n\nS. 5(3)(b) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.5(b)).\n\n(b) Every application under paragraph (a) shall be in writing in the prescribed form signed by the person making the application, shall set forth the grounds of the application, and shall be lodged with the proper officer of the court a reasonable time in the circumstances before the hearing of the application.\n\nS. 5(3)(c) amended by Nos 8124 s. 4(2), 9848 s. 18(1), 57/1989 s. 3 (Sch. item 48.5(c)), 68/2009 s. 97(Sch. item 42.1).\n\n(c) Not less than twenty-eight days before the hearing of an application under this subsection the applicant shall serve or cause to be served personally or by post on the informant or complainant or, in the case of an indictment, the Director of Public Prosecutions a true copy of the application lodged with the proper officer of the court.\n\nS. 5(3)(d) inserted by No. 8124 s. 4(3), amended by Nos 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.2), 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.5(d)(i)(ii)) (as amended by No. 34/1990 s. 5(Sch. 4 items 46, 47)).\n\n(d) At any time after the lodging of an application under paragraph (a) the applicant may apply ex parte to a court for a stay of proceedings in the matter and upon any such application the court may direct the return of any warrant unexecuted or may stay the issue or execution of any such warrant pending the determination of an application under paragraph (a).\n\nS. 5(3)(e) inserted by No. 8124 s. 4(3).\n\n(e) The Governor in Council may make regulations prescribing forms for the purposes of this section.\n\nS. 5(4) amended by Nos 9008 s. 2(1)(Sch. item 3(a)(ii)), 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.6).\n\n(4) Every warrant to imprison a principal pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (a) of subsection (1) shall be in or to the effect of the prescribed form.\n\nS. 5(5) amended by Nos 9008 s. 2(1)(Sch. item 3(a)(iii)), 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.7(a)–(c)).\n\n(5) Every warrant of seizure and sale and warrant to seize property of a surety to a forfeited recognisance shall be in or to the effect of the prescribed form and every warrant to imprison a surety shall be in or to the effect of the prescribed form.\n\nS. 5(6)–5(9) repealed.[[2]](#endnote-3)\n\n* * * * *\n\nS. 5(9A) inserted by No. 8124 s. 4(5), amended by Nos 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.8(a)(b)), 37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 43.2(a)).\n\n(9A) The proper officer of the court shall attach or cause to be attached to every warrant to imprison issued under this section a notice in the prescribed form addressed to the police officer executing the warrant requiring the police officer to deliver to the principal or surety before the execution of the warrant a statement in writing in the prescribed form with respect to the provisions of subsection (3) and shall allow the principal or surety, as the case may be, reasonable time and opportunity to make application thereunder should he so desire.\n\nS. 5(10) amended by Nos 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.9), 37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 43.2(b)).\n\n(10) Any police officer to whom a warrant under this section is directed shall execute the warrant according to its tenor unless the amount of money specified in the warrant be sooner paid and the keeper of the gaol shall receive into his custody any person referred to in a warrant to imprison and safely keep him for the term or period on the warrant named unless the said amount be sooner paid or unless he is otherwise removed or discharged from custody by due course of law.\n\nS. 5(11) amended by Nos 8124 s. 4(6)(a)(b), 8731 s. 173, 57/1989 s. 3 (Sch. item 48.10(a)).\n\n(11) The provisions of the **Magistrates' Court Act 1989** with respect to warrants and to the payment or part payment of moneys shall, so far as those provisions are applicable and with such modifications as are necessary, extend and apply with respect to the recovery of moneys payable under forfeited recognisances and in particular with the following modifications, namely—\n\n(a) any reference in those provisions to a warrant shall be read and construed as if it were a reference to a warrant issued for the purposes of this section;\n\nS. 5(11)(b) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.10(b)).\n\n(b) any reference in those provisions to a fine or other sum adjudged to be paid under a conviction or order of the Magistrates' Court shall be read and construed as if it were a reference to an order made for the recovery of the moneys payable under a forfeited recognisance;\n\nS. 5(11)(c) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.10(c)(i)(ii)).\n\n(c) any reference in those provisions to the Magistrates' Court shall be read and construed as if it were a reference to the court making an order forfeiting a recognisance; and\n\nS. 5(11)(d) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.10(d)).\n\n(d) any reference in those provisions to a registrar of the magistrates' court shall be read and construed as if it included a reference to the Prothonotary or the Registrar of the County Court (as the case requires).\n\nS. 5(12) amended by Nos 9008 s. 2(1)(Sch. item 3(a)(v)), 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.11).\n\n(12) The officer in charge of a prison shall on receiving payment of moneys payable under a forfeited recognisance forthwith pay the amount received to the proper officer of the court.\n\nS. 5(13) amended by No. 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.3), repealed by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.12).\n\n* * * * *\n\nS. 6  \nrepealed by No. 7900 s. 3, new s. 6 inserted by No. 9008 s. 2(1)(Sch. item 3(b)).\n\n\t6 Breach of bail\n\nS. 6(1) amended by Nos 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.13(a)–(c)), 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.3), 28/2023 s. 64(2).\n\n(1) Where a court is satisfied that a person has failed to observe a condition of bail the court shall declare the bail to be forfeited and shall order that the amount undertaken by the bail guarantor or guarantors to be paid to His Majesty in the event of such a breach be paid to the proper officer of the court forthwith or within such time as the court allows and that in default of payment of that amount in accordance with the order that the amount be obtained by seizing and selling the property of the bail guarantor or guarantors and in default, in whole or in part, that the bail guarantor or guarantors be imprisoned for the term (not exceeding two years) fixed by the order.\n\nS. 6(1A) inserted by No. 9158 s. 6, amended by Nos 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.14), 70/2010 s. 37, 28/2023 s. 64(3).\n\n(1A) Where a court makes an order under subsection (1) and the bail guarantor has pursuant to section 9(3) of the **Bail Act 1977** lodged in cash the amount of the bail the court shall order that the cash lodged be forfeited and that the amount of the bail be paid to the proper officer of the court.\n\nS. 6(2) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.15(a)(b)).\n\n(2) Every order under subsection (1) shall be in the prescribed form, shall be signed by the judge, or magistrate presiding and shall be delivered to the proper officer of the court.\n\nS. 6(3) amended by Nos 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.16(a)(b)), 28/2023 s. 64(4)(a)(b).\n\n(3) Where a court makes an order under subsection (1) in the absence of one or more bail guarantors the proper officer of the court shall send by post addressed to each of the absent bail guarantors at his address shown in the undertaking of bail a notice in writing signed by the proper officer of the court setting forth—\n\nS. 6(3)(a) amended by No. 28/2023 s. 64(4)(c).\n\n(a) particulars of the order made against the bail guarantor; and\n\nS. 6(3)(b) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.16(c)).\n\n(b) a statement that a warrant of seizure and sale or a warrant to seize property will issue after the expiration of 28 days unless—\n\n(i) the amount due under the order is paid;\n\n(ii) an order is made for the payment of the amount by instalments; or\n\n(iii) application is made under subsection (4) for rescission or variation of the order.\n\nS. 6(4) amended by Nos 16/1986 s. 30, 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.4(a)(b)), 57/1989 s. 3 (Sch. item 48.17(a)) (as amended by No. 34/1990 s. 5(Sch. 4 item 48)), 28/2023 s. 64(5).\n\n(4) Where bail is declared to be forfeited under subsection (1) any bail guarantor may at any time within 28 days after the making of the order or, if the order was made in the absence of the bail guarantor, within 28 days after the order first comes to his notice apply to the Court that made the order to vary or rescind the order on the ground that it would be unjust to require him to pay the amount undertaken to be paid having regard to all the circumstances of the case and the court may vary or rescind the order and cancel any warrant issued in the case under the provisions of this section before the warrant so issued is executed.\n\nS. 6(5) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.18).\n\n(5) Every application under subsection (4) shall be in writing in the prescribed form signed by the person making the application, shall set forth the grounds of the application and shall be lodged with the proper officer of the court a reasonable time in the circumstances before the hearing of the application.\n\nS. 6(6) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.19(b)).\n\n(6) Not less than 28 days before the hearing of an application under subsection (4) the applicant shall serve or cause to be served personally or by post—\n\n(a) on the informant or complainant; or\n\nS. 6(6)(b) amended by No. 37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 43.3(a)).\n\n(b) where the informant is a police officer—on the officer in charge of the police station nearest to the court where the application is to be heard; or\n\nS. 6(6)(c) amended by Nos 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.19(a)), 68/2009 s. 97(Sch. item 42.2).\n\n(c) in the case of an indictment or an appeal—the Director of Public Prosecutions—\n\na true copy of the application lodged with the proper officer of the court.\n\nS. 6(7) amended by Nos 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.5), 57/1989 s. 3(Sch.  \nitem 48.20 (a)(b)) (as amended by No. 34/1990 s. 5(Sch. 4 items 49, 50)).\n\n(7) At the time after the lodging of an application under subsection (4) the applicant may apply ex parte to a court for a stay of proceedings in the matter and upon any such application the court may direct the return of any warrant unexecuted or may stay the issue or execution of a warrant pending the determination of the application.\n\n(8) The Governor in Council may make regulations prescribing forms for the purposes of this section.\n\nS. 6(9) amended by Nos 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.21(a)–(c)), 28/2023 s. 64(5).\n\n(9) Every warrant of seizure and sale and warrant to seize property of a bail guarantor to forfeited bail shall be in or to the effect of the prescribed form and every warrant to imprison a bail guarantor shall be in or to the effect of the prescribed form.\n\nS. 6(10) amended by Nos 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.22(a)(b)), 37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 43.3(b)), 28/2023 s. 64(5).\n\n(10) The proper officer of the court shall attach or cause to be attached to every warrant to imprison issued under this section a notice in the prescribed form addressed to the police officer executing the warrant requiring the police officer to deliver to the bail guarantor before the execution of the warrant a statement in writing in the prescribed form with respect to the provisions of subsection (4) and shall allow the bail guarantor reasonable time and opportunity to make application thereunder should he so desire.\n\nS. 6(11) amended by Nos 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.23), 37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 43.3(c)).\n\n(11) Any police officer to whom a warrant under this section is directed shall execute the warrant according to its tenor unless the amount of money specified in the warrant be sooner paid and the officer in charge of the prison shall receive into his custody any person referred to in a warrant to imprison and safely keep him for the period stated in the warrant unless the amount be sooner paid or unless he is otherwise removed or discharged from custody by due course of law.\n\nS. 6(12) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.24(a)).\n\n(12) The provisions of the **Magistrates' Court Act 1989** with respect to warrants and to the payment or part payment of moneys shall, so far as those provisions are applicable and with such modifications as are necessary, extend and apply with respect to the recovery of moneys payable under bail undertakings and in particular with the following modifications, namely—\n\n(a) any reference in those provisions to a warrant shall be read and construed as if it were a reference to a warrant issued for the purposes of this section;\n\nS. 6(12)(b) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.24(b)).\n\n(b) any reference in those provisions to a fine or other sum adjudged to be paid under a conviction or order of the Magistrates' Court shall be read and construed as if it were a reference to an order made for the recovery of the moneys payable under forfeited bail;\n\nS. 6(12)(c) amended by Nos 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.6), 57/1989 s. 3(Sch.  \nitem 48.24 (c)(i)(ii)) (as amended by No. 34/1990 s. 5(Sch. 4 item 51)).\n\n(c) any reference in those provisions to the Magistrates' Court shall be read and construed as if it were a reference to a court declaring bail to be forfeited;\n\nS. 6(12)(d) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.24(d)(i)(ii)).\n\n(d) any reference in those provisions to a registrar of the Magistrates' Court shall be read and construed as if it included a reference to the Prothonotary or the Registrar of the County Court (as the case requires).\n\nS. 6(13) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.25).\n\n(13) The officer in charge of a prison shall on receiving payment of moneys payable under bail declared to be forfeited forthwith pay the amount received to the proper officer of the court.\n\nS. 6(14) amended by No. 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.7), repealed by No. 57/1989 s. 3 (Sch. item 48.26).\n\n* * * * *\n\nNo. 3665 s. 7.\n\nS. 7  \namended by Nos 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.8), 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.4).\n\n\t7 Other debts and duties to be recoverable by Crown suit\n\nWhen any debt duty or sum of money is due to His Majesty otherwise than upon or by virtue of any recognisance His Majesty may cause to be sued out of the Supreme Court a certain writ to be called a writ of capias ad respondendum; and every such writ may be in the form contained in the Sixth Schedule to this Act or to the like effect, and shall be executed by the sheriff or other officer or person to whom the same is directed, and shall be deemed and taken to be the commencement of a Crown suit: Provided always that it shall be lawful for His Majesty to order the sheriff or other officer or person to whom such writ is directed not to arrest any one or more of the defendants but to serve a copy thereof only on such defendant or defendants, which order shall be duly obeyed by such sheriff or other officer or person; and such service shall be of the same force and effect as the service of a writ in any civil proceeding between subject and subject; and no such writ shall be issued except upon a fiat under the hand of the Attorney-General in the form contained in the Seventh Schedule to this Act or to the like effect stating the mode in which the same (so far as regards the execution or service thereof) is to be indorsed; and before signing any such fiat the Attorney-General shall by due inquiry in that behalf satisfy himself that such indorsement is reasonable and proper under the circumstances of the case.\n\nNo. 3665 s. 8.\n\nS. 8 amended by No. 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.5).\n\n\t8 Bail bonds in Crown suits assignable\n\nIf any person is arrested under or by virtue of any such writ as last aforesaid and the sheriff or other officer or person to whom the same is directed takes bail from such person, such sheriff or other officer or person at the request of the Attorney-General shall assign to His Majesty the bail bond taken from such person by indorsing and attesting the same under his hand and seal in the presence of two or more credible witnesses; and if such bail bond is forfeited, such process shall thereupon issue as on bonds originally made to His Majesty.\n\nNo. 3665 s. 9.\n\n\t9 Proceedings indorsed on writ may be taken\n\nAll such steps and proceedings as are mentioned in or upon any writ issued under this Part or in any notice issued according to the course and practice for the time being of the Supreme Court shall and may with such alterations modifications and substitutions as are necessary be had and taken in the same manner as if the same were expressly directed by this Part.\n\nNo. 3665 s. 10.\n\nS. 10 amended by Nos 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.9 (a)(b)), 57/1989 s. 3 (Sch. item 48.27(a)–(c)), 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.6).\n\n\t10 Form of information\n\nIn lieu of the indorsement of claim in a civil proceeding between subject and subject, a complaint shall be filed or delivered (as the case may be) by the Attorney-General for and on behalf of His Majesty; and in the complaint the cause of complaint shall be set forth in the same manner and form as nearly as may be as in any such indorsement of claim as aforesaid; and the complaint shall commence and conclude in the form contained in the Eighth Schedule to this Act or to the like effect.\n\nNo. 3665 s. 11.\n\nS. 11 amended by No. 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.10).\n\n\t11 Proceedings to be the same as in actions\n\nThe time form and manner of process and proceeding in any Crown suit, except where it is otherwise provided by this Act, shall be the same as nearly as may be as by any law or rule of practice or pleading now or hereafter to be in force in the Supreme Court is directed in any civil proceeding between subject and subject.\n\nNo. 3665 s. 12.\n\nS. 12 amended by Nos 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.11), 35/1996 s. 453(Sch. 1 item 20), 18/2005 s. 18(Sch. 1 item 31), 17/2014 s. 160(Sch. 2 item 31).\n\n\t12 Persons may defend in forma pauperis\n\nWhen any person against whom any proceedings under this Part are instituted in the Supreme Court is disabled by poverty from making defence thereto, it shall be competent for such person to petition the court on affidavit verifying such disability; and the court, on being satisfied of the truth of the facts alleged in such affidavit, may assign Australian legal practitioners to such person; and the Australian legal practitioners so assigned are hereby required to act for such person without fee.\n\nNo. 3665 s. 13.\n\nS. 13 amended by No. 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.12).\n\n\t13 Appeal for new trial etc.\n\nAn appeal or motion for a new trial or to enter a verdict or in arrest of judgment or for judgment non obstante veredicto shall be allowed and be made and granted in the same manner and upon the same terms in all respects as by any law or rule of practice now or hereafter in force is directed in any civil proceeding between subject and subject.\n\nNo. 3665 s. 14.\n\nS. 14 amended by Nos 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.13), 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.7).\n\n\t14 Suits relating to land or goods\n\nThe possession of land belonging to His Majesty shall and may be recovered and obtained by proceedings in the same form as nearly as may be as in a proceeding for the recovery of land between subject and subject; and the possession of goods or damages for detaining taking damaging or converting them or for trespassing upon land shall and may be recovered in the same manner as is hereinbefore directed with respect to any debt duty or sum of money due to His Majesty otherwise than upon or by virtue of a recognisance.\n\nNo. 3665 s. 15.\n\nS. 15 amended by Nos 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.14  \n(a)–(d)), 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.8).\n\n\t15 Execution in detinue and ejectment\n\nIn all Crown suits in the nature of ejectment or detinue, such warrants of execution as by any law or rule of practice now or hereafter in force are or can be issued in any civil proceeding of the same nature between subject and subject for the recovery of land goods or writings shall and may be issued on behalf of His Majesty; and where part of any such warrant is or may be for seizure and sale, such part may consist of the writ next hereinafter mentioned.\n\nNo. 3665 s. 16.\n\nS. 16 amended by Nos 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.15), 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.9).\n\n\t16 Execution in other cases\n\nAll sums recovered by His Majesty by any judgment under this Part shall and may be levied and recovered by virtue of a writ to be called a fieri capias; and every such last-mentioned writ may be in the form contained in the Ninth Schedule to this Act or to the like effect; and His Majesty may levy the poundage fees and expenses of execution over and above the sum recovered, and shall have all such rights powers and remedies for obtaining and compelling satisfaction of any judgment as by any law now or hereafter in force are available in a civil proceeding between subject and subject.\n\nNo. 3665 s. 17.\n\nS. 17 amended by No. 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.10).\n\n\t17 Property of Crown debtors bound as property of subjects' debtors\n\nExcept where it is otherwise provided by this Part His Majesty shall not enforce a demand against a public debtor or accountant or against any of his property in any other manner than one subject could enforce a claim against another subject and his property; and shall have such and the same lien claim and rights as any subject has and can enforce, and no other.\n\nNo. 3665 s. 18.\n\nS. 18 amended by Nos 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.16), 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.11).\n\n\t18 Title of the cause and costs of suit\n\nIn all pleadings and proceedings under this Part and in all affidavits notices consents summonses and rules to be used therein, the title of the cause or proceedings shall be stated to be \"The King against\" the person sued (naming him) and no other title whatsoever shall be necessary; and His Majesty shall be entitled to full costs of suit in all cases in which a plaintiff in any civil proceeding between subject and subject would be entitled thereto.\n\nS. 19 amended by No. 19/1989 s. 16(Sch. item 17.17), repealed by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.29).\n\n* * * * *\n\nPart II—Civil proceedings by and against the Crown\n\nNo. 5874 s. 1(2).\n\n\t20 Application to causes of action arising after 1 January 1956\n\nThe provisions of this Part shall apply only in respect of causes of action arising after the commencement of the **Crown Proceedings Act 1955**.\n\nNo. 5874 s. 2.\n\n\t21 Definition\n\nIn this Part unless inconsistent with the context or subject-matter ***proceeding*** means action suit or proceeding of a civil nature.\n\nNo. 5874 s. 3.\n\n\t22 In what courts proceedings to be taken by or against the Crown\n\n(1) Every proceeding which may be taken by or against the Crown under this Part shall be taken in the court which would have jurisdiction if the proceeding were between subject and subject.\n\n(2) Every proceeding under this Part shall be taken by or against the Crown under the title of the \"State of Victoria\" and shall be instituted and proceeded with in accordance with any procedure of the court specifically applicable thereto or, if no procedure is specifically applicable thereto, as nearly as possible in accordance with the procedure applicable to proceedings between subject and subject.\n\nNo. 5874 s. 4.\n\n\t23 Liability of the Crown in contract\n\n(1) Subject to this Part—\n\n(a) the Crown shall be liable in respect of any contract made on its behalf in the same manner as a subject is liable in respect of his contracts; and\n\n(b) the Crown shall be liable for the torts of any servant or agent of the Crown or independent contractor employed by the Crown as nearly as possible in the same manner as a subject is liable for the torts of his servant or agent or of an independent contractor employed by him.\n\nNote to s. 23(1) inserted by No. 54/2016 s. 3.\n\n**Note**\n\nPolice officers and protective services officers are not servants or agents of the Crown or independent contractors employed by the Crown. See Division 8 of Part 4 of the **Victoria Police Act 2013** for the liability of the State for a tort committed by a police officer or a protective services officer in the performance or purported performance of the officer's duties.\n\n(2) No proceeding shall lie against the Crown under this Part in respect of anything done or omitted to be done by any person while discharging or purporting to discharge any responsibility of a judicial nature invested in him.\n\n(3) No proceeding shall lie against the Crown under this Part—\n\n(a) in respect of any contract made by or on behalf of any public statutory corporation; or\n\n(b) in respect of any tort of any such corporation or of any of its servants or agents or of any independent contractor employed by it—\n\nand nothing in this Part shall affect any provision in any Act by which any liability of any such corporation or of any of its members officers or servants in respect of any matter is specifically limited or conditioned, but no such corporation shall on the ground that it is the Crown or the servant or agent of the Crown be exempt from any liability to which it would otherwise be subject.\n\nNo. 5874 s. 5.\n\n\t24 Proceedings by Crown\n\nAny right or claim which the Crown may have against any person may be enforced by a proceeding under this Part or in any appropriate matter under Part I of this Act.\n\nNo. 5874 s. 6.\n\n\t25 Rights of parties\n\nIn any proceeding under this Part in which the State of Victoria is a party the rights of parties shall as nearly as possible be the same and judgment may be given and costs awarded on either side and every judgment order or decree shall be subject to the same rights of re-hearing appeal and review, as in a proceeding between subject and subject.\n\nNo. 5874 s. 7.\n\n\t26 Certificate for payment of judgment by Crown\n\n(1) Except as is provided in this section, no execution or attachment or process in the nature thereof shall be issued against the Crown out of any court in any proceeding under this Part; but after any judgment order or decree has been given pronounced or entered against the Crown in any such proceeding the proper officer of the court shall give to the party in whose favour it was so given pronounced or entered a certificate setting out the sum awarded against the Crown in the proceeding, whether as damages or otherwise or for costs, and the other particulars in respect of which compliance by the Crown is directed by the judgment order or decree.\n\nS. 26(2) amended by No. 57/1989 s. 3(Sch. item 48.30).\n\n(2) On the receipt of such certificate it shall be lawful for the Governor to cause to be paid out of the Consolidated Fund (which is hereby to the necessary extent appropriated accordingly) the sum set out in the certificate and also to cause compliance to be made with the other particulars set out therein.\n\nNo. 5874 s. 8(1).\n\n\t27 Scope of this Part\n\nThe provisions of this Part shall take effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any Act or enactment or in any rule of law practice or procedure.\n\nSchedules\n\nSection 2.\n\nFirst Schedule\n\n| *Number of Act* | *Title of Act* | *Extent of Repeal* |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 3665 | **Crown Remedies and Liability Act 1928** | So much as is not already repealed |\n| 5874 | **Crown Proceedings Act 1955** | The whole |\n\n\nSection 4.\n\nSch. 2 amended by No. 33/2018 s. 89\n\nSecond Schedule\n\nThis is to certify to the Attorney-General that at the this day holden at the several persons whose names and places of abode or business are specified in the schedule below were fined the several sums set opposite to their respective names in the said schedule and the cause of such fine is duly and truly set forth in the same schedule.\n\nTHE SCHEDULE\n\n- *Proper Full Name* *Place of Abode\nor Business* *Cause of Fine* *Amount*\n- $ c\n- Behaving and conducting himself in a disorderly manner in court\n- Total . . . . . . $\n\n\nDate:\n\nSigned:\n\nJudge.\n\nThird Schedule\n\nSection 4.\n\nSch. 3 amended by Nos 9019 s. 2(1)(Sch. item 49), 57/1989 s. 3 (Sch. item 48.31), 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.12).\n\nVictoria (to wit) Be it remembered That F.W.E. Attorney-General for and on behalf of the King gives the court here to understand and be informed that at the County Court holden at on the day of before J.G.F.  \na fine of dollars was imposed and inflicted upon A.B. for that he the said A.B. [behaved and conducted himself in a disorderly manner in the said court *or as the case may be*] as by the certificate of the said J.G.F. now filed\n\nof record appears. Therefore on the day of it is considered by the court here that the King do recover against the said A.B. the said sum of and also the sum of $10[[3]](#endnote-4) for costs making together the sum of\n\nSch. 4 repealed by No. 9008 s. 2(1)(Sch. item 3(c)).\n\n* * * * *\n\nSchs 5, 6 substituted by No. 7900 s. 5, repealed by No. 9008 s. 2(1)(Sch. item 3(c)).\n\n* * * * *\n\nSection 7.\n\nSch. 7 amended by No. 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.13).\n\nSeventh Schedule\n\nIn the Supreme Court.\n\nThe King *against* A.B. of etc. and C.D. of etc.\n\nLet a writ of Capias ad Respondendum issue in this suit to hold to bail  \nfor dollars with an indorsement thereon [*not*] to arrest the above-named A.B. [*or as the case may be*].\n\nDated this day of 19 .\n\nF.W.E.\n\nAttorney-General.\n\nSection 10.\n\nSch. 8 amended by No. 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.14).\n\nEighth Schedule\n\nIn the Supreme Court.\n\nThe day of in the year of our Lord Victoria  \n(to wit) F.W.E. Attorney-General for and on behalf of the King sues E.F.  \nand G.H. who have been arrested to answer the King by a writ issued on  \nthe day of\n\nAnd also for etc. [*proceed as usual with the second and subsequent paragraphs* *if any*] And the King claims dollars  \n[*or if the suit is to recover specific goods*] a return of the said goods or their value and dollars for their detention.\n\nSection 16.\n\nSch. 9 amended by No. 25/2023 s. 7(Sch. 1 item 9.15).\n\nNinth Schedule[[4]](#endnote-5)\n\nNo.\n\nTo the Sheriff:\n\nGreeting We command you that you take C.D. if he shall be found in  \nand him safely keep so that you may have his body before our Supreme Court at Melbourne immediately after the execution hereof to satisfy us dollars which lately in our said court we recovered against the said C.D. whereof the said C.D. is convicted together with the sum of for interest upon the said sum at the rate of $16 for every $200 by the year until this day. And we do further command you that of the real and personal estate of the said C.D. in you cause to be made the said sums and have the same before our said court immediately after the execution hereof to be rendered to us and in what you shall have executed this writ make appear to our said court immediately after the execution hereof and have there then this writ. Witness G.H. at\n\nMelbourne this day of in the year of Our Lord One thousand nine hundred and\n\n[*To be indorsed*.]\n\nLevy [the whole *or* $ ] beside sheriff's poundage officer's fees and other incidental expenses.\n\nWhen the full amount is levied the defendant may be discharged without further authority but if the full amount is not levied the defendant can only be discharged by the court or the judge or by the written authority of the Attorney-General.\n\nThe defendant is a and resides at\n\n\n\nEndnotes\n\n1 General information\n\nSee [www.legislation.vic.gov.au](http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au) for Victorian Bills, Acts and current Versions of legislation and up-to-date legislative information.\n\nThe **Crown Proceedings Act 1958** was assented to on 30 September 1958 and came into operation on 1 April 1959: Government Gazette 18 March 1959 page 892.\n\nINTERPRETATION OF LEGISLATION ACT 1984 (ILA)\n\nStyle changes\n\nSection 54A of the ILA authorises the making of the style changes set out in Schedule 1 to that Act.\n\nReferences to ILA s. 39B\n\nSidenotes which cite ILA s. 39B refer to section 39B of the ILA which provides that where an undivided section or clause of a Schedule is amended by the insertion of one or more subsections or subclauses, the original section or clause becomes subsection or subclause (1) and is amended by the insertion of the expression \"(1)\" at the beginning of the original section or clause.\n\nInterpretation\n\nAs from 1 January 2001, amendments to section 36 of the ILA have the following effects:\n\n• Headings\n\nAll headings included in an Act which is passed on or after 1 January 2001 form part of that Act. Any heading inserted in an Act which was passed before 1 January 2001, by an Act passed on or after 1 January 2001, forms part of that Act. This includes headings to Parts, Divisions or Subdivisions in a Schedule; sections; clauses; items; tables; columns; examples; diagrams; notes or forms. See section 36(1A)(2A).\n\n• Examples, diagrams or notes\n\nAll examples, diagrams or notes included in an Act which is passed on or after 1 January 2001 form part of that Act. Any examples, diagrams or notes inserted in an Act which was passed before 1 January 2001, by an Act passed on or after 1 January 2001, form part of that Act. See section 36(3A).\n\n• Punctuation\n\nAll punctuation included in an Act which is passed on or after 1 January 2001 forms part of that Act. Any punctuation inserted in an Act which was passed before 1 January 2001, by an Act passed on or after 1 January 2001, forms part of that Act. See section 36(3B).\n\n• Provision numbers\n\nAll provision numbers included in an Act form part of that Act, whether inserted in the Act before, on or after 1 January 2001. Provision numbers include section numbers, subsection numbers, paragraphs and subparagraphs. See section 36(3C).\n\n• Location of \"legislative items\"\n\nA \"legislative item\" is a penalty, an example or a note. As from 13 October 2004, a legislative item relating to a provision of an Act is taken to be at the foot of that provision even if it is preceded or followed by another legislative item that relates to that provision. For example, if a penalty at the foot of a provision is followed by a note, both of these legislative items will be regarded as being at the foot of that provision. See section 36B.\n\n• Other material\n\nAny explanatory memorandum, table of provisions, endnotes, index and other material printed after the Endnotes does not form part of an Act.  \nSee section 36(3)(3D)(3E).\n\n2 Table of Amendments\n\nThis publication incorporates amendments made to the **Crown Proceedings Act 1958** by Acts and subordinate instruments.\n\n–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––\n\n**Crown Proceedings (Forfeited Recognisances) Act 1969, No. 7900/1969**\n\n| Assent Date: | 9.12.69 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | 1.9.70: Government Gazette 26.8.70 p. 2913 |\n| Current State: | All of Act in operation |\n\n\n**Crown Proceedings (Forfeited Recognisances) Act 1971, No. 8124/1971**\n\n| Assent Date: | 4.5.71 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | 1.6.72: Government Gazette 22.3.72 p. 772 |\n| Current State: | All of Act in operation |\n\n\n**Magistrates (Summary Proceedings) Act 1975, No. 8731/1975**\n\n| Assent Date: | 16.5.75 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | S. 173 on 1.7.76: Government Gazette 24.3.76 p. 848 |\n| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Crown Proceedings Act 1958** |\n\n\n**Bail Act 1977, No. 9008/1977**\n\n| Assent Date: | 10.5.77 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | 1.9.77: Government Gazette 17.8.77 p. 2654 |\n| Current State: | All of Act in operation |\n\n\n**Statute Law Revision Act 1977, No. 9019/1977**\n\n| Assent Date: | 17.5.77 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | 17.5.77: subject to s. 2(2) |\n| Current State: | All of Act in operation |\n\n\n**Bail (Amendment) Act 1978, No. 9158/1978**\n\n| Assent Date: | 30.5.78 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | 1.10.78: Government Gazette 6.9.78 p. 2869 |\n| Current State: | All of Act in operation |\n\n\n**Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1982, No. 9848/1982**\n\n| Assent Date: | 21.12.82 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | Ss 1–8, 17 on 12.1.83: Government Gazette 12.1.83 p. 80; rest of Act on 1.6.83: Government Gazette 11.5.83 p. 1146 |\n| Current State: | All of Act in operation |\n\n\n**Courts Amendment Act 1986, No. 16/1986**\n\n| Assent Date: | 22.4.86 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | Ss 1–11, 13–27, 29–34 on 1.7.86: Government Gazette 25.6.86 p. 2180; s. 28 on 1.9.86: Government Gazette 27.8.86 p. 3201; s. 12 on 1.1.88: Government Gazette 7.10.87 p. 2701 |\n| Current State: | All of Act in operation |\n\n\n**County Court (Amendment) Act 1989, No. 19/1989**\n\n| Assent Date: | 16.5.89 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | 1.8.89: Government Gazette 26.7.89 p. 1858 |\n| Current State: | All of Act in operation |\n\n\n**Magistrates' Court (Consequential Amendments) Act 1989, No. 57/1989** (as amended by No. 34/1990)\n\n| Assent Date: | 14.6.89 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | S. 4(1)(a)–(e)(2) on 1.9.89: Government Gazette 30.8.89 p. 2210; rest of Act on 1.9.90: Government Gazette 25.7.90 p. 2217 |\n| Current State: | All of Act in operation |\n\n\n**Legal Practice Act 1996, No. 35/1996**\n\n| Assent Date: | 6.11.96 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | S. 453(Sch. 1 item 20) on 1.1.97: s. 2(3) |\n| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Crown Proceedings Act 1958** |\n\n\n**Statute Law Revision Act 2000, No. 74/2000**\n\n| Assent Date: | 21.11.00 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | S. 3(Sch. 1 item 32) on 22.11.00: s. 2(1) |\n| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Crown Proceedings Act 1958** |\n\n\n**Legal Profession (Consequential Amendments) Act 2005, No. 18/2005**\n\n| Assent Date: | 24.5.05 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | S. 18(Sch. 1 item 31) on 12.12.05: Government Gazette 1.12.05 p. 2781 |\n| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Crown Proceedings Act 1958** |\n\n\n**Criminal Procedure Amendment (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2009, No. 68/2009**\n\n| Assent Date: | 24.11.09 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | S. 97(Sch. item 42) on 1.1.10: Government Gazette 10.12.09 p. 3215 |\n| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Crown Proceedings Act 1958** |\n\n\n**Bail Amendment Act 2010, No. 70/2010**\n\n| Assent Date: | 19.10.10 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | S. 37 on 1.1.11: s. 2(2) |\n| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Crown Proceedings Act 1958** |\n\n\n**Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014, No. 17/2014**\n\n| *Assent Date:* | 25.3.14 |\n| --- | --- |\n| *Commencement Date:* | S. 160(Sch. 2 item 31) on 1.7.15: Special Gazette (No. 151) 16.6.15 p. 1 |\n| *Current State:* | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Crown Proceedings Act 1958** |\n\n\n**Victoria Police Amendment (Consequential and Other Matters) Act 2014, No. 37/2014**\n\n| Assent Date: | 3.6.14 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | S. 10(Sch. item 43) on 1.7.14: Special Gazette (No. 200) 24.6.14 p. 2 |\n| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Crown Proceedings Act 1958** |\n\n\n**Police and Justice Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous) Act 2016, No. 54/2016**\n\n| *Assent Date:* | 18.10.16 |\n| --- | --- |\n| *Commencement Date:* | S. 3 on 1.12.16: Special Gazette (No. 368) 29.11.16 p. 1 |\n| *Current State:* | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Crown Proceedings Act 1958** |\n\n\n**Justice Legislation Amendment (Family Violence Protection and Other Matters) Act 2018, No. 33/2018**\n\n| *Assent Date:* | 14.8.18 |\n| --- | --- |\n| *Commencement Date:* | Ss 88, 89 on 31.7.19: Special Gazette (No. 306) 30.7.19 p. 1 |\n| *Current State:* | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Crown Proceedings Act 1958** |\n\n\n**Statute Law Amendment (References to the Sovereign) Act 2023, No. 25/2023**\n\n| *Assent Date:* | 5.9.23 |\n| --- | --- |\n| *Commencement Date:* | S. 7(Sch. 1 item 9) on 6.9.23: s. 2 |\n| *Current State:* | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Crown Proceedings Act 1958** |\n\n\n**Bail Amendment Act 2023, No. 28/2023**\n\n| *Assent Date:* | 24.10.23 |\n| --- | --- |\n| *Commencement Date:* | S. 64 on 25.3.24: s. 2(2) |\n| *Current State:* | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Crown Proceedings Act 1958** |\n\n\n–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––\n\n3 Explanatory details\n\n1. S. 4: Refer to section 5 to the **Decimal Currency Act 1965**, No. 7315/1965 (*repealed*). [↑](#endnote-ref-2)\n\n2. S. 5(6)–5(9):\n\n  S. 5(6)(7) repealed by No. 9008 s. 2(1)(Sch. item 3(a)(iv)).\n\n  S. 5(7A) inserted by No. 8124 s. 4(4), repealed by No. 9008 s. 2(1)(Sch. item 3(a)(iv)).\n\n  S. 5(8)(9) repealed by No. 9008 s. 2(1)(Sch. item 3(a)(iv)). [↑](#endnote-ref-3)\n\n3. Sch. 3: See note 1. [↑](#endnote-ref-4)\n\n4. Sch. 9: See note 1. [↑](#endnote-ref-5)","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"kimi_summary":{"_metrics":{"source":"grok-batch-everything"},"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The legislation has not grown significantly beyond its original 1958 consolidating purpose of regulating Crown debt recovery (Part I) and civil liability/ proceedings (Part II). Amendments have modernised procedural details (e.g. integration with contemporary bail and court rules) and updated terminology but remain anchored to the core framework of equalising Crown and subject positions in civil matters."},"complexity_factors":["Highly detailed procedural rules in ss.5 and 6 with 13+ subsections each, including notice requirements, 28-day time limits, ex parte stay applications, and cross-links to the Magistrates' Court Act 1989 and Bail Act 1977","Retention of archaic language, writ forms (e.g. capias ad respondendum in s.7) and prescribed schedules (Second to Ninth Schedules) alongside modern amendments","Frequent cross-references to external legislation including Bail Act 1977 (bail guarantor definitions), Victoria Police Act 2013 (police officer definitions), and Magistrates' Court Act 1989 (warrant execution)","Layered exceptions and modifications, such as judicial immunity in s.23(2), limits on execution against the Crown in s.26, and savings provisions in s.2 preserving pre-1958 matters","Cumulative amendments (over 20 listed in the Table of Amendments) that insert new definitions (s.2A) and alter forms without fully consolidating the text"],"plain_english_summary":"**The Crown Proceedings Act 1958** is a Victorian law that explains how the state government (called 'the Crown') can collect money or property owed to it, and how ordinary people or businesses can sue the government (or be sued by it) in civil cases. \n\nIt is split into two parts: Part I gives the government special but structured ways to recover debts, fines, forfeited bail amounts, and land or goods. For example, it sets out step-by-step rules for turning unpaid court fines into formal judgments (s.4), handling people who break promises to appear in court (recognisances under s.5 and bail under s.6), and using old-style court writs to start cases. Part II makes the government legally responsible for contracts it signs and for harm caused by its employees (torts), much like a normal person or company would be, while protecting it from being sued for certain judicial decisions or actions by independent public corporations (s.23). \n\nThe law matters because it balances the government's need to efficiently collect what is owed (like unpaid fines) with fair court processes for citizens, including rights to appeal, pay by instalments, or challenge orders if they seem unfair. It ensures government and citizens are mostly on equal footing in civil lawsuits, with the state paying judgments from public funds rather than facing forced asset seizures."},"summary":{"complexity_score":5,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The Act appears to have maintained its original purpose of waiving Crown immunity and providing a framework for civil proceedings against the Victorian government. The consolidated version history suggests amendments over time, but the core scope — enabling litigation against the Crown — remains consistent with its original intent. No significant scope expansion or contraction is evident from the available information."},"complexity_factors":["Involves constitutional and historical legal concepts (Crown immunity) that require background knowledge to fully understand","Intersects with multiple areas of law — contract, tort, property, and procedural law","Distinctions between different Crown entities and which are covered can be technical","Procedural requirements for suing the Crown differ from standard civil litigation","The provided text is heavily truncated/formatted metadata only, limiting full analysis of substantive provisions","Age of the Act (1958) means interpretation may rely on case law accumulated over decades"],"plain_english_summary":"## Crown Proceedings Act 1958 (Victoria)\n\n**What is this law?**\nThis is a Victorian law that allows ordinary people and businesses to **sue the government** (referred to as \"the Crown\") in court — something that historically was not possible under old English legal traditions where the monarch could not be sued.\n\n**Who does it affect?**\n- **Anyone who has been wronged by the Victorian government** or its agencies (e.g. injured by a government employee's negligence, affected by a breach of contract with a government department)\n- **Government departments and agencies** in Victoria\n- **Businesses** dealing with the state government\n\n**Why does it matter?**\nBefore laws like this existed, the government had near-complete legal immunity — you simply could not take the Crown to court. This Act levels the playing field by:\n- Allowing people to **sue the State of Victoria** in largely the same way they could sue a private person or company\n- Covering claims in **contract** (broken agreements), **tort** (civil wrongs like negligence), and **property disputes**\n- Setting out the **procedures** for how such lawsuits must be conducted\n\n**Key practical impact:** If a government vehicle hits your car, a government contractor breaches a deal, or a public servant's negligence causes you harm, this Act gives you a legal pathway to seek compensation from the State."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":5,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The Act’s core scope — consolidating rules for recovery of Crown property and for civil proceedings by and against the Crown — remains as stated in the long title and Part I/II structure. Subsequent amendments updated definitions, procedures, forms and cross‑statutory references (e.g. adding the bail guarantor definition (s 2A), adapting Magistrates' Court provisions (ss 5(11), 6(12))), but these are procedural and definitional changes rather than a change to the Act’s primary subject‑matter. Part II remains limited to causes of action arising after 1 January 1956 as originally framed (s 20), and earlier Crown proceedings statutes were repealed and absorbed (First Schedule)."},"complexity_factors":["Cross‑references to other statutes and court practice (e.g. Magistrates' Court Act) requiring harmonisation of procedures (ss 5(11), 6(12), s 11).","Multiple procedural timelines and notice requirements (28‑day windows for rescission or variation; ss 5(2A)–(3), 6(3)–(4)).","Use of prescribed forms and many Schedules that determine practical steps and document content (Schedules; ss 4, 10, 16).","Gatekeeping and discretionary points held by officials (Attorney‑General fiat for certain writs (s 7); Governor’s power to make regulations (s 5(3)(e), s 6(8)); courts’ discretion to vary orders (ss 5(3)(a), 6(4))).","Different remedy regimes depending on whether the Crown is plaintiff or defendant (execution against debtors and seizure rules vs. payment from Consolidated Fund on certificate (s 26)).","Specialized terms and roles (recognisance, bail guarantor, surety) introduce technical legal concepts that affect remedies (s 2A; ss 5–6)."],"plain_english_summary":"# What this law does (mechanics first)\n\n- It sets out how the Crown (the State of Victoria) can recover money, land or goods owed to it and the procedural rules for civil proceedings by and against the Crown. (Short title and division; Parts I and II.)\n\n- Recovery by the Crown: debts, fines, forfeited recognisances and breaches of bail are recovered by court processes very similar to ordinary civil actions between private parties. The Act prescribes particular writs, forms and steps for starting a Crown suit and for execution of judgments (ss 3–18; Schedules).\n  - Where a fine is imposed not by a conviction, the judge or magistrate certifies the fine and a law officer causes judgment to be entered for the fine plus costs (s 4; Third Schedule).\n  - If a recognisance or bail is forfeited, the court may order payment to the court officer and, in default, permit seizure and sale of a surety’s (or guarantor’s) property or imprisonment for a fixed term (up to two years) (s 5(1); s 6(1)).\n  - The court must give written orders in prescribed forms and, when forfeiture orders are made in a guarantor’s absence, notify absent principals/guarantors and allow a 28‑day period in which they may apply to vary or rescind the order (ss 5(2), 5(2A)–(3); ss 6(2)–(4)).\n  - Warrants under these sections are executed by police or sheriffs according to their tenor and relevant Magistrates’ Court provisions are applied with necessary modifications (ss 5(9A)–(11); 6(9)–(12)).\n\n- Proceedings by and against the Crown (Part II):\n  - Where causes of action arose after 1 January 1956, civil proceedings by or against the Crown proceed in the court that would have jurisdiction between private parties, and under the title “State of Victoria” (ss 20–22).\n  - The Crown is liable on contracts entered on its behalf and for torts of its servants, agents or independent contractors as nearly as possible in the same way as a private person (s 23(1)). The Act also lists statutory exceptions (s 23(2)–(3)).\n  - If judgment is obtained against the Crown, execution or attachment will not issue against Crown property; instead the court issues a certificate and the Governor causes payment out of the Consolidated Fund (s 26).\n\n- Administrative and procedural points: the Attorney‑General must sign fiats before certain writs issue and must be satisfied the indorsement is reasonable (s 7). Various prescribed forms, schedules and cross‑references to other court rules govern how steps are implemented (Schedules; ss 5(3)(e), 6(8)).\n\n# Who this affects and who pays\n\n- Who pays when the Crown sues: the person owing money, the bail guarantor or surety whose recognisance or undertaking is forfeited, or a defendant ordered to pay by judgment (ss 3, 5, 6, 16).\n\n- Who pays when the Crown is defendant: payments ordered against the Crown are to be met from the Consolidated Fund on certificate from the court (s 26(1)–(2)).\n\n- Who decides key steps: courts declare forfeiture and make recovery orders; judges and magistrates sign prescribed orders and warrants (ss 4–6); the Attorney‑General authorises the issue of certain writs and must be satisfied as to their indorsement (s 7); the Governor causes payment from public funds after court certificate (s 26).\n\n# Why the Act exists (official purpose claim), and a practical test of that claim\n\n- Official purpose claim: the Act was enacted to consolidate the law on protection and recovery of Crown property and civil proceedings by and against the Crown (Long title; s 1 divisioning). That is, it seeks to put Crown recovery and Crown litigation on a stable statutory footing and to align Crown procedure with ordinary civil practice where appropriate.\n\n- How that purpose plays out in practice (costs, incentives, trade‑offs, risks):\n  - Costs and who bears them: individual debtors, bail guarantors and sureties bear direct enforcement costs, including risks of seizure, sale of assets, and imprisonment up to two years if orders are not complied with (ss 5(1), 6(1)). Where the State is ordered to pay, the cost is borne by the public purse (Consolidated Fund) after judicial certificate (s 26).\n  - Incentives and behaviour: the availability of seizure, sale and imprisonment for forfeited recognisances or bail creates enforcement pressure on guarantors and principals to comply with court orders (ss 5, 6). Requiring the Attorney‑General to sign fiats before certain writs and limiting execution against the Crown (s 7; s 26) channel enforcement through public officials rather than private remedies.\n  - Compliance burden and timing rules: many actions require prescribed forms, written notices, and strict timing (for example 28‑day windows for applications to rescind or vary forfeiture orders; ss 5(2A)–(3), 6(3)–(4)). Parties must serve copies on informants or, in indictable cases, the Director of Public Prosecutions (s 5(3)(c); s 6(6)).\n  - Bureaucratic discretion and decision points: the Attorney‑General has a gatekeeping role before writs issue (s 7); the Governor may make regulations prescribing forms (s 5(3)(e); s 6(8)); courts have discretion to vary or rescind forfeiture orders on grounds of injustice (ss 5(3)(a), 6(4)). These create institutional points where policy or administrative judgment affects outcomes.\n  - Implementation risk and interlocking rules: the Act cross‑references other legislation and court practice (for example the Magistrates' Court Act provisions as adapted by ss 5(11), 6(12)), so operational consistency depends on coordination between statutes and court rules.\n  - Effects on private contracting and enterprise: the Crown is treated like a private contracting party for most contracts and torts (s 23(1)), which preserves private parties’ ability to sue the State; however statutory carve‑outs (s 23(3)) mean some public corporations or their liabilities remain governed by other statutes.\n\n# Concrete trade‑offs and distributional points\n\n- Concentrated benefits: the Crown (and officials enforcing Crown debts) gain procedural tools to recover money and property (ss 3, 7, 16). Assignment of bail bonds to the Crown (s 8) centralises enforcement options.\n\n- Diffuse costs: individuals who act as bail guarantors, sureties or who owe small fines may face seizure, sale of assets or imprisonment if orders are not paid; the procedural formality and notice requirements create administrative compliance costs for those individuals (ss 4–6).\n\n- Opportunity costs: when the Crown is a defendant, claimants cannot levy execution against Crown property; instead they rely on public appropriation (s 26). That changes the creditor’s remedies compared with private litigation and shifts the fiscal impact onto the Consolidated Fund.\n\n# Implementation details to note\n\n- Prescribed forms and schedules are integral to how the Act operates (Second to Ninth Schedules; see ss 4, 10, 16, and schedules).\n- The Act incorporates and adapts existing court practice so Crown suits proceed “as nearly as may be” like subject‑to‑subject proceedings (s 11; s 22(2)).\n- Part II applies only to causes of action arising after a specified date (s 20), and the First Schedule repeals earlier Crown proceedings statutes, signalling that this Act was intended as the primary code on these topics (First Schedule).\n\nOverall, the law establishes detailed, court‑based recovery procedures for Crown debts and aligns many Crown litigation rules with ordinary civil procedure while preserving specific public‑law features (Attorney‑General fiat, payment from Consolidated Fund, statutory exceptions). (See especially Parts I and II; ss 3–7, 11, 22–26.)"}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/crown-proceedings-act-1958","history":"/api/acts/crown-proceedings-act-1958/history","analysis":"/api/acts/crown-proceedings-act-1958/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/crown-proceedings-act-1958/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/crown-proceedings-act-1958/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/crown-proceedings-act-1958/documents"}}