{"id":"qld:sl-2015-0080","name":"Crime and Corruption Regulation 2015","slug":"crime-and-corruption-regulation-2015","collection":"regulation","jurisdiction":"qld","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":"80 of 2015","makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":175216,"registerId":"qld-qld:sl-2015-0080-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-05","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"pt.1","sectionType":"part","heading":"Preliminary","content":"# Preliminary","sortOrder":0},{"sectionNumber":"sec.1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Short title","content":"### sec.1 Short title\n\nThis regulation may be cited as the Crime and Corruption Regulation 2015 .","sortOrder":1},{"sectionNumber":"sec.2","sectionType":"section","heading":"Commencement","content":"### sec.2 Commencement\n\nThis regulation commences on 1 September 2015.","sortOrder":2},{"sectionNumber":"pt.2","sectionType":"part","heading":"Search warrants, surveillance warrants and covert search warrants","content":"# Search warrants, surveillance warrants and covert search warrants","sortOrder":3},{"sectionNumber":"sec.3","sectionType":"section","heading":"Information for search warrant application","content":"### sec.3 Information for search warrant application\n\nFor section 86 (4) (c) of the Act , the information about any search warrants issued within the previous year that must be included in a search warrant application is as follows—\nwhen and where the warrant was issued, and the court that issued it;\nthe type of major crime or corruption or the confiscation related activity or the qualifying offence or suspected qualifying offence for which the warrant was issued;\nwhether any evidence was seized under the warrant;\nwhether a proceeding was started because of a search under the search warrant.\n- (a) when and where the warrant was issued, and the court that issued it;\n- (b) the type of major crime or corruption or the confiscation related activity or the qualifying offence or suspected qualifying offence for which the warrant was issued;\n- (c) whether any evidence was seized under the warrant;\n- (d) whether a proceeding was started because of a search under the search warrant.","sortOrder":4},{"sectionNumber":"sec.4","sectionType":"section","heading":"Information for surveillance warrant application","content":"### sec.4 Information for surveillance warrant application\n\nFor section 121 (4) (c) of the Act , the information about any warrants issued within the previous year that must be included in a surveillance warrant application is as follows—\nthe type of warrant;\nwhen and where the warrant was issued, and the court that issued it;\nhow long the warrant was in force;\nwhether the warrant related to a person or a place;\nthe type of major crime or corruption or the confiscation related activity or the qualifying offence or suspected qualifying offence for which the warrant was issued;\nif the warrant was a search warrant or a covert search warrant—\nany evidence seized under the warrant; and\nwhether a proceeding was started because of a search under the warrant; and\nhow the search helped in any investigation;\nif the warrant was a surveillance warrant—\nwhether a proceeding was started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant; and\nhow any surveillance under the warrant helped in any investigation.\n- (a) the type of warrant;\n- (b) when and where the warrant was issued, and the court that issued it;\n- (c) how long the warrant was in force;\n- (d) whether the warrant related to a person or a place;\n- (e) the type of major crime or corruption or the confiscation related activity or the qualifying offence or suspected qualifying offence for which the warrant was issued;\n- (f) if the warrant was a search warrant or a covert search warrant— (i) any evidence seized under the warrant; and (ii) whether a proceeding was started because of a search under the warrant; and (iii) how the search helped in any investigation;\n- (i) any evidence seized under the warrant; and\n- (ii) whether a proceeding was started because of a search under the warrant; and\n- (iii) how the search helped in any investigation;\n- (g) if the warrant was a surveillance warrant— (i) whether a proceeding was started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant; and (ii) how any surveillance under the warrant helped in any investigation.\n- (i) whether a proceeding was started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant; and\n- (ii) how any surveillance under the warrant helped in any investigation.\n- (i) any evidence seized under the warrant; and\n- (ii) whether a proceeding was started because of a search under the warrant; and\n- (iii) how the search helped in any investigation;\n- (i) whether a proceeding was started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant; and\n- (ii) how any surveillance under the warrant helped in any investigation.","sortOrder":5},{"sectionNumber":"sec.5","sectionType":"section","heading":"Information for covert search warrant application","content":"### sec.5 Information for covert search warrant application\n\nFor section 148 (3) (d) of the Act , the information about any warrants issued within the previous year that must be included in a covert search warrant application is as follows—\nthe type of warrant;\nwhen and where the warrant was issued, and the court that issued it;\nhow long the warrant was in force;\nwhether the warrant related to a person or a place;\nthe type of major crime or corruption or the confiscation related activity or the qualifying offence or suspected qualifying offence for which the warrant was issued;\nif the warrant was a search warrant or a covert search warrant—\nany evidence seized under the warrant; and\nwhether a proceeding was started because of a search under the warrant; and\nhow the search helped in any investigation;\nif the warrant was a surveillance warrant—\nwhether a proceeding was started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant; and\nhow any surveillance under the warrant helped in any investigation.\n- (a) the type of warrant;\n- (b) when and where the warrant was issued, and the court that issued it;\n- (c) how long the warrant was in force;\n- (d) whether the warrant related to a person or a place;\n- (e) the type of major crime or corruption or the confiscation related activity or the qualifying offence or suspected qualifying offence for which the warrant was issued;\n- (f) if the warrant was a search warrant or a covert search warrant— (i) any evidence seized under the warrant; and (ii) whether a proceeding was started because of a search under the warrant; and (iii) how the search helped in any investigation;\n- (i) any evidence seized under the warrant; and\n- (ii) whether a proceeding was started because of a search under the warrant; and\n- (iii) how the search helped in any investigation;\n- (g) if the warrant was a surveillance warrant— (i) whether a proceeding was started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant; and (ii) how any surveillance under the warrant helped in any investigation.\n- (i) whether a proceeding was started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant; and\n- (ii) how any surveillance under the warrant helped in any investigation.\n- (i) any evidence seized under the warrant; and\n- (ii) whether a proceeding was started because of a search under the warrant; and\n- (iii) how the search helped in any investigation;\n- (i) whether a proceeding was started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant; and\n- (ii) how any surveillance under the warrant helped in any investigation.","sortOrder":6},{"sectionNumber":"sec.6","sectionType":"section","heading":"Report on covert search","content":"### sec.6 Report on covert search\n\nA report under section 156 (1) of the Act on the exercise of the powers under a covert search warrant must state the following—\nthe name of the person who prepared the report and, if the person is a police officer, the officer’s rank and registered number;\nif and when powers were exercised under the warrant;\nthe facts and circumstances of compliance with the warrant and its conditions;\nparticulars of anything seized, photographed, inspected or tested under the warrant;\na description of any order sought in relation to anything seized or photographed under the warrant and the reason for the order.\n- (a) the name of the person who prepared the report and, if the person is a police officer, the officer’s rank and registered number;\n- (b) if and when powers were exercised under the warrant;\n- (c) the facts and circumstances of compliance with the warrant and its conditions;\n- (d) particulars of anything seized, photographed, inspected or tested under the warrant;\n- (e) a description of any order sought in relation to anything seized or photographed under the warrant and the reason for the order.","sortOrder":7},{"sectionNumber":"pt.3","sectionType":"part","heading":"Monitoring orders and suspension orders","content":"# Monitoring orders and suspension orders","sortOrder":8},{"sectionNumber":"sec.7","sectionType":"section","heading":"Information for monitoring order application","content":"### sec.7 Information for monitoring order application\n\nFor section 119C (2) (b) (ii) of the Act , the information about any monitoring orders issued within the previous year that must be included in an application for a monitoring order is as follows—\nwhen and where the order was issued;\nhow long the order was in force;\nthe type of serious crime related activity or serious crime derived property to which the order relates;\nhow the order helped in the investigation or another investigation;\nwhether a proceeding was started because of the use of the order.\nThe application must also state the following information—\nthe applicant’s name and, if the applicant is a police officer, the officer’s rank and registered number;\nthe person about whom the application is made (the named person);\nthe name of the financial institution;\nthe serious crime related activity or serious crime derived property to which the application relates;\nthe information or evidence relied on to support a reasonable suspicion that the named person—\nhas been, or is about to be, involved in a serious crime related activity; or\nhas acquired directly or indirectly, or is about to acquire directly or indirectly, serious crime derived property;\nthe name or names in which each relevant account with the financial institution is believed to be held;\nthe type of information the financial institution is to be required to give.\n(sec.7-ssec.1) For section 119C (2) (b) (ii) of the Act , the information about any monitoring orders issued within the previous year that must be included in an application for a monitoring order is as follows— when and where the order was issued; how long the order was in force; the type of serious crime related activity or serious crime derived property to which the order relates; how the order helped in the investigation or another investigation; whether a proceeding was started because of the use of the order.\n(sec.7-ssec.2) The application must also state the following information— the applicant’s name and, if the applicant is a police officer, the officer’s rank and registered number; the person about whom the application is made (the named person); the name of the financial institution; the serious crime related activity or serious crime derived property to which the application relates; the information or evidence relied on to support a reasonable suspicion that the named person— has been, or is about to be, involved in a serious crime related activity; or has acquired directly or indirectly, or is about to acquire directly or indirectly, serious crime derived property; the name or names in which each relevant account with the financial institution is believed to be held; the type of information the financial institution is to be required to give.\n- (a) when and where the order was issued;\n- (b) how long the order was in force;\n- (c) the type of serious crime related activity or serious crime derived property to which the order relates;\n- (d) how the order helped in the investigation or another investigation;\n- (e) whether a proceeding was started because of the use of the order.\n- (a) the applicant’s name and, if the applicant is a police officer, the officer’s rank and registered number;\n- (b) the person about whom the application is made (the named person);\n- (c) the name of the financial institution;\n- (d) the serious crime related activity or serious crime derived property to which the application relates;\n- (e) the information or evidence relied on to support a reasonable suspicion that the named person— (i) has been, or is about to be, involved in a serious crime related activity; or (ii) has acquired directly or indirectly, or is about to acquire directly or indirectly, serious crime derived property;\n- (i) has been, or is about to be, involved in a serious crime related activity; or\n- (ii) has acquired directly or indirectly, or is about to acquire directly or indirectly, serious crime derived property;\n- (f) the name or names in which each relevant account with the financial institution is believed to be held;\n- (g) the type of information the financial institution is to be required to give.\n- (i) has been, or is about to be, involved in a serious crime related activity; or\n- (ii) has acquired directly or indirectly, or is about to acquire directly or indirectly, serious crime derived property;","sortOrder":9},{"sectionNumber":"sec.8","sectionType":"section","heading":"Information for suspension order application","content":"### sec.8 Information for suspension order application\n\nFor section 119I (2) (b) (ii) of the Act , the information about any suspension orders issued within the previous year that must be included in an application for a suspension order is as follows—\nwhen and where the order was issued;\nhow long the order was in force;\nthe type of serious crime related activity or serious crime derived property to which the order relates;\nhow the order helped in the investigation or another investigation;\nwhether a proceeding was started because of the use of the order.\nThe application must also state the following information—\nthe applicant’s name and, if the applicant is a police officer, the officer’s rank and registered number;\nthe person about whom the application is made (the named person);\nthe name of the financial institution;\nthe serious crime related activity or serious crime derived property to which the application relates;\nthe information or evidence relied on to support a reasonable suspicion that the named person—\nhas been, or is about to be, involved in a serious crime related activity; or\nhas acquired directly or indirectly, or is about to acquire directly or indirectly, serious crime derived property;\nthe name or names in which each relevant account with the financial institution is believed to be held;\nthe type of information the financial institution is to be required to give.\n(sec.8-ssec.1) For section 119I (2) (b) (ii) of the Act , the information about any suspension orders issued within the previous year that must be included in an application for a suspension order is as follows— when and where the order was issued; how long the order was in force; the type of serious crime related activity or serious crime derived property to which the order relates; how the order helped in the investigation or another investigation; whether a proceeding was started because of the use of the order.\n(sec.8-ssec.2) The application must also state the following information— the applicant’s name and, if the applicant is a police officer, the officer’s rank and registered number; the person about whom the application is made (the named person); the name of the financial institution; the serious crime related activity or serious crime derived property to which the application relates; the information or evidence relied on to support a reasonable suspicion that the named person— has been, or is about to be, involved in a serious crime related activity; or has acquired directly or indirectly, or is about to acquire directly or indirectly, serious crime derived property; the name or names in which each relevant account with the financial institution is believed to be held; the type of information the financial institution is to be required to give.\n- (a) when and where the order was issued;\n- (b) how long the order was in force;\n- (c) the type of serious crime related activity or serious crime derived property to which the order relates;\n- (d) how the order helped in the investigation or another investigation;\n- (e) whether a proceeding was started because of the use of the order.\n- (a) the applicant’s name and, if the applicant is a police officer, the officer’s rank and registered number;\n- (b) the person about whom the application is made (the named person);\n- (c) the name of the financial institution;\n- (d) the serious crime related activity or serious crime derived property to which the application relates;\n- (e) the information or evidence relied on to support a reasonable suspicion that the named person— (i) has been, or is about to be, involved in a serious crime related activity; or (ii) has acquired directly or indirectly, or is about to acquire directly or indirectly, serious crime derived property;\n- (i) has been, or is about to be, involved in a serious crime related activity; or\n- (ii) has acquired directly or indirectly, or is about to acquire directly or indirectly, serious crime derived property;\n- (f) the name or names in which each relevant account with the financial institution is believed to be held;\n- (g) the type of information the financial institution is to be required to give.\n- (i) has been, or is about to be, involved in a serious crime related activity; or\n- (ii) has acquired directly or indirectly, or is about to acquire directly or indirectly, serious crime derived property;","sortOrder":10},{"sectionNumber":"pt.4","sectionType":"part","heading":"Register of prescribed information","content":"# Register of prescribed information","sortOrder":11},{"sectionNumber":"sec.9","sectionType":"section","heading":"Information prescribed","content":"### sec.9 Information prescribed\n\nThis part prescribes information for section 166 (6) of the Act .","sortOrder":12},{"sectionNumber":"sec.10","sectionType":"section","heading":"Search warrant application","content":"### sec.10 Search warrant application\n\nFor an application for a search warrant, the information is as follows—\nwhen and where the application was made;\nif known, the name of the person suspected of being involved in the major crime or corruption or the confiscation related activity or the qualifying offence or suspected qualifying offence to which the application relates;\nthe type of major crime or corruption or the confiscation related activity or the qualifying offence or suspected qualifying offence to which the application relates;\nwhether or not the warrant was issued;\nif the warrant was issued—\nwhen and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and\nhow long the warrant was in force; and\nthe benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant; and\nevidence seized under the warrant\na proceeding started because of a search under the warrant\ninformation about the return, destruction or disposal of any evidence seized under the warrant.\n- (a) when and where the application was made;\n- (b) if known, the name of the person suspected of being involved in the major crime or corruption or the confiscation related activity or the qualifying offence or suspected qualifying offence to which the application relates;\n- (c) the type of major crime or corruption or the confiscation related activity or the qualifying offence or suspected qualifying offence to which the application relates;\n- (d) whether or not the warrant was issued;\n- (e) if the warrant was issued— (i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and (ii) how long the warrant was in force; and (iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant; and Examples of benefits derived from exercising powers under a search warrant— • evidence seized under the warrant • a proceeding started because of a search under the warrant (iv) information about the return, destruction or disposal of any evidence seized under the warrant.\n- (i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and\n- (ii) how long the warrant was in force; and\n- (iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant; and Examples of benefits derived from exercising powers under a search warrant— • evidence seized under the warrant • a proceeding started because of a search under the warrant\n- • evidence seized under the warrant\n- • a proceeding started because of a search under the warrant\n- (iv) information about the return, destruction or disposal of any evidence seized under the warrant.\n- (i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and\n- (ii) how long the warrant was in force; and\n- (iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant; and Examples of benefits derived from exercising powers under a search warrant— • evidence seized under the warrant • a proceeding started because of a search under the warrant\n- • evidence seized under the warrant\n- • a proceeding started because of a search under the warrant\n- (iv) information about the return, destruction or disposal of any evidence seized under the warrant.\n- • evidence seized under the warrant\n- • a proceeding started because of a search under the warrant","sortOrder":13},{"sectionNumber":"sec.11","sectionType":"section","heading":"Surveillance warrant application","content":"### sec.11 Surveillance warrant application\n\nFor an application for a surveillance warrant, the information is as follows—\nwhen and where the application was made;\nif known, the name of the person the chairman reasonably believes has been, or is likely to be, involved in corruption being investigated by the commission;\na description of the place mentioned in the application;\nthe type of corruption to which the application relates;\nwhether or not the warrant was issued;\nif the warrant was issued—\nwhen and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and\nhow long the warrant was in force; and\nthe benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant; and\na proceeding started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant\na brief description of how using a surveillance device under the warrant helped in the investigation of the corruption\nif and when powers were exercised under the warrant; and\nif a surveillance device was not installed under the warrant—why it was not installed.\n- (a) when and where the application was made;\n- (b) if known, the name of the person the chairman reasonably believes has been, or is likely to be, involved in corruption being investigated by the commission;\n- (c) a description of the place mentioned in the application;\n- (d) the type of corruption to which the application relates;\n- (e) whether or not the warrant was issued;\n- (f) if the warrant was issued— (i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and (ii) how long the warrant was in force; and (iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant; and Examples of benefits derived from exercising powers under a surveillance warrant— • a proceeding started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant • a brief description of how using a surveillance device under the warrant helped in the investigation of the corruption (iv) if and when powers were exercised under the warrant; and (v) if a surveillance device was not installed under the warrant—why it was not installed.\n- (i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and\n- (ii) how long the warrant was in force; and\n- (iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant; and Examples of benefits derived from exercising powers under a surveillance warrant— • a proceeding started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant • a brief description of how using a surveillance device under the warrant helped in the investigation of the corruption\n- • a proceeding started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant\n- • a brief description of how using a surveillance device under the warrant helped in the investigation of the corruption\n- (iv) if and when powers were exercised under the warrant; and\n- (v) if a surveillance device was not installed under the warrant—why it was not installed.\n- (i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and\n- (ii) how long the warrant was in force; and\n- (iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant; and Examples of benefits derived from exercising powers under a surveillance warrant— • a proceeding started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant • a brief description of how using a surveillance device under the warrant helped in the investigation of the corruption\n- • a proceeding started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant\n- • a brief description of how using a surveillance device under the warrant helped in the investigation of the corruption\n- (iv) if and when powers were exercised under the warrant; and\n- (v) if a surveillance device was not installed under the warrant—why it was not installed.\n- • a proceeding started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant\n- • a brief description of how using a surveillance device under the warrant helped in the investigation of the corruption","sortOrder":14},{"sectionNumber":"sec.12","sectionType":"section","heading":"Extension of surveillance warrant application","content":"### sec.12 Extension of surveillance warrant application\n\nFor an application for an extension of a surveillance warrant, the information is as follows—\nif and when powers were exercised under the warrant before the application;\nif a surveillance device was not installed under the warrant before the application—why it was not installed;\nwhether or not the warrant was extended;\nif the warrant was extended—\nthe date to which the warrant was extended; and\nthe benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant after it was extended.\nSee section 11 (f) (iii) for examples of benefits derived under a surveillance warrant.\n- (a) if and when powers were exercised under the warrant before the application;\n- (b) if a surveillance device was not installed under the warrant before the application—why it was not installed;\n- (c) whether or not the warrant was extended;\n- (d) if the warrant was extended— (i) the date to which the warrant was extended; and (ii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant after it was extended. Note— See section 11 (f) (iii) for examples of benefits derived under a surveillance warrant.\n- (i) the date to which the warrant was extended; and\n- (ii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant after it was extended. Note— See section 11 (f) (iii) for examples of benefits derived under a surveillance warrant.\n- (i) the date to which the warrant was extended; and\n- (ii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant after it was extended. Note— See section 11 (f) (iii) for examples of benefits derived under a surveillance warrant.","sortOrder":15},{"sectionNumber":"sec.13","sectionType":"section","heading":"Covert search warrant application","content":"### sec.13 Covert search warrant application\n\nFor an application for a covert search warrant, the information is as follows—\nwhen and where the application was made;\nif known, the name of the person suspected of being involved in the major crime to which the application relates;\na description of the place mentioned in the application;\nthe type of major crime to which the application relates;\nwhether or not the warrant was issued;\nif the warrant was issued—\nwhen and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and\nhow long the warrant was in force; and\nthe benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant.\nevidence seized under the warrant\na proceeding started because of a search under the warrant\n- (a) when and where the application was made;\n- (b) if known, the name of the person suspected of being involved in the major crime to which the application relates;\n- (c) a description of the place mentioned in the application;\n- (d) the type of major crime to which the application relates;\n- (e) whether or not the warrant was issued;\n- (f) if the warrant was issued— (i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and (ii) how long the warrant was in force; and (iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant. Examples of benefits derived from exercising powers under a covert search warrant— • evidence seized under the warrant • a proceeding started because of a search under the warrant\n- (i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and\n- (ii) how long the warrant was in force; and\n- (iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant. Examples of benefits derived from exercising powers under a covert search warrant— • evidence seized under the warrant • a proceeding started because of a search under the warrant\n- • evidence seized under the warrant\n- • a proceeding started because of a search under the warrant\n- (i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and\n- (ii) how long the warrant was in force; and\n- (iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant. Examples of benefits derived from exercising powers under a covert search warrant— • evidence seized under the warrant • a proceeding started because of a search under the warrant\n- • evidence seized under the warrant\n- • a proceeding started because of a search under the warrant\n- • evidence seized under the warrant\n- • a proceeding started because of a search under the warrant","sortOrder":16},{"sectionNumber":"sec.14","sectionType":"section","heading":"Extension of covert search warrant application","content":"### sec.14 Extension of covert search warrant application\n\nFor an application for an extension of a covert search warrant, the information is as follows—\nif and when powers were exercised under the warrant before the application;\nif the powers under the warrant were not exercised before the application—why the powers were not exercised;\nwhether or not the warrant was extended;\nif the warrant was extended—\nthe date to which the warrant was extended; and\nthe benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant after it was extended.\nSee section 13 (f) (iii) for examples of benefits derived under a covert search warrant.\n- (a) if and when powers were exercised under the warrant before the application;\n- (b) if the powers under the warrant were not exercised before the application—why the powers were not exercised;\n- (c) whether or not the warrant was extended;\n- (d) if the warrant was extended— (i) the date to which the warrant was extended; and (ii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant after it was extended. Note— See section 13 (f) (iii) for examples of benefits derived under a covert search warrant.\n- (i) the date to which the warrant was extended; and\n- (ii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant after it was extended. Note— See section 13 (f) (iii) for examples of benefits derived under a covert search warrant.\n- (i) the date to which the warrant was extended; and\n- (ii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant after it was extended. Note— See section 13 (f) (iii) for examples of benefits derived under a covert search warrant.","sortOrder":17},{"sectionNumber":"sec.15","sectionType":"section","heading":"Additional powers warrant application","content":"### sec.15 Additional powers warrant application\n\nFor an application for an additional powers warrant, the information is as follows—\nwhen and where the application was made;\nif known, the name of the person being investigated and the name of any suspected associate of the person;\na description of the place mentioned in the application;\nthe type of corruption or crime investigation relating to terrorism to which the application relates;\nwhether or not the warrant was issued;\nif the warrant was issued—\nwhen and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and\nhow long the warrant was in force; and\nthe benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant.\nevidence copied or seized under the warrant\na proceeding started because of the exercise of powers under the warrant\n- (a) when and where the application was made;\n- (b) if known, the name of the person being investigated and the name of any suspected associate of the person;\n- (c) a description of the place mentioned in the application;\n- (d) the type of corruption or crime investigation relating to terrorism to which the application relates;\n- (e) whether or not the warrant was issued;\n- (f) if the warrant was issued— (i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and (ii) how long the warrant was in force; and (iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant. Examples of benefits derived from exercising powers under an additional powers warrant— • evidence copied or seized under the warrant • a proceeding started because of the exercise of powers under the warrant\n- (i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and\n- (ii) how long the warrant was in force; and\n- (iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant. Examples of benefits derived from exercising powers under an additional powers warrant— • evidence copied or seized under the warrant • a proceeding started because of the exercise of powers under the warrant\n- • evidence copied or seized under the warrant\n- • a proceeding started because of the exercise of powers under the warrant\n- (i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and\n- (ii) how long the warrant was in force; and\n- (iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant. Examples of benefits derived from exercising powers under an additional powers warrant— • evidence copied or seized under the warrant • a proceeding started because of the exercise of powers under the warrant\n- • evidence copied or seized under the warrant\n- • a proceeding started because of the exercise of powers under the warrant\n- • evidence copied or seized under the warrant\n- • a proceeding started because of the exercise of powers under the warrant","sortOrder":18},{"sectionNumber":"sec.16","sectionType":"section","heading":"Extension of additional powers warrant application","content":"### sec.16 Extension of additional powers warrant application\n\nFor an application for an extension of an additional powers warrant, the information is as follows—\nif the warrant conferred power to make copies of records under section 165 of the Act and no records were copied under the warrant—why no records were copied;\nif the warrant conferred power to seize documents under section 165 of the Act and no documents were seized under the warrant—why no documents were seized;\nif the warrant conferred power to require a person to give to the commission or a commission officer 1 or more sworn affidavits or statutory declarations under section 165 of the Act and no sworn affidavit or statutory declaration was required under the warrant—why they were not required;\nwhether or not the warrant was extended;\nif the warrant was extended—\nthe date to which it was extended; and\nthe benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant after it was extended.\nSee section 15 (f) (iii) for examples of benefits derived under an additional powers warrant.\n- (a) if the warrant conferred power to make copies of records under section 165 of the Act and no records were copied under the warrant—why no records were copied;\n- (b) if the warrant conferred power to seize documents under section 165 of the Act and no documents were seized under the warrant—why no documents were seized;\n- (c) if the warrant conferred power to require a person to give to the commission or a commission officer 1 or more sworn affidavits or statutory declarations under section 165 of the Act and no sworn affidavit or statutory declaration was required under the warrant—why they were not required;\n- (d) whether or not the warrant was extended;\n- (e) if the warrant was extended— (i) the date to which it was extended; and (ii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant after it was extended. Note— See section 15 (f) (iii) for examples of benefits derived under an additional powers warrant.\n- (i) the date to which it was extended; and\n- (ii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant after it was extended. Note— See section 15 (f) (iii) for examples of benefits derived under an additional powers warrant.\n- (i) the date to which it was extended; and\n- (ii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant after it was extended. Note— See section 15 (f) (iii) for examples of benefits derived under an additional powers warrant.","sortOrder":19},{"sectionNumber":"sec.17","sectionType":"section","heading":"Disclosure of information under Act , s 130 (2) (f) (ii) or (g)","content":"### sec.17 Disclosure of information under Act , s 130 (2) (f) (ii) or (g)\n\nFor a disclosure of information under section 130 (2) (f) (ii) or (g) of the Act , the information is as follows—\nthe name of—\nthe commission officer who disclosed the information or authorised its disclosure; and\nthe officer or declared agency to whom the information was disclosed;\nbrief particulars of the information disclosed and the reason for disclosing it;\nwhen the information was disclosed.\n- (a) the name of— (i) the commission officer who disclosed the information or authorised its disclosure; and (ii) the officer or declared agency to whom the information was disclosed;\n- (i) the commission officer who disclosed the information or authorised its disclosure; and\n- (ii) the officer or declared agency to whom the information was disclosed;\n- (b) brief particulars of the information disclosed and the reason for disclosing it;\n- (c) when the information was disclosed.\n- (i) the commission officer who disclosed the information or authorised its disclosure; and\n- (ii) the officer or declared agency to whom the information was disclosed;","sortOrder":20},{"sectionNumber":"pt.5","sectionType":"part","heading":"Miscellaneous","content":"# Miscellaneous","sortOrder":21},{"sectionNumber":"sec.18","sectionType":"section","heading":"Receipt for seized property","content":"### sec.18 Receipt for seized property\n\nFor section 112 (2) of the Act , a receipt for a thing seized must include the following information—\nthe date and time the thing was seized;\nif the thing was seized from a person—the name, address and contact telephone number of the person, if known;\nif the thing was seized from an occupied place—the name, address and contact telephone number of the occupier of the place, if known;\nthe name and contact telephone number of the commission officer who seized the thing and, if the commission officer is a police officer, the officer’s rank;\nwhere the thing will be taken, if known;\nthe date the receipt is issued.\n- (a) the date and time the thing was seized;\n- (b) if the thing was seized from a person—the name, address and contact telephone number of the person, if known;\n- (c) if the thing was seized from an occupied place—the name, address and contact telephone number of the occupier of the place, if known;\n- (d) the name and contact telephone number of the commission officer who seized the thing and, if the commission officer is a police officer, the officer’s rank;\n- (e) where the thing will be taken, if known;\n- (f) the date the receipt is issued.","sortOrder":22},{"sectionNumber":"sec.19","sectionType":"section","heading":"Declared agencies","content":"### sec.19 Declared agencies\n\nFor schedule 2 of the Act , definition declared agency , an entity mentioned in schedule 1 is a declared agency.\nSubsection (1) is subject to any restriction stated in schedule 1 for the entity.\n(sec.19-ssec.1) For schedule 2 of the Act , definition declared agency , an entity mentioned in schedule 1 is a declared agency.\n(sec.19-ssec.2) Subsection (1) is subject to any restriction stated in schedule 1 for the entity.","sortOrder":23},{"sectionNumber":"sec.20","sectionType":"section","heading":"Entities declared to be criminal organisations","content":"### sec.20 Entities declared to be criminal organisations\n\ns 20 om 2016 No. 62 s 58","sortOrder":24},{"sectionNumber":"pt.6","sectionType":"part","heading":"Repeal and transitional provisions","content":"# Repeal and transitional provisions","sortOrder":25},{"sectionNumber":"pt.6-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Repeal provision","content":"## Repeal provision","sortOrder":26},{"sectionNumber":"sec.21","sectionType":"section","heading":"Repeal","content":"### sec.21 Repeal\n\nThe Crime and Corruption Regulation 2005 , SL No. 108 is repealed.","sortOrder":27},{"sectionNumber":"pt.6-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Transitional provisions","content":"## Transitional provisions","sortOrder":28},{"sectionNumber":"sec.22","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definition","content":"### sec.22 Definition\n\nIn this division—\nrepealed regulation means the repealed Crime and Corruption Regulation 2005 .","sortOrder":29},{"sectionNumber":"sec.23","sectionType":"section","heading":"Applications made before commencement","content":"### sec.23 Applications made before commencement\n\nThis section applies to an application—\nfor a warrant or an extension of a warrant for which the repealed regulation made provision; and\nthat was made, but not decided, before the commencement.\nThe repealed regulation continues to apply to the application.\n(sec.23-ssec.1) This section applies to an application— for a warrant or an extension of a warrant for which the repealed regulation made provision; and that was made, but not decided, before the commencement.\n(sec.23-ssec.2) The repealed regulation continues to apply to the application.\n- (a) for a warrant or an extension of a warrant for which the repealed regulation made provision; and\n- (b) that was made, but not decided, before the commencement.","sortOrder":30},{"sectionNumber":"sec.24","sectionType":"section","heading":"References to repealed regulation","content":"### sec.24 References to repealed regulation\n\nIn a document, a reference to the repealed regulation may, if the context permits, be taken to be a reference to this regulation.\nFor references to the repealed regulation in an Act, see the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , section 14H .\nFor references to the repealed regulation in a statutory instrument, see the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , section 14H and the Statutory Instruments Act 1992 , section 14 (1) and schedule 1 .\n- 1 For references to the repealed regulation in an Act, see the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , section 14H .\n- 2 For references to the repealed regulation in a statutory instrument, see the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , section 14H and the Statutory Instruments Act 1992 , section 14 (1) and schedule 1 .","sortOrder":31}],"analysis":{"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":3,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"Section 21 repeals the 2005 Regulation and the instrument replaces it by prescribing detailed information and reporting requirements for warrant and order applications, reports and receipts across Parts 2–5. Transitional provisions (secs 22–24) preserve pending applications under the repealed regulation and allow references to the old regulation to be read as references to this one where context permits."},"complexity_factors":["Procedural and prescriptive text listing required information for many warrant and order types (search, surveillance, covert, monitoring, suspension, additional powers)","Frequent cross‑references to multiple sections of the principal Act for context and legal effect","Repetitive, near‑identical clauses across several provisions increasing reading length but not substantive discretion","Low substantive discretion — mostly specification of documentation and reporting rather than new substantive powers","Includes repeal and transitional provisions (secs 21–24) that require attention to timing and application to pending matters","Affects multiple actors (commission officers, police, courts, financial institutions) creating distributed compliance obligations"],"plain_english_summary":"This Regulation prescribes the precise information and reports required when applying for or extending search, surveillance, covert search, monitoring, suspension and additional‑powers warrants; it also sets required content for covert‑search reports and receipts for seized property, declares certain agencies, repeals the 2005 Regulation and preserves pending applications.\n\nIt affects commission officers, police, courts and financial institutions by imposing specific disclosure and record‑keeping duties. Who pays: agencies and institutions bear administrative and compliance costs; who decides: courts and the commission use the prescribed information to authorise intrusive powers."},"issue_detection":{"absurdities":[],"contradictions":[]},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":4,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The regulation appears to maintain its original scope as a procedural/administrative instrument supporting the Crime and Corruption Act 2001. It has not expanded beyond specifying application requirements, register contents, and administrative procedures for warrants and orders. Section 20 (entities declared to be criminal organisations) was repealed in 2016, actually narrowing the scope slightly."},"complexity_factors":["Heavy cross-referencing to the parent Act (Crime and Corruption Act 2001) – most sections start with 'For section X of the Act'","Repetitive structure with near-identical requirements across multiple warrant types (search, surveillance, covert search, monitoring, suspension, additional powers)","Nested conditional logic (e.g., 'if the warrant was issued—' followed by multiple sub-paragraphs)","Multiple defined terms imported from the Act (major crime, corruption, confiscation related activity, qualifying offence, serious crime related activity, serious crime derived property, declared agency, commission officer)","Duplicative formatting in the source text (bullet points repeated in prose and list form)","Transitional provisions handling the switchover from the 2005 regulation"],"plain_english_summary":"This regulation sets out the administrative details for how Queensland's Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC) applies for and manages various investigative powers under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001.\n\n**What it does:**\nThe regulation is essentially a 'how-to' guide that specifies what information must be included in applications for:\n- **Search warrants** – to enter and search premises\n- **Surveillance warrants** – to use listening devices or cameras\n- **Covert search warrants** – to secretly enter premises without the occupier knowing\n- **Monitoring orders** – to track someone's bank transactions\n- **Suspension orders** – to freeze someone's bank accounts\n- **Additional powers warrants** – special powers for terrorism or corruption investigations\n\nIt also sets out what must be recorded in a central register about these applications, and what details must be given to people when their property is seized.\n\n**Who it affects:**\n- **Police and CCC officers** who must fill out the correct paperwork when applying for warrants\n- **Courts** that issue the warrants (they receive these applications)\n- **People under investigation** whose financial records may be monitored or whose property may be seized\n- **Financial institutions** that must comply with monitoring and suspension orders\n\n**Why it matters:**\nThis ensures powerful investigative tools are used transparently and consistently. By requiring detailed records of previous warrants and their outcomes, it prevents abuse of power and helps courts assess whether new warrants should be granted. It creates an audit trail so oversight bodies can check that surveillance and searches are justified and effective."},"summary":{"complexity_score":5,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The regulation closely mirrors the structure and intent of the Crime and Corruption Regulation 2005 it replaced, updating and modernising the administrative information requirements without materially expanding or contracting the scope of the original regulatory framework. It remains a procedural/administrative instrument subordinate to the Crime and Corruption Act 2001."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple interlocking warrant types (search, surveillance, covert search, additional powers, monitoring, suspension) each with distinct but overlapping information requirements","Heavily cross-referenced — almost every section references specific provisions of the parent Crime and Corruption Act, requiring readers to consult that Act to understand the full legal context","Nested conditional requirements (e.g., 'if the warrant was issued, then if it was a search warrant, then...' structures) create multi-layered reading demands","Specialised legal terminology including 'major crime', 'serious crime related activity', 'serious crime derived property', 'qualifying offence', and 'confiscation related activity' — all defined elsewhere in the parent Act","Transitional provisions add a layer of complexity around applications made before commencement and how references to the old regulation are to be treated","Register requirements (Part 4) largely duplicate the warrant application requirements but serve a different administrative purpose, creating potential for confusion","Omitted section (s.20) and reference to schedule 1 for declared agencies requires readers to locate external materials not reproduced in the regulation"],"plain_english_summary":"The regulation sets out the forms, checklists and record‑keeping rules the Queensland Crime and Corruption Commission and police must use when seeking intrusive investigation powers (searches, covert searches, surveillance, financial monitoring/suspension and related warrants). It doesn’t create new powers but forces investigators to justify requests (including a 12‑month “look‑back”), keep receipts and registers, and thus strengthens internal accountability—affecting CCC officers, police, financial institutions and anyone subject to a CCC probe."},"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"A positive credit balance is required for all requests, including BYOK, so fallback providers remain available. Add credits at https://vercel.com/d?to=%2F%5Bteam%5D%2F%7E%2Fai%3Fmodal%3Dtop-up to continue.","source":"analysis-cron"}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/crime-and-corruption-regulation-2015","history":"/api/acts/crime-and-corruption-regulation-2015/history","analysis":"/api/acts/crime-and-corruption-regulation-2015/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/crime-and-corruption-regulation-2015/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/crime-and-corruption-regulation-2015/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/crime-and-corruption-regulation-2015/documents"}}