{"id":"F2008L01033","name":"Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Iraq) Regulations 2008","slug":"charter-of-the-united-nations-sanctions-iraq-regulations-2008","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":"45 of 2008","makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":73174,"registerId":"commonwealth-F2008L01033-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-02","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"Part 1","sectionType":"part","heading":"Preliminary","content":"## Part 1—Preliminary","sortOrder":0},{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Name of Regulations","content":"#### 1 Name of Regulations\n\n  These Regulations are the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Iraq) Regulations 2008.","sortOrder":1},{"sectionNumber":"4","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions","content":"#### 4 Definitions\n\n> Note: A number of expressions used in these Regulations are defined in the Act, including asset.\n\n  In these Regulations:\n\n> Act means the Charter of the United Nations Act 1945.\n\n> arms or related matériel includes:\n\n    (a) weapons; and\n    (b) ammunition; and\n    (c) military vehicles and equipment; and\n    (d) spare parts and accessories for the things mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (c); and\n    (e) paramilitary equipment.\n\n> Arts Department means the Department administered by the Minister administering the Protection of Movable Cultural Heritage Act 1986.\n\n> Australian aircraft has the same meaning as in the Criminal Code.\n\n> Australian ship has the same meaning as in the Criminal Code.\n\n> Committee means the committee established under paragraph 1 of Resolution 1518.\n\n> controlled asset means the following assets:\n\n    (a) an asset of the previous government of Iraq that was located in Australia on 22 May 2003;\n    (b) an asset that has been removed from Iraq, or acquired, by a designated person or entity.\n\n> designated person or entity means a person or entity that the Committee or the Security Council:\n\n    (a) designates for the purposes of paragraph 19 of Resolution 1483; or\n    (b) decides is subject to the asset freeze measures relating to Iraq.\n\n> Note: A list of designated persons and entities could in 2026 be viewed on the United Nations’ website (https://www.un.org).\n\n> Development Fund for Iraq means the Development Fund for Iraq referred to in paragraph 12 of Resolution 1483.\n\n> export sanctioned goods has the meaning given by regulation 5.\n\n> illegally removed cultural property means an item of:\n\n    (a) Iraqi cultural property; or\n    (b) archaeological, historical, cultural, rare scientific, or religious, importance;\n  that has been illegally removed from Iraq on or after 6 August 1990.\n\n> multinational force means the multinational force described in Resolution 1511.\n\n> paramilitary equipment means any of the following:\n\n    (a) batons, clubs, riot sticks and similar devices of a kind used for law enforcement purposes;\n    (b) body armour, including:\n    (i) bullet‑resistant apparel; and\n    (ii) bullet‑resistant pads; and\n    (iii) protective helmets;\n    (c) handcuffs, leg irons and other devices used for restraining prisoners;\n    (d) riot protection shields;\n    (e) whips;\n    (f) parts and accessories designed or adapted for use in, or with, equipment mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (e).\n\n> previous government of Iraq means:\n\n    (a) the government or governments of Iraq led by former President Saddam Hussein; and\n    (b) a state body, corporation or other body or agency in relation to that government.\n\n> Resolution 1483 means Resolution 1483 (2003) of the Security Council, adopted on 22 May 2003.\n\n> Resolution 1511 means Resolution 1511 (2003) of the Security Council, adopted on 16 October 2003.\n\n> Resolution 1518 means Resolution 1518 (2003) of the Security Council, adopted on 24 November 2003.\n\n> Resolution 1546 means Resolution 1546 (2004) of the Security Council, adopted on 8 June 2004.\n\n> sanctioned supply has the meaning given in regulation 6.\n\n> Security Council means the United Nations Security Council.\n\n> Security Council resolution means a resolution adopted by the Security Council.","sortOrder":2},{"sectionNumber":"5","sectionType":"section","heading":"Export sanctioned goods","content":"#### 5 Export sanctioned goods\n\n  For these Regulations, export sanctioned goods means arms or related matériel.","sortOrder":3},{"sectionNumber":"6","sectionType":"section","heading":"Sanctioned supply","content":"#### 6 Sanctioned supply\n\n  A person makes a sanctioned supply if:\n    (a) the person supplies, sells or transfers goods to another person; and\n    (b) the goods are export sanctioned goods; and\n    (c) as a direct or indirect result of the supply, sale or transfer the goods are transferred to Iraq.","sortOrder":4},{"sectionNumber":"Part 2","sectionType":"part","heading":"UN sanction enforcement laws","content":"## Part 2—UN sanction enforcement laws","sortOrder":5},{"sectionNumber":"7","sectionType":"section","heading":"Prohibitions relating to a sanctioned supply","content":"#### 7 Prohibitions relating to a sanctioned supply\n\n  (1) A person contravenes this regulation if:\n    (a) the person makes a sanctioned supply; and\n    (b) the sanctioned supply is not an authorised supply.\n  (2) Section 15.1 of the Criminal Code applies to an offence under section 27 of the Act that relates to a contravention of subregulation (1).\n\n> Note: This has the effect that the offence has extraterritorial operation.\n\n  (3) A person, whether or not in Australia, and whether or not an Australian citizen, contravenes this regulation if the person uses the services of an Australian ship or an Australian aircraft to transport export sanctioned goods in the course of, or for the purpose of, making a sanctioned supply that is not an authorised supply.\n  (4) A body corporate contravenes this regulation if:\n    (a) the body corporate has effective control over the actions of another body corporate or entity, wherever incorporated or situated; and\n    (b) the other body corporate or entity makes a sanctioned supply; and\n    (c) the sanctioned supply is not an authorised supply.\n  (5) For this regulation:\n\n> authorised supply means a sanctioned supply that is authorised by:\n\n    (a) a permit under regulation 8; or\n    (b) if the supply, sale or transfer takes place in or from a foreign country—a permit:\n    (i) granted by the foreign country; and\n    (ii) properly granted by the foreign country; and\n    (iii) granted in a way that accords with the foreign country’s obligations under Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq, as existing from time to time.\n  (6) A defendant, to a charge under section 27 of the Act that relates to subregulation (1), (3) or (4), bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subparagraph (b)(i) of the definition of authorised supply in subregulation (5).\n  (7) For paragraph (b) of the definition of authorised supply in subregulation (5), a permit is taken not to have been properly granted if the prosecution shows that the permit was granted on the basis of false or misleading information provided by any person, or of corrupt conduct by any person.\n\n> Note: This regulation is a UN sanction enforcement law as specified by the Minister under the Charter of the United Nations (UN Sanction Enforcement Law) Declaration 2008.","sortOrder":6},{"sectionNumber":"8","sectionType":"section","heading":"Permit to make a sanctioned supply","content":"#### 8 Permit to make a sanctioned supply\n\n  (1) The Minister may, on application, grant a person a permit authorising the making of a sanctioned supply.\n\n> Note: Section 13A of the Act applies to a permit granted by the Minister under this subregulation.\n\n  (2) The Minister may grant a permit only if the sanctioned supply is required by the Government of Iraq or the multinational force to serve the purposes of Resolution 1546.\n  (3) A permit is subject to any conditions specified in the permit.","sortOrder":7},{"sectionNumber":"9","sectionType":"section","heading":"Return of illegally removed cultural property of Iraq","content":"#### 9 Return of illegally removed cultural property of Iraq\n\n  (1) A person who suspects that an item in the possession or control of a person is illegally removed cultural property must, as soon as practicable, notify any of the following:\n    (a) the Secretary of the Department;\n    (b) the Secretary of the Arts Department;\n    (c) a member of the Australian Federal Police or of the police force of a State or Territory.\n  (2) If the Secretary of the Department reasonably believes that a person has possession or control of an item that might be illegally removed cultural property, the Secretary may, by written notice to the person, direct the person to comply with arrangements specified by the Secretary for storage of the item.\n\n> Note: If notified about an item under subregulation (1), the Departments and police will work together to determine whether the item is illegally removed cultural property. If satisfied it is, the Department will arrange for its eventual safe return to an appropriate institution in Iraq.\n\n  (3) A person commits an offence of strict liability if:\n    (a) the person is directed under subregulation (2) to comply with specified arrangements; and\n    (b) the person fails to comply with the arrangements.\n\nPenalty: 50 penalty units.\n\n  (4) If the Secretary cannot satisfy himself or herself that an item for which arrangements are specified under subregulation (2) is an item of illegally removed cultural property, the Secretary must terminate the arrangements.","sortOrder":8},{"sectionNumber":"10","sectionType":"section","heading":"Dealing with illegally removed cultural property of Iraq","content":"#### 10 Dealing with illegally removed cultural property of Iraq\n\n  (1) A person contravenes this regulation if the person does any of the following otherwise than in accordance with a direction under subregulation 9(2):\n    (a) gives illegally removed cultural property to another person;\n    (b) trades in illegally removed cultural property;\n    (c) transfers the title of illegally removed cultural property.\n  (2) Section 15.1 of the Criminal Code (extended geographical jurisdiction—category A) applies to an offence under section 27 of the Act that relates to a contravention of subregulation (1).\n  (3) A body corporate contravenes this regulation if:\n    (a) the body corporate has effective control over another body corporate or entity (wherever incorporated or situated); and\n    (b) the other body corporate or entity contravenes subregulation (1).","sortOrder":9},{"sectionNumber":"11","sectionType":"section","heading":"Certain controlled assets must be transferred to Development Fund for Iraq","content":"#### 11 Certain controlled assets must be transferred to Development Fund for Iraq\n\n  (1) A person who holds a controlled asset that is not subject to a judicial, administrative or arbitral lien or judgement must, as soon as practicable, inform:\n    (a) the Secretary of the Department; or\n    (b) the Australian Federal Police, or a police force of a State or Territory.\n  (2) If the Department confirms that the person holds a controlled asset the person must comply with any reasonable arrangements specified by the Department for the transfer of the controlled asset to the Development Fund for Iraq.\n\n> Note 1: Claims made by individuals or non‑government entities on controlled assets transferred to the Development Fund for Iraq may be presented to the Government of Iraq.\n\n> Note 2: Controlled assets enjoy the same privileges, immunities and protections as provided under paragraph 22 of Resolution 1483.","sortOrder":10},{"sectionNumber":"12","sectionType":"section","heading":"Prohibition relating to controlled assets","content":"#### 12 Prohibition relating to controlled assets\n\n  (1) A person contravenes this regulation if:\n    (a) the person holds a controlled asset ; and\n    (b) the person, otherwise than in accordance with arrangements under regulation 11:\n    (i) uses or deals with the asset; or\n    (ii) allows the asset to be used or dealt with; or\n    (iii) facilitates the use of, or the dealing with, the asset.\n  (2) Section 15.1 of the Criminal Code applies to an offence under section 27 of the Act that relates to a contravention of subregulation (1).\n\n> Note 1: Subregulation (2) has the effect that the offence has extraterritorial operation.\n\n> Note 2: This regulation is a UN sanction enforcement law as specified by the Minister under the Charter of the United Nations (UN Sanction Enforcement Law) Declaration 2008.","sortOrder":11},{"sectionNumber":"12A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Compensation for acquisition of property","content":"#### 12A Compensation for acquisition of property\n\n  (1) If the operation of this Part would result in an acquisition of property (within the meaning of paragraph 51(xxxi) of the Constitution) from a person otherwise than on just terms (within the meaning of that paragraph), the Commonwealth is liable to pay a reasonable amount of compensation to the person.\n  (2) If the Commonwealth and the person do not agree on the amount of the compensation, the person may institute proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia for the recovery from the Commonwealth of such reasonable amount of compensation as the court determines.","sortOrder":12},{"sectionNumber":"Part 3","sectionType":"part","heading":"Miscellaneous","content":"## Part 3—Miscellaneous","sortOrder":13},{"sectionNumber":"13","sectionType":"section","heading":"Delegations by Minister","content":"#### 13 Delegations by Minister\n\n  (1) The Minister may delegate the Minister’s powers and functions under these Regulations (other than this power of delegation) to:\n    (a) the Secretary of the Department; or\n    (b) an SES employee, or acting SES employee, in the Department.\n  (2) The delegation must be in writing.\n  (3) The delegate must comply with any directions of the Minister in exercising powers or functions under the delegation.","sortOrder":14},{"sectionNumber":"Part 4","sectionType":"part","heading":"Application and transitional provisions","content":"## Part 4—Application and transitional provisions","sortOrder":15},{"sectionNumber":"14","sectionType":"section","heading":"Saving provision for amendments made by the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Iraq) Amendment Regulation 2015","content":"#### 14 Saving provision for amendments made by the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Iraq) Amendment Regulation 2015\n\n  The amendments made by the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Iraq) Amendment Regulation 2015 do not affect a person’s duty to comply with an arrangement specified by the Department for the purposes of subregulation 9(2) before the commencement of that instrument.","sortOrder":16}],"analysis":{"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"Unauthenticated. Configure AI_GATEWAY_API_KEY or use a provider module. Learn more: https://ai-sdk.dev/unauthenticated-ai-gateway","source":"analysis-cron"},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":4,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The legislation maintains its original scope as enacted in 2008. The 2015 amendment (referenced in regulation 14) was a technical saving provision that did not expand the substantive scope. The regulations continue to address the three original purposes: arms embargo, asset freezing for the Development Fund for Iraq, and cultural property return."},"complexity_factors":["Moderate cross-referencing: References to 4 UN Security Council resolutions (1483, 1511, 1518, 1546) and multiple external statutes (Criminal Code, Charter of the United Nations Act 1945, Protection of Movable Cultural Heritage Act 1986)","18 defined terms in regulation 4, including nested definitions (e.g., 'arms or related matériel' contains 5 sub-points, 'paramilitary equipment' contains 6 sub-points)","Conditional logic with exceptions: Regulation 7 creates prohibitions with exceptions for 'authorised supplies' which themselves have 3 cumulative conditions, plus an evidential burden reversal in subregulation (6)","Extraterritorial operation provisions requiring understanding of Criminal Code section 15.1 (extended geographical jurisdiction)","Corporate liability through 'effective control' tests (regulations 7(4) and 10(3))","Constitutional safeguard clause (regulation 12A) requiring understanding of section 51(xxxi) acquisitions of property on just terms"],"plain_english_summary":"These regulations bring UN sanctions on Iraq into Australian law, imposing an arms embargo on supplying weapons or military equipment (including via Australian ships/aircraft), freezing assets of Saddam Hussein’s former regime or designated persons for transfer to the Development Fund for Iraq, and banning/reporting trade in Iraqi cultural artefacts taken since August 1990.\n\nThey apply to people in Australia, Australian citizens abroad, Australian-controlled foreign entities and users of Australian vessels—enforcing obligations to stabilise Iraq and protect its assets and heritage."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":6,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"These Regulations remain focused on implementing specific UN Security Council measures concerning Iraq (arms embargo/controls, asset treatment, and return of illegally removed cultural property). The measures in the provided version do not expand the Regulations beyond that original implementation purpose. Elements such as the permit route, asset-transfer mechanics to the Development Fund for Iraq, criminalisation of unauthorised dealing in cultural property, extraterritorial reach, and the added compensation provision are all instruments aimed at enforcing those UN obligations rather than creating new policy fields. The 2015 amendment is preserved by a saving provision (Reg 14), but that provision maintains continuity rather than signalling a substantive scope expansion."},"complexity_factors":["21 defined terms listed in regulation 4 (many with multi-part definitions, e.g. arms, paramilitary equipment, controlled asset)","Cross-reference to external instruments: Charter of the United Nations Act 1945 (section 27), Criminal Code s 15.1, and multiple UN Security Council Resolutions (Reg 4, Reg 7)","Extraterritorial application via Criminal Code (Reg 7(2), 10(2), 12(2))","Evidential burden on defendant concerning foreign permits (Reg 7(6))","Conditional permit scheme with narrow substantive criterion (permit only if required by Iraqi Government or multinational force to serve Res 1546) (Reg 8(2))","Corporate liability that extends to bodies corporate exercising effective control over foreign entities (Reg 7(4), 10(3))","Multiple enforcement types: criminal offences, mandatory reporting/directions, administrative transfers to Development Fund for Iraq (Reg 7–12)","Penalty and constitutional compensation machinery: 50 penalty units for some breaches (Reg 9(3)); compensation provision tied to s 51(xxxi) of the Constitution and Federal Court jurisdiction (Reg 12A)","Delegation and administrative discretion (Minister delegations in Reg 13)","Transitional/saving provision referencing later amendment (Reg 14)"],"plain_english_summary":"**What these Regulations do, mechanically**\n\n- They implement specific United Nations Security Council sanctions relating to Iraq by creating criminal offences, controls over certain assets and cultural items, and a limited permit system. Key provisions: (Reg 5–6, 7–8, 9–12A)\n  - Make it an offence to supply arms or related matériel to Iraq without authorisation (a “sanctioned supply”) (Reg 5–7).\n  - Allow the Minister to issue permits authorising a sanctioned supply, but only where the supply is required by the Government of Iraq or the multinational force to serve the purposes of UN Resolution 1546 (Reg 8).\n  - Require people who suspect an item is Iraqi cultural property illegally removed since 6 August 1990 to notify authorities, permit government-directed storage, and criminalise unauthorised dealing in such items (Reg 9–10).\n  - Require holders of certain “controlled assets” (assets of the previous Iraqi government located in Australia on 22 May 2003, or assets removed from Iraq or acquired by designated persons/entities) to report them and, if directed, transfer them to the Development Fund for Iraq (Reg 11–12).\n  - Provide that if these rules cause an acquisition of property other than on “just terms” under the Constitution, the Commonwealth must pay reasonable compensation and disputes can be litigated in the Federal Court (Reg 12A).\n  - Allow the Minister to delegate most powers under the Regulations to senior Departmental officers (Reg 13).\n\n**Who is affected**\n\n- Individuals and companies that supply arms or related matériel, or that use Australian ships or aircraft to move such goods (Reg 6–7).\n- Bodies corporate with effective control over other entities that make prohibited supplies (Reg 7(4), 10(3)).\n- Anyone who possesses, trades in, gifts or transfers title to Iraqi cultural property that was illegally removed on/after 6 Aug 1990, unless acting under a departmental direction (Reg 9–10).\n- Holders of “controlled assets” connected to the previous Iraqi government or to designated persons/entities (Reg 11–12).\n- The Commonwealth government as payer of compensation where constitutionally required (Reg 12A).\n\n**Why it matters (purpose claims and testing them against costs and incentives)**\n\n- Official purpose claim: to give effect in Australian law to specific UN Security Council measures relating to Iraq (see defined Resolution references in Reg 4 and enforcement rules in Reg 7). The Regulations therefore aim to prevent flows of arms and certain assets to prohibited persons, secure illegally removed cultural property, and vest certain Iraqi-origin assets in the Development Fund for Iraq.\n\n- Who decides and who pays:\n  - The Minister (or delegated senior departmental officers) decides on permits and directions (Reg 8, 13). That makes the executive the gatekeeper for authorised activity.\n  - Private parties who hold relevant items or assets bear reporting and storage costs (Reg 9, 11). If the Commonwealth’s actions amount to an acquisition, the Commonwealth pays compensation (Reg 12A).\n\n- Behaviour changes the Regulations create:\n  - Suppliers of arms must either obtain a permit (which is narrowly constrained) or refrain from supplying goods that will reach Iraq (Reg 6–8). This raises compliance costs for exporters and for transport operators using Australian ships or aircraft (Reg 7(3)).\n  - Persons dealing in cultural items must report and may be required to hand items into government storage and thereby refrain from further dealing until the item is cleared (Reg 9–10). Failure to comply can attract criminal penalties and a 50 penalty unit fine for the storage direction offence (Reg 9(3)).\n  - Holders of controlled assets must report and may be required to transfer assets to the Development Fund for Iraq (Reg 11–12), which transfers value away from holders to a UN‑mandated fund.\n\n- Costs, incentives and trade-offs:\n  - Compliance and administrative cost: reporting, storage, and permit applications fall on private holders and suppliers (Reg 8–11). Commercial parties face added due diligence burdens to avoid criminal exposure.\n  - Concentrated vs diffuse impact: suppliers of arms and holders of particular Iraqi-linked assets face concentrated compliance costs; the public bears potential compensation costs where property is acquired (Reg 12A).\n  - Enforcement reach and substitution effects: the Regulations extend extraterritorial reach to conduct involving Australian ships/aircraft and to bodies corporate with effective control of foreign entities (Reg 7(3)–(4), Reg 10(2)). This reduces the ability of Australian-connected actors to evade sanctions by using overseas subsidiaries or transport, but could push transactions entirely offshore where foreign permits are available (Reg 7(5)(b)).\n  - Burden of proof: the defendant bears an evidential burden to show a foreign permit was properly granted (Reg 7(6)), which shifts some practical evidentiary responsibility onto accused persons in prosecutions.\n  - Bureaucratic discretion and implementation risk: the Minister’s power to issue permits is narrow (must be required by Iraqi Government or multinational force to serve Res 1546) but otherwise subject to conditions the Minister specifies (Reg 8); storage/transfer directions are made by departmental Secretaries (Reg 9–11). That creates administrative discretion over which items/assets are detained, stored or transferred.\n  - Legal risk and remedies: the Regulations acknowledge constitutional limits by providing a statutory compensation route for acquisitions outside “just terms” (Reg 12A). Disputes on compensation are for the Federal Court.\n\n**Concrete legal mechanics to watch (selected sections)**\n\n- Definitions and scope: the document defines arms or related matériel and other key terms in Reg 4; “export sanctioned goods” is arms or related matériel (Reg 5) and a “sanctioned supply” means supply that results in transfer to Iraq (Reg 6).\n- Offence framing and reach: criminal offences are created by reference to section 27 of the Charter of the United Nations Act 1945, with extraterritorial reach via Criminal Code s 15.1 (Reg 7(2), (3), (4); Reg 10(2); Reg 12(2)).\n- Authorised supply: a sanctioned supply is authorised only by a Ministerial permit or, where the transaction is in/from a foreign country, by a properly granted foreign permit consistent with UN obligations; the defendant bears an evidential burden on the foreign-permit point (Reg 7(5)–(7)).\n- Cultural property: suspected illegally removed cultural items must be notified and can be subject to storage directions; unauthorised dealing is an offence (Reg 9–10).\n- Controlled assets and transfer: reporting obligations and mandatory transfer arrangements to the Development Fund for Iraq where assets are confirmed (Reg 11–12).\n\n**Implementation and compliance risks**\n\n- Administrative complexity: the need to determine whether a supply will reach Iraq (directly or indirectly) can impose investigative costs on prosecutors and require exporters to conduct chain-of-custody due diligence (Reg 6–7).\n- Foreign permit reliance: allowing properly granted foreign permits as a defence point creates reliance on foreign administrative systems; courts may need to assess what is “properly granted” (Reg 7(5)(b), (6)–(7)).\n- Attribution and corporate control: establishing effective control by an Australian body corporate over foreign entities can complicate prosecutions and corporate compliance (Reg 7(4), 10(3)).\n\n**Net effect, succinctly**\n\nThese Regulations turn specific UN measures about arms embargoes, asset freezes and cultural property relating to Iraq into enforceable Australian law by: creating criminal offences with extraterritorial reach; setting out a narrowly constrained permit path for authorised supplies; requiring reporting and possible transfer of certain Iraqi-linked assets to a UN-mandated fund; and criminalising unauthorised dealing in illegally removed Iraqi cultural property. The Minister (or delegated officials) makes the key permission and direction decisions; private parties bear reporting, storage and compliance costs, while the Commonwealth may pay compensation if property is acquired otherwise than on constitutionally-just terms (Reg 8, 9–11, 12A)."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/charter-of-the-united-nations-sanctions-iraq-regulations-2008","history":"/api/acts/charter-of-the-united-nations-sanctions-iraq-regulations-2008/history","analysis":"/api/acts/charter-of-the-united-nations-sanctions-iraq-regulations-2008/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/charter-of-the-united-nations-sanctions-iraq-regulations-2008/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/charter-of-the-united-nations-sanctions-iraq-regulations-2008/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/charter-of-the-united-nations-sanctions-iraq-regulations-2008/documents"}}