{"id":"F2008L00917","name":"Charter of the United Nations (Dealing with Assets) Regulations 2008","slug":"charter-of-the-united-nations-dealing-with-assets-regulations-2008","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":"29 of 2008","makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":73040,"registerId":"commonwealth-F2008L00917-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-02","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"Part 1","sectionType":"part","heading":"Preliminary","content":"## Part 1—Preliminary","sortOrder":0},{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Name of Regulations","content":"#### 1 Name of Regulations\n\n  These Regulations are the Charter of the United Nations (Dealing with Assets) Regulations 2008.","sortOrder":1},{"sectionNumber":"4","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions","content":"#### 4 Definitions\n\n  In these Regulations:\n\n> Act means the Charter of the United Nations Act 1945.\n\n> AFP means the Australian Federal Police constituted by section 6 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.\n\n> controlled asset means:\n\n    (a) a freezable asset; or\n    (b) a controlled asset as defined in any of the Sanctions Regulations.\n\n> designated person or entity means:\n\n    (a) a proscribed person or entity; or\n    (b) a designated person or entity as defined in any of the Sanctions Regulations.\n\n> Resolution 1373 means Resolution 1373 (2001) of the Security Council of the United Nations.\n\n> Sanctions Regulations means the following:\n\n    (a) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—ISIL (Da’esh) and Al‑Qaida) Regulations 2008;\n    (aa) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Central African Republic) Regulation 2014;\n    (c) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Democratic People’s Republic of Korea) Regulations 2008;\n    (d) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Democratic Republic of the Congo) Regulations 2008;\n    (e) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Haiti) Regulations 2025;\n    (f) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Iran) Regulation 2016;\n    (g) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Iraq) Regulations 2008;\n    (h) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Lebanon) Regulations 2008;\n    (i) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Libya) Regulations 2011;\n    (j) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Mali) Regulations 2018;\n    (k) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Somalia) Regulations 2008;\n    (ka) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—South Sudan) Regulation 2015;\n    (l) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Sudan) Regulations 2008;\n    (m) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—the Taliban) Regulation 2013;\n    (ma) the Charter of the United Nations (Sanctions—Yemen) Regulation 2014;\n    (n) these Regulations.\n\n> Note: For these Regulations:\n\n    (a) the Department is the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the Minister is the Minister for Foreign Affairs; and\n    (b) the following terms are defined in the Act:\n     asset (section 2);\n     freezable asset (section 14);\n     proscribed person or entity (section 14).","sortOrder":2},{"sectionNumber":"5","sectionType":"section","heading":"Permissible dealings for sanctions regulations","content":"#### 5 Permissible dealings for sanctions regulations\n\n  (1) This regulation defines various permissible dealings for the Sanctions Regulations.\n  (2) If a set of Sanctions Regulations adopts any of subregulations (3) to (7):\n    (a) a reference in the subregulation to a designated person or entity is a reference to a designated person or entity as defined in those Regulations; and\n    (b) a reference in the subregulation to a controlled asset is a reference to a controlled asset as defined in those Regulations.\n  (3) A dealing constituted by:\n    (a) a payment to:\n    (i) a designated person; or\n    (ii) a person or entity acting on behalf of, or at the direction of, a designated person or entity; or\n    (iii) an entity owned or controlled by a designated person or entity; or\n    (b) a use or dealing with a controlled asset;\n  is a basic expense dealing if it is necessary for basic expenses, including the following:\n    (c) foodstuffs;\n    (d) rent or mortgage;\n    (e) medicines or medical treatment;\n    (f) taxes;\n    (g) insurance premiums;\n    (h) public utility charges;\n    (i) reasonable professional fees;\n    (j) reimbursement of expenses associated with the provision of legal services;\n    (k) fees or service charges that are in accordance with national laws for the routine holding or maintenance of frozen assets.\n  (4) A dealing constituted by:\n    (a) a payment to:\n    (i) a designated person; or\n    (ii) a person or entity acting on behalf of, or at the direction of, a designated person or entity; or\n    (iii) an entity owned or controlled by a designated person or entity; or\n    (b) a use or dealing with a controlled asset;\n  is a legally required dealing if:\n    (c) it is necessary to satisfy a judicial, administrative or arbitral lien or judgement that was made prior to the date on which the person or entity became a designated person or entity; and\n    (d) it is not for the benefit of a designated person or entity.\n  (5) A dealing constituted by:\n    (a) a payment to:\n    (i) a designated person; or\n    (ii) a person or entity acting on behalf of, or at the direction of, a designated person or entity; or\n    (iii) an entity owned or controlled by a designated person or entity; or\n    (b) a use or dealing with a controlled asset;\n  is a contractual dealing if it is a payment:\n    (c) to apply interest or other earnings due on accounts holding controlled assets; or\n    (d) required under contracts, agreements or obligations made before the date on which those accounts became accounts holding controlled assets.\n\n> Note: If the account into which the payment is paid is frozen under Sanctions Regulations, this payment will also be frozen once received.\n\n  (6) A dealing constituted by:\n    (a) a payment by:\n    (i) a designated person; or\n    (ii) a person or entity acting on behalf of, or at the direction of, a designated person or entity; or\n    (iii) an entity owned or controlled by a designated person or entity;\n  is a required payment dealing if:\n    (b) the payment is required under a contract made before the person or entity became a designated person or entity; and\n    (c) the payment is not directly or indirectly being received by a designated person or entity.\n  (7) Any other dealing constituted by:\n    (a) a payment to:\n    (i) a designated person; or\n    (ii) a person or entity acting on behalf of, or at the direction of, a designated person or entity; or\n    (iii) an entity owned or controlled by a designated person or entity; or\n    (b) a use or dealing with a controlled asset;\n  is an extraordinary expense dealing if it is necessary for extraordinary expenses.","sortOrder":3},{"sectionNumber":"Part 2","sectionType":"part","heading":"Grounds for listing persons, entities or assets","content":"## Part 2—Grounds for listing persons, entities or assets","sortOrder":4},{"sectionNumber":"20","sectionType":"section","heading":"Listing for Resolution 1373","content":"#### 20 Listing for Resolution 1373\n\n  (1) For subsection 15 (2) of the Act, the Minister must list a person or entity if the Minister is satisfied that the person or entity is a person or entity mentioned in paragraph 1 (c) of Resolution 1373.\n  (2) For subsection 15 (4) of the Act, the Minister may list an asset, or class of asset, if the Minister is satisfied that the asset, or class of asset, is owned or controlled by a person or entity mentioned in paragraph 1 (c) of Resolution 1373.\n\n> Note: Paragraph 1 (c) of Resolution 1373 requires States to:\n\n> Note: ‘Freeze without delay funds and other financial assets or economic resources of persons who commit, or attempt to commit, terrorist acts or participate in or facilitate the commission of terrorist acts; of entities owned or controlled directly or indirectly by such persons; and of persons and entities acting on behalf of, or at the direction of such persons and entities, including funds derived or generated from property owned or controlled directly or indirectly by such persons and associated persons and entities;’.","sortOrder":5},{"sectionNumber":"21","sectionType":"section","heading":"Advance notice of listing of persons, entities and assets","content":"#### 21 Advance notice of listing of persons, entities and assets\n\n  (1) The Department may give notice of decisions of the Minister to list a person or entity, or an asset or class of asset, under section 15 of the Act to any person who is engaged in the business of holding, dealing in, or facilitating dealing in, assets.\n  (2) The notice may be given before notice of the listing that is the subject of the decisions is published in the Gazette.","sortOrder":6},{"sectionNumber":"Part 3","sectionType":"part","heading":"Authorised dealings","content":"## Part 3—Authorised dealings","sortOrder":7},{"sectionNumber":"30","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions for Part 3","content":"#### 30 Definitions for Part 3\n\n  (1) In this Part, a dealing constituted by:\n    (a) a payment to a proscribed person or entity, or a payment to a person or entity acting on behalf of, or at the direction of a proscribed person or entity; or\n    (b) a use or dealing with a freezable asset;\n  is basic expense dealing if it is necessary for basic expenses, including the following:\n    (c) foodstuffs;\n    (d) rent or mortgage;\n    (e) medicines or medical treatment;\n    (f) taxes;\n    (g) insurance premiums;\n    (h) public utility charges;\n    (i) reasonable professional fees;\n    (j) reimbursement of expenses associated with the provision of legal services;\n    (k) fees or service charges that are in accordance with national laws for the routine holding or maintenance of frozen assets.\n  (2) In this Part a dealing constituted by:\n    (a) a payment to a proscribed person or entity, or a payment to a person or entity acting on behalf of, or at the direction of a proscribed person or entity; or\n    (b) a use or dealing with a freezable asset;\n  is a contractual dealing if it is a payment:\n    (c) to apply interest or other earnings due on accounts holding freezable assets; or\n    (d) required under contracts, agreements or obligations made before the date on which those accounts became accounts holding freeazable assets.\n\n> Note: If the account into which the payment is paid is frozen under Part 4 of the Act, this payment will also be frozen once received.\n\n  (3) In this Part any other dealing constituted by:\n    (a) a payment to a proscribed person or entity, or a payment to a person or entity acting on behalf of, or at the direction of a proscribed person or entity; or\n    (b) a use or dealing with a freezable asset;\n  is an extraordinary expense dealing.","sortOrder":8},{"sectionNumber":"31","sectionType":"section","heading":"Authorised dealings","content":"#### 31 Authorised dealings\n\n  (1) When an application has been made under section 22 of the Act in relation to a use of or dealing with a freezable asset, the Minister may authorise the use or dealing if it is a basic expense dealing, a contractual dealing or an extraordinary expense dealing.\n  (2) An application must specify which kind of dealing mentioned in subregulation (2) the application is for.","sortOrder":9},{"sectionNumber":"Part 4","sectionType":"part","heading":"Miscellaneous","content":"## Part 4—Miscellaneous","sortOrder":10},{"sectionNumber":"40","sectionType":"section","heading":"Consolidated list of entities, persons and assets","content":"#### 40 Consolidated list of entities, persons and assets\n\n  (1) The Department must maintain a document that sets out:\n    (a) all persons and entities that are currently designated persons or entities; and\n    (b) all assets or classes of assets currently listed under section 15 of the Act.\n  (2) The Department must ensure that an electronic version of the document is made available to the public on the internet.","sortOrder":11},{"sectionNumber":"41","sectionType":"section","heading":"Request to AFP for help","content":"#### 41 Request to AFP for help\n\n  (1) A person who holds an asset that the person suspects is, or may be, a controlled asset may request the AFP to help the person determine whether or not the asset is owned or controlled by a designated person or entity.\n  (2) The request must be accompanied by details of the asset, and as much information about the asset (including information about the owner or controller of the asset) as is known to the person making the request.\n  (3) The AFP must use its best endeavours to help a person who has made a request under subregulation (1).\n  (4) As soon as practicable after receiving a request under subregulation (1), the AFP must respond in writing.\n  (5) The response must state whether the AFP considers that:\n    (a) it is likely that the asset is owned or controlled by a designated person or entity; or\n    (b) it is unlikely that the asset is owned or controlled by a designated person or entity; or\n    (c) it is unknown whether the asset is owned or controlled by a designated person or entity.\n\n> Note: These Regulations do not limit the obligation of:\n\n    (a) a cash dealer under section 16 of the Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988 to report a suspicious transaction; or\n    (b) a reporting entity under the Anti‑Money Laundering and Counter‑Terrorism Financing Act 2006.","sortOrder":12},{"sectionNumber":"42","sectionType":"section","heading":"Notification","content":"#### 42 Notification\n\n  (1) This regulation sets out what a person who is holding an asset must do if the person forms an opinion (a notifiable opinion) that:\n    (a) the asset is a controlled asset; or\n    (b) the asset, having been a controlled asset, or having been previously treated by the person as a controlled asset, is not, or is no longer, a controlled asset.\n  (2) Paragraph (1) (b) does not apply if:\n    (a) the asset has been removed from the list mentioned in regulation 40; or\n    (b) all designated persons associated with the asset have been removed from the list.\n  (3) As soon as practicable after a person forms a notifiable opinion, the person must inform the AFP of:\n    (a) the asset about which the opinion was formed; and\n    (b) as much information about the asset (including information about the owner or controller of the asset) as is known to the person; and\n    (c) the reasons for the opinion.","sortOrder":13},{"sectionNumber":"43","sectionType":"section","heading":"Protection of information","content":"#### 43 Protection of information\n\n  (1) This regulation applies to a person who, at the time that something is done under the Act or these Regulations (a relevant action), is:\n    (a) the Minister; or\n    (b) the Secretary of the Department; or\n    (c) an officer of the Commonwealth; or\n    (d) an AFP employee, or a member of the Australian Federal Police, within the meaning of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979; or\n    (e) a person who holds a controlled asset or an asset that the person suspects may be a controlled asset; or\n    (f) a person employed by a person mentioned in paragraph (e).\n  (2) A person to whom this regulation applies is not required:\n    (a) to produce in a court any document that has come into the custody or control of the person in the course of, or because of, the relevant action; or\n    (b) to divulge or communicate to a court any matter or thing that has come to the notice of the person in the course of, or because of, the relevant action;\n  unless it is necessary to do so to comply with the Act or these Regulations.","sortOrder":14},{"sectionNumber":"44","sectionType":"section","heading":"Indemnity","content":"#### 44 Indemnity\n\n  A person (including the Commonwealth) is not liable to an action, suit or proceeding for anything done or omitted to be done in good faith and without negligence under regulation 41 or 42.\n\n> Note: Section 24 of the Act is an indemnity for anything done or omitted to be done in compliance or purported compliance with the Act.","sortOrder":15}],"analysis":{"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":6,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"Originally focused on implementing UN Security Council Resolution 1373 (post-9/11 counter-terrorism asset freezing), the instrument has expanded into a central hub for Australia's entire sanctions administration system. The definition of 'Sanctions Regulations' has grown from a handful of terrorism-related regimes to include 14+ country-specific sanctions (North Korea, Iran, Libya, Mali, South Sudan, etc.). The 'permissible dealings' framework in Regulation 5 now serves as a template adopted by all these separate sanctions regulations, making this instrument a meta-regulation that governs how other regulations operate. This is significantly broader than the original counter-terrorism focus."},"complexity_factors":["Extensive cross-referencing between multiple legislative instruments (the parent Act, 14+ separate Sanctions Regulations for different countries/regimes, and the AFP Act)","Dual definition systems: terms like 'controlled asset' and 'designated person' have different meanings depending on whether you're in Part 3 (Resolution 1373/proscribed persons) or Regulation 5 (other sanctions regimes)","Nested conditional logic in the 'permissible dealings' framework (Regulation 5 and Part 3) with multiple overlapping categories (basic expense, legally required, contractual, required payment, extraordinary expense)","Mirror definitions: Part 3 essentially duplicates the structure of Regulation 5 but uses slightly different terminology ('freezable asset' vs 'controlled asset', 'proscribed person' vs 'designated person')","Temporal conditions throughout (distinguishing between contracts/judgments made 'before' vs 'after' designation dates)","Multi-layered ownership tests ('owned or controlled by', 'acting on behalf of or at the direction of') creating uncertainty about indirect control","Interaction with other financial crime regimes noted but not explained (Financial Transaction Reports Act, Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act)"],"plain_english_summary":"These regulations implement Australia’s UN-driven regime to freeze and manage assets of designated terrorists and sanctioned persons/entities, requiring banks and asset-holders to identify, report and block controlled assets. They allow narrowly tailored exceptions for basic, legal or approved extraordinary expenses and empower the AFP and Foreign Affairs to administer listings and assist compliance. It affects financial institutions, advisers, enforcement agencies and designated individuals, ensuring sanctions bite while permitting limited humanitarian and legal payments."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":6,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The Regulations have been broadened beyond a narrow, original freezing mechanism to create a fuller operational framework for multiple UN sanctions regimes. Concretely, the instrument: (a) groups and treats a long list of separate Sanctions Regulations together (regulation 4), (b) implements listing specifically for persons under UNSC Resolution 1373 (regulation 20), (c) sets out multiple categories of permitted dealings and ministerial authorisation procedures (regulations 5, 30–31), and (d) adds administrative tools—advance notice to market participants (reg 21), a public consolidated list (reg 40), AFP assistance (reg 41) and notification duties (reg 42). Those additions expand the operational scope from mere prohibition/freeze mechanics to a system of exemptions, assistance and publication, increasing regulatory reach and the set of operational burdens on private actors."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple cross‑references to the Charter of the United Nations Act 1945 (definitions and powers) and to many separate Sanctions Regulations (regulation 4 lists ~17 instruments).","Regulation 5 contains five distinct categories of permissible dealings with nested subconditions and cross‑references to ‘adoption’ by individual Sanctions Regulations (conditional logic).","Duplication of similar categories in Part 3 (regulations 30–31) for dealings under the Act introduces parallel rule sets to reconcile.","Ministerial discretion and mandatory duties coexist (e.g. reg 20: Minister must list persons under Resolution 1373 but may list assets), creating conditional obligations.","Administrative procedures with subjective standards: AFP must use ‘best endeavours’ and give an opinion category (reg 41), which is operationally vague.","Notification obligations include conditional exceptions and timing duties (reg 42), increasing compliance traps.","Information protection and indemnity provisions are conditional (limited to necessity, good faith and absence of negligence), adding legal uncertainty about the bounds of protection (regs 43–44).","Practical interactions with frozen receiving accounts (note to reg 5(5) and reg 30(2) note) create timing and sequencing complexity for payments and freezes."],"plain_english_summary":"**What these Regulations do (mechanically)**\n\n- They set out detailed rules that sit under the Charter of the United Nations Act 1945 for how Australian persons and entities must treat assets and payments that are connected with persons, entities or assets listed under United Nations sanctions regimes.\n- They define key terms, identify which sanctions instruments are treated together for the purpose of these Regulations, and list categories of permitted (authorised) financial dealings with frozen or controlled assets.\n- They require the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (the Department) to keep and publish a consolidated, up‑to‑date list of designated persons, entities and listed assets, and they authorise the Australian Federal Police (AFP) to help people who suspect they hold a controlled asset.\n- They create simple administrative protections for officials and private parties who act in good faith when using AFP help or notifying authorities, and they protect some information from being disclosed to courts except where necessary to comply with the law.\n\n**Who is affected**\n\n- Owners and holders of assets (including banks, custodians and other financial intermediaries). Those people must watch for assets that may be “controlled” or “freezable” under the Act or the named Sanctions Regulations.\n- Businesses that hold, deal in, or facilitate dealing in assets (they can receive advance notice of upcoming listings under regulation 21).\n- The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the Minister for Foreign Affairs (who decide listings and maintain the consolidated list).\n- The Australian Federal Police, which must respond to requests for help and make assessments about whether an asset is likely to be controlled.\n- Persons and entities that are designated, proscribed or otherwise listed under the range of UN sanctions instruments enumerated in the definitions.\n\n**Key operational rules (plain description)**\n\n- Definitions: The Regulations import defined terms from the Act (for example, “asset”, “freezable asset”, “proscribed person or entity”) and add a list of specific Sanctions Regulations that are treated together for these rules (regulation 4).\n\n- Permissible dealings for sanctions regimes (regulation 5): if a particular Sanctions Regulation adopts the listed subregulations, payments or uses of controlled assets can fall into categories that are permitted without further authorisation: \n  - Basic expense dealings (food, rent/mortgage, medicines, taxes, insurance, utilities, reasonable professional and legal fees, routine maintenance of frozen assets).\n  - Legally required dealings (payments necessary to satisfy liens or judgments that pre‑date listing and are not for the benefit of the designated person).\n  - Contractual dealings (interest or earnings on accounts holding controlled assets and obligations arising from contracts made before listing).\n  - Required payment dealings (payments required under pre‑listing contracts where the recipient is not the designated person).\n  - Extraordinary expense dealings (other necessary extraordinary expenses).\n  Note: if a receiving account is frozen the payment may be frozen on receipt.\n\n- Listing under Resolution 1373 (regulation 20): the Minister must list persons or entities when satisfied they fall within paragraph 1(c) of UNSC Resolution 1373 (which concerns persons who commit, attempt, facilitate or are associated with terrorist acts); the Minister may list assets owned or controlled by such persons.\n\n- Advance notice (regulation 21): the Department may give advance notice of listing decisions to persons or businesses engaged in holding or dealing in assets, and that notice can be given before the listing is published in the Gazette.\n\n- Authorised dealings under the Act (Part 3, regulations 30–31): where an application is made under the Act to deal with a freezable asset, the Minister may authorise basic expense, contractual or extraordinary expense dealings. An application must say which category of dealing it is for.\n\n- Consolidated public list (regulation 40): the Department must maintain and publish an electronic consolidated list of all currently designated persons, entities and listed assets.\n\n- AFP assistance (regulation 41): a person who suspects an asset is controlled may ask the AFP for help. The request must supply details; the AFP must use its best endeavours and reply in writing saying whether it thinks the asset is likely, unlikely, or unknown to be owned or controlled by a designated person or entity.\n\n- Notification obligations (regulation 42): if someone holding an asset forms a view that the asset is (or is no longer) a controlled asset, they must inform the AFP as soon as practicable and provide information and reasons. There are limited exceptions where delisting or removal of associated designated persons has already occurred.\n\n- Information protection and indemnity (regulations 43–44): certain persons involved in actions under the Act/these Regulations are not required to produce or divulge documents or matters to a court unless necessary to comply with the law (reg 43). People (including the Commonwealth) acting in good faith and without negligence in providing AFP help or making notifications are indemnified against legal action for those acts or omissions (reg 44).\n\n**Why the instrument says it exists (stated purpose) and how that plays out practically**\n\n- The Regulations are framed to implement and give operational effect to UN Security Council measures (for example, Resolution 1373 and the listed sanctions regimes). That means translating high‑level UN obligations into Australian procedures for listing, freezing and permitting narrowly defined exceptions for ordinary or legally required payments.\n- Practical effects and trade‑offs: these rules create compliance obligations on asset holders and financial intermediaries (monitoring, freezing, reporting, and possibly refusing or returning payments); they give the Minister and Department centralized decision power over listing and authorisation; they create an AFP assistance channel intended to reduce uncertainty for private holders. The Regulations also protect officials and cooperating private parties from disclosure and liability when they act in good faith.\n\n**Costs, incentives and implementation risks (concrete mechanisms)**\n\n- Who pays: the compliance costs and operational delays fall mainly on banks, custodians and other asset holders who must screen, freeze and report. A frozen receiving account can cause payments to be frozen on arrival (reg 5(5) note).\n- Incentives and private behaviour: the availability of authorised dealing categories (basic expense, contractual, legally required, etc.) reduces the pressure to cut off all transactions, but asset holders must interpret and document eligibility for those categories; that increases administrative burden and record‑keeping costs (reg 5, reg 30–31).\n- Discretion and decision risk: the Minister has listing and authorisation powers (reg 20, reg 31). That centralises decision‑making and can create operational risk where private parties face delay or uncertainty while awaiting a Ministerial authorisation or AFP response.\n- Enforcement and error costs: mistaken listings or delays can freeze legitimate commerce; the AFP help mechanism (reg 41) reduces uncertainty but depends on AFP capacity and on the quality of information supplied by the asset holder. The indemnity and information protection provisions lower litigation risk for officials and cooperating private parties (regs 43–44) but do not eliminate reputational or liquidity costs for those whose assets are frozen.\n\n**Where to look in the Regulations for the operative rules**\n\n- Definitions and scope: regulation 4.\n- Categories of permissible dealings for sanctions regimes: regulation 5.\n- Listing for Resolution 1373: regulation 20.\n- Advance notice and consolidated list: regulations 21 and 40.\n- AFP assistance and notification duties: regulations 41 and 42.\n- Authorised dealings under the Act (applications and Ministerial authorisation): regulations 30–31.\n- Information protection and indemnity: regulations 43–44.\n\n"},"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"A positive credit balance is required for all requests, including BYOK, so fallback providers remain available. Add credits at https://vercel.com/d?to=%2F%5Bteam%5D%2F%7E%2Fai%3Fmodal%3Dtop-up to continue.","source":"analysis-cron"}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/charter-of-the-united-nations-dealing-with-assets-regulations-2008","history":"/api/acts/charter-of-the-united-nations-dealing-with-assets-regulations-2008/history","analysis":"/api/acts/charter-of-the-united-nations-dealing-with-assets-regulations-2008/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/charter-of-the-united-nations-dealing-with-assets-regulations-2008/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/charter-of-the-united-nations-dealing-with-assets-regulations-2008/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/charter-of-the-united-nations-dealing-with-assets-regulations-2008/documents"}}