{"id":"australian-crime-commission-state-provisions-act-2003","name":"Australian Crime Commission (State Provisions) Act 2003","slug":"australian-crime-commission-state-provisions-act-2003","collection":"act","jurisdiction":"vic","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":176445,"registerId":"vic-australian-crime-commission-state-provisions-act-2003-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-05","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Australian Crime Commission (State Provisions) Act 2003","content":"Version No. 016\n\n**Australian Crime Commission (State Provisions) Act 2003**\n\n**No. 52 of 2003**\n\nVersion incorporating amendments as at  \n1 March 2019\n\n**table of provisions**\n\n*Section Page*\n\nPart 1—Preliminary 1\n\n1 Purposes 1\n\n2 Commencement 1\n\n3 Definitions 2\n\n4 Act to bind the Crown 6\n\nPart 2—The Australian Crime Commission, the Board and the Inter-Governmental Committee 7\n\nDivision 1—The Australian Crime Commission 7\n\n5 Functions of ACC 7\n\n6 CEO to manage ACC operations/investigations 7\n\n7 Counsel assisting ACC 8\n\nDivision 2—The Board of the ACC 8\n\n8 Functions of the Board 8\n\n9 Board meetings 10\n\n10 Presiding at Board meetings 10\n\n11 Quorum at Board meetings 10\n\n12 Voting at Board meetings 10\n\n13 Conduct of Board meetings 11\n\n14 Resolutions outside of Board meetings 11\n\n15 Board committees 12\n\nDivision 3—The Inter-Governmental Committee 13\n\n16 Functions of Committee 13\n\nPart 3—Examinations 15\n\n17 Examinations 15\n\n18 Conduct of examination 15\n\n19 Power to summon witnesses and take evidence 19\n\n20 Power to obtain documents 20\n\n21 Disclosure of summons or notice may be prohibited 21\n\n22 Offences of disclosure 24\n\n23 Failure of witnesses to attend and answer questions 26\n\n24 Warrant for arrest of witness 29\n\n25 False or misleading evidence 31\n\n26 Protection of witnesses from harm or intimidation 31\n\n27 Legal protection of examiners, counsel and witnesses 32\n\n28 Order for delivery to examiner of passport of witness 33\n\nPart 4—Search warrants 35\n\n29 Search warrants 35\n\n30 Application by telephone for search warrants 39\n\nPart 5—Performance of functions and exercise of powers 42\n\n31 Consent of Board may be needed before functions can be performed 42\n\n32 Functions not affected by State laws 42\n\n33 Extent to which functions are conferred 42\n\n34 Performance of functions 42\n\n35 Functions of federal judicial officers 44\n\n36 Limitation on challenge to Board determination 45\n\n37 Cooperation with law enforcement agencies and coordination with overseas authorities 45\n\n38 Incidental powers of ACC 45\n\nPart 6—General 46\n\n39 Double jeopardy 46\n\n40 Arrangements for Board to obtain information or intelligence 46\n\n41 Administrative arrangements with the Commonwealth 46\n\n42 Judges to perform functions under the ACC Act 46\n\n43 Furnishing of reports and information 47\n\n44 Secrecy 50\n\n45 Delegation 52\n\n46 Obstructing, hindering or disrupting the ACC or an examiner 52\n\n47 Public meetings and bulletins 53\n\n48 Annual report 53\n\n49 Supreme Court—limitation of jurisdiction 55\n\n50 Regulations 55\n\nPart 8—Transitional 57\n\n53 Definitions 57\n\n54 Certain investigations taken to be special investigations 57\n\n55 Assembling and giving evidence obtained by the NCA 57\n\n56 Limitation on challenges to validity of references 58\n\n57 Arrangements to obtain information or intelligence 58\n\n58 Things seized under search warrants 58\n\n59 Directions as to publication 58\n\n60 Disclosure of summons or notice 59\n\n61 Witness protection 59\n\n62 Administrative arrangements in relation to the NCA 59\n\n63 Secrecy obligations 59\n\n64 Validation of administrative actions 60\n\n65 Transitional regulations 61\n\nEndnotes 63\n\n1 General information 63\n\n2 Table of Amendments 66\n\n3 Amendments Not in Operation 68\n\n4 Explanatory details 69\n\n**Version No.** **016**\n\n**Australian Crime Commission (State Provisions) Act 2003**\n\n**No. 52 of 2003**\n\nVersion incorporating amendments as at  \n1 March 2019\n\n**The Parliament of Victoria enacts as follows:**\n\nPart 1—Preliminary\n\n\t1 Purposes\n\nThe purposes of this Act are to—\n\n(a) make provision for the operation of the Australian Crime Commission in Victoria;\n\n(b) repeal the **National Crime Authority (State Provisions) Act 1984**;\n\n(c) make consequential amendments to various Acts.\n\n\t2 Commencement\n\n(1) This Act (except the provisions referred to in subsection (2)) comes into operation on the day after the day on which it receives the Royal Assent.\n\n(2) The following provisions come into operation on a day or days to be proclaimed—\n\n(a) paragraphs (d) and (e) of the definition of ***Commonwealth body or person*** in section 3(1);\n\n(b) section 15;\n\n(c) Division 3 of Part 2;\n\n(d) section 44(1)(b);\n\n(e) items 11 and 14 of Schedule 1.\n\n\t3 Definitions\n\n(1) In this Act—\n\n***ACC Act*** means the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 of the Commonwealth;\n\n**Note**\n\nThat Act was originally known as the National Crime Authority Act 1984.\n\n***ACC operation/investigation*** means—\n\n(a) an ACC State intelligence operation; or\n\n(b) an ACC State investigation;\n\n***ACC State intelligence operation*** means an intelligence operation that the ACC is undertaking under section 5(b);\n\n***ACC State investigation*** means an investigation that the ACC is conducting under section 5(a);\n\n***authority*** includes a department, agency or body;\n\nS. 3(1) def. of *Common-wealth body or person* amended by No. 68/2013 s. 19(1)(a).\n\n***Commonwealth body or person*** means—\n\n(a) the ACC; or\n\n(b) the Board; or\n\n(c) the Chair of the Board; or\n\n(d) a member of the Board; or\n\n(e) the Inter-Governmental Committee; or\n\n(f) the CEO; or\n\n(g) a member of the staff of the ACC; or\n\n(h) an examiner; or\n\n(i) a Judge of the Federal Court; or\n\n(j) a Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia;\n\n***Commonwealth Minister*** means the Commonwealth Minister administering the ACC Act;\n\n***confer*** includes to impose;\n\nS. 3(1) def. of *Federal Magistrate* repealed by No. 68/2013 s. 19(1)(b).\n\n **** * * * ****\n\n***function*** has a meaning affected by subsection (4);\n\n***intelligence operation*** means the collection, correlation, analysis or dissemination of criminal information and intelligence relating to a relevant criminal activity;\n\nS. 3(1) def. of *issuing officer* amended by No. 68/2013 s. 19(1)(c).\n\n***issuing officer*** means—\n\n(a) a Judge of the Federal Court; or\n\n(b) a Judge of a court of the State; or\n\n(c) a Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia;\n\nS. 3(1) def. of *Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia* inserted by No. 68/2013 s. 19(1)(d).\n\n***Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia*** means a Judge (including the Chief Judge) who holds office under the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 of the Commonwealth;\n\nS. 3(1) def. of *legal practitioner* inserted by No. 18/2005 s. 18(Sch. 1 item 8.1), amended by No. 17/2014 s. 160(Sch. 2 item 9).\n\n***legal practitioner*** means an Australian legal practitioner;\n\n***perform*** includes to exercise;\n\n***serious and organised crime*** means an offence—\n\n(a) that involves 2 or more offenders and substantial planning and organisation; and\n\n(b) that involves, or is of a kind that ordinarily involves, the use of sophisticated methods and techniques; and\n\n(c) that is committed, or is of a kind that is ordinarily committed, in conjunction with other offences of a like kind; and\n\n(d) that is an offence of a kind prescribed by the regulations or an offence that involves any of the following—\n\n(i) theft;\n\n(ii) fraud;\n\n(iii) tax evasion;\n\n(iv) money laundering;\n\n(v) currency violations;\n\n(vi) illegal drug dealings;\n\n(vii) illegal gambling;\n\n(viii) obtaining financial benefit by vice engaged in by others;\n\n(ix) extortion;\n\n(x) violence;\n\n(xi) bribery or corruption of, or by, an officer of the Commonwealth, an officer of a State or an officer of a Territory;\n\n(xii) perverting the course of justice;\n\n(xiii) bankruptcy and company violations;\n\n(xiv) harbouring of criminals;\n\n(xv) forging of passports;\n\n(xvi) firearms;\n\n(xvii) armament dealings;\n\n(xviii) illegal importation or exportation of fauna into or out of Australia;\n\n(xix) cybercrime;\n\n(xx) matters of the same general nature as one or more of the matters listed above; and\n\n(e) that is punishable by imprisonment for a period of 3 years or more—\n\nbut—\n\n(f) does not include an offence committed in the course of a genuine dispute as to matters pertaining to the relations of employees and employers by a party to the dispute, unless the offence is committed in connection with, or as part of, a course of activity involving the commission of a serious and organised crime other than an offence so committed; and\n\n(g) does not include an offence the time for the commencement of a prosecution for which has expired;\n\n***special ACC operation/investigation*** means—\n\n(a) an ACC State intelligence operation that the Board has determined to be a special operation; or\n\n(b) an ACC State investigation that the Board has determined to be a special investigation;\n\n***State Minister*** means the State Minister administering this Act.\n\n(2) If this Act uses a term that is used in the ACC Act, the term has the same meaning in this Act as it has in the ACC Act unless the contrary intention appears in this Act.\n\n(3) If the head of an ACC operation/investigation suspects that an offence (the ***incidental offence***) that is not a serious and organised crime may be directly or indirectly connected with, or may be a part of, a course of activity involving the commission of a serious and organised crime (whether or not the head has identified the nature of that serious and organised crime), then the incidental offence is, for so long only as the head so suspects, taken, for the purposes of this Act, to be a serious and organised crime.\n\n(4) A reference in this Act, other than Part 2, to a function includes a reference to a power or duty.\n\n\t4 Act to bind the Crown\n\nThis Act binds the Crown in right of the State and, so far as the legislative power of the State permits, the Crown in its other capacities.\n\nPart 2—The Australian Crime Commission, the Board and the Inter-Governmental Committee\n\nDivision 1—The Australian Crime Commission\n\n\t5 Functions of ACC\n\nThe ACC has the following functions—\n\n(a) to investigate a matter relating to a relevant criminal activity, in so far as the serious and organised crime is, or the serious and organised crimes are or include, an offence or offences against a law of the State (irrespective of whether that offence or those offences have a federal aspect);\n\n(b) to undertake an intelligence operation in so far as the serious and organised crime is, or the serious and organised crimes are or include, an offence or offences against a law of the State (irrespective of whether that offence or those offences have a federal aspect);\n\n(c) to provide a report to the Board on the outcome of such an investigation or operation;\n\n(d) such other functions as are conferred on the ACC by other provisions of this Act or any other Act.\n\n\t6 CEO to manage ACC operations/investigations\n\n(1) The CEO is to manage, coordinate and control ACC operations/investigations.\n\n(2) As soon as practicable after the Board consents under section 55A(3) of the ACC Act to the ACC undertaking an intelligence operation under section 5(b) or conducting an investigation under section 5(a), the CEO must determine, in writing, the head of the operation or investigation.\n\n(3) Before the CEO determines the head of the operation or investigation, the CEO must consult the Chair of the Board, and such other members of the Board as the CEO thinks appropriate, in relation to the determination.\n\n(4) Subject to such consultation with the examiners as is appropriate and practicable, the CEO may make arrangements as to the examiner who is to be able to exercise his or her powers under this Act in relation to a special ACC operation/investigation.\n\n\t7 Counsel assisting ACC\n\nThe CEO may appoint a legal practitioner to assist the ACC as counsel in relation to ACC operations/investigations generally or in relation to a particular matter or matters.\n\nDivision 2—The Board of the ACC\n\n\t8 Functions of the Board\n\n(1) The Board has the following functions—\n\n(a) to determine, in writing, whether an ACC State intelligence operation is a special operation or whether an ACC State investigation is a special investigation;\n\n(b) to determine, in writing, the class or classes of persons to participate in an ACC State intelligence operation or ACC State investigation;\n\n(c) to establish task forces;\n\n(d) such other functions as are conferred on the Board by other provisions of this Act.\n\n(2) The Board may determine, in writing, that an ACC State intelligence operation is a special operation. Before doing so, it must consider whether methods of collecting the criminal information and intelligence that do not involve the use of powers in this Act have been effective.\n\n(3) The Board may determine, in writing, that an ACC State investigation is a special investigation. Before doing so, it must consider whether ordinary police methods of investigation into the matters are likely to be effective.\n\n(4) A determination under subsection (2) or (3) must—\n\n(a) describe the general nature of the circumstances or allegations constituting the relevant criminal activity to which the operation or investigation relates; and\n\n(b) state that the serious and organised crime is, or the serious and organised crimes are or include, an offence or offences against a law of the State but need not specify the particular offence or offences; and\n\n(c) set out the purpose of the operation or investigation.\n\n(5) The Chair of the Board must, within the period of 3 days beginning on the day a determination under subsection (2) or (3) is made, give a copy of the determination to the Inter-Governmental Committee.\n\n(6) A determination under subsection (2) or (3) has effect immediately after it is made.\n\n(7) Sections 9 to 15 have effect in relation to the Board's functions under this Act.\n\n\t9 Board meetings\n\n(1) The Chair of the Board may convene meetings of the Board.\n\n(2) The Chair, in exercising his or her power to convene meetings, must ensure that meetings of the Board are scheduled to meet the requirements set out in section 7D of the ACC Act.\n\n\t10 Presiding at Board meetings\n\nA meeting of the Board must be presided over by—\n\n(a) if the Chair of the Board is present, the Chair; or\n\n(b) otherwise, another eligible Commonwealth Board member who is present and who is nominated, in writing, by the Chair to preside.\n\n\t11 Quorum at Board meetings\n\nAt a meeting of the Board a quorum is constituted by 7 Board members (not including the CEO).\n\n\t12 Voting at Board meetings\n\n(1) Subject to this section, a question arising at a meeting of the Board is to be determined by a majority of the votes of Board members present.\n\n(2) The person presiding at a meeting has—\n\n(a) a deliberative vote; and\n\n(b) if necessary, also a casting vote.\n\n(3) The CEO is not entitled to vote on any question arising at a meeting of the Board.\n\n(4) The Board cannot determine that an ACC State intelligence operation is a special operation, or that an ACC State investigation is a special investigation, unless at least 9 Board members (including at least 2 eligible Commonwealth Board members) vote in favour of making the determination.\n\n\t13 Conduct of Board meetings\n\n(1) The Board may regulate proceedings at its meetings as it considers appropriate.\n\n(2) The Board must ensure that minutes of its meetings are kept.\n\n\t14 Resolutions outside of Board meetings\n\n(1) This section applies to a resolution—\n\n(a) which, without being considered at a meeting of the Board, is referred to all members of the Board; and\n\n(b) of which—\n\n(i) if subparagraph (ii) does not apply, a majority of those members (not including the CEO); or\n\n(ii) if the resolution is that the Board determine that an ACC State intelligence operation is a special operation, or that an ACC State investigation is a special investigation—at least 9 Board members (not including the CEO but including at least 2 eligible Commonwealth Board members)—\n\nindicate by telephone or other mode of communication to the Chair of the Board that they are in favour.\n\n(2) The resolution is as valid and effectual as if it had been passed at a meeting of the Board duly convened and held.\n\n\t15 Board committees\n\n(1) The Board may, with the unanimous agreement of all the members of the Board (not including the CEO), establish a committee or committees to assist in carrying out the functions of the Board.\n\n(2) The Board may dissolve a committee at any time.\n\n(3) The functions of a committee are as determined by the unanimous agreement of all the members of the Board (not including the CEO).\n\n(4) However, the Board cannot determine that a committee has the function of determining whether an ACC State intelligence operation is a special operation or whether an ACC State investigation is a special investigation.\n\n(5) In performing its functions, a committee must comply with any directions given to the committee by the Board.\n\n(6) A question arising at a meeting of a committee is to be determined by a majority of the votes of committee members present.\n\n(7) However, the CEO is not entitled to vote on any question arising at a meeting of a committee of which he or she is a member.\n\n(8) A committee must inform the other members of the Board of its decisions.\n\n(9) A committee may regulate proceedings at its meetings as it considers appropriate.\n\n(10) A committee must ensure that minutes of its meetings are kept.\n\nDivision 3—The Inter-Governmental Committee\n\n\t16 Functions of Committee\n\n(1) Within the period of 30 days beginning on the day the Committee is given a copy of a determination (a ***special determination***) under section 8(2) or (3), the Committee may by resolution, with the agreement of the member of the Committee representing the Commonwealth and at least 5 other members of the Committee, request the Chair of the Board to give further information to the Committee in relation to the determination.\n\n(2) Subject to subsection (3), the Chair of the Board must comply with the request.\n\n(3) If the Chair of the Board considers that disclosure of information to the public could prejudice the safety or reputation of persons or the operations of law enforcement agencies, the Chair must not give the Committee the information.\n\n(4) If the Chair of the Board does not give the Committee information on the ground that the Chair considers that disclosure of the information to the public could prejudice the safety or reputation of persons or the operations of law enforcement agencies, the Committee may refer the request to the State Minister.\n\n(5) If the Committee refers the request to the State Minister, he or she—\n\n(a) must determine in writing whether disclosure of the information could prejudice the safety or reputation of persons or the operations of law enforcement agencies; and\n\n(b) must provide copies of that determination to the Chair of the Board and the Committee; and\n\n(c) must not disclose his or her reasons for determining the question of whether the information could prejudice the safety or reputation of persons or the operations of law enforcement agencies in the way stated in the determination.\n\n(6) Within the period of 30 days beginning on the day the Committee makes a request under subsection (1) in relation to a special determination, the Committee may by resolution, with the agreement of the member of the Committee representing the Commonwealth and at least 5 other members of the Committee, revoke the determination.\n\n(7) The Committee must notify the Chair of the Board and the CEO of the revocation. The revocation takes effect when the CEO is so notified.\n\n(8) To avoid doubt, the revoking of the determination does not affect the validity of any act done in connection with the ACC operation/investigation concerned before the CEO is so notified.\n\n(9) The Committee does not have a duty to consider whether to exercise the power under subsection (1) or (6) in respect of any special determination, whether the Committee is requested to do so by any person, or in any other circumstances.\n\nPart 3—Examinations\n\n\t17 Examinations\n\nAn examiner may conduct an examination for the purposes of a special ACC operation/ investigation.\n\n\t18 Conduct of examination\n\n(1) An examiner may regulate the conduct of proceedings at an examination as the examiner thinks fit.\n\n(2) At an examination before an examiner—\n\n(a) a person giving evidence may be represented by a legal practitioner; and\n\n(b) if, by reason of the existence of special circumstances, the examiner consents to a person who is not giving evidence being represented by a legal practitioner, the person may be so represented.\n\n(3) An examination before an examiner must be held in private and the examiner may give directions as to the persons who may be present during the examination or a part of the examination.\n\n(4) Nothing in a direction given by the examiner under subsection (3) prevents the presence, when evidence is being taken at an examination before the examiner, of—\n\n(a) a person representing the person giving evidence; or\n\n(b) a person representing, in accordance with subsection (2), a person who, by reason of a direction given by the examiner under subsection (3), is entitled to be present.\n\n(5) If an examination before an examiner is being held, a person (other than a member of the staff of the ACC approved by the examiner) must not be present at the examination unless the person is entitled to be present by reason of a direction given by the examiner under subsection (3) or by reason of subsection (4).\n\n(6) At an examination before an examiner—\n\n(a) counsel assisting the examiner generally or in relation to the matter to which the ACC operation/investigation relates; or\n\n(b) any person authorised by the examiner to appear before the examiner at the examination; or\n\n(c) any legal practitioner representing a person at the examination in accordance with subsection (2)—\n\nmay, so far as the examiner thinks appropriate, examine or cross-examine any witness on any matter that the examiner considers relevant to the ACC operation/investigation.\n\n(7) If a person (other than a member of the staff of the ACC) is present at an examination before an examiner while another person (the ***witness***) is giving evidence at the examination, the examiner must—\n\n(a) inform the witness that the person is present; and\n\n(b) give the witness an opportunity to comment on the presence of the person.\n\n(8) To avoid doubt, a person does not cease to be entitled to be present at an examination before an examiner or part of such an examination if—\n\n(a) the examiner fails to comply with subsection (7); or\n\n(b) a witness comments adversely on the presence of the person under subsection (7)(b).\n\n(9) An examiner may direct that—\n\n(a) any evidence given before the examiner; or\n\n(b) the contents of any document, or a description of any thing, produced to the examiner; or\n\n(c) any information that might enable a person who has given evidence before the examiner to be identified; or\n\n(d) the fact that any person has given or may be about to give evidence at an examination—\n\nmust not be published, or must not be published except in such manner, and to such persons, as the examiner specifies. The examiner must give such a direction if the failure to do so might prejudice the safety or reputation of a person or prejudice the fair trial of a person who has been, or may be, charged with an offence.\n\n(10) Subject to subsection (11), the CEO may, in writing, vary or revoke a direction under subsection (9).\n\n(11) The CEO must not vary or revoke a direction if to do so might prejudice the safety or reputation of a person or prejudice the fair trial of a person who has been or may be charged with an offence.\n\n(12) If—\n\n(a) a person has been charged with an offence before a federal court or before a court of the State; and\n\n(b) the court considers that it may be desirable in the interests of justice that particular evidence given before an examiner, being evidence in relation to which the examiner has given a direction under subsection (9), be made available to the person or to a legal practitioner representing the person—\n\nthe court may give to the examiner or to the CEO a certificate to that effect and, if the court does so, the examiner or the CEO, as the case may be, must make the evidence available to the court.\n\n(13) If—\n\n(a) the examiner or the CEO makes evidence available to a court in accordance with subsection (12); and\n\n(b) the court, after examining the evidence, is satisfied that the interests of justice so require—\n\nthe court may make the evidence available to the person charged with the offence concerned or to a legal practitioner representing the person.\n\n(14) A person who—\n\n(a) is present at an examination in contravention of subsection (5); or\n\n(b) makes a publication in contravention of a direction given under subsection (9)—\n\nis guilty of an offence punishable by a fine not exceeding $2200 or imprisonment for a period not exceeding one year.\n\n(15) At the conclusion of an examination held by an examiner, the examiner must give the head of the special ACC operation/investigation—\n\n(a) a record of the proceedings of the examination; and\n\n(b) any documents or other things given to the examiner at, or in connection with, the examination.\n\n\t19 Power to summon witnesses and take evidence\n\n(1) An examiner may summon a person to appear before the examiner at an examination to give evidence and to produce such documents or other things (if any) as are referred to in the summons.\n\n(2) Before issuing a summons under subsection (1), the examiner must be satisfied that it is reasonable in all the circumstances to do so. The examiner must also record in writing the reasons for the issue of the summons.\n\n(3) A summons under subsection (1) requiring a person to appear before an examiner at an examination must be accompanied by a copy of the determination of the Board that the State ACC intelligence operation is a special operation or that the State ACC investigation is a special investigation.\n\n(4) A summons under subsection (1) requiring a person to appear before an examiner at an examination must, unless the examiner issuing the summons is satisfied that, in the particular circumstances of the special ACC operation/investigation to which the examination relates, it would prejudice the effectiveness of the special ACC operation/investigation for the summons to do so, set out, so far as is reasonably practicable, the general nature of the matters in relation to which the examiner intends to question the person, but nothing in this subsection prevents the examiner from questioning the person in relation to any matter that relates to a special ACC operation/investigation.\n\n(5) The examiner who is holding an examination may require a person appearing at the examination to produce a document or other thing.\n\n(6) An examiner may, at an examination, take evidence on oath or affirmation and for that purpose—\n\n(a) the examiner may require a person appearing at the examination to give evidence either to take an oath or to make an affirmation in a form approved by the examiner; and\n\n(b) the examiner, or a person who is an authorised person in relation to the ACC, may administer an oath or affirmation to a person so appearing at the examination.\n\n(7) In this section, a reference to a person who is an authorised person in relation to the ACC is a reference to a person authorised in writing, or a person included in a class of persons authorised in writing, for the purposes of this section by the CEO.\n\n(8) The powers conferred by this section are not exercisable except for the purposes of a special ACC operation/investigation.\n\n\t20 Power to obtain documents\n\n(1) An examiner may, by notice in writing served on a person, require the person—\n\n(a) to attend, at a time and place specified in the notice, before a person specified in the notice, being the examiner or a member of the staff of the ACC; and\n\n(b) to produce at that time and place to the person so specified a document or thing specified in the notice, being a document or thing that is relevant to a special ACC operation/investigation.\n\n(2) Before issuing a notice under subsection (1), the examiner must be satisfied that it is reasonable in all the circumstances to do so. The examiner must also record in writing the reasons for the issue of the notice.\n\n(3) A notice may be issued under this section in relation to a special ACC operation/investigation, whether or not an examination before an examiner is being held for the purposes of the operation or investigation.\n\n(4) A person must not refuse or fail to comply with a notice served on the person under this section.\n\n(5) A person who contravenes subsection (4) is guilty of an indictable offence punishable by a fine not exceeding $22 000 or imprisonment for a period not exceeding 5 years.\n\n(6) The provisions of section 23(3) to (5) and (7) apply in relation to a person who is required to produce a document or thing by a notice served on him or her under this section in the same manner as they apply in relation to a person who is required to produce a document or thing at an examination before an examiner.\n\nS. 20(7) amended by No. 68/2009 s. 97(Sch. item 9).\n\n(7) If there is a contravention of section 23(3) as applied by subsection (6), the provisions of section 23(6) of this Act and section 28(1) of the **Criminal Procedure Act 2009** apply to that contravention.\n\n\t21 Disclosure of summons or notice may be prohibited\n\n(1) The examiner issuing a summons under section 19 or a notice under section 20 must, or may, as provided in subsection (2), include in it a notation to the effect that disclosure of information about the summons or notice, or any official matter connected with it, is prohibited except in the circumstances, if any, specified in the notation.\n\n(2) A notation must not be included in the summons or notice except as follows—\n\n(a) the examiner must include the notation if satisfied that failure to do so would reasonably be expected to prejudice—\n\n(i) the safety or reputation of a person; or\n\n(ii) the fair trial of a person who has been or may be charged with an offence; or\n\n(iii) the effectiveness of an operation or investigation;\n\n(b) the examiner may include the notation if satisfied that failure to do so might prejudice—\n\n(i) the safety or reputation of a person; or\n\n(ii) the fair trial of a person who has been or may be charged with an offence; or\n\n(iii) the effectiveness of an operation or investigation;\n\n(c) the examiner may include the notation if satisfied that failure to do so might otherwise be contrary to the public interest.\n\n(3) If a notation is included in the summons or notice, it must be accompanied by a written statement setting out the rights and obligations conferred or imposed by section 22 on the person who was served with, or otherwise given, the summons or notice.\n\n(4) If, after the ACC has concluded the operation or investigation concerned—\n\n(a) no evidence of an offence has been obtained as described in section 34(1); or\n\n(b) evidence of an offence or offences has been assembled and given as required by section 34(1) and the CEO has been advised that no person will be prosecuted; or\n\n(c) evidence of an offence or offences committed by only one person has been assembled and given as required by section 434(1) and criminal proceedings have begun against that person; or\n\n(d) evidence of an offence or offences committed by 2 or more persons has been assembled and given as required by section 34(1) and—\n\n(i) criminal proceedings have begun against all those persons; or\n\n(ii) criminal proceedings have begun against one or more of those persons and the CEO has been advised that no other of those persons will be prosecuted—\n\nall the notations that were included under this section in any summonses or notices relating to the operation or investigation are cancelled by this subsection.\n\n(5) If a notation is cancelled by subsection (4), the CEO must serve a written notice of that fact on each person who was served with, or otherwise given, the summons or notice containing the notation.\n\n(6) In this section—\n\n***official matter*** has the same meaning as in section 22.\n\n\t22 Offences of disclosure\n\n(1) A person who is served with, or otherwise given, a summons or notice containing a notation made under section 21 must not disclose—\n\n(a) the existence of the summons or notice or any information about it; or\n\n(b) the existence of, or any information about, any official matter connected with the summons or notice.\n\n1. $2200 or imprisonment for one year.\n\n\n(2) Subsection (1) does not prevent the person from making a disclosure—\n\n(a) in accordance with the circumstances, if any, specified in the notation; or\n\n(b) to a legal practitioner for the purpose of obtaining legal advice or representation relating to the summons, notice or matter; or\n\n(c) if the person is a body corporate, to an officer or agent of the body corporate for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the summons or notice; or\n\n(d) if the person is a legal practitioner, for the purpose of obtaining the agreement of another person under section 23(3) to the legal practitioner answering a question or producing a document at an examination before an examiner.\n\n(3) If a disclosure is made to a person as permitted by subsection (2) or (4), the following provisions apply—\n\n(a) while he or she is a person of a kind to whom a disclosure is so permitted to be made, he or she must not disclose the existence of, or any information about, the summons or notice, or any official matter connected with it, except as permitted by subsection (4);\n\n(b) while he or she is no longer such a person, he or she must not, in any circumstances, make a record of, or disclose the existence of, the summons, notice or matter, or disclose any information about any of them.\n\n1. $2200 or imprisonment for one year.\n\n\n(4) A person to whom information has been disclosed, as permitted by subsection (2) or this subsection, may disclose that information—\n\n(a) if the person is an officer or agent of a body corporate referred to in subsection (2)(c)—\n\n(i) to another officer or agent of the body corporate for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the summons or notice; or\n\n(ii) to a legal practitioner for the purpose of obtaining legal advice or representation relating to the summons, notice or matter; or\n\n(b) if the person is a legal practitioner, for the purpose of giving legal advice, or making representations, relating to the summons, notice or matter.\n\n(5) This section ceases to apply to a summons or notice after—\n\n(a) the notation contained in the summons or notice is cancelled by section 21(4); or\n\n(b) 5 years elapse after the issue of the summons or notice—\n\nwhichever is sooner.\n\n(6) A reference in this section to disclosing something's existence includes disclosing information from which a person could reasonably be expected to infer its existence.\n\n(7) In this section—\n\n***official matter*** means any of the following (whether past, present or contingent)—\n\n(a) the determination referred to in section 19(3);\n\n(b) an ACC operation/investigation;\n\n(c) an examination held by an examiner;\n\n(d) court proceedings.\n\n\t23 Failure of witnesses to attend and answer questions\n\n(1) A person served, as prescribed, with a summons to appear as a witness at an examination before an examiner must not—\n\n(a) fail to attend as required by the summons; or\n\n(b) fail to attend from day to day unless excused, or released from further attendance, by the examiner.\n\n(2) A person appearing as a witness at an examination before an examiner must not—\n\n(a) when required pursuant to section 19 either to take an oath or make an affirmation, refuse or fail to comply with the requirement; or\n\n(b) refuse or fail to answer a question that he or she is required to answer by the examiner; or\n\n(c) refuse or fail to produce a document or thing that he or she was required to produce by a summons under this Act served on him or her as prescribed.\n\n(3) Where—\n\n(a) a legal practitioner is required to answer a question or produce a document at an examination before an examiner; and\n\n(b) the answer to the question would disclose, or the document contains, a privileged communication made by or to the legal practitioner in his or her capacity as a legal practitioner—\n\nthe legal practitioner is entitled to refuse to comply with the requirement unless the person to whom or by whom the communication was made agrees to the legal practitioner complying with the requirement but, where the legal practitioner refuses to comply with the requirement, he or she must, if so required by the examiner, give the examiner the name and address of the person to whom or by whom the communication was made.\n\n(4) Subsection (5) limits the use that can be made of any answers given at an examination before an examiner, or documents or things produced at an examination before an examiner. That subsection only applies if—\n\n(a) a person appearing as a witness at an examination before an examiner—\n\n(i) answers a question that he or she is required to answer by the examiner; or\n\n(ii) produces a document or thing that he or she was required to produce by a summons under this Act served on him or her as prescribed; and\n\n(b) in the case of the production of a document that is, or forms part of, a record of an existing or past business, the document sets out details of earnings received by the person in respect of his or her employment and does not set out any other information; and\n\n(c) before answering the question or producing the document or thing, the person claims that the answer, or the production of the document or thing, might tend to incriminate the person or make the person liable to a penalty.\n\n(5) The answer, or the document or thing, is not admissible in evidence against the person in—\n\n(a) a criminal proceeding; or\n\n(b) a proceeding for the imposition of a penalty—\n\nother than—\n\n(c) confiscation proceedings; or\n\n(d) a proceeding in respect of—\n\n(i) in the case of an answer, the falsity of the answer; or\n\n(ii) in the case of the production of a document, the falsity of any statement contained in the document.\n\n(6) A person who contravenes subsection (1), (2) or (3) is guilty of an indictable offence punishable by a fine not exceeding $22 000 or imprisonment for a period not exceeding 5 years.\n\n(7) Subsection (3) does not affect the law relating to legal professional privilege.\n\n\t24 Warrant for arrest of witness\n\nS. 24(1) amended by No. 6/2018 s. 68(Sch. 2 item 11.1).\n\n(1) Where, upon application by an examiner, a Judge of the Federal Court sitting in chambers or the Supreme Court is satisfied by evidence on oath or affirmation that there are reasonable grounds to believe—\n\n(a) that a person who has been ordered, under section 28, to deliver his or her passport to the examiner, whether or not the person has complied with the order, is nevertheless likely to leave Australia for the purpose of avoiding giving evidence before the examiner; or\n\n(b) that a person in relation to whom a summons has been issued under section 19(1)—\n\n(i) has absconded or is likely to abscond; or\n\n(ii) is otherwise attempting, or is otherwise likely to attempt, to evade service of the summons; or\n\n(c) that a person has committed an offence under section 23(1) or is likely to do so—\n\nthe Judge or the Court may issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person.\n\n(2) The warrant may be executed by any person to whom it is addressed and the person executing it has power to break into and enter any premises, vessel, aircraft or vehicle for the purpose of executing it.\n\n(3) A member of the Australian Federal Police cannot execute the warrant unless he or she is also a member of the staff of the ACC.\n\n(4) The warrant may be executed even if the warrant is not at the time in the possession of the person executing it.\n\n(5) A person executing the warrant may only use such reasonable force as is necessary for the execution.\n\n(6) Where a person is apprehended under the warrant, he or she must be brought, as soon as practicable, before a Judge of the Federal Court or the Supreme Court and the Judge or the Court may—\n\n(a) admit the person to bail, with such security as the Judge or the Court thinks fit, on such conditions as he or she or it thinks necessary to ensure the appearance of the person as a witness before the examiner; or\n\n(b) order the continued detention of the person for the purposes of ensuring his or her appearance as such a witness; or\n\n(c) order the release of the person.\n\n(7) Where a person is under detention under this section, he or she must, within 14 days after he or she was brought, or last brought, before a Judge of the Federal Court or the Supreme Court in accordance with this section, or within such shorter or longer time as a Judge or the Court has fixed upon the last previous appearance of the person before a Judge or the Court under this section, be again brought before a Judge or the Court and the Judge or the Court may then exercise any of the powers of a Judge or the Court under subsection (6).\n\n(8) In this section—\n\n***Australia*** includes the external Territories.\n\n\t25 False or misleading evidence\n\n(1) A person must not, at an examination before an examiner, give evidence that the person knows is false or misleading in a material particular.\n\n(2) A contravention of subsection (1) is an indictable offence punishable by a fine not exceeding $22 000 or imprisonment for a period not exceeding 5 years.\n\n\t26 Protection of witnesses from harm or intimidation\n\nWhere it appears to an examiner that, by reason of the fact that a person—\n\n(a) is to appear, is appearing or has appeared at an examination before the examiner to give evidence or to produce a document or thing; or\n\n(b) proposes to furnish or has furnished information, or proposes to produce or has produced a document or thing, to the ACC otherwise than at an examination before the examiner—\n\nthe safety of the person may be prejudiced or the person may be subjected to intimidation or harassment, the examiner may make such arrangements (including arrangements with the State Minister or with members of the Australian Federal Police or of the Police Force of the State) as are necessary to avoid prejudice to the safety of the person, or to protect the person from intimidation or harassment.\n\n\t27 Legal protection of examiners, counsel and witnesses\n\n(1) An examiner has, in the performance of his or her functions or the exercise of his or her powers as an examiner in relation to an examination before the examiner, the same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court.\n\nS. 27(2) amended by No. 18/2005 s. 18(Sch. 1 item 8.2).\n\n(2) A legal practitioner assisting the ACC or an examiner or representing a person at an examination before an examiner has the same protection and immunity as a legal practitioner has in appearing for a party in proceedings in the High Court.\n\n(3) Subject to this Act, a person summoned to attend or appearing before an examiner as a witness has the same protection as a witness in proceedings in the High Court.\n\n\t28 Order for delivery to examiner of passport of witness\n\nS. 28(1) amended by No. 6/2018 s. 68(Sch. 2 item 11.1).\n\n(1) Where, upon application by an examiner, a Judge of the Federal Court sitting in chambers is satisfied by evidence on oath or affirmation that—\n\n(a) in connection with a special ACC operation/ investigation, a summons has been issued under this Act requiring a person to appear before an examiner at an examination (whether or not the summons has been served), or a person has appeared before an examiner at an examination, to give evidence or to produce documents or other things; and\n\n(b) there are reasonable grounds for believing that the person may be able to give to the examiner evidence or further evidence that is, or to produce to the examiner documents or other things or further documents or other things that are, relevant to the special ACC operation/investigation and could be of particular significance to the special ACC operation/investigation; and\n\n(c) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the person intends to leave Australia and has in his or her possession, custody or control a passport issued to him or her—\n\nthe Judge may make an order requiring the person to appear before a Judge of the Federal Court on a date, and at a time and place, specified in the order to show cause why he or she should not be ordered to deliver the passport to the examiner.\n\n(2) Where a person appears before a Judge of the Federal Court under an order made under subsection (1), the Judge may, if he or she thinks fit, make an order—\n\n(a) requiring the person to deliver to the examiner any passport issued to him or her that is in his or her possession, custody or control; and\n\n(b) authorising the examiner to retain the passport until the expiration of such period (not exceeding one month) as is specified in the order.\n\n(3) A Judge of the Federal Court may, upon application by the examiner, extend for a further period (not exceeding one month) or further periods (not exceeding one month in each case) the period for which the examiner is authorised to retain a passport under an order made under subsection (2), but so that the total period for which the examiner is authorised to retain the passport does not exceed 3 months.\n\n(4) A Judge of the Federal Court may, at any time while the examiner is authorised under an order made under this section to retain a passport issued to a person, upon application made by the person, revoke the order and, if the order is revoked, the examiner must forthwith return the passport to the person.\n\n(5) In this section—\n\n***Australia*** includes the external Territories.\n\nPart 4—Search warrants\n\n\t29 Search warrants\n\n(1) An eligible person may apply to an issuing officer for the issue of a warrant under subsection (2) if—\n\n(a) the eligible person has reasonable grounds for suspecting that, on a particular day (the ***relevant day***), being the day on which, or a particular day within one month after the day on which, the application is made, there may be, upon any land or upon or in any premises, vessel, aircraft or vehicle, a thing or things of a particular kind connected with a special ACC operation/investigation (***things of the relevant kind***); and\n\n(b) the eligible person believes on reasonable grounds that, if a summons were issued for the production of the thing or things, the thing or things might be concealed, lost, mutilated or destroyed.\n\n(2) Where an application under subsection (1) is made to an issuing officer, the issuing officer may issue a warrant authorising a person named in the warrant (the ***authorised person***), with such assistance as the authorised person thinks necessary and if necessary by force—\n\n(a) to enter upon the land or upon or into the premises, vessel, aircraft or vehicle; and\n\n(b) to search the land, premises, vessel, aircraft or vehicle for things of the relevant kind; and\n\n(c) to seize any things of the relevant kind found upon the land or upon or in the premises, vessel, aircraft or vehicle and deliver things so seized to any person participating in the special ACC operation/investigation.\n\n(3) A member of the Australian Federal Police cannot be an authorised person unless he or she is also a member of the staff of the ACC.\n\n(4) An issuing officer must not issue a warrant under subsection (2) unless—\n\n(a) an affidavit has been furnished to him or her setting out the grounds on which the issue of the warrant is being sought; and\n\n(b) the applicant (or some other person) has given to the issuing officer, either orally or by affidavit, such further information (if any) as the issuing officer requires concerning the grounds on which the issue of the warrant is being sought; and\n\n(c) the issuing officer is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for issuing the warrant.\n\n(5) Where an issuing officer issues a warrant under subsection (2), he or she must state on the affidavit furnished to him or her as mentioned in subsection (4)(a) which of the grounds specified in that affidavit he or she has relied on to justify the issue of the warrant and particulars of any other grounds relied on by him or her to justify the issue of the warrant.\n\n(6) A warrant issued under this section must—\n\n(a) include a statement of the purpose for which the warrant is issued, which must include a reference to the special ACC operation/ investigation with which the things of the relevant kind are connected;\n\n(b) state whether entry is authorised to be made at any time of the day or night or during specified hours of the day or night;\n\n(c) include a description of the kind of things authorised to be seized; and\n\n(d) specify a date, not being later than one month after the date of issue of the warrant, upon which the warrant ceases to have effect.\n\n(7) A warrant issued under this section may be executed, in accordance with its terms, at any time during the period commencing on the relevant day and ending on the date specified in the warrant as the date upon which the warrant ceases to have effect.\n\n(8) A person executing a warrant issued under this section may only use such reasonable force as is necessary for the execution.\n\n(9) Where, in the course of searching, in accordance with the terms of a warrant issued under this section, for things of the relevant kind, the person executing the warrant finds a thing that he or she believes on reasonable grounds to be evidence that would be admissible in the prosecution of a person for an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory and he or she believes on reasonable grounds that it is necessary to seize the thing in order to prevent its concealment, loss, mutilation or destruction, or its use in committing such an offence, the person may seize the thing and, if he or she does so, the thing is to be taken, for the purposes of this Act, to have been seized pursuant to the warrant.\n\n(10) Where a thing is seized pursuant to a warrant issued under this section—\n\n(a) the head of the special ACC operation/ investigation may retain the thing if, and for so long as, retention of the thing by the head of the special ACC operation/investigation is reasonably necessary for the purposes of the special ACC operation/investigation to which the thing is relevant; and\n\n(b) if the retention of the thing by the head of the special ACC operation/investigation is not, or ceases to be, reasonably necessary for such purposes, a person participating in the special ACC operation/investigation must cause the thing to be delivered to—\n\n(i) if the thing may be used in evidence in proceedings of a kind referred to in subsection (13), the authority or person responsible for taking the proceedings; or\n\n(ii) if subparagraph (i) does not apply, the person who appears to the person participating in the special ACC operation/investigation to be entitled to the possession of the thing—\n\nunless the CEO has furnished the thing to the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth or of a State, or to a law enforcement agency, or to another person or authority, in accordance with section 34(1)(a), (b) or (c).\n\n(11) A person participating in the special ACC operation/investigation may, instead of delivering a thing in accordance with subsection (10)(b)(ii), deliver the thing to the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth or of a State, or to a law enforcement agency, for the purpose of assisting in the investigation of criminal offences, where the person participating in the special ACC operation/investigation is satisfied that the thing is likely to be useful for that purpose.\n\n(12) Nothing in this section affects a right of a person to apply for, or the power of a person to issue, a warrant, being a right or power existing otherwise than by virtue of this section.\n\n(13) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1)(a), a reference in this section to a thing connected with a special ACC operation/ investigation, includes a reference to a thing that may be used in evidence in proceedings for the taking, by or on behalf of the Crown in right of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory, of civil remedies in respect of a matter connected with, or arising out of, an offence to which the special ACC operation/investigation relates.\n\n(14) In this section—\n\n***thing*** includes a document.\n\n\t30 Application by telephone for search warrants\n\n(1) Where, by reason of circumstances of urgency, an eligible person considers it necessary to do so, the eligible person may make application by telephone for a warrant under section 29.\n\nS. 30(2) amended by No. 6/2018 s. 68(Sch. 2 item 11.2).\n\n(2) Before so making application, the eligible person must prepare an affidavit that sets out the grounds on which the issue of the warrant is being sought, but may, if it is necessary to do so, make the application before the affidavit has been sworn or affirmed.\n\n(3) Where an issuing officer issues a warrant under section 29 upon an application made by telephone, he or she must—\n\n(a) complete and sign the warrant; and\n\n(b) inform the eligible person who made the application of the terms of the warrant and the date on which and the time at which it was signed; and\n\n(c) record on the warrant his or her reasons for issuing the warrant; and\n\n(d) send a copy of the warrant to the CEO.\n\n(4) Where a warrant is issued under section 29 upon an application made by telephone a member of the staff of the ACC or a member of the Police Force of the State may complete a form of warrant in the terms indicated by the issuing officer under subsection (3) and, where a form of warrant is so completed, he or she must write on it the name of the issuing officer who issued the warrant and the date on which and the time at which it was signed.\n\nS. 30(5) amended by No. 6/2018 s. 68(Sch. 2 item 11.2).\n\n(5) Where a person completes a form of warrant in accordance with subsection (4), the person must, not later than the day next following the date of expiry of the warrant, send to the issuing officer who signed the warrant the form of warrant completed by him or her and the affidavit duly sworn or affirmed in connection with the warrant.\n\n(6) Upon receipt of the documents referred to in subsection (5) the issuing officer must attach them to the warrant signed by him or her and deal with the documents in the manner in which he or she would have dealt with the affidavit if the application for the warrant had been made to him or her in accordance with section 29.\n\n(7) A form of warrant duly completed in accordance with subsection (4) is to be taken to be a warrant issued under section 29.\n\nPart 5—Performance of functions and exercise of powers\n\n\t31 Consent of Board may be needed before functions can be performed\n\nThe conferral of a function on a Commonwealth body or person by this Act is subject to any provision of the ACC Act that requires the consent of the Board before the function can be performed.\n\n\t32 Functions not affected by State laws\n\nA Commonwealth body or person is not precluded by any law of the State from performing a function conferred by this Act.\n\n\t33 Extent to which functions are conferred\n\n(1) This Act does not purport to impose any duty on a Commonwealth body or person to perform a function if the imposition of the duty would be beyond the legislative power of the Parliament of the State.\n\n(2) This section does not limit the operation of section 35 of this Act or section 6 of the **Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984**.\n\n\t34 Performance of functions\n\n(1) Where the ACC, in carrying out an ACC operation/investigation, obtains evidence of an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory, being evidence that would be admissible in a prosecution for the offence, the CEO must assemble the evidence and give it to—\n\n(a) the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth or the State, as the case requires; or\n\n(b) the relevant law enforcement agency; or\n\n(c) any person or authority (other than a law enforcement agency) who is authorised by or under a law of the Commonwealth or of the State or Territory to prosecute the offence.\n\n(2) Where the ACC, in carrying out an ACC operation/investigation, obtains evidence that would be admissible in confiscation proceedings, the CEO may assemble the evidence and give it to—\n\n(a) the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth or the relevant State, as the case requires; or\n\n(b) a relevant law enforcement agency; or\n\n(c) any person or authority (other than a law enforcement authority) who is authorised to commence the confiscation proceedings.\n\n(3) Where, as a result of the performance of any of the ACC's functions, the Board considers that a recommendation should be made to the Commonwealth Minister or to the appropriate State Minister of a participating State, being a recommendation—\n\n(a) for reform of the law relating to relevant offences, including—\n\n(i) evidence and procedure applicable to the trials of relevant offences; and\n\n(ii) relevant offences in relation to, or involving, corporations; and\n\n(iii) taxation, banking and financial frauds; and\n\n(iv) reception by Australian courts of evidence obtained in foreign countries as to relevant offences; and\n\n(v) maintenance and preservation of taxation, banking and financial records; or\n\n(b) for reform of administrative practices; or\n\n(c) for reform of administration of the courts in relation to trials of relevant offences—\n\nthe Board may make the recommendation to the Commonwealth Minister, or to that State Minister, as the case may be.\n\n(4) Where the ACC has obtained particular information or intelligence in the course of performing one or more of its functions, nothing in this Act is to be taken to prevent the ACC from making use of the information or intelligence in the performance of any of its other functions.\n\n\t35 Functions of federal judicial officers\n\n(1) In this section—\n\nS. 35(1) def. of *federal judicial officer* amended by No. 68/2013 s. 19(2).\n\n***federal judicial officer*** means a Judge of the Federal Court or a Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.\n\n(2) A function conferred on a federal judicial officer by this Act is conferred on the federal judicial officer in a personal capacity and not as a court or a member of a court. The federal judicial officer need not accept the function conferred.\n\n(3) Anything done or made by a federal judicial officer under this Act has effect only by virtue of this Act and is not to be taken by implication to be done or made by a court.\n\n(4) A federal judicial officer performing a function under this Act has the same protection and immunity as if he or she were performing that function as, or as a member of, a court (being the court of which the federal judicial officer is a member).\n\n\t36 Limitation on challenge to Board determination\n\nIf—\n\n(a) an ACC State intelligence operation is determined by the Board to be a special operation; or\n\n(b) an ACC State investigation is determined by the Board to be a special investigation—\n\nthen, except in a proceeding instituted by the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth or of a State, any act or thing done by the ACC because of that determination must not be challenged, reviewed, quashed or called in question in any court of the State on the ground that the determination was not lawfully made.\n\n\t37 Cooperation with law enforcement agencies and coordination with overseas authorities\n\n(1) In performing its functions under this Act, the ACC must, so far as is practicable, work in cooperation with law enforcement agencies.\n\n(2) In performing its functions under this Act, the ACC may coordinate its activities with the activities of authorities and persons in other countries performing functions similar to functions of the ACC.\n\n\t38 Incidental powers of ACC\n\nThe ACC has power to do all things necessary to be done for or in connection with, or reasonably incidental to, the performance of its functions under this Act, and any specific powers conferred on the ACC by this Act are not to be taken to limit by implication the generality of this section.\n\nPart 6—General\n\n\t39 Double jeopardy\n\nIf—\n\n(a) an act or omission by a person is an offence under this Act and is also an offence under the ACC Act; and\n\n(b) the person has been punished for the offence under the ACC Act—\n\nthe person is not liable to be punished for the offence under this Act.\n\n\t40 Arrangements for Board to obtain information or intelligence\n\nThe State Minister may make an arrangement with the Commonwealth Minister for the Board to be given by the State, or an authority of the State, information or intelligence relating to relevant criminal activities.\n\n\t41 Administrative arrangements with the Commonwealth\n\nThe State Minister may make an arrangement with the Commonwealth Minister under which the State will, from time to time as agreed upon under the arrangement, make available a person who is an officer or employee of the State or of an authority of the State or a member of the Police Force of the State, or persons who are such officers, employees or members, to perform services for the ACC.\n\n\t42 Judges to perform functions under the ACC Act\n\nA Judge of a court of the State may perform functions conferred on the Judge by section 22, 23 or 31 of the ACC Act.\n\n\t43 Furnishing of reports and information\n\n(1) The Chair of the Board must keep the Commonwealth Minister informed of the general conduct of the ACC in the performance of the ACC's functions under this Act. If the Commonwealth Minister requests the Chair of the Board to provide to him or her information concerning a specific matter relating to the ACC's conduct in the performance of its functions under this Act, the Chair must comply with the request.\n\n(2) Subject to subsection (3), if a State Minister who is a member of the Inter-Governmental Committee requests the Chair of the Board to provide to him or her information concerning a specific matter relating to the ACC's conduct in the performance of its functions under this Act, the Chair must comply with the request.\n\n(3) If the Chair of the Board considers that disclosure of information to the public could prejudice the safety or reputation of persons or the operations of law enforcement agencies, the Chair must not provide the information under subsection (2).\n\n(4) Subject to subsection (6), the Chair of the Board—\n\n(a) must, when requested by the Inter-Governmental Committee to furnish information to the Committee concerning a specific matter relating to an ACC operation/ investigation that the ACC has conducted or is conducting, comply with the request; and\n\n(b) must when requested by the Inter-Governmental Committee to do so, and may at such other times as the Chair of the Board thinks appropriate, inform the Committee concerning the general conduct of the ACC in the performance of the ACC's functions under this Act.\n\n(5) Subject to subsection (6), the Chair of the Board must furnish to the Inter-Governmental Committee, for transmission to the Governments represented on the Committee, a report of the findings of any special ACC operation/ investigation conducted by the ACC.\n\n(6) The Chair of the Board must not furnish to the Inter-Governmental Committee any matter the disclosure of which to members of the public could prejudice the safety or reputation of persons or the operations of law enforcement agencies and, if the findings of the ACC in an investigation include any such matter, the Chair of the Board must prepare a separate report in relation to the matter and furnish that report to the State Minister.\n\n(7) The Chair of the Board may include in a report furnished under subsection (5) a recommendation that the report be laid before each House of the Parliament of the State.\n\n(8) The CEO may give to—\n\n(a) any law enforcement agency; or\n\n(b) any foreign law enforcement agency; or\n\n(c) any other authority of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory prescribed by the regulations—\n\nany information that has come into the ACC's possession under this Act and that is relevant to the activities of that agency or authority if—\n\n(d) it appears to the CEO to be appropriate to do so; and\n\n(e) to do so would not be contrary to a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory that would otherwise apply.\n\n(9) The CEO may, whenever it appears to the CEO to be appropriate to do so, furnish to authorities and persons responsible for taking civil remedies by or on behalf of the Crown in right of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory any information that has come into the ACC's possession under this Act and that may be relevant for the purposes of so taking such remedies in respect of matters connected with, or arising out of, offences against the laws of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory, as the case may be.\n\n(10) Where any information relating to the performance of the functions of an authority of the Commonwealth or a State or the Administration of a Territory comes into the ACC's possession under this Act, the CEO may, if he or she considers it desirable to do so—\n\n(a) furnish that information to the authority or Administration; and\n\n(b) make any recommendations to the authority or Administration as to the performance of its functions that the CEO considers appropriate.\n\n(11) A report under this Act that sets out any finding that an offence has been committed, or makes any recommendation for the institution of a prosecution in respect of an offence, must not be made available to the public unless the finding or recommendation is expressed to be based on evidence that would be admissible in the prosecution of a person for that offence.\n\n(12) The CEO may, whenever it appears to the CEO to be appropriate to do so, furnish to the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation any information that has come into the ACC's possession under this Act and that is relevant to security as defined in section 4 of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979  of the Commonwealth.\n\n\t44 Secrecy\n\n(1) This section applies to—\n\n(a) the CEO; and\n\n(b) a member of the Board; and\n\n(c) a member of the staff of the ACC; and\n\n(d) an examiner.\n\n(2) A person to whom this section applies who, either directly or indirectly, except for the purposes of a relevant Act or otherwise in connection with the performance of his or her functions under a relevant Act, and either while he or she is or after he or she ceases to be a person to whom this section applies—\n\n(a) makes a record of any information; or\n\n(b) divulges or communicates to any person any information—\n\nbeing information acquired by him or her by reason of, or in the course of, the performance of his or her functions under this Act, is guilty of an offence punishable by a fine not exceeding $5500 or imprisonment for a period not exceeding one year, or both.\n\n(3) A person to whom this section applies cannot be required to produce in any court any document that has come into his or her custody or control in the course of, or by reason of, the performance of his or her functions under this Act, or to divulge or communicate to a court a matter or thing that has come to his or her notice in the performance of those functions, except where the ACC, or the CEO, the acting CEO, a member of the Board or an examiner in his or her official capacity, is a party to the relevant proceeding or it is necessary to do so—\n\n(a) for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of a relevant Act; or\n\n(b) for the purposes of a prosecution instituted as a result of an operation or investigation carried out by the ACC in the performance of its functions.\n\n(4) In this section—\n\n***court*** includes any tribunal, authority or person having power to require the production of documents or the answering of questions;\n\n***member of the staff of the ACC*** means—\n\n(a) a person referred to in the definition of ***member of the staff of the ACC*** in section 4(1) of the ACC Act; or\n\n(b) a person who assists, or performs services for or on behalf of, a legal practitioner appointed under section 7 in the performance of the legal practitioner's functions as counsel to the ACC;\n\n***produce*** includes permit access to, and ***production*** has a corresponding meaning;\n\n***relevant Act*** means the ACC Act, this Act or any corresponding Act of another State.\n\n\t45 Delegation\n\nThe CEO may, by writing, delegate to a member of the staff of the ACC who is an SES employee, or an acting SES employee, all or any of the CEO's functions under this Act.\n\n\t46 Obstructing, hindering or disrupting the ACC or an examiner\n\n(1) A person must not—\n\n(a) obstruct or hinder—\n\n(i) the ACC in the performance of its functions; or\n\n(ii) an examiner in the performance of his or her functions as an examiner; or\n\n(b) disrupt an examination before an examiner.\n\n(2) A person who contravenes subsection (1) is guilty of an indictable offence punishable by a fine not exceeding $22 000 or imprisonment for a period not exceeding 5 years.\n\n\t47 Public meetings and bulletins\n\n(1) The Board may hold meetings in public for the purpose of informing the public about, or receiving submissions in relation to, the performance of the ACC's functions, including its functions under this Act.\n\n(2) The Board may publish bulletins for the purpose of informing the public about the performance of the ACC's functions, including its functions under this Act.\n\n(3) The Board must not—\n\n(a) divulge in the course of a meeting held under subsection (1); or\n\n(b) include in a bulletin published under subsection (2)—\n\nany matter the disclosure of which to members of the public could prejudice the safety or reputation of a person or prejudice the fair trial of a person who has been or may be charged with an offence.\n\n\t48 Annual report\n\n(1) In this section—\n\n***annual report*** means a report by the Chair of the Board under section 61 of the ACC Act.\n\n(2) An annual report in relation to a year must include the following—\n\n(a) a description of any ACC State investigation that the ACC conducted during the year and that the Board determined to be a special investigation;\n\n(b) a description, which may include statistics, of any patterns or trends, and the nature and scope, of any criminal activity that have come to the attention of the ACC during that year in the performance of its functions under this Act;\n\n(c) any recommendations for changes in the laws of the Commonwealth, of a participating State or of a Territory, or for administrative action, that, as a result of the performance of the ACC's functions under this Act, the Board considers should be made;\n\n(d) the general nature and the extent of any information furnished by the CEO during that year under this Act to a law enforcement agency;\n\n(e) the extent to which ACC State investigations have resulted in the prosecution in that year of persons for offences;\n\n(f) the extent to which ACC State investigations have resulted in confiscation proceedings;\n\n(g) particulars of the number and results of court proceedings involving the ACC in relation to its functions under this Act being proceedings that were determined, or otherwise disposed of, during that year.\n\n(3) An annual report must not—\n\n(a) identify persons as being suspected of having committed offences; or\n\n(b) identify persons as having committed offences unless those persons have been convicted of those offences.\n\n(4) In any annual report the Chair of the Board must take reasonable care to ensure that the identity of a person is not revealed if to reveal his or her identity might, having regard to any material appearing in the report, prejudice the safety or reputation of a person or prejudice the fair trial of a person who has been or may be charged with an offence.\n\n(5) The State Minister is to cause a copy of—\n\n(a) each annual report that he or she receives; and\n\n(b) any comments made on the report by the Inter-Governmental Committee, being comments that accompanied the report—\n\nto be laid before each House of the Parliament of the State within 15 sitting days of that House after he or she receives the report.\n\n\t49 Supreme Court—limitation of jurisdiction\n\nIt is the intention of sections 36, 56 and 64 to alter or vary section 85 of the **Constitution Act 1975**.\n\n\t50 Regulations\n\nThe Governor in Council may make regulations for or with respect to any matter or thing required or permitted by this Act to be prescribed or necessary to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to this Act.\n\nPt 7 (Heading and ss 51, 52) repealed by No. 28/2007 s. 3(Sch. item 2).\n\n* * * * *\n\nPart 8—Transitional\n\n\t53 Definitions\n\nIn this Part—\n\n***NCA investigation*** means an investigation under section 5(4) of the NCA (State Provisions) Act;\n\n***NCA (State Provisions) Act*** means the **National Crime Authority (State Provisions) Act 1984**.\n\n\t54 Certain investigations taken to be special investigations\n\nIf an ACC State investigation relates to a matter in relation to which an NCA investigation had been commenced but not completed before 1 January 2003, the Board of the ACC is taken to have determined, in writing, that the ACC State investigation is a special investigation.\n\n\t55 Assembling and giving evidence obtained by the NCA\n\nIf—\n\n(a) before 1 January 2003, the National Crime Authority obtained evidence of a kind referred to in subsection (1) of section 6 of the NCA (State Provisions) Act; but\n\n(b) the National Crime Authority had not assembled and given the evidence as mentioned in that subsection before 1 January 2003—\n\nsection 34(1) applies as if that evidence had been obtained by the ACC in carrying out an ACC operation/investigation.\n\n\t56 Limitation on challenges to validity of references\n\nSection 8 of the NCA (State Provisions) Act continues to apply in relation to a reference made under that Act as if that section had not been repealed by this Act.\n\n\t57 Arrangements to obtain information or intelligence\n\nAn arrangement that was in force under section 11 of the NCA (State Provisions) Act immediately before 1 January 2003 has effect as if it had been made under section 40.\n\n\t58 Things seized under search warrants\n\nIf a thing seized pursuant to a warrant under section 12 of the NCA (State Provisions) Act is in the ACC's possession, section 29(10) and (11) apply to that thing as if it had been seized pursuant to a warrant under section 29.\n\n\t59 Directions as to publication\n\n(1) If a direction was in force under section 16(9) of the NCA (State Provisions) Act immediately before 1 January 2003—\n\n(a) the direction has effect; and\n\n(b) section 18(10), (11) and (14)(b) apply to the direction as if it were a direction under section 18(9).\n\n(2) Section 18(12) and (13), so far as they relate to the CEO, apply to evidence in relation to which a direction was given under section 16(9) of the NCA (State Provisions) Act as if it were evidence given before an examiner in relation to which the examiner has given a direction under section 18(9).\n\n\t60 Disclosure of summons or notice\n\nIf a notation made in connection with an NCA investigation was in force under section 18A of the NCA (State Provisions) Act immediately before 1 January 2003—\n\n(a) the notation has effect;\n\n(b) section 22 applies to the summons or notice containing the notation; and\n\n(c) if there is an ACC operation/investigation relating to the matter to which the NCA investigation related, section 21(4) and (5) apply as if the notation had been made in connection with the ACC operation/ investigation.\n\n\t61 Witness protection\n\nArrangements that were in effect under section 24 of the NCA (State Provisions) Act immediately before 1 January 2003 have effect as if they had been made under section 26.\n\n\t62 Administrative arrangements in relation to the NCA\n\nAn arrangement that was in force under section 28(b) of the NCA (State Provisions) Act immediately before 1 January 2003 has effect as if it had been made under section 41.\n\n\t63 Secrecy obligations\n\n(1) In this section—\n\n***former official*** means a person who was, at any time, a person to whom section 31 of the NCA (State Provisions) Act applied.\n\n(2) Section 44(2) and (3) extend to a former official (whether or not he or she is or has been a person to whom section 44 applies) as if—\n\n(a) references in section 44 to this Act or to a corresponding Act of another State included references to the NCA (State Provisions) Act or to a corresponding Act of another State; and\n\n(b) the reference in section 44(3)(b) to an investigation carried out by the ACC included a reference to an investigation carried out by the National Crime Authority before 1 January 2003.\n\n\t64 Validation of administrative actions\n\nThe **Co-operative Schemes (Administrative Actions) Act 2001** (the ***validation Act***) applies to administrative actions that have been taken, or have purportedly been taken, under the NCA (State Provisions) Act as if—\n\n(a) the NCA (State Provisions) Act were still a relevant State Act for the purposes of the validation Act; and\n\n(b) for the purposes of the validation Act, the \"commencement time\", in relation to the NCA (State Provisions) Act, were the time when section 51 of this Act comes into operation.\n\n**Note**\n\nThe NCA (State Provisions) Act was declared to be a relevant State Act for the purposes of the **Co‑operative Schemes (Administrative Actions) Act 2001** by proclamation of the Governor in Council published in the Government Gazette on 13 December 2001.\n\n\t65 Transitional regulations\n\n(1) If there is no sufficient provision in this Part for dealing with a transitional matter, the regulations may prescribe all matters that are required or necessary to be prescribed in relation to that matter.\n\n(2) In subsection (1)—\n\n***transitional matter*** includes a savings or application matter.\n\n(3) If regulations made under subsection (1) provide that a state of affairs specified or described in the regulations is to be taken to have existed, or not to have existed, at and from a day that is earlier than the day on which the regulations are made but not earlier than 1 January 2003, the regulations have effect according to their terms.\n\n(4) Regulations that contain a provision referred to in subsection (3) cannot be made more than 12 months after the day on which section 51 comes into operation.\n\n(5) If regulations contain a provision referred to in subsection (3), the provision does not operate so as to—\n\n(a) affect in a manner prejudicial to any person (other than the State or an authority of the State), the rights of that person existing before the date of making of those regulations; or\n\n(b) impose liabilities on any person (other than the State or an authority of the State) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of making of those regulations.\n\nSch. (Heading) repealed by No. 21/2015 s. 3(Sch. 1 item 8).\n\nSch. 1 repealed by No. 28/2007 s. 3(Sch. item 2).\n\n* * * * *\n\n\n\nEndnotes\n\n1 General information\n\nSee [www.legislation.vic.gov.au](http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au) for Victorian Bills, Acts and current Versions of legislation and up-to-date legislative information.\n\n*Minister's second reading speech—*\n\n*Legislative Assembly: 7 May 2003*\n\n*Legislative Council: 10 June 2003*\n\nThe long title for the Bill for this Act was \"to make provision for the operation of the Australian Crime Commission in Victoria, to repeal the **National Crime Authority (State Provisions) Act 1984**, to make consequential amendments to various Acts and for other purposes.\"\n\n**Constitution Act 1975:**\n\n*Section 85(5) statement:*\n\n*Legislative Assembly: 7 May 2003*\n\n*Legislative Council: 10 June 2003*\n\n*Absolute majorities:*\n\n*Legislative Assembly: 5 June 2003*\n\n*Legislative Council: 10 June 2003*\n\nThe **Australian Crime Commission (State Provisions) Act 2003** was assented to on 16 June 2003 and came into operation as follows:\n\nSections 1, 2, 3(1) (except paragraphs (d) and (e) of the definition of ***Commonwealth body or person***), 3(2)–(4), 4–14, 17–43, 44(1)(a)(c)(d)  \n(2)–(4), 45–65, Schedule 1 (except items 11 and 14) on 17 June 2003: section 2(1); Schedule 1 (items 11 and 14) on 16 October 2003: Government Gazette 16 October 2003 page 2624. Section 3(1) paragraphs (d) and (e) of the definition of ***Commonwealth body or person***, sections 15, 16 and 44(1)(b) on 13 May 2004: Government Gazette 13 May 2004 pages 1217, 1218.\n\nINTERPRETATION OF LEGISLATION ACT 1984 (ILA)\n\nStyle changes\n\nSection 54A of the ILA authorises the making of the style changes set out in Schedule 1 to that Act.\n\nReferences to ILA s. 39B\n\nSidenotes which cite ILA s. 39B refer to section 39B of the ILA which provides that where an undivided section or clause of a Schedule is amended by the insertion of one or more subsections or subclauses, the original section or clause becomes subsection or subclause (1) and is amended by the insertion of the expression \"(1)\" at the beginning of the original section or clause.\n\nInterpretation\n\nAs from 1 January 2001, amendments to section 36 of the ILA have the following effects:\n\n• Headings\n\nAll headings included in an Act which is passed on or after 1 January 2001 form part of that Act. Any heading inserted in an Act which was passed before 1 January 2001, by an Act passed on or after 1 January 2001, forms part of that Act. This includes headings to Parts, Divisions or Subdivisions in a Schedule; sections; clauses; items; tables; columns; examples; diagrams; notes or forms. See section 36(1A)(2A).\n\n• Examples, diagrams or notes\n\nAll examples, diagrams or notes included in an Act which is passed on or after 1 January 2001 form part of that Act. Any examples, diagrams or notes inserted in an Act which was passed before 1 January 2001, by an Act passed on or after 1 January 2001, form part of that Act. See section 36(3A).\n\n• Punctuation\n\nAll punctuation included in an Act which is passed on or after 1 January 2001 forms part of that Act. Any punctuation inserted in an Act which was passed before 1 January 2001, by an Act passed on or after 1 January 2001, forms part of that Act. See section 36(3B).\n\n• Provision numbers\n\nAll provision numbers included in an Act form part of that Act, whether inserted in the Act before, on or after 1 January 2001. Provision numbers include section numbers, subsection numbers, paragraphs and subparagraphs. See section 36(3C).\n\n• Location of \"legislative items\"\n\nA \"legislative item\" is a penalty, an example or a note. As from 13 October 2004, a legislative item relating to a provision of an Act is taken to be at the foot of that provision even if it is preceded or followed by another legislative item that relates to that provision. For example, if a penalty at the foot of a provision is followed by a note, both of these legislative items will be regarded as being at the foot of that provision. See section 36B.\n\n• Other material\n\nAny explanatory memorandum, table of provisions, endnotes, index and other material printed after the Endnotes does not form part of an Act.  \nSee section 36(3)(3D)(3E).\n\n2 Table of Amendments\n\nThis publication incorporates amendments made to the **Australian Crime Commission (State Provisions) Act 2003** by Acts and subordinate instruments.\n\n–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––\n\n**Legal Profession (Consequential Amendments) Act 2005, No. 18/2005**\n\n| Assent Date: | 24.5.05 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | S. 18(Sch. 1 item 8) on 12.12.05: Government Gazette 1.12.05 p. 2781 |\n| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Australian Crime Commission (State Provisions) Act 2003** |\n\n\n**Statute Law Revision Act 2007, No. 28/2007**\n\n| Assent Date: | 26.6.07 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | S. 3(Sch. item 2) on 27.6.07: s. 2(1) |\n| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Australian Crime Commission (State Provisions) Act 2003** |\n\n\n**Criminal Procedure Amendment (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2009, No. 68/2009**\n\n| Assent Date: | 24.11.09 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | S. 97(Sch. item 9) on 1.1.10: Government Gazette 10.12.09 p. 3215 |\n| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Australian Crime Commission (State Provisions) Act 2003** |\n\n\n**Courts and Other Justice Legislation Amendment Act 2013, No. 68/2013**\n\n| Assent Date: | 19.11.13 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | S. 19 on 1.2.14: Special Gazette (No. 17) 28.1.14 p. 1 |\n| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Australian Crime Commission (State Provisions) Act 2003** |\n\n\n**Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014, No. 17/2014**\n\n| *Assent Date:* | 25.3.14 |\n| --- | --- |\n| *Commencement Date:* | S. 160(Sch. 2 item 9) on 1.7.15: Special Gazette (No. 151) 16.6.15 p. 1 |\n| *Current State:* | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Australian Crime Commission (State Provisions) Act 2003** |\n\n\n**Statute Law Revision Act 2015, No. 21/2015**\n\n| *Assent Date:* | 16.6.15 |\n| --- | --- |\n| *Commencement Date:* | S. 3(Sch. 1 item 8) on 1.8.15: s. 2(1) |\n| *Current State:* | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Australian Crime Commission (State Provisions) Act 2003** |\n\n\n**Oaths and Affirmations Act 2018, No. 6/2018**\n\n| Assent Date: | 27.2.18 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Commencement Date: | S. 68(Sch. 2 item 11) on 1.3.19: s. 2(2) |\n| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the **Australian Crime Commission (State Provisions) Act 2003** |\n\n\n–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––\n\n3 Amendments Not in Operation\n\nThere are no amendments which were Not in Operation at the date of this publication.\n\n4 Explanatory details\n\nNo entries at date of publication.","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"Unauthenticated. Configure AI_GATEWAY_API_KEY or use a provider module. Learn more: https://ai-sdk.dev/unauthenticated-ai-gateway","source":"analysis-cron"},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The legislation appears consistent with its original purpose. It was enacted to enable the Australian Crime Commission (successor to the National Crime Authority) to operate in Victoria with appropriate state-based powers. While there have been amendments over time (updating court names, legal practitioner definitions, and procedural references), these are maintenance amendments rather than expansions of scope. The core framework — special investigations, examinations, search warrants, and secrecy — remains as originally enacted in 2003."},"complexity_factors":["Extensive cross-referencing with the Commonwealth Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (the 'ACC Act'), including imported definitions and conditional operations","Multi-layered approval requirements: Board determinations require specific voting thresholds (9 members including 2 federal), with separate processes for urgent resolutions and committee delegations","Nested conditional logic for 'special' operations: must consider whether ordinary methods would work, must describe general nature of circumstances, but need not specify particular offences","Complex secrecy and disclosure regime: section 21 mandates notations 'must' or 'may' be included based on different thresholds ('reasonably expected to' vs 'might' prejudice), with cascading disclosure restrictions in section 22 applying to secondary recipients","Multiple safeguards and limitations on evidence use: section 23(4)-(5) creates use immunity for self-incriminating evidence (with exceptions for confiscation proceedings and falsity), while section 18(9)-(13) creates judicial override mechanisms for publication bans","Dual jurisdiction mechanics: federal judicial officers act in personal capacity not as courts (section 35), while State Supreme Court and Federal Court both have roles in warrants and arrests","Transitional provisions preserving old NCA investigations, determinations, and secrecy obligations under repealed legislation (Part 8)","47 defined terms in section 3, including complex composite definitions like 'serious and organised crime' with 20 specific offence categories plus exclusions for industrial disputes","Telephone warrant applications with subsequent affidavit requirements (section 30) creating procedural complexity","Overlapping offences with Commonwealth law managed through double jeopardy provision (section 39)"],"plain_english_summary":"This is Victorian legislation that allows the Australian Crime Commission (ACC) — a national body fighting serious and organised crime — to operate within Victoria. It gives the ACC special powers that go beyond what ordinary police have, but only when the ACC Board approves a 'special' operation or investigation.\n\n**Key things this law does:**\n\n* **Sets up the ACC's role in Victoria**: The ACC can investigate serious and organised crimes (like drug trafficking, money laundering, cybercrime, and corruption) that break Victorian laws, even if there's no federal (Commonwealth) aspect involved.\n\n* **Creates a special approval process**: Before the ACC can use its strongest powers, the Board must determine that an operation is 'special' — meaning ordinary police methods aren't likely to work. This requires at least 9 Board members (including 2 federal representatives) to vote in favour.\n\n* **Gives the ACC coercive powers**: Once an operation is declared 'special', ACC examiners can:\n  * **Summon witnesses** to give evidence in private hearings (examinations)\n  * **Demand documents** and other evidence\n  * **Issue search warrants** to enter premises and seize items\n  * **Arrest witnesses** who try to flee or avoid giving evidence\n  * **Temporarily confiscate passports** to stop people leaving Australia\n\n* **Protects witnesses and restricts publicity**: The law includes strict secrecy provisions. People summoned or examined often cannot tell anyone about it (with limited exceptions for legal advice). Examiners can ban publication of evidence to protect witnesses or ensure fair trials.\n\n* **Replaced an older body**: This Act repealed the National Crime Authority (State Provisions) Act 1984, transferring powers from the old National Crime Authority to the new ACC.\n\n**Who it affects:**\n* People suspected of serious and organised crime in Victoria\n* Witnesses called to give evidence at ACC examinations\n* Law enforcement agencies (Victoria Police, Australian Federal Police) who must cooperate with the ACC\n* Legal practitioners representing witnesses\n\n**Why it matters:**\nThis law creates a hybrid system where a national agency can use extraordinary, court-like powers (compelling testimony, jailing refusers) that normally only courts have, but for intelligence-gathering and investigation purposes rather than prosecution. It balances powerful crime-fighting tools with oversight mechanisms (Board approval, secrecy protections, and limits on how evidence can be used in court)."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":8,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The Act implements the stated original purpose of enabling ACC operations in the State and replacing the National Crime Authority State provisions. Subsequent amendments (for example adding references to Judges of the Federal Circuit Court, updating the definition of legal practitioner, and procedural refinements through later Acts) are largely technical or updating measures to align with Commonwealth and State procedural changes rather than a fundamental expansion of the law’s substantive scope. The core scope — conferring ACC investigative/intelligence powers in relation to State offences, coercive examination and search powers, secrecy obligations, and mechanisms for inter‑governmental information sharing — remains consistent with the Act’s original intent (see s1 and Part 8 transitional provisions)."},"complexity_factors":["Extensive definitions and defined terms (over 30 terms defined in section 3 and elsewhere, e.g. ACC operation/investigation, special ACC operation/investigation, serious and organised crime).","Heavy cross‑referencing to the Commonwealth ACC Act and multiple other Acts (Criminal Procedure Act 2009, ASIO Act 1979, Constitution Act 1975).","Numerous conditional paths and nested exceptions (e.g. when compelled answers/documents are inadmissible except for falsity or confiscation proceedings — ss23(4)–(5)).","Multiple coercive power types with differing authorisation and execution rules (examinations, notices to produce, summonses, arrest warrants, passport orders, search warrants — Parts 3–4).","Different judicial roles and limits: issuing officers, Judges of Federal Court or State Supreme Court, and federal judicial officers operating personally (ss24,28,35).","High voting and quorum thresholds and special procedural rules for Board determinations (ss11–12,14–15).","Varied criminal penalties with multiple scales ($2,200; $5,500; $22,000 and imprisonment up to 5 years) and time limits for secrecy notations (s22).","Transitional provisions preserving and mapping prior NCA arrangements into the ACC regime (Part 8) and numerous amendment notes across schedules increasing interpretive complexity."],"plain_english_summary":"**What this law does, in plain English**\n\n- Creates the legal framework for the Australian Crime Commission (ACC) to carry out investigations and intelligence operations in Victoria where the conduct being investigated includes offences against Victorian law (see section 5). It replaces the earlier National Crime Authority (NCA) State provisions (Part 8 transitional provisions).\n\n- Establishes the internal governance and decision rules for the ACC's Board and the CEO’s role in running ACC operations in the State (sections 6–15). The CEO manages, coordinates and controls ACC operations/investigations and appoints legal counsel to assist (s6–7). The Board decides when an ACC State operation or investigation is a “special” one (s8) and must meet high voting thresholds to do so (s12(4)).\n\n- Gives examiners (investigative officers with quasi‑judicial powers) authority to hold private examinations, summon witnesses, compel production of documents and take evidence on oath (Parts 3, especially ss17–21). Notices and summonses may carry secrecy notations; breaching secrecy or refusing to comply with a lawful notice can attract criminal penalties (see ss21–23, penalties up to $22,000 and/or imprisonment for up to 5 years in many cases).\n\n- Provides for coercive search and seizure powers tied to special operations/investigations, including emergency (telephone) applications for warrants (Part 4, ss29–30). It permits authorised officers to enter, search and seize specified items and sets out retention and delivery rules for seized material (s29).\n\n- Authorises judicial involvement for coercive steps (issuing officers and federal/state Judges for warrants, arrest warrants, passport‑retention orders) and preserves some judicial safeguards (ss24,28,29). It also provides a limited mechanism for courts to access examination material where interests of justice require (s18(12)–(13)).\n\n- Regulates cooperation and information sharing between the ACC and state/ Commonwealth/foreign agencies, allows the ACC to furnish intelligence and evidence to prosecutors and law enforcement, and permits recommendations for law reform (s34, s37, s40–43).\n\n- Imposes secrecy obligations on ACC officials and penalises unauthorised disclosure (s44). It also restricts review in State courts of Board determinations that an operation/investigation is “special” (s36).\n\n- Contains protections and limits: legal professional privilege is preserved in specified ways (s23(3)); compelled answers or documents are, with specified exceptions, not admissible against the witness in subsequent criminal proceedings (s23(4)–(5)); witnesses may be provided protection arrangements (s26). Double jeopardy between Commonwealth and State punishment under this Act and the ACC Act is prevented (s39).\n\n**Who it affects**\n\n- Individuals who are summoned to give evidence or produce documents to an ACC examiner, including employees, officers of corporate bodies and legal practitioners (Parts 3, 19–23).\n- Businesses and other organisations that may be the subject of notices, warrants or searches, or that hold records relevant to serious and organised crime (Parts 3–4).\n- State and Commonwealth law enforcement agencies, Courts and Ministers (information‑sharing, oversight, and prosecutorial recipients) (ss34,40–43).\n- ACC staff, Board members, examiners and appointed counsel who operate under the Act and who are subject to secrecy obligations and given statutory immunity for official acts (ss27,44).\n\n**Why it matters — practical mechanics and trade‑offs**\n\nStated purpose (s1): provide for operation of the ACC in Victoria and replace the NCA State provisions. Mechanically, the Act imports strong, Commonwealth‑style coercive investigative powers into the State context and sets out how evidence and intelligence gathered by the ACC are to be handled, shared and used.\n\nCosts, incentives and trade‑offs you should note (with section pointers):\n\n- Compliance burden and criminal sanctions: persons and organisations required to attend, answer or produce documents face criminal penalties for non‑compliance (ss20(4)–(5), 23(6)). This creates a direct compliance cost for businesses and individuals who must respond to notices and summonses.\n\n- Secrecy vs transparency: notations may prohibit disclosure of summonses and related matters (ss21–22). Secrecy safeguards safety and investigative effectiveness but imposes long‑lasting constraints (notations lapse after 5 years or when certain thresholds are met — s22(5)).\n\n- Limits on legal challenge: section 36 bars State courts from questioning acts done because the Board has declared an operation/investigation “special” except where the Commonwealth or a State Attorney‑General sues. That narrows judicial review of the triggering decision and concentrates oversight within executive and inter‑governmental channels rather than ordinary State judicial review.\n\n- Preservation of some legal protections: compelled evidence has limited admissibility against witnesses (s23(4)–(5)); legal professional privilege is acknowledged (s23(3)); courts retain discrete powers to access confidential examination material in the interests of justice (s18(12)–(13)).\n\n- Bureaucratic discretion and centralisation: the CEO has substantial operational control (s6), can delegate (s45), and the Board has exclusive power to designate special operations (s8). This concentrates decision‑making within ACC structures and the Board, subject to the Inter‑Governmental Committee’s limited oversight and revocation power (s16).\n\n- Inter‑agency and cross‑border effects: the ACC may share information with state, Commonwealth and foreign agencies (s34, s43). That reduces transaction costs for multi‑jurisdictional investigations but raises privacy and coordination risks for businesses and individuals whose information is shared more widely.\n\n- Operational constraints and checks: judges must authorize arrest warrants and passport orders (ss24,28), and issuing officers must be satisfied of reasonable grounds before granting search warrants (s29). AFP members may only execute some powers when also ACC staff (s24(3), s29(3)), which channels execution through ACC personnel.\n\n- Economic and market effects: in practice, compelled seizures and production of records can disrupt businesses, divert management time and impose documentary‑retention and compliance costs. The Board’s power to recommend law reform (s34(3)) can affect regulatory and commercial settings over time.\n\n**Implementation risks and opportunity costs**\n\n- Coordination risk: the ACC’s work overlaps with State police; effective implementation requires arrangements (s41) and operational cooperation (s37). Failure to coordinate can cause duplication or gaps in enforcement.\n\n- Concentration of discretion: high thresholds to declare special operations (s12(4)) produce concentrated decision costs at the Board level; secrecy and limited judicial review reduce external checks (s36, s44), increasing the importance of internal governance and inter‑governmental oversight (s16, s43).\n\n**Practical behaviour changes caused by the law**\n\n- Businesses and individuals will invest more in legal compliance and record‑keeping where there is a risk of ACC notice or warrant.\n- Witnesses must be prepared to attend private examinations and may require legal representation; they also face limits on disclosure about the summons/notice (ss17–23).\n- State authorities may second staff to the ACC (s41) and the ACC can transfer evidence to prosecuting agencies (s34), which alters the division of investigative labour.\n\n**Key sections to consult quickly**: functions and scope (s5); examiner powers and secrecy (ss17–23); search warrants (ss29–30); performance and sharing of evidence (s34); limitation on review (s36); secrecy and offences (s44); transitional NCA replacement rules (Part 8).\n\n"},"summary":{"complexity_score":4,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"Based on available information, the Act appears to serve its original stated purpose of providing Victorian legislative support for ACC operations within the state. There is no evidence from the provided text of scope creep or significant divergence from the original intent of enabling Commonwealth-state cooperation in serious crime investigations."},"complexity_factors":["Involves interaction between Commonwealth and State law (cooperative federalism), which requires understanding of both legal systems","Relies heavily on the Commonwealth Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 by reference, meaning the full effect cannot be understood from this Act alone","ACC powers (compulsory examination, immunities, secrecy obligations) are legally technical and have significant consequences for individuals","Limited text was provided, preventing full assessment of all provisions","Short statute but embedded in a complex multi-jurisdictional framework that requires cross-referencing multiple laws"],"plain_english_summary":"This Act links Victoria to the Commonwealth’s Australian Crime Commission, giving Victorian legal force to ACC investigations, powers and procedures so they operate validly in the state. It lets ACC officers exercise special investigative powers (for example, compulsory questioning and searches) within Victoria.\n\nIt affects people and businesses under ACC scrutiny, Victorian law enforcement cooperating with the ACC, and lawyers handling ACC matters — ensuring national crime-fighting isn’t blocked by jurisdictional gaps."},"issue_detection":{"absurdities":[{"type":"other","section":"section 21(4)(c)","severity":"medium","reasoning":"Section 21(4)(c) cancels secrecy notations where evidence concerning one person has been assembled and given “as required by section 434(1)” and criminal proceedings have begun. The supplied Act ends at section 65, while section 34(1) contains the operative evidence-assembly duty and is cited by the adjacent paragraphs 21(4)(a), (b) and (d). The cross-reference to section 434(1) therefore leaves this cancellation path without an operative supplied provision.","confidence":0.99,"description":"The cancellation trigger relies on evidence being assembled and given as required by section 434(1), but the supplied Act contains no section 434.","source_quotes":["evidence of an offence or offences committed by only one person has been assembled and given as required by section 434(1) and criminal proceedings have begun against that person;","Where the ACC, in carrying out an ACC operation/investigation, obtains evidence of an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory, being evidence that would be admissible in a prosecution for the offence, the CEO must assemble the evidence and give it to—","the notation contained in the summons or notice is cancelled by section 21(4);"]}],"contradictions":[]}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/australian-crime-commission-state-provisions-act-2003","history":"/api/acts/australian-crime-commission-state-provisions-act-2003/history","analysis":"/api/acts/australian-crime-commission-state-provisions-act-2003/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/australian-crime-commission-state-provisions-act-2003/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/australian-crime-commission-state-provisions-act-2003/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/australian-crime-commission-state-provisions-act-2003/documents"}}