{"id":"australasia-railway-special-provisions-regulations-2000","name":"AUSTRALASIA RAILWAY (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) REGULATIONS 2000","slug":"australasia-railway-special-provisions-regulations-2000","collection":"regulation","jurisdiction":"nt","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":174275,"registerId":"nt-australasia-railway-special-provisions-regulations-2000-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-05","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"AUSTRALASIA RAILWAY (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) REGULATIONS 2000","content":"NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA\nAUSTRALASIA RAILWAY (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) REGULATIONS 2000\nAs in force at 19 March 2001\nTable of provisions\nPart 1 Preliminary\n1 Citation ............................................................................................ 1\n2 Commencement .............................................................................. 1\n3 Definitions ........................................................................................ 1\nPart 2 Amendment of AustralAsia Railway\nCorporation Act 1996\n4 New section ..................................................................................... 2\n\"28C Successful consortium may pass on civil penalties to contractors\nPart 3 Amendments of AustralAsia Railway\n(Special Provisions) Act 1999\n5 Repeal ............................................................................................. 3\n6 Repeal and substitution ................................................................... 3\n\"10A Relief against forfeiture of leases\n\"10AA Power of Crown Lands Minister to enter agreements about\ntermination or forfeiture of leases\n\"10B Certain provisions of Law of Property Act 2000 not to apply\n7 Easements in favour of PAWA ........................................................ 8\n8 Access easements in favour of private landholders......................... 8\nPart 4 Amendments of AustralAsia Railway (Third\nParty Access) Act 1999\n9 New section ..................................................................................... 8\n\"8 Modification of Code\n10 Schedule.......................................................................................... 9\n\"48 Amendment of Code\nENDNOTES\n\n\n\nNORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA\n____________________\nAs in force at 19 March 2001\n____________________\nAUSTRALASIA RAILWAY (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) REGULATIONS 2000\nRegulations under the AustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Act 1999\nPart 1 Preliminary\n1 Citation\nThese Regulations may be cited as the AustralAsia Railway\n(Special Provisions) Regulations 2000.\n2 Commencement\nThese Regulations come into operation on the date, or respective\ndates, fixed by the Minister by notice in the Gazette.\n3 Definitions\nIn these Regulations, unless the contrary intention appears:\nRailway Corporation Act means the AustralAsia Railway\nCorporation Act 1996.\nSpecial Provisions Act means the AustralAsia Railway (Special\nProvisions) Act 1999.\nThird Party Access Act means the AustralAsia Railway (Third\nParty Access) Act 1999.\n\nPart 2 Amendment of AustralAsia Railway Corporation Act 1996\nAustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Regulations 2000 2\nPart 2 Amendment of AustralAsia Railway\nCorporation Act 1996\n4 New section\nThe Railway Corporation Act is amended by inserting after\nsection 28B in Part 4B the following:\n\"28C Successful consortium may pass on civil penalties to\ncontractors\n\"(1) An agreement to which the successful consortium and a contractor\nof the successful consortium are parties may provide –\n(a) that if the successful consortium –\n(i) is in breach of an obligation under an agreement with the\nCorporation; and\n(ii) is required to pay to the Corporation by way of civil\npenalty for the breach an amount in accordance with\nsection 28B; and\n(b) that if the breach of the obligation by the successful\nconsortium arose, in whole or in part, from a breach by the\ncontractor of an obligation under an agreement with the\nsuccessful consortium in connection with the construction,\noperation or maintenance of the railway,\nthen the contractor is required to pay to the successful consortium\nthe amount, or part of the amount, of the civil penalty required to be\npaid by the successful consortium to the Corporation.\n\"(2) An amount required to be paid to the successful consortium by a\ncontractor under an agreement in accordance with subsection (1) is\na debt due to the successful consortium by the contractor –\n(a) despite that neither the successful consortium nor any other\nperson (whether a party to the agreement or not) suffered\ndamage as a result of the breach; and\n(b) despite that the amount required to be paid by the contractor\nis unrelated to the extent of any damage that the successful\nconsortium or any other person (whether a party to the\nagreement or not) may have suffered as a result of the\nbreach.\".\n\nPart 3 Amendments of AustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Act 1999\nAustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Regulations 2000 3\nPart 3 Amendments of AustralAsia Railway (Special\nProvisions) Act 1999\n5 Repeal\nSection 5B of the Special Provisions Act is repealed.\n6 Repeal and substitution\nSection 10A of the Special Provisions Act is repealed and the\nfollowing substituted –\n\"10A Relief against forfeiture of leases\n\"(1) In relation to a registered lease –\n(a) sections 136 to 140 (inclusive) of the Law of Property\nAct 2000 (Act No. 1 of 2000) apply subject to the modifications\nthat –\n(i) may be made to, or that may apply in relation to, those\nprovisions by virtue of this section; or\n(ii) may be made by regulation; and\n(b) the provisions of the Crown Lands Act 1992 relating to\nforfeiture of leases and Part VII of the Commercial Tenancies\nAct 1979 do not apply.\n\"(2) Relief against forfeiture of a lease (whether under section 138\nor 139 of the applied provisions or any other law of the Territory,\nincluding the common law and the law of equity) is not available if\nthe lease is being terminated as a consequence of the lawful\ntermination of the Concession Deed.\n\"(3) On an application for relief against forfeiture of a registered lease\nunder section 138 of the applied provisions, subject to\nsubsections (2) and (11), the Supreme Court must grant the relief\nunless the Court is satisfied –\n(a) that there has been a material breach of the lease;\n(b) that written notice of the breach has been given to the lessee,\nany sublessee under a registered sublease and the holder of\nany registered security over the lease or any registered\nsublease requiring –\n(i) in the case of a remediable breach, including a breach\nfor non-payment of rent – the breach to be remedied;\n\nPart 3 Amendments of AustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Act 1999\nAustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Regulations 2000 4\n(ii) in the case of a non-remediable breach – the payment of\nreasonable compensation; or\n(iii) in the case of a breach which is partly remediable and\npartly non-remediable – the breach to be remedied to\nthe extent that it is capable of remedy and otherwise the\npayment of reasonable compensation;\n(c) that a reasonable period of time to comply with the\nrequirements set out in the notice under paragraph (b) has\nbeen given;\n(d) in the case of a breach which is remediable or partly\nremediable – that the breach has not been remedied and none\nof the lessee, any sublessee under a registered sublease or\nthe holder of any registered security over the lease or any\nregistered sublease is diligently pursuing the remedy of the\nbreach or that part of the breach that is remediable; and\n(e) in the case of a breach which is non-remediable or partly non-\nremediable – that reasonable compensation has not been\npaid.\n\"(4) If a lessee under a registered lease is not entitled to relief under\nsubsection (3), subject to subsection (2), the Supreme Court may\ngrant the lessee relief in accordance with section 138(2) and (3) of\nthe applied provisions.\n\"(5) Section 138 of the applied provisions (as modified by the operation\nof subsection (3) of this section) is to operate as if the section\nincluded a provision allowing a sublessee under a registered\nsublease or the holder of any registered security over a registered\nsublease to make application under that section in relation to the\nregistered headlease (and such an application may be made even\nthough the headlessee has not applied for relief under that section).\n\"(6) Section 139 of the applied provisions is to operate as if the section\nincluded a provision allowing the holder of any registered security\nover a registered sublease to make application under that section\nas if the holder of the security were a sublessee.\n\"(7) On an application in relation to a registered headlease under\nsection 139 of the applied provisions by a sublessee under a\nregistered sublease or the holder of any registered security over a\nregistered sublease, the Supreme Court must, subject to\nsubsections (8) and (11), grant the application unless –\n(a) the granting of the application would be inconsistent with a\ndecision on an application under section 138 of the applied\nprovisions;\n\nPart 3 Amendments of AustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Act 1999\nAustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Regulations 2000 5\n(b) the Court is satisfied, in respect of any breach of the\nheadlease, that the headlessee has not had a reasonable\nopportunity –\n(i) to remedy the breach or to pay reasonable\ncompensation or both; or\n(ii) to apply for relief against forfeiture,\ntaking into account –\n(iii) sections 137 and 138 of the applied provisions and this\nsection; and\n(iv) the principle that the preservation of the headlease (and\nany registered sublease) by way of orders under\nsection 138 of the applied provisions (as modified by the\noperation of subsection (3) of this section) is to be\npreferred to the making of an order under section 139 of\nthe applied provisions; or\n(c) the Court is satisfied, in respect of any breach of the\nheadlease that is attributable to any act, omission or default of\nthe sublessee or the holder of any registered security over the\nsublease –\n(i) that written notice of the breach has been given to the\nsublessee and the holder of any registered security over\nthe sublease requiring –\n(A) in the case of a remediable breach, including a\nbreach for non-payment of rent – the breach to be\nremedied;\n(B) in the case of a non-remediable breach – the\npayment of reasonable compensation; or\n(C) in the case of a breach which is partly remediable\nand partly non-remediable – the breach to be\nremedied to the extent that it is capable of remedy\nand otherwise the payment of reasonable\ncompensation;\n(ii) that a reasonable period of time to comply with the\nrequirements set out in the notice under\nsubparagraph (i) has been given;\n(iii) in the case of a breach which is remediable or partly\nremediable – that the breach has not been remedied and\nneither the sublessee nor the holder of any registered\n\nPart 3 Amendments of AustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Act 1999\nAustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Regulations 2000 6\nsecurity over the sublease is diligently pursuing the\nremedy of the breach or that part of the breach that is\nremediable; and\n(iv) in the case of a breach which is non-remediable or partly\nnon-remediable – that reasonable compensation has not\nbeen paid.\n\"(8) Subsection (7) does not derogate from the operation of\nsection 139(2) and (3) of the applied provisions.\n\"(9) If a sublessee under a registered sublease is not entitled to an\norder under subsection (7), subject to subsection (2), the Supreme\nCourt may grant an order in accordance with section 139 of the\napplied provisions.\n\"(10) If the Supreme Court makes an order under section 139(1)(d) of the\napplied provisions in respect of a registered lease, the lease\ngranted to the sublessee by virtue of the order (the new lease) is to\ninclude a provision to the effect –\n(a) that despite any law to the contrary or any provisions as to the\nperiod of the new lease, the new lease will be automatically\nand simultaneously determined on the termination of the\nConcession Deed and without necessity of notice;\n(b) that if the new lease is determined in the manner\ncontemplated by paragraph (a), the new lease and any\ninterests derived or dependent on the new lease will be\ndetermined for all time; and\n(c) that, for the avoidance of doubt, it is expressly acknowledged\nand agreed by the parties to the new lease that, on the\ntermination of the Concession Deed, the new lease is\nintended to and will expire by effluxion of time, despite any\nlaw.\n\"(11) The Supreme Court must not make an order under section 138\nor 139 of the applied provisions in relation to a registered\nheadlease on the application of a sublessee under a registered\nsublease or the holder of any registered security over a registered\nsublease unless –\n(a) the headlessee; and\n(b) any sublessee under a registered sublease or holder of any\nregistered security over a registered sublease who is not the\napplicant,\n\nPart 3 Amendments of AustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Act 1999\nAustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Regulations 2000 7\nhas had notice of the application and the Court has given each of\nthose persons who is entitled to such notice a reasonable\nopportunity to be heard on the application.\n\"(12) In this section, unless the contrary intention appears –\napplied provisions means sections 136 to 140 (inclusive) of the\nLaw of Property Act 2000 (Act No. 1 of 2000) as modified and\napplied under this section.\nlease means –\n(a) a lease over a part of the corridor and includes –\n(i) a sublease over a part of the corridor; and\n(ii) a lease over a part of the corridor granted by virtue of an\norder under section 139(1)(d) of the applied provisions;\nor\n(b) a lease over a part of the Port of Darwin granted for a purpose\nconnected with the construction, operation or maintenance of\nthe railway;\nlessee includes –\n(a) a sublessee; and\n(b) the executors, administrators and assigns of a lessee.\n\"10AA Power of Crown Lands Minister to enter agreements about\ntermination or forfeiture of leases\n\"(1) Despite the provisions of the Crown Lands Act 1992 relating to the\ntermination and forfeiture of leases, the Crown Lands Minister may\nin the name of the Territory enter into an agreement relating to the\ntermination or forfeiture of a lease over a part of the corridor\ngranted under that Act, including an agreement that is inconsistent\nwith the provisions of the Crown Lands Act 1992 relating to the\ntermination and forfeiture of leases.\n\"(2) In subsection (1), Crown Lands Minister means the Minister for\nthe time being administering the Crown Lands Act 1992 (except\nsection 79).\n\nPart 4 Amendments of AustralAsia Railway (Third Party Access) Act 1999\nAustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Regulations 2000 8\n\"10B Certain provisions of Law of Property Act 2000 not to apply\n\"Sections 134 and 141 of the Law of Property Act 2000 do not apply\nin relation to –\n(a) a sublease over a part of the corridor; or\n(b) a lease over a part of the Port of Darwin granted for a purpose\nconnected with the construction, operation or maintenance of\nthe railway.\".\n7 Easements in favour of PAWA\nSection 14 of the Special Provisions Act is amended –\n(a) by omitting from subsection (1) \"the Real Property Act 1918 or\";\n(b) by omitting from subsection (3) \"the Register under the Real\nProperty Act 1918 or\"; and\n(c) by omitting from subsection (3A)(c) \"the Real Property Act 1918 or\".\n8 Access easements in favour of private landholders\nSection 14A of the Special Provisions Act is amended by omitting\nfrom subsection (3) \"the Real Property Act 1918 or\".\nPart 4 Amendments of AustralAsia Railway (Third\nParty Access) Act 1999\n9 New section\nThe Third Party Access Act is amended by inserting after section 7\nthe following:\n\"8 Modification of Code\nIf the designated Minister under Part IIIA of the Trade Practices\nAct 1974 of the Commonwealth believes under section 44H(6) of\nthat Act that an amendment to the Access Code made under\nclause 48 of the Code after the commencement of this section is, or\nresults in, a substantial modification of the Code, then that\namendment is to be taken not to be in force, and never to have\nbeen in force, to the extent of that belief.\n\nPart 4 Amendments of AustralAsia Railway (Third Party Access) Act 1999\nAustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Regulations 2000 9\n10 Schedule\nThe Schedule to the Third Party Access Act is amended by omitting\nclause 48 and substituting the following:\n\"48 Amendment of Code\n\"(1) This Code may be amended by the Northern Territory Minister and\nthe South Australian Minister jointly as prescribed.\n\"(2) This clause expires on 30 June 2001.\".\n\nENDNOTES\nAustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Regulations 2000 10\nENDNOTES\n1 KEY\nKey to abbreviations\namd = amended od = order\napp = appendix om = omitted\nbl = by-law pt = Part\nch = Chapter r = regulation/rule\ncl = clause rem = remainder\ndiv = Division renum = renumbered\nexp = expires/expired rep = repealed\nf = forms s = section\nGaz = Gazette sch = Schedule\nhdg = heading sdiv = Subdivision\nins = inserted SL = Subordinate Legislation\nlt = long title sub = substituted\nnc = not commenced\n2 LIST OF LEGISLATION\nAustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Regulations (SL No. 61, 2000)\nNotified 10 January 2001\nCommenced 14 February 2001 (Gaz G6, 14 February 2001, p 3)\nAmendments of AustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Regulations (SL No. 20, 2001)\nNotified 19 March 2001\nCommenced 19 March 2001\n3 GENERAL AMENDMENTS\nGeneral amendments of a formal nature (which are not referred to in the table\nof amendments to this reprint) are made by the Interpretation Legislation\nAmendment Act 2018 (Act No. 22, 2018) to: rr 1, 3, 6, 7 and 8.\n4 LIST OF AMENDMENTS\nr 3 amd No. 20, 2001, r 3\npt 4 hdg ins No. 20, 2001, r 4\nrr 9 – 10 ins No. 20, 2001, r 4","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"issue_detection":{"absurdities":[],"contradictions":[]},"summary":{"complexity_score":3,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"Unable to assess scope change from original intent due to insufficient content in the provided document. The metadata suggests the regulations remain in force as originally made, with one reprint recorded (REPA048R1), which may indicate minor amendments but no fundamental scope change can be confirmed."},"complexity_factors":["Insufficient substantive content provided to assess full complexity — the document appears to be a metadata/header record only, with no actual regulatory provisions included","Regulations of this type typically involve cross-referencing with a parent Act, adding interpretive complexity","Infrastructure and railway law can involve multiple overlapping jurisdictions (Commonwealth, Northern Territory, South Australia) which adds legal complexity in practice","The 'special provisions' framing suggests bespoke rules that deviate from standard frameworks, which can be harder to navigate"],"plain_english_summary":"These regulations set out special rules and targeted exemptions under the Australasia Railway Act for the Alice Springs–Darwin rail project, translating the Act’s broad powers into specific, enforceable requirements for construction, operation and corridor management.\n\nThey affect railway operators, staff, nearby residents and businesses, and government agencies overseeing infrastructure — providing the legal framework that governs safety, land access and operational obligations for this landmark rail link."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"These regulations expand the practical scope of liability and property rules for the railway corridor and related leases. They enable a consortium to pass civil‑penalty costs to contractors (s28C), restrict availability of statutory and equitable relief against forfeiture for registered leases and add conditions for sublessees and secured holders (s10A), permit the Crown Lands Minister to strike agreements inconsistent with the Crown Lands Act about lease termination (s10AA), and disapply certain Law of Property protections for corridor/subleases (s10B). They also alter who may amend the Access Code and impose a sunset on that power (cl 48). The concrete effects are to shift payment risk onto contractors, increase ministerial and contractual discretion over leases, and modify court remedies and property protections for lessees and sublessees."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple cross‑references and modifications across several Acts (AustralAsia Railway Corporation Act 1996; AustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Act 1999; Law of Property Act 2000; Crown Lands Act 1992; Trade Practices Act-related Access Code).","Creates a statutory contractual debt right allowing pass-through of civil penalties to contractors regardless of whether any party suffered loss (s28C).","Alters equitable and statutory relief against forfeiture with layered procedural requirements for the Supreme Court and special rules for sublessees and secured holders (s10A).","Express exclusions and disapplications of provisions of the Law of Property Act and Crown Lands Act for corridor leases and Port of Darwin leases (ss10A, 10B, 10AA).","Introduces ministerial power to negotiate lease termination arrangements inconsistent with existing Crown Lands Act procedures, increasing executive discretion (s10AA).","Interplay with Commonwealth Part IIIA designation and Access Code amendment rights, including a temporary expiry for the joint amendment power (new s8; cl 48), creates federal–territory interaction complexity.","Technical property‑law drafting: applied/modified provisions, definitions of 'registered lease', and automatic determination clauses for leases created by court order increase interpretive difficulty."],"plain_english_summary":"The regulations amend AustralAsia railway laws so a successful consortium may contractually require its contractors to pay civil penalties the consortium owes to the Corporation (s28C). They also change relief‑against‑forfeiture rules for registered railway and port leases, let the Crown Lands Minister enter agreements about lease termination that can be inconsistent with the Crown Lands Act, limit some Law of Property Act protections for corridor/subleases, and restrict how the Access Code may be amended (ss10A, 10AA, 10B; cl 48)."},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The regulations remain tightly focused on their original purpose: facilitating the AustralAsia Railway project through technical amendments to the three core railway Acts. While the lease forfeiture provisions are detailed and create a specialised property law regime, this is directly connected to the railway corridor and Port of Darwin land specifically granted for railway purposes. There is no significant expansion beyond the railway infrastructure context."},"complexity_factors":["Heavy cross-referencing between three separate Acts (AustralAsia Railway Corporation Act 1996, AustralAsia Railway (Special Provisions) Act 1999, and AustralAsia Railway (Third Party Access) Act 1999) plus the Law of Property Act 2000 and Crown Lands Act 1992","Nested conditional logic in section 10A with multiple subsections (11 subsections) containing 'unless' clauses, 'despite' clauses, and layered exceptions","Modification of existing statutory provisions 'as if' they included additional text (section 10A(5), (6)), creating interpretive complexity","Interaction between common law, equity, and statutory modifications requiring readers to understand baseline law before understanding changes","Temporal limitation clause (clause 48(2) expiry on 30 June 2001) creating time-sensitive conditional operation","Federal-state interaction provisions referencing Part IIIA of the Commonwealth Trade Practices Act 1974","Defined terms with inclusive definitions ('includes') that expand rather than limit meaning, particularly 'lease' and 'lessee' in section 10A(12)","Multiple parties with standing to apply for relief (lessees, sublessees, mortgage holders) with different procedural requirements for each"],"plain_english_summary":"These regulations make technical amendments to three Northern Territory laws governing the Adelaide-to-Darwin railway project (the AustralAsia Railway). They cover four main areas:\n\n**1. Passing on civil penalties to contractors**\n- Allows the successful consortium building the railway to pass on civil penalties (fines for breaking contracts) to their subcontractors if the subcontractor's breach caused the problem.\n- The subcontractor must pay even if no one actually suffered damage, and even if the penalty amount doesn't match any actual loss.\n\n**2. Special rules for lease forfeitures**\n- Creates a unique regime for when railway-related leases can be forfeited (taken back by the government) or saved from forfeiture.\n- Normally, tenants can apply to court for \"relief against forfeiture\" (asking a court to stop the landlord taking back the lease). These rules change how that works:\n  - No relief is available if the lease ends because the main Concession Deed (the big contract for the railway) is terminated lawfully.\n  - Courts must grant relief to tenants who fix their breaches or pay compensation, unless specific conditions aren't met.\n  - Subtenants and mortgage holders get special rights to apply for relief even if the head tenant doesn't.\n  - Any new lease granted by a court automatically ends when the Concession Deed ends.\n- Also gives the Crown Lands Minister power to make special agreements about ending leases that override normal land laws.\n- Excludes certain standard property law protections for railway subleases.\n\n**3. Easements (rights to use land)**\n- Removes references to the old Real Property Act 1918 from provisions about easements for the Power and Water Authority and private landholders, reflecting that this Act was replaced by the Law of Property Act 2000.\n\n**4. Third party access to the railway**\n- Allows the federal Minister to invalidate amendments to the railway's Access Code if they substantially modify it.\n- Changes how the Access Code can be amended, requiring joint action by NT and SA Ministers, with this power expiring on 30 June 2001.\n\n**Who it affects:** The railway consortium, their contractors, tenants and subtenants of railway land, mortgage holders with security over railway leases, the Power and Water Authority, private landholders near the railway, and regulators overseeing third-party access to the railway line.\n\n**Why it matters:** These are technical fixes to support the major infrastructure project. The lease provisions are particularly significant—they create a special property law regime that prioritises the stability of the overall railway project over normal tenant protections, ensuring that if the main railway deal collapses, the sub-leases collapse with it rather than surviving independently."},"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"A positive credit balance is required for all requests, including BYOK, so fallback providers remain available. Add credits at https://vercel.com/d?to=%2F%5Bteam%5D%2F%7E%2Fai%3Fmodal%3Dtop-up to continue.","source":"analysis-cron"}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/australasia-railway-special-provisions-regulations-2000","history":"/api/acts/australasia-railway-special-provisions-regulations-2000/history","analysis":"/api/acts/australasia-railway-special-provisions-regulations-2000/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/australasia-railway-special-provisions-regulations-2000/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/australasia-railway-special-provisions-regulations-2000/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/australasia-railway-special-provisions-regulations-2000/documents"}}