{"id":"F2006L01384","name":"ASA 508 - Enquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims - April 2006","slug":"asa-508-enquiry-regarding-litigation-and-claims-april-2006","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"repealed","isInForce":false,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":58948,"registerId":"commonwealth-F2006L01384-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-02","status":"Repealed","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standa","sectionType":"section","heading":"Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard","content":"###### Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard\n\nThis Auditing Standard is available on the AUASB website: www.auasb.gov.au.\n\nAlternatively, printed copies of this Auditing Standard are available by contacting:\n\n| Auditing and Assurance Standards BoardLevel 4530 Collins StreetMelbourne Victoria 3000AUSTRALIA | Phone: (03) 8080 7400Fax: (03) 8080 7450E-mail: enquiries@auasb.gov.auPostal Address:PO Box 204Collins Street WestMelbourne Victoria 8007AUSTRALIA |\n| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |","sortOrder":0},{"sectionNumber":"COPYRIGHT","sectionType":"section","heading":"COPYRIGHT","content":"##### COPYRIGHT\n\n© Commonwealth of Australia 2006 Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB). The text, graphics and layout of this Auditing Standard are protected by Australian copyright law and the comparable law of other countries. Reproduction within Australia in unaltered form (retaining this notice) is permitted for personal and non-commercial use subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights for commercial purposes within Australia should be addressed to the Principal Executive, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne Victoria 8007. Otherwise, no part of the Auditing Standard may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the AUASB except as permitted by law.\n\nISSN 1833-4393","sortOrder":1},{"sectionNumber":"CONTENTS","sectionType":"part","heading":"CONTENTS","content":"#   \nCONTENTS\n\nPREFACE\n\nAUTHORITY STATEMENT\n\nParagraphs\n\nApplication.................................. 1-2\n\nOperative Date................................ 3\n\nIntroduction.................................. 4-6\n\nAudit Implications............................. 7\n\nAudit Procedures.............................. 8-10\n\nRequests for Representation Letters from Lawyers........ 11-17\n\nEmployee and/or Third Party Lawyers ................ 18-21\n\nLawyer’s Response............................. 22-25\n\nLawyer’s Inability to Respond Comprehensively or Limitations in a Response 26-30\n\nAudit Reporting Considerations..................... 31-32\n\nRelated Procedures............................. 33-37\n\nConformity with International Standards on Auditing...... 38\n\nAppendix 1: Example of a Request for a Representation Letter to a Lawyer for a Companyan Audit Client","sortOrder":2},{"sectionNumber":"Preface","sectionType":"part","heading":"Preface","content":"###### Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard\n\nThis Auditing Standard is available on the AUASB website: www.auasb.gov.au.\n\nAlternatively, printed copies of this Auditing Standard are available by contacting:\n\n| Auditing and Assurance Standards BoardLevel 4530 Collins StreetMelbourne Victoria 3000AUSTRALIA | Phone: (03) 8080 7400Fax: (03) 8080 7450E-mail: enquiries@auasb.gov.auPostal Address:PO Box 204Collins Street WestMelbourne Victoria 8007AUSTRALIA |\n| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n\n##### COPYRIGHT\n\n© Commonwealth of Australia 2006 Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB). The text, graphics and layout of this Auditing Standard are protected by Australian copyright law and the comparable law of other countries. Reproduction within Australia in unaltered form (retaining this notice) is permitted for personal and non-commercial use subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights for commercial purposes within Australia should be addressed to the Principal Executive, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne Victoria 8007. Otherwise, no part of the Auditing Standard may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the AUASB except as permitted by law.\n\nISSN 1833-4393\n\n#   \nCONTENTS\n\nPREFACE\n\nAUTHORITY STATEMENT\n\nParagraphs\n\nApplication.................................. 1-2\n\nOperative Date................................ 3\n\nIntroduction.................................. 4-6\n\nAudit Implications............................. 7\n\nAudit Procedures.............................. 8-10\n\nRequests for Representation Letters from Lawyers........ 11-17\n\nEmployee and/or Third Party Lawyers ................ 18-21\n\nLawyer’s Response............................. 22-25\n\nLawyer’s Inability to Respond Comprehensively or Limitations in a Response 26-30\n\nAudit Reporting Considerations..................... 31-32\n\nRelated Procedures............................. 33-37\n\nConformity with International Standards on Auditing...... 38\n\nAppendix 1: Example of a Request for a Representation Letter to a Lawyer for a Companyan Audit Client\n\n#   \nPreface\n\n#### Reasons for Issuing Auditing Standard ASA 508 Enquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims\n\nThe Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) issues Auditing Standard ASA 508 Enquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims due to the requirements of the legislative provisions explained below.\n\nThe Corporate Law Economic Reform Program (Audit Reform and Corporate Disclosure) Act 2004 (the CLERP 9 Act) established the AUASB as an independent statutory body under section 227A of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001, as from 1 July 2004. Under section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001, the AUASB may make Auditing Standards for the purposes of the corporations legislation. These Auditing Standards are legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.\n\n#### Main Features\n\nThe purpose of this Auditing Standard is to establish mandatory requirements and provide explanatory guidance on obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding legal matters affecting the entity.\n\nThis Auditing Standard:\n\n(a) requires the auditor to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the identification of legal matters;\n\n(b) requires the auditor to request management to obtain a representation letter from the entity’s lawyers as a means of acquiring sufficient appropriate audit evidence for the identification and existence of litigation by or against the entity; and\n\n(c) includes additional follow up procedures, which the auditor ordinarily pursues, when a lawyer’s response to a representation letter is either not received or the response is incomplete.\n\n#### Operative Date\n\nThis Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2006.\n\n####   \nMain changes from AUS 508 (July 2002 Inquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims)\n\nThe main differences between this Auditing Standard and the Auditing Standard issued by the Auditing & Assurance Standards Board of the Australian Accounting Research Foundation, AUS 508 (July 2002) Inquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims, are that in this Auditing Standard:\n\n1.  The word ‘shall’, in the bold-type paragraphs, is the terminology used to describe an auditor’s mandatory requirements, whereas an auditor’s degree of responsibility is described in AUS 508 by the word ‘should’.and\n2.  The explanatory guidance paragraphs provide guidance and illustrative examples to assist the auditor in fulfilling the mandatory requirements, whereas in AUS 508 some obligations are implied within certain explanatory paragraphs. Accordingly, these paragraphs have been amended to clarify that these matters form part of the explanatory guidance.\n3.  This Auditing Standard includes explanatory guidance, not included in AUS 508, regarding circumstances when it may be difficult to either obtain a representation letter or be provided with information about legal matters from the entity’s lawyers, and alternative audit procedures that the auditor may consider in such circumstances (paragraphs 27 and 28)..\n\n##   \nAUTHORITY STATEMENT\n\nThe Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) makes Auditing Standard 508 Enquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims as set out in paragraphs 1 to 38 and Appendix 1, pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001.\n\nThis Auditing Standard is to be read in conjunction with the Preamble to AUASB Standards, which sets out the intentions of the AUASB on how the Auditing Standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied.\n\nThe mandatory requirements of this Auditing Standard are set out in bold-type paragraphs.\n\nDated 28 April 2006 M H Kelsall  \nChairman - AUASB","sortOrder":3},{"sectionNumber":"Reasons for Issuing Auditing Standard AS","sectionType":"subdivision","heading":"Reasons for Issuing Auditing Standard ASA 508 Enquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims","content":"#### Reasons for Issuing Auditing Standard ASA 508 Enquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims\n\nThe Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) issues Auditing Standard ASA 508 Enquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims due to the requirements of the legislative provisions explained below.\n\nThe Corporate Law Economic Reform Program (Audit Reform and Corporate Disclosure) Act 2004 (the CLERP 9 Act) established the AUASB as an independent statutory body under section 227A of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001, as from 1 July 2004. Under section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001, the AUASB may make Auditing Standards for the purposes of the corporations legislation. These Auditing Standards are legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.","sortOrder":4},{"sectionNumber":"Main Features","sectionType":"subdivision","heading":"Main Features","content":"#### Main Features\n\nThe purpose of this Auditing Standard is to establish mandatory requirements and provide explanatory guidance on obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding legal matters affecting the entity.\n\nThis Auditing Standard:\n\n(a) requires the auditor to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the identification of legal matters;\n\n(b) requires the auditor to request management to obtain a representation letter from the entity’s lawyers as a means of acquiring sufficient appropriate audit evidence for the identification and existence of litigation by or against the entity; and\n\n(c) includes additional follow up procedures, which the auditor ordinarily pursues, when a lawyer’s response to a representation letter is either not received or the response is incomplete.","sortOrder":5},{"sectionNumber":"Operative Date","sectionType":"subdivision","heading":"Operative Date","content":"#### Operative Date\n\nThis Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2006.","sortOrder":6},{"sectionNumber":"Main changes from AUS 508 (July 2002 Inq","sectionType":"subdivision","heading":"Main changes from AUS 508 (July 2002 Inquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims)","content":"####   \nMain changes from AUS 508 (July 2002 Inquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims)\n\nThe main differences between this Auditing Standard and the Auditing Standard issued by the Auditing & Assurance Standards Board of the Australian Accounting Research Foundation, AUS 508 (July 2002) Inquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims, are that in this Auditing Standard:\n\n1.  The word ‘shall’, in the bold-type paragraphs, is the terminology used to describe an auditor’s mandatory requirements, whereas an auditor’s degree of responsibility is described in AUS 508 by the word ‘should’.and\n2.  The explanatory guidance paragraphs provide guidance and illustrative examples to assist the auditor in fulfilling the mandatory requirements, whereas in AUS 508 some obligations are implied within certain explanatory paragraphs. Accordingly, these paragraphs have been amended to clarify that these matters form part of the explanatory guidance.\n3.  This Auditing Standard includes explanatory guidance, not included in AUS 508, regarding circumstances when it may be difficult to either obtain a representation letter or be provided with information about legal matters from the entity’s lawyers, and alternative audit procedures that the auditor may consider in such circumstances (paragraphs 27 and 28)..\n\n##   \nAUTHORITY STATEMENT\n\nThe Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) makes Auditing Standard 508 Enquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims as set out in paragraphs 1 to 38 and Appendix 1, pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001.\n\nThis Auditing Standard is to be read in conjunction with the Preamble to AUASB Standards, which sets out the intentions of the AUASB on how the Auditing Standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied.\n\nThe mandatory requirements of this Auditing Standard are set out in bold-type paragraphs.\n\nDated 28 April 2006 M H Kelsall  \nChairman - AUASB","sortOrder":7},{"sectionNumber":"AUTHORITY STATEMENT","sectionType":"part","heading":"AUTHORITY STATEMENT","content":"##   \nAUTHORITY STATEMENT\n\nThe Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) makes Auditing Standard 508 Enquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims as set out in paragraphs 1 to 38 and Appendix 1, pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001.\n\nThis Auditing Standard is to be read in conjunction with the Preamble to AUASB Standards, which sets out the intentions of the AUASB on how the Auditing Standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied.\n\nThe mandatory requirements of this Auditing Standard are set out in bold-type paragraphs.","sortOrder":8},{"sectionNumber":"AUDITING STANDARD","sectionType":"part","heading":"AUDITING STANDARD","content":"## AUDITING STANDARD\n\n### Enquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims\n\n##### Application\n\n1 This Auditing Standard applies to:\n\n(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half-year, in accordance with Part 2M.3 of the Corporations Act 2001; and\n\n(b) an audit of a financial report for any other purpose.\n\n2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other financial information.\n\n##### Operative Date\n\n3 This Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2006.\n\n##### Introduction\n\n4 The purpose of this Auditing Standard is to establish mandatory requirements and provide explanatory guidance on obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding legal matters affecting the entity. In particular, this Auditing Standard identifies the appropriate method of communication with the entity’s lawyers in connection with litigation by or against the entity.\n\n5 The auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding:\n\n(a) whether all material legal matters have been identified;\n\n(b) the probability of any material revenue or expense arising from such matters and the estimated amount thereof; and\n\n(c) the adequacy of the accounting treatment of such matters including their disclosure in the financial report.\n\n6 “Legal matters” means matters referred to lawyers by an entity relating to pending or potential litigation which may result in actual or contingent liabilities, and other matters referred to the entity’s lawyers which may affect the financial position or the results of the entity’'s operations.\n\n##### Audit Implications\n\n7 It is the responsibility of those charged with governance of an entity to adopt policies and procedures to identify, evaluate, record and report on the outcome of any material legal matter. However, since the factors that would be considered in the accounting for and reporting of legal matters are within the direct knowledge and control of the management of an entity, management is the primary source of information. Ordinarily, the auditor would seek audit evidence from different sources to corroborate management assertions.\n\n##### Audit Procedures\n\n8 To identify legal matters affecting the entity, the auditor ordinarily performs the following procedures:\n\n-   reviews and discusses with management the procedures within the entity’s internal control structure for identifying and recording legal matters and bringing them to the attention of management;\n-   reviews and discusses with management the procedures within the entity’s internal control structure for the identification, control and recording of legal expenses and associated revenues and expenses in appropriate accounts;\n-   obtains and discusses with management:\n\n(i) a list of legal matters, including a description of the matters and an estimate of their likely financial consequences; and\n\n(ii) an analysis identifying legal expenses;\n\n-   reviews relevant documents, for example correspondence with the entity’s lawyers; and\n-   obtains from management an assurance that the information obtained regarding material outstanding legal matters is complete.\n\n9 Audit procedures that are undertaken for different purposes might also disclose legal matters. Such procedures include:\n\n-   examining contracts, loan agreements, leases, insurance policies and claims, and other correspondence;\n-   reading minutes of meetings of the governing body, the audit committee, shareholders and appropriate committees;\n-   obtaining information concerning guarantees from bank confirmations;\n-   developing a knowledge of the essential characteristics of the entity’'s business operations, including an understanding of the potential involvement in legal matters; and\n-   enquiries of management and other employees of the entity.\n\n10 The procedures outlined in paragraphs 8 and 9 of this Auditing Standard are methods whereby the auditor can identify both material legal matters and the lawyers who have been consulted by the entity. However, these procedures may not necessarily provide the auditor with sufficient appropriate audit evidence concerning the likely outcome of legal matters, or indicate whether the information provided by management is complete. Furthermore, the auditor ordinarily does not possess the skills necessary and is not in a position to make legal judgements concerning the likely outcome of legal matters.\n\n##### Requests for Representation Letters from Lawyers\n\n11 When legal matters have been identified or when the auditor believes they may exist, the auditor shall endeavour to obtain written representations from all lawyers with whom management has consulted on material legal matters.\n\n12 Written representations are obtained from the entity’s lawyers in order to evaluate the reasonableness of management’'s estimates of the likely financial settlement of legal matters, and to corroborate the completeness of the legal matters identified by management. The completeness of the response obtained is likely to depend on the individual lawyer and the size and complexity of the lawyer’s firm, and it may be necessary for further audit procedures to be undertaken in order to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the audit opinion.\n\n13 The auditor shall request management to prepare the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers, with a request that the lawyers responds directly to the auditor. The auditor shall send the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers..\n\n14 The representation letter would ordinarily be prepared on the entity’'s letterhead.\n\n15 The matters that would ordinarily be covered in the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers include, but would not necessarily be limited to, the following:\n\n-   identification of the name and the end of the reporting period of the entity and all other entities to which the einquiry relates, for example subsidiaries and incorporated joint ventures;\n-   a list prepared by management which names each entity subject to a legal matter, describes the nature of each legal matter and its status;\n-   management’'s evaluation of the probable outcome and estimate of the financial settlement (inclusive of costs and disbursements) for each legal matter in respect of which a lawyer has been engaged by the entity;\n-   a request that the entity’s lawyers advise whether the items are properly described and the evaluations are reasonable;\n-   a request for comment on those legal matters on which the entity’s lawyers disagrees with management;\n-   a list of open files maintained by the entity’s lawyers in relation to the entity;\n-   a request that the response be provided on a specified date which would be as close as possible to the expected date of the audit report; and\n-   a request that the entity’s lawyers advise the nature of and reasons for any limitation on the response.\n\n16 An example representation letter to a lawyer is included in Appendix 1.\n\n17 An auditor may in some cases request that management send a request for a representation letter to the entity’s lawyers who are not identified as currently handling the entity’'s legal matters. For example when the entity has changed lawyers on a particular matter, or when a lawyer engaged by the entity has resigned, the auditor would consider the need for enquiries concerning the reasons for the change or resignation.\n\nEmployee and/or Third Party Lawyers\n\n18 Where lawyers who are employees of the entity have the primary responsibility for legal matters and are in the best position to corroborate management’'s representations, the auditor shall endeavour to obtain a representation letter, seeking information similar to that sought from a third party lawyer, from those employees.\n\n19 Before relying on the opinion of either an employee lawyer or a third party lawyer, care must be exercised to ensure that conditions prevail which would make such reliance reasonable. For the applicable mandatory requirements and explanatory guidance on using the work of an expert, refer to ASA 620 Using the Work of an Expert.\n\n20 If both employee and third party lawyers are involved in advising the entity on the same legal matter, the auditor would ordinarily seek a written representation letter from the lawyer with the primary responsibility for that matter. However, there may be circumstances where the employee lawyer has primary responsibility, but the matter has involved substantial participation by a third party lawyer, and is of such significance that the auditor would consider obtaining a written representation letter from the third party lawyer that their opinion does not differ materially from that of the employee lawyer.\n\n21 In circumstances where both employee and third party lawyers have devoted substantial attention to a legal matter involving the entity and primary responsibility rests with the third party lawyer, evidence obtained from an employee lawyer is not an adequate substitute for any information that a third party lawyer may refuse to furnish, in which case, the procedures outlined in paragraphs 22 to 30 would ordinarily be followed.\n\nLawyer’s Response\n\n22 If the a response from the entity’s lawyers containss a material disagreement with management’'s original evaluation of a particular matter, the auditor shall seek discussions with management and the entity’s lawyers, unless management subsequently agrees with the lawyer’s’ evaluation.\n\n23 If the disagreement is resolved after discussions, the auditor would ordinarily request that the entity’s lawyers confirm in writing to the auditor the reasonableness of the details as resolved.\n\n24 If the disagreement is not resolved, the auditor would ordinarily prepare a memorandum of the discussion and seek written confirmation from management and the entity’s lawyers that it is an accurate record of the discussion. In conjunction with evidence from other audit procedures, the auditor, under ASA 701 Modifications to the Auditor’s Report, needs to consider the effect of such disagreement on the auditor’s report.\n\n25 If the response from the entity’s lawyers contains information that requires clarification, the auditor would ordinarily make further enquiries of management and the entity’s lawyers, as appropriate, and request clarification in writing.\n\nLawyer’s Inability to Respond Comprehensively or Limitations in a Response\n\n26 If a response is not received from the entity’s lawyers, or the response received is incomplete, the auditor would ordinarily consider:\n\n(a) requesting management to contact the entity’s lawyers to either seek a complete answer to the original request, or an explanation for the lack of, or limitation in, a response, which ought to be sent directly to the auditor; or\n\n(b) making arrangements to discuss with management or the entity’s lawyers the reasons for the lack of, or limitation in, a response.\n\n27 Due to the following circumstances it may be difficult to either obtain a representation letter or be provided with information about legal matters from the entity’s lawyers:\n\n(a) If the entity is involved in litigation, or litigation is anticipated or contemplated, relevant information about legal matters may be subject to legal professional privilege. Disclosure of this information in the representation letter, directly to the auditor for the purposes of the audit of the entity’s financial report, is not privileged. This may cause legal professional privilege attaching to the entity’s communications with its lawyers to be compromised, as information in the representation letter might become discoverable in litigation proceedings.;\n\n(b) Factors influencing the outcome of a legal matter may sometimes not be within the a lawyer’s’ competence to judge, for example where there is no relevant or historical experience of the entity or other entities in similar matters, or where the litigation is at an early stage.; and\n\n(c) Due to material uncertainties, the entity’sa lawyers may be is unable to form a conclusion to corroborate management’'s representations regarding outstanding legal matters.\n\n28 Where the auditor has not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence as to a material financial report assertion regarding legal matters, under ASA 330 The Auditor’’s Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks, the auditor needs to consider whether alternative audit procedures can provide further audit evidence. Alternative audit procedures may include:\n\n(a) further enquiries of management or those charged with governance, about for instance the processes, procedures and assumptions they implement, adopt or make to ensure legal matters are recognised and disclosed in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework;\n\n(b) where possible, making arrangements to discuss legal matters with management and the entity’s lawyer;\n\n(c) reviewing documents in management’'s possession concerning legal matters, including the entity’s bBoard minutes; and\n\n(d) examining accounts rendered by the entity’s third party lawyers.\n\n29 The auditor may also consider any relevant legislation to assist in obtaining information about legal matters, including:\n\n-   Section 310 of the Corporations Act 2001 for example, entitles the auditor to a right of access at all reasonable times to the books of a company registered scheme and disclosing entity, and may require from any officer information, explanations and other assistance for the purposes of the audit or review.\n-   When the entity is a disclosing entity, whether disclosure of any legal matters has been made in accordance with the continuous disclosure requirements under section 674 or 675 of the Corporations Act 2001.\n\n30 Under ASA 230 Audit Documentation, the auditor needs to prepare sufficient appropriate audit documentation regarding the alternative audit procedures performed., the auditor ordinarily records details of alternative audit procedures performed.\n\nAudit Reporting Considerations\n\n31 A limitation on the scope of the auditor’s work exists when:\n\n(a) management refuses to respond to the auditor’s request that they prepare the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers;\n\n(b) management does not allow the auditor to communicate with the entity’s lawyer; or\n\n(c) the auditor has been unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence from performing alternative audit procedures.\n\nAccordingly, under ASA 701 Modifications to the Auditor’s Report, the auditor needs to consider the effect on the auditor’s report.\n\n32 In those circumstances where, due to material uncertainties, athe entity’s lawyers are is unable to form a conclusion to corroborate management’'s representation, under ASA 701 the auditor needs to consider the effect on the auditor’s report arising from the extent of disclosure of the material uncertainty in the financial report. Under ASA 701:\n\n(a) where the auditor considers that the disclosure of the material uncertainty in the financial report is adequate the auditor needs to include an emphasis of matter section; or\n\n(b) if in the auditor’s opinion the disclosure of the material uncertainty is inadequate or unreliable, a modified opinion needs to be expressed on the basis of a disagreement with management.\n\n#####   \nRelated Procedures\n\n33 The auditor shall enquire of management about new legal matters referred to athe entity’s lawyers subsequent to the date of the request for a representation letter to the entity’s lawyers and prior to signing the auditor’s report.\n\n34 Under paragraphs 13 and 33 of this Auditing Standard, when new legal matters have been referred to athe entity’s lawyers, subsequent to sending the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers and prior to signing the audit report, which may have a material effect on the financial report, the auditor needs to request management to prepare an additional representation letter to the lawyer regarding the new legal matters.\n\n35 If audit procedures lead to the discovery of matters of a legal nature not previously identified by management, the auditor shall consider the impact of each of the matters on the financial report.\n\n36 When legal matters are discovered, which were not previously identified by management, the auditor would ordinarily inform management and request they address further enquiries to, or arrange a meeting with, the entity’s lawyers or other relevant experts, at which the auditor would be present. In addition, under paragraph 5 of this Auditing Standard, the auditor needs to extend the auditor’s audit procedures to ensure that sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to form an opinion has been obtained. If, however, having regard to all the circumstances, the auditor is unable to obtain satisfaction that all the information required for the purposes of the audit has been received, the audit opinion needs to be modified under ASA 701.\n\n37 If information comes to the auditor’'s attention that may indicate the existence of material liabilities resulting from matters of a legal nature on which management has not sought advice, the auditor ordinarily discusses the matter with those charged with governance. Depending on the circumstances, refusal by management to seek advice may be considered to be a limitation in the scope of the auditor’s work.\n\n##### Conformity with International Standards on Auditing\n\n38 Except as noted below, this Auditing Standard conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 501 Audit Evidence – Additional Considerations for Specific Items Part C: Procedures Regarding Litigation and Claims, issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board of the International Federation of Accountants. The differences between this Auditing Standard and ISA 501 are:\n\n-   This Auditing Standard includes mandatory requirements and explanatory guidance dealing with the:\n\n♦ receipt of an incomplete response from a lawyer in response to a representation letter, or where the lawyer’s response contains a material disagreement with management’s evaluation of particular legal matters (paragraphs 31 and 32);\n\n♦ identification of legal matters subsequent to obtaining the representation letter (paragraphs 33‑37); and\n\n♦ obtaining of audit evidence about legal matters where the entity’s employee lawyers have primary responsibility for legal matters (paragraphs 18-21).\n\n-   The Appendix to this Auditing Standard is not included in ISA 501.\n\nCompliance with this Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 501.\n\n#####   \nAPPENDIX 1\n\n##### EXAMPLE OF A REQUEST FOR A REPRESENTATION LETTER TO A LAWYER FOR AN COMPANY AUDIT CLIENT\n\n(Letterhead of Client)\n\n(Date)\n\n(Name and Address of Lawyer)\n\nDear ...\n\nIn connection with the preparation and audit of the financial report of the company (and the following subsidiaries and/or divisions) for the reporting period ended (date) we request that you provide to this company, at our cost, the following information,\n\n    1 Confirmation that you are acting for the company (and the above-named subsidiaries and/or divisions) in relation to the matters mentioned below and that the directors’' description and estimates of the amounts of the financial settlement (including costs and disbursements) which might arise in relation to those matters are in your opinion reasonable.\n\n| Name of Company(subsidiary ordivision) | Directors'’Descriptionof Matter(includingcurrent status) | Directors’' Estimateof the Financial Settlement (inclusive of costs and disbursements) |\n| -------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n\n    2 Should you disagree with any of the information included in 1 above, please comment on the nature of your disagreement.\n    3 In addition to the above, a list of open files that you maintain in relation to the company (and the above mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions).\n    4 In relation to the matters identified under 2 and 3 above, we authorise you to discuss these matters with our auditor (name and address), if requested, and at our cost.\n  \n    It is understood that:\n    (a) the company (and the above-named subsidiaries and/or divisions) may have used other lawyers in certain matters;\n    (b) the information sought relates only to information relating to legal matters referred to your firm (including branches or subsidiaries) which were current at any time during the above-mentioned reporting period, or have arisen since the end of the reporting period and up to the date of your response;\n    (c) unless separately requested in writing, you are not responsible for keeping the auditors advised of any changes after the date of your reply;\n    (d) you are only required to respond on matters referred to you as lawyers for the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions), not on those within your knowledge solely because of the holding of any office as director, secretary or otherwise of the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions) by a consultant, partner or employee of your firm; and\n    (e) your reply is sought solely for the information of, and assistance to, this company in connection with the audit of, and report with respect to, the financial report of the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions) and will not be quoted or otherwise referred to in any financial report or related documents of the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions) nor will it be furnished to any governmental agency or other person, subject to specific legislative requirements, without the prior written consent of your firm.\n\nYour prompt assistance in this matter will be appreciated. If you are unable to confirm or provide the information requested above, please advise us and our auditor the reasons for any limitation or impediment to fulfilling this request.\n\nWould you please forward a signed copy of your reply directly to our auditors, (name) at (address), by (date).\n\nYours faithfully,\n\n(Signature of client)","sortOrder":9},{"sectionNumber":"Enquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims","sectionType":"division","heading":"Enquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims","content":"## AUDITING STANDARD\n\n### Enquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims\n\n##### Application\n\n1 This Auditing Standard applies to:\n\n(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half-year, in accordance with Part 2M.3 of the Corporations Act 2001; and\n\n(b) an audit of a financial report for any other purpose.\n\n2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other financial information.\n\n##### Operative Date\n\n3 This Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2006.\n\n##### Introduction\n\n4 The purpose of this Auditing Standard is to establish mandatory requirements and provide explanatory guidance on obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding legal matters affecting the entity. In particular, this Auditing Standard identifies the appropriate method of communication with the entity’s lawyers in connection with litigation by or against the entity.\n\n5 The auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding:\n\n(a) whether all material legal matters have been identified;\n\n(b) the probability of any material revenue or expense arising from such matters and the estimated amount thereof; and\n\n(c) the adequacy of the accounting treatment of such matters including their disclosure in the financial report.\n\n6 “Legal matters” means matters referred to lawyers by an entity relating to pending or potential litigation which may result in actual or contingent liabilities, and other matters referred to the entity’s lawyers which may affect the financial position or the results of the entity’'s operations.\n\n##### Audit Implications\n\n7 It is the responsibility of those charged with governance of an entity to adopt policies and procedures to identify, evaluate, record and report on the outcome of any material legal matter. However, since the factors that would be considered in the accounting for and reporting of legal matters are within the direct knowledge and control of the management of an entity, management is the primary source of information. Ordinarily, the auditor would seek audit evidence from different sources to corroborate management assertions.\n\n##### Audit Procedures\n\n8 To identify legal matters affecting the entity, the auditor ordinarily performs the following procedures:\n\n-   reviews and discusses with management the procedures within the entity’s internal control structure for identifying and recording legal matters and bringing them to the attention of management;\n-   reviews and discusses with management the procedures within the entity’s internal control structure for the identification, control and recording of legal expenses and associated revenues and expenses in appropriate accounts;\n-   obtains and discusses with management:\n\n(i) a list of legal matters, including a description of the matters and an estimate of their likely financial consequences; and\n\n(ii) an analysis identifying legal expenses;\n\n-   reviews relevant documents, for example correspondence with the entity’s lawyers; and\n-   obtains from management an assurance that the information obtained regarding material outstanding legal matters is complete.\n\n9 Audit procedures that are undertaken for different purposes might also disclose legal matters. Such procedures include:\n\n-   examining contracts, loan agreements, leases, insurance policies and claims, and other correspondence;\n-   reading minutes of meetings of the governing body, the audit committee, shareholders and appropriate committees;\n-   obtaining information concerning guarantees from bank confirmations;\n-   developing a knowledge of the essential characteristics of the entity’'s business operations, including an understanding of the potential involvement in legal matters; and\n-   enquiries of management and other employees of the entity.\n\n10 The procedures outlined in paragraphs 8 and 9 of this Auditing Standard are methods whereby the auditor can identify both material legal matters and the lawyers who have been consulted by the entity. However, these procedures may not necessarily provide the auditor with sufficient appropriate audit evidence concerning the likely outcome of legal matters, or indicate whether the information provided by management is complete. Furthermore, the auditor ordinarily does not possess the skills necessary and is not in a position to make legal judgements concerning the likely outcome of legal matters.\n\n##### Requests for Representation Letters from Lawyers\n\n11 When legal matters have been identified or when the auditor believes they may exist, the auditor shall endeavour to obtain written representations from all lawyers with whom management has consulted on material legal matters.\n\n12 Written representations are obtained from the entity’s lawyers in order to evaluate the reasonableness of management’'s estimates of the likely financial settlement of legal matters, and to corroborate the completeness of the legal matters identified by management. The completeness of the response obtained is likely to depend on the individual lawyer and the size and complexity of the lawyer’s firm, and it may be necessary for further audit procedures to be undertaken in order to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the audit opinion.\n\n13 The auditor shall request management to prepare the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers, with a request that the lawyers responds directly to the auditor. The auditor shall send the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers..\n\n14 The representation letter would ordinarily be prepared on the entity’'s letterhead.\n\n15 The matters that would ordinarily be covered in the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers include, but would not necessarily be limited to, the following:\n\n-   identification of the name and the end of the reporting period of the entity and all other entities to which the einquiry relates, for example subsidiaries and incorporated joint ventures;\n-   a list prepared by management which names each entity subject to a legal matter, describes the nature of each legal matter and its status;\n-   management’'s evaluation of the probable outcome and estimate of the financial settlement (inclusive of costs and disbursements) for each legal matter in respect of which a lawyer has been engaged by the entity;\n-   a request that the entity’s lawyers advise whether the items are properly described and the evaluations are reasonable;\n-   a request for comment on those legal matters on which the entity’s lawyers disagrees with management;\n-   a list of open files maintained by the entity’s lawyers in relation to the entity;\n-   a request that the response be provided on a specified date which would be as close as possible to the expected date of the audit report; and\n-   a request that the entity’s lawyers advise the nature of and reasons for any limitation on the response.\n\n16 An example representation letter to a lawyer is included in Appendix 1.\n\n17 An auditor may in some cases request that management send a request for a representation letter to the entity’s lawyers who are not identified as currently handling the entity’'s legal matters. For example when the entity has changed lawyers on a particular matter, or when a lawyer engaged by the entity has resigned, the auditor would consider the need for enquiries concerning the reasons for the change or resignation.\n\nEmployee and/or Third Party Lawyers\n\n18 Where lawyers who are employees of the entity have the primary responsibility for legal matters and are in the best position to corroborate management’'s representations, the auditor shall endeavour to obtain a representation letter, seeking information similar to that sought from a third party lawyer, from those employees.\n\n19 Before relying on the opinion of either an employee lawyer or a third party lawyer, care must be exercised to ensure that conditions prevail which would make such reliance reasonable. For the applicable mandatory requirements and explanatory guidance on using the work of an expert, refer to ASA 620 Using the Work of an Expert.\n\n20 If both employee and third party lawyers are involved in advising the entity on the same legal matter, the auditor would ordinarily seek a written representation letter from the lawyer with the primary responsibility for that matter. However, there may be circumstances where the employee lawyer has primary responsibility, but the matter has involved substantial participation by a third party lawyer, and is of such significance that the auditor would consider obtaining a written representation letter from the third party lawyer that their opinion does not differ materially from that of the employee lawyer.\n\n21 In circumstances where both employee and third party lawyers have devoted substantial attention to a legal matter involving the entity and primary responsibility rests with the third party lawyer, evidence obtained from an employee lawyer is not an adequate substitute for any information that a third party lawyer may refuse to furnish, in which case, the procedures outlined in paragraphs 22 to 30 would ordinarily be followed.\n\nLawyer’s Response\n\n22 If the a response from the entity’s lawyers containss a material disagreement with management’'s original evaluation of a particular matter, the auditor shall seek discussions with management and the entity’s lawyers, unless management subsequently agrees with the lawyer’s’ evaluation.\n\n23 If the disagreement is resolved after discussions, the auditor would ordinarily request that the entity’s lawyers confirm in writing to the auditor the reasonableness of the details as resolved.\n\n24 If the disagreement is not resolved, the auditor would ordinarily prepare a memorandum of the discussion and seek written confirmation from management and the entity’s lawyers that it is an accurate record of the discussion. In conjunction with evidence from other audit procedures, the auditor, under ASA 701 Modifications to the Auditor’s Report, needs to consider the effect of such disagreement on the auditor’s report.\n\n25 If the response from the entity’s lawyers contains information that requires clarification, the auditor would ordinarily make further enquiries of management and the entity’s lawyers, as appropriate, and request clarification in writing.\n\nLawyer’s Inability to Respond Comprehensively or Limitations in a Response\n\n26 If a response is not received from the entity’s lawyers, or the response received is incomplete, the auditor would ordinarily consider:\n\n(a) requesting management to contact the entity’s lawyers to either seek a complete answer to the original request, or an explanation for the lack of, or limitation in, a response, which ought to be sent directly to the auditor; or\n\n(b) making arrangements to discuss with management or the entity’s lawyers the reasons for the lack of, or limitation in, a response.\n\n27 Due to the following circumstances it may be difficult to either obtain a representation letter or be provided with information about legal matters from the entity’s lawyers:\n\n(a) If the entity is involved in litigation, or litigation is anticipated or contemplated, relevant information about legal matters may be subject to legal professional privilege. Disclosure of this information in the representation letter, directly to the auditor for the purposes of the audit of the entity’s financial report, is not privileged. This may cause legal professional privilege attaching to the entity’s communications with its lawyers to be compromised, as information in the representation letter might become discoverable in litigation proceedings.;\n\n(b) Factors influencing the outcome of a legal matter may sometimes not be within the a lawyer’s’ competence to judge, for example where there is no relevant or historical experience of the entity or other entities in similar matters, or where the litigation is at an early stage.; and\n\n(c) Due to material uncertainties, the entity’sa lawyers may be is unable to form a conclusion to corroborate management’'s representations regarding outstanding legal matters.\n\n28 Where the auditor has not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence as to a material financial report assertion regarding legal matters, under ASA 330 The Auditor’’s Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks, the auditor needs to consider whether alternative audit procedures can provide further audit evidence. Alternative audit procedures may include:\n\n(a) further enquiries of management or those charged with governance, about for instance the processes, procedures and assumptions they implement, adopt or make to ensure legal matters are recognised and disclosed in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework;\n\n(b) where possible, making arrangements to discuss legal matters with management and the entity’s lawyer;\n\n(c) reviewing documents in management’'s possession concerning legal matters, including the entity’s bBoard minutes; and\n\n(d) examining accounts rendered by the entity’s third party lawyers.\n\n29 The auditor may also consider any relevant legislation to assist in obtaining information about legal matters, including:\n\n-   Section 310 of the Corporations Act 2001 for example, entitles the auditor to a right of access at all reasonable times to the books of a company registered scheme and disclosing entity, and may require from any officer information, explanations and other assistance for the purposes of the audit or review.\n-   When the entity is a disclosing entity, whether disclosure of any legal matters has been made in accordance with the continuous disclosure requirements under section 674 or 675 of the Corporations Act 2001.\n\n30 Under ASA 230 Audit Documentation, the auditor needs to prepare sufficient appropriate audit documentation regarding the alternative audit procedures performed., the auditor ordinarily records details of alternative audit procedures performed.\n\nAudit Reporting Considerations\n\n31 A limitation on the scope of the auditor’s work exists when:\n\n(a) management refuses to respond to the auditor’s request that they prepare the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers;\n\n(b) management does not allow the auditor to communicate with the entity’s lawyer; or\n\n(c) the auditor has been unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence from performing alternative audit procedures.\n\nAccordingly, under ASA 701 Modifications to the Auditor’s Report, the auditor needs to consider the effect on the auditor’s report.\n\n32 In those circumstances where, due to material uncertainties, athe entity’s lawyers are is unable to form a conclusion to corroborate management’'s representation, under ASA 701 the auditor needs to consider the effect on the auditor’s report arising from the extent of disclosure of the material uncertainty in the financial report. Under ASA 701:\n\n(a) where the auditor considers that the disclosure of the material uncertainty in the financial report is adequate the auditor needs to include an emphasis of matter section; or\n\n(b) if in the auditor’s opinion the disclosure of the material uncertainty is inadequate or unreliable, a modified opinion needs to be expressed on the basis of a disagreement with management.\n\n#####   \nRelated Procedures\n\n33 The auditor shall enquire of management about new legal matters referred to athe entity’s lawyers subsequent to the date of the request for a representation letter to the entity’s lawyers and prior to signing the auditor’s report.\n\n34 Under paragraphs 13 and 33 of this Auditing Standard, when new legal matters have been referred to athe entity’s lawyers, subsequent to sending the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers and prior to signing the audit report, which may have a material effect on the financial report, the auditor needs to request management to prepare an additional representation letter to the lawyer regarding the new legal matters.\n\n35 If audit procedures lead to the discovery of matters of a legal nature not previously identified by management, the auditor shall consider the impact of each of the matters on the financial report.\n\n36 When legal matters are discovered, which were not previously identified by management, the auditor would ordinarily inform management and request they address further enquiries to, or arrange a meeting with, the entity’s lawyers or other relevant experts, at which the auditor would be present. In addition, under paragraph 5 of this Auditing Standard, the auditor needs to extend the auditor’s audit procedures to ensure that sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to form an opinion has been obtained. If, however, having regard to all the circumstances, the auditor is unable to obtain satisfaction that all the information required for the purposes of the audit has been received, the audit opinion needs to be modified under ASA 701.\n\n37 If information comes to the auditor’'s attention that may indicate the existence of material liabilities resulting from matters of a legal nature on which management has not sought advice, the auditor ordinarily discusses the matter with those charged with governance. Depending on the circumstances, refusal by management to seek advice may be considered to be a limitation in the scope of the auditor’s work.\n\n##### Conformity with International Standards on Auditing\n\n38 Except as noted below, this Auditing Standard conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 501 Audit Evidence – Additional Considerations for Specific Items Part C: Procedures Regarding Litigation and Claims, issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board of the International Federation of Accountants. The differences between this Auditing Standard and ISA 501 are:\n\n-   This Auditing Standard includes mandatory requirements and explanatory guidance dealing with the:\n\n♦ receipt of an incomplete response from a lawyer in response to a representation letter, or where the lawyer’s response contains a material disagreement with management’s evaluation of particular legal matters (paragraphs 31 and 32);\n\n♦ identification of legal matters subsequent to obtaining the representation letter (paragraphs 33‑37); and\n\n♦ obtaining of audit evidence about legal matters where the entity’s employee lawyers have primary responsibility for legal matters (paragraphs 18-21).\n\n-   The Appendix to this Auditing Standard is not included in ISA 501.\n\nCompliance with this Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 501.\n\n#####   \nAPPENDIX 1\n\n##### EXAMPLE OF A REQUEST FOR A REPRESENTATION LETTER TO A LAWYER FOR AN COMPANY AUDIT CLIENT\n\n(Letterhead of Client)\n\n(Date)\n\n(Name and Address of Lawyer)\n\nDear ...\n\nIn connection with the preparation and audit of the financial report of the company (and the following subsidiaries and/or divisions) for the reporting period ended (date) we request that you provide to this company, at our cost, the following information,\n\n    1 Confirmation that you are acting for the company (and the above-named subsidiaries and/or divisions) in relation to the matters mentioned below and that the directors’' description and estimates of the amounts of the financial settlement (including costs and disbursements) which might arise in relation to those matters are in your opinion reasonable.\n\n| Name of Company(subsidiary ordivision) | Directors'’Descriptionof Matter(includingcurrent status) | Directors’' Estimateof the Financial Settlement (inclusive of costs and disbursements) |\n| -------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n\n    2 Should you disagree with any of the information included in 1 above, please comment on the nature of your disagreement.\n    3 In addition to the above, a list of open files that you maintain in relation to the company (and the above mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions).\n    4 In relation to the matters identified under 2 and 3 above, we authorise you to discuss these matters with our auditor (name and address), if requested, and at our cost.\n  \n    It is understood that:\n    (a) the company (and the above-named subsidiaries and/or divisions) may have used other lawyers in certain matters;\n    (b) the information sought relates only to information relating to legal matters referred to your firm (including branches or subsidiaries) which were current at any time during the above-mentioned reporting period, or have arisen since the end of the reporting period and up to the date of your response;\n    (c) unless separately requested in writing, you are not responsible for keeping the auditors advised of any changes after the date of your reply;\n    (d) you are only required to respond on matters referred to you as lawyers for the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions), not on those within your knowledge solely because of the holding of any office as director, secretary or otherwise of the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions) by a consultant, partner or employee of your firm; and\n    (e) your reply is sought solely for the information of, and assistance to, this company in connection with the audit of, and report with respect to, the financial report of the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions) and will not be quoted or otherwise referred to in any financial report or related documents of the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions) nor will it be furnished to any governmental agency or other person, subject to specific legislative requirements, without the prior written consent of your firm.\n\nYour prompt assistance in this matter will be appreciated. If you are unable to confirm or provide the information requested above, please advise us and our auditor the reasons for any limitation or impediment to fulfilling this request.\n\nWould you please forward a signed copy of your reply directly to our auditors, (name) at (address), by (date).\n\nYours faithfully,\n\n(Signature of client)","sortOrder":10},{"sectionNumber":"Application","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application","content":"##### Application\n\n1 This Auditing Standard applies to:\n\n(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half-year, in accordance with Part 2M.3 of the Corporations Act 2001; and\n\n(b) an audit of a financial report for any other purpose.\n\n2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other financial information.","sortOrder":11},{"sectionNumber":"Introduction","sectionType":"section","heading":"Introduction","content":"##### Introduction\n\n4 The purpose of this Auditing Standard is to establish mandatory requirements and provide explanatory guidance on obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding legal matters affecting the entity. In particular, this Auditing Standard identifies the appropriate method of communication with the entity’s lawyers in connection with litigation by or against the entity.\n\n5 The auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding:\n\n(a) whether all material legal matters have been identified;\n\n(b) the probability of any material revenue or expense arising from such matters and the estimated amount thereof; and\n\n(c) the adequacy of the accounting treatment of such matters including their disclosure in the financial report.\n\n6 “Legal matters” means matters referred to lawyers by an entity relating to pending or potential litigation which may result in actual or contingent liabilities, and other matters referred to the entity’s lawyers which may affect the financial position or the results of the entity’'s operations.","sortOrder":13},{"sectionNumber":"Audit Implications","sectionType":"section","heading":"Audit Implications","content":"##### Audit Implications\n\n7 It is the responsibility of those charged with governance of an entity to adopt policies and procedures to identify, evaluate, record and report on the outcome of any material legal matter. However, since the factors that would be considered in the accounting for and reporting of legal matters are within the direct knowledge and control of the management of an entity, management is the primary source of information. Ordinarily, the auditor would seek audit evidence from different sources to corroborate management assertions.","sortOrder":14},{"sectionNumber":"Audit Procedures","sectionType":"section","heading":"Audit Procedures","content":"##### Audit Procedures\n\n8 To identify legal matters affecting the entity, the auditor ordinarily performs the following procedures:\n\n-   reviews and discusses with management the procedures within the entity’s internal control structure for identifying and recording legal matters and bringing them to the attention of management;\n-   reviews and discusses with management the procedures within the entity’s internal control structure for the identification, control and recording of legal expenses and associated revenues and expenses in appropriate accounts;\n-   obtains and discusses with management:\n\n(i) a list of legal matters, including a description of the matters and an estimate of their likely financial consequences; and\n\n(ii) an analysis identifying legal expenses;\n\n-   reviews relevant documents, for example correspondence with the entity’s lawyers; and\n-   obtains from management an assurance that the information obtained regarding material outstanding legal matters is complete.\n\n9 Audit procedures that are undertaken for different purposes might also disclose legal matters. Such procedures include:\n\n-   examining contracts, loan agreements, leases, insurance policies and claims, and other correspondence;\n-   reading minutes of meetings of the governing body, the audit committee, shareholders and appropriate committees;\n-   obtaining information concerning guarantees from bank confirmations;\n-   developing a knowledge of the essential characteristics of the entity’'s business operations, including an understanding of the potential involvement in legal matters; and\n-   enquiries of management and other employees of the entity.\n\n10 The procedures outlined in paragraphs 8 and 9 of this Auditing Standard are methods whereby the auditor can identify both material legal matters and the lawyers who have been consulted by the entity. However, these procedures may not necessarily provide the auditor with sufficient appropriate audit evidence concerning the likely outcome of legal matters, or indicate whether the information provided by management is complete. Furthermore, the auditor ordinarily does not possess the skills necessary and is not in a position to make legal judgements concerning the likely outcome of legal matters.","sortOrder":15},{"sectionNumber":"Requests for Representation Letters from","sectionType":"section","heading":"Requests for Representation Letters from Lawyers","content":"##### Requests for Representation Letters from Lawyers\n\n11 When legal matters have been identified or when the auditor believes they may exist, the auditor shall endeavour to obtain written representations from all lawyers with whom management has consulted on material legal matters.\n\n12 Written representations are obtained from the entity’s lawyers in order to evaluate the reasonableness of management’'s estimates of the likely financial settlement of legal matters, and to corroborate the completeness of the legal matters identified by management. The completeness of the response obtained is likely to depend on the individual lawyer and the size and complexity of the lawyer’s firm, and it may be necessary for further audit procedures to be undertaken in order to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the audit opinion.\n\n13 The auditor shall request management to prepare the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers, with a request that the lawyers responds directly to the auditor. The auditor shall send the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers..\n\n14 The representation letter would ordinarily be prepared on the entity’'s letterhead.\n\n15 The matters that would ordinarily be covered in the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers include, but would not necessarily be limited to, the following:\n\n-   identification of the name and the end of the reporting period of the entity and all other entities to which the einquiry relates, for example subsidiaries and incorporated joint ventures;\n-   a list prepared by management which names each entity subject to a legal matter, describes the nature of each legal matter and its status;\n-   management’'s evaluation of the probable outcome and estimate of the financial settlement (inclusive of costs and disbursements) for each legal matter in respect of which a lawyer has been engaged by the entity;\n-   a request that the entity’s lawyers advise whether the items are properly described and the evaluations are reasonable;\n-   a request for comment on those legal matters on which the entity’s lawyers disagrees with management;\n-   a list of open files maintained by the entity’s lawyers in relation to the entity;\n-   a request that the response be provided on a specified date which would be as close as possible to the expected date of the audit report; and\n-   a request that the entity’s lawyers advise the nature of and reasons for any limitation on the response.\n\n16 An example representation letter to a lawyer is included in Appendix 1.\n\n17 An auditor may in some cases request that management send a request for a representation letter to the entity’s lawyers who are not identified as currently handling the entity’'s legal matters. For example when the entity has changed lawyers on a particular matter, or when a lawyer engaged by the entity has resigned, the auditor would consider the need for enquiries concerning the reasons for the change or resignation.\n\nEmployee and/or Third Party Lawyers\n\n18 Where lawyers who are employees of the entity have the primary responsibility for legal matters and are in the best position to corroborate management’'s representations, the auditor shall endeavour to obtain a representation letter, seeking information similar to that sought from a third party lawyer, from those employees.\n\n19 Before relying on the opinion of either an employee lawyer or a third party lawyer, care must be exercised to ensure that conditions prevail which would make such reliance reasonable. For the applicable mandatory requirements and explanatory guidance on using the work of an expert, refer to ASA 620 Using the Work of an Expert.\n\n20 If both employee and third party lawyers are involved in advising the entity on the same legal matter, the auditor would ordinarily seek a written representation letter from the lawyer with the primary responsibility for that matter. However, there may be circumstances where the employee lawyer has primary responsibility, but the matter has involved substantial participation by a third party lawyer, and is of such significance that the auditor would consider obtaining a written representation letter from the third party lawyer that their opinion does not differ materially from that of the employee lawyer.\n\n21 In circumstances where both employee and third party lawyers have devoted substantial attention to a legal matter involving the entity and primary responsibility rests with the third party lawyer, evidence obtained from an employee lawyer is not an adequate substitute for any information that a third party lawyer may refuse to furnish, in which case, the procedures outlined in paragraphs 22 to 30 would ordinarily be followed.\n\nLawyer’s Response\n\n22 If the a response from the entity’s lawyers containss a material disagreement with management’'s original evaluation of a particular matter, the auditor shall seek discussions with management and the entity’s lawyers, unless management subsequently agrees with the lawyer’s’ evaluation.\n\n23 If the disagreement is resolved after discussions, the auditor would ordinarily request that the entity’s lawyers confirm in writing to the auditor the reasonableness of the details as resolved.\n\n24 If the disagreement is not resolved, the auditor would ordinarily prepare a memorandum of the discussion and seek written confirmation from management and the entity’s lawyers that it is an accurate record of the discussion. In conjunction with evidence from other audit procedures, the auditor, under ASA 701 Modifications to the Auditor’s Report, needs to consider the effect of such disagreement on the auditor’s report.\n\n25 If the response from the entity’s lawyers contains information that requires clarification, the auditor would ordinarily make further enquiries of management and the entity’s lawyers, as appropriate, and request clarification in writing.\n\nLawyer’s Inability to Respond Comprehensively or Limitations in a Response\n\n26 If a response is not received from the entity’s lawyers, or the response received is incomplete, the auditor would ordinarily consider:\n\n(a) requesting management to contact the entity’s lawyers to either seek a complete answer to the original request, or an explanation for the lack of, or limitation in, a response, which ought to be sent directly to the auditor; or\n\n(b) making arrangements to discuss with management or the entity’s lawyers the reasons for the lack of, or limitation in, a response.\n\n27 Due to the following circumstances it may be difficult to either obtain a representation letter or be provided with information about legal matters from the entity’s lawyers:\n\n(a) If the entity is involved in litigation, or litigation is anticipated or contemplated, relevant information about legal matters may be subject to legal professional privilege. Disclosure of this information in the representation letter, directly to the auditor for the purposes of the audit of the entity’s financial report, is not privileged. This may cause legal professional privilege attaching to the entity’s communications with its lawyers to be compromised, as information in the representation letter might become discoverable in litigation proceedings.;\n\n(b) Factors influencing the outcome of a legal matter may sometimes not be within the a lawyer’s’ competence to judge, for example where there is no relevant or historical experience of the entity or other entities in similar matters, or where the litigation is at an early stage.; and\n\n(c) Due to material uncertainties, the entity’sa lawyers may be is unable to form a conclusion to corroborate management’'s representations regarding outstanding legal matters.\n\n28 Where the auditor has not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence as to a material financial report assertion regarding legal matters, under ASA 330 The Auditor’’s Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks, the auditor needs to consider whether alternative audit procedures can provide further audit evidence. Alternative audit procedures may include:\n\n(a) further enquiries of management or those charged with governance, about for instance the processes, procedures and assumptions they implement, adopt or make to ensure legal matters are recognised and disclosed in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework;\n\n(b) where possible, making arrangements to discuss legal matters with management and the entity’s lawyer;\n\n(c) reviewing documents in management’'s possession concerning legal matters, including the entity’s bBoard minutes; and\n\n(d) examining accounts rendered by the entity’s third party lawyers.\n\n29 The auditor may also consider any relevant legislation to assist in obtaining information about legal matters, including:\n\n-   Section 310 of the Corporations Act 2001 for example, entitles the auditor to a right of access at all reasonable times to the books of a company registered scheme and disclosing entity, and may require from any officer information, explanations and other assistance for the purposes of the audit or review.\n-   When the entity is a disclosing entity, whether disclosure of any legal matters has been made in accordance with the continuous disclosure requirements under section 674 or 675 of the Corporations Act 2001.\n\n30 Under ASA 230 Audit Documentation, the auditor needs to prepare sufficient appropriate audit documentation regarding the alternative audit procedures performed., the auditor ordinarily records details of alternative audit procedures performed.\n\nAudit Reporting Considerations\n\n31 A limitation on the scope of the auditor’s work exists when:\n\n(a) management refuses to respond to the auditor’s request that they prepare the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers;\n\n(b) management does not allow the auditor to communicate with the entity’s lawyer; or\n\n(c) the auditor has been unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence from performing alternative audit procedures.\n\nAccordingly, under ASA 701 Modifications to the Auditor’s Report, the auditor needs to consider the effect on the auditor’s report.\n\n32 In those circumstances where, due to material uncertainties, athe entity’s lawyers are is unable to form a conclusion to corroborate management’'s representation, under ASA 701 the auditor needs to consider the effect on the auditor’s report arising from the extent of disclosure of the material uncertainty in the financial report. Under ASA 701:\n\n(a) where the auditor considers that the disclosure of the material uncertainty in the financial report is adequate the auditor needs to include an emphasis of matter section; or\n\n(b) if in the auditor’s opinion the disclosure of the material uncertainty is inadequate or unreliable, a modified opinion needs to be expressed on the basis of a disagreement with management.","sortOrder":16},{"sectionNumber":"Related Procedures","sectionType":"section","heading":"Related Procedures","content":"#####   \nRelated Procedures\n\n33 The auditor shall enquire of management about new legal matters referred to athe entity’s lawyers subsequent to the date of the request for a representation letter to the entity’s lawyers and prior to signing the auditor’s report.\n\n34 Under paragraphs 13 and 33 of this Auditing Standard, when new legal matters have been referred to athe entity’s lawyers, subsequent to sending the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers and prior to signing the audit report, which may have a material effect on the financial report, the auditor needs to request management to prepare an additional representation letter to the lawyer regarding the new legal matters.\n\n35 If audit procedures lead to the discovery of matters of a legal nature not previously identified by management, the auditor shall consider the impact of each of the matters on the financial report.\n\n36 When legal matters are discovered, which were not previously identified by management, the auditor would ordinarily inform management and request they address further enquiries to, or arrange a meeting with, the entity’s lawyers or other relevant experts, at which the auditor would be present. In addition, under paragraph 5 of this Auditing Standard, the auditor needs to extend the auditor’s audit procedures to ensure that sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to form an opinion has been obtained. If, however, having regard to all the circumstances, the auditor is unable to obtain satisfaction that all the information required for the purposes of the audit has been received, the audit opinion needs to be modified under ASA 701.\n\n37 If information comes to the auditor’'s attention that may indicate the existence of material liabilities resulting from matters of a legal nature on which management has not sought advice, the auditor ordinarily discusses the matter with those charged with governance. Depending on the circumstances, refusal by management to seek advice may be considered to be a limitation in the scope of the auditor’s work.","sortOrder":17},{"sectionNumber":"Conformity with International Standards ","sectionType":"section","heading":"Conformity with International Standards on Auditing","content":"##### Conformity with International Standards on Auditing\n\n38 Except as noted below, this Auditing Standard conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 501 Audit Evidence – Additional Considerations for Specific Items Part C: Procedures Regarding Litigation and Claims, issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board of the International Federation of Accountants. The differences between this Auditing Standard and ISA 501 are:\n\n-   This Auditing Standard includes mandatory requirements and explanatory guidance dealing with the:\n\n♦ receipt of an incomplete response from a lawyer in response to a representation letter, or where the lawyer’s response contains a material disagreement with management’s evaluation of particular legal matters (paragraphs 31 and 32);\n\n♦ identification of legal matters subsequent to obtaining the representation letter (paragraphs 33‑37); and\n\n♦ obtaining of audit evidence about legal matters where the entity’s employee lawyers have primary responsibility for legal matters (paragraphs 18-21).\n\n-   The Appendix to this Auditing Standard is not included in ISA 501.\n\nCompliance with this Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 501.","sortOrder":18},{"sectionNumber":"APPENDIX 1","sectionType":"section","heading":"APPENDIX 1","content":"## AUDITING STANDARD\n\n### Enquiry Regarding Litigation and Claims\n\n##### Application\n\n1 This Auditing Standard applies to:\n\n(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half-year, in accordance with Part 2M.3 of the Corporations Act 2001; and\n\n(b) an audit of a financial report for any other purpose.\n\n2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other financial information.\n\n##### Operative Date\n\n3 This Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2006.\n\n##### Introduction\n\n4 The purpose of this Auditing Standard is to establish mandatory requirements and provide explanatory guidance on obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding legal matters affecting the entity. In particular, this Auditing Standard identifies the appropriate method of communication with the entity’s lawyers in connection with litigation by or against the entity.\n\n5 The auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding:\n\n(a) whether all material legal matters have been identified;\n\n(b) the probability of any material revenue or expense arising from such matters and the estimated amount thereof; and\n\n(c) the adequacy of the accounting treatment of such matters including their disclosure in the financial report.\n\n6 “Legal matters” means matters referred to lawyers by an entity relating to pending or potential litigation which may result in actual or contingent liabilities, and other matters referred to the entity’s lawyers which may affect the financial position or the results of the entity’'s operations.\n\n##### Audit Implications\n\n7 It is the responsibility of those charged with governance of an entity to adopt policies and procedures to identify, evaluate, record and report on the outcome of any material legal matter. However, since the factors that would be considered in the accounting for and reporting of legal matters are within the direct knowledge and control of the management of an entity, management is the primary source of information. Ordinarily, the auditor would seek audit evidence from different sources to corroborate management assertions.\n\n##### Audit Procedures\n\n8 To identify legal matters affecting the entity, the auditor ordinarily performs the following procedures:\n\n-   reviews and discusses with management the procedures within the entity’s internal control structure for identifying and recording legal matters and bringing them to the attention of management;\n-   reviews and discusses with management the procedures within the entity’s internal control structure for the identification, control and recording of legal expenses and associated revenues and expenses in appropriate accounts;\n-   obtains and discusses with management:\n\n(i) a list of legal matters, including a description of the matters and an estimate of their likely financial consequences; and\n\n(ii) an analysis identifying legal expenses;\n\n-   reviews relevant documents, for example correspondence with the entity’s lawyers; and\n-   obtains from management an assurance that the information obtained regarding material outstanding legal matters is complete.\n\n9 Audit procedures that are undertaken for different purposes might also disclose legal matters. Such procedures include:\n\n-   examining contracts, loan agreements, leases, insurance policies and claims, and other correspondence;\n-   reading minutes of meetings of the governing body, the audit committee, shareholders and appropriate committees;\n-   obtaining information concerning guarantees from bank confirmations;\n-   developing a knowledge of the essential characteristics of the entity’'s business operations, including an understanding of the potential involvement in legal matters; and\n-   enquiries of management and other employees of the entity.\n\n10 The procedures outlined in paragraphs 8 and 9 of this Auditing Standard are methods whereby the auditor can identify both material legal matters and the lawyers who have been consulted by the entity. However, these procedures may not necessarily provide the auditor with sufficient appropriate audit evidence concerning the likely outcome of legal matters, or indicate whether the information provided by management is complete. Furthermore, the auditor ordinarily does not possess the skills necessary and is not in a position to make legal judgements concerning the likely outcome of legal matters.\n\n##### Requests for Representation Letters from Lawyers\n\n11 When legal matters have been identified or when the auditor believes they may exist, the auditor shall endeavour to obtain written representations from all lawyers with whom management has consulted on material legal matters.\n\n12 Written representations are obtained from the entity’s lawyers in order to evaluate the reasonableness of management’'s estimates of the likely financial settlement of legal matters, and to corroborate the completeness of the legal matters identified by management. The completeness of the response obtained is likely to depend on the individual lawyer and the size and complexity of the lawyer’s firm, and it may be necessary for further audit procedures to be undertaken in order to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the audit opinion.\n\n13 The auditor shall request management to prepare the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers, with a request that the lawyers responds directly to the auditor. The auditor shall send the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers..\n\n14 The representation letter would ordinarily be prepared on the entity’'s letterhead.\n\n15 The matters that would ordinarily be covered in the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers include, but would not necessarily be limited to, the following:\n\n-   identification of the name and the end of the reporting period of the entity and all other entities to which the einquiry relates, for example subsidiaries and incorporated joint ventures;\n-   a list prepared by management which names each entity subject to a legal matter, describes the nature of each legal matter and its status;\n-   management’'s evaluation of the probable outcome and estimate of the financial settlement (inclusive of costs and disbursements) for each legal matter in respect of which a lawyer has been engaged by the entity;\n-   a request that the entity’s lawyers advise whether the items are properly described and the evaluations are reasonable;\n-   a request for comment on those legal matters on which the entity’s lawyers disagrees with management;\n-   a list of open files maintained by the entity’s lawyers in relation to the entity;\n-   a request that the response be provided on a specified date which would be as close as possible to the expected date of the audit report; and\n-   a request that the entity’s lawyers advise the nature of and reasons for any limitation on the response.\n\n16 An example representation letter to a lawyer is included in Appendix 1.\n\n17 An auditor may in some cases request that management send a request for a representation letter to the entity’s lawyers who are not identified as currently handling the entity’'s legal matters. For example when the entity has changed lawyers on a particular matter, or when a lawyer engaged by the entity has resigned, the auditor would consider the need for enquiries concerning the reasons for the change or resignation.\n\nEmployee and/or Third Party Lawyers\n\n18 Where lawyers who are employees of the entity have the primary responsibility for legal matters and are in the best position to corroborate management’'s representations, the auditor shall endeavour to obtain a representation letter, seeking information similar to that sought from a third party lawyer, from those employees.\n\n19 Before relying on the opinion of either an employee lawyer or a third party lawyer, care must be exercised to ensure that conditions prevail which would make such reliance reasonable. For the applicable mandatory requirements and explanatory guidance on using the work of an expert, refer to ASA 620 Using the Work of an Expert.\n\n20 If both employee and third party lawyers are involved in advising the entity on the same legal matter, the auditor would ordinarily seek a written representation letter from the lawyer with the primary responsibility for that matter. However, there may be circumstances where the employee lawyer has primary responsibility, but the matter has involved substantial participation by a third party lawyer, and is of such significance that the auditor would consider obtaining a written representation letter from the third party lawyer that their opinion does not differ materially from that of the employee lawyer.\n\n21 In circumstances where both employee and third party lawyers have devoted substantial attention to a legal matter involving the entity and primary responsibility rests with the third party lawyer, evidence obtained from an employee lawyer is not an adequate substitute for any information that a third party lawyer may refuse to furnish, in which case, the procedures outlined in paragraphs 22 to 30 would ordinarily be followed.\n\nLawyer’s Response\n\n22 If the a response from the entity’s lawyers containss a material disagreement with management’'s original evaluation of a particular matter, the auditor shall seek discussions with management and the entity’s lawyers, unless management subsequently agrees with the lawyer’s’ evaluation.\n\n23 If the disagreement is resolved after discussions, the auditor would ordinarily request that the entity’s lawyers confirm in writing to the auditor the reasonableness of the details as resolved.\n\n24 If the disagreement is not resolved, the auditor would ordinarily prepare a memorandum of the discussion and seek written confirmation from management and the entity’s lawyers that it is an accurate record of the discussion. In conjunction with evidence from other audit procedures, the auditor, under ASA 701 Modifications to the Auditor’s Report, needs to consider the effect of such disagreement on the auditor’s report.\n\n25 If the response from the entity’s lawyers contains information that requires clarification, the auditor would ordinarily make further enquiries of management and the entity’s lawyers, as appropriate, and request clarification in writing.\n\nLawyer’s Inability to Respond Comprehensively or Limitations in a Response\n\n26 If a response is not received from the entity’s lawyers, or the response received is incomplete, the auditor would ordinarily consider:\n\n(a) requesting management to contact the entity’s lawyers to either seek a complete answer to the original request, or an explanation for the lack of, or limitation in, a response, which ought to be sent directly to the auditor; or\n\n(b) making arrangements to discuss with management or the entity’s lawyers the reasons for the lack of, or limitation in, a response.\n\n27 Due to the following circumstances it may be difficult to either obtain a representation letter or be provided with information about legal matters from the entity’s lawyers:\n\n(a) If the entity is involved in litigation, or litigation is anticipated or contemplated, relevant information about legal matters may be subject to legal professional privilege. Disclosure of this information in the representation letter, directly to the auditor for the purposes of the audit of the entity’s financial report, is not privileged. This may cause legal professional privilege attaching to the entity’s communications with its lawyers to be compromised, as information in the representation letter might become discoverable in litigation proceedings.;\n\n(b) Factors influencing the outcome of a legal matter may sometimes not be within the a lawyer’s’ competence to judge, for example where there is no relevant or historical experience of the entity or other entities in similar matters, or where the litigation is at an early stage.; and\n\n(c) Due to material uncertainties, the entity’sa lawyers may be is unable to form a conclusion to corroborate management’'s representations regarding outstanding legal matters.\n\n28 Where the auditor has not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence as to a material financial report assertion regarding legal matters, under ASA 330 The Auditor’’s Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks, the auditor needs to consider whether alternative audit procedures can provide further audit evidence. Alternative audit procedures may include:\n\n(a) further enquiries of management or those charged with governance, about for instance the processes, procedures and assumptions they implement, adopt or make to ensure legal matters are recognised and disclosed in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework;\n\n(b) where possible, making arrangements to discuss legal matters with management and the entity’s lawyer;\n\n(c) reviewing documents in management’'s possession concerning legal matters, including the entity’s bBoard minutes; and\n\n(d) examining accounts rendered by the entity’s third party lawyers.\n\n29 The auditor may also consider any relevant legislation to assist in obtaining information about legal matters, including:\n\n-   Section 310 of the Corporations Act 2001 for example, entitles the auditor to a right of access at all reasonable times to the books of a company registered scheme and disclosing entity, and may require from any officer information, explanations and other assistance for the purposes of the audit or review.\n-   When the entity is a disclosing entity, whether disclosure of any legal matters has been made in accordance with the continuous disclosure requirements under section 674 or 675 of the Corporations Act 2001.\n\n30 Under ASA 230 Audit Documentation, the auditor needs to prepare sufficient appropriate audit documentation regarding the alternative audit procedures performed., the auditor ordinarily records details of alternative audit procedures performed.\n\nAudit Reporting Considerations\n\n31 A limitation on the scope of the auditor’s work exists when:\n\n(a) management refuses to respond to the auditor’s request that they prepare the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers;\n\n(b) management does not allow the auditor to communicate with the entity’s lawyer; or\n\n(c) the auditor has been unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence from performing alternative audit procedures.\n\nAccordingly, under ASA 701 Modifications to the Auditor’s Report, the auditor needs to consider the effect on the auditor’s report.\n\n32 In those circumstances where, due to material uncertainties, athe entity’s lawyers are is unable to form a conclusion to corroborate management’'s representation, under ASA 701 the auditor needs to consider the effect on the auditor’s report arising from the extent of disclosure of the material uncertainty in the financial report. Under ASA 701:\n\n(a) where the auditor considers that the disclosure of the material uncertainty in the financial report is adequate the auditor needs to include an emphasis of matter section; or\n\n(b) if in the auditor’s opinion the disclosure of the material uncertainty is inadequate or unreliable, a modified opinion needs to be expressed on the basis of a disagreement with management.\n\n#####   \nRelated Procedures\n\n33 The auditor shall enquire of management about new legal matters referred to athe entity’s lawyers subsequent to the date of the request for a representation letter to the entity’s lawyers and prior to signing the auditor’s report.\n\n34 Under paragraphs 13 and 33 of this Auditing Standard, when new legal matters have been referred to athe entity’s lawyers, subsequent to sending the representation letter to the entity’s lawyers and prior to signing the audit report, which may have a material effect on the financial report, the auditor needs to request management to prepare an additional representation letter to the lawyer regarding the new legal matters.\n\n35 If audit procedures lead to the discovery of matters of a legal nature not previously identified by management, the auditor shall consider the impact of each of the matters on the financial report.\n\n36 When legal matters are discovered, which were not previously identified by management, the auditor would ordinarily inform management and request they address further enquiries to, or arrange a meeting with, the entity’s lawyers or other relevant experts, at which the auditor would be present. In addition, under paragraph 5 of this Auditing Standard, the auditor needs to extend the auditor’s audit procedures to ensure that sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to form an opinion has been obtained. If, however, having regard to all the circumstances, the auditor is unable to obtain satisfaction that all the information required for the purposes of the audit has been received, the audit opinion needs to be modified under ASA 701.\n\n37 If information comes to the auditor’'s attention that may indicate the existence of material liabilities resulting from matters of a legal nature on which management has not sought advice, the auditor ordinarily discusses the matter with those charged with governance. Depending on the circumstances, refusal by management to seek advice may be considered to be a limitation in the scope of the auditor’s work.\n\n##### Conformity with International Standards on Auditing\n\n38 Except as noted below, this Auditing Standard conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 501 Audit Evidence – Additional Considerations for Specific Items Part C: Procedures Regarding Litigation and Claims, issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board of the International Federation of Accountants. The differences between this Auditing Standard and ISA 501 are:\n\n-   This Auditing Standard includes mandatory requirements and explanatory guidance dealing with the:\n\n♦ receipt of an incomplete response from a lawyer in response to a representation letter, or where the lawyer’s response contains a material disagreement with management’s evaluation of particular legal matters (paragraphs 31 and 32);\n\n♦ identification of legal matters subsequent to obtaining the representation letter (paragraphs 33‑37); and\n\n♦ obtaining of audit evidence about legal matters where the entity’s employee lawyers have primary responsibility for legal matters (paragraphs 18-21).\n\n-   The Appendix to this Auditing Standard is not included in ISA 501.\n\nCompliance with this Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 501.\n\n#####   \nAPPENDIX 1\n\n##### EXAMPLE OF A REQUEST FOR A REPRESENTATION LETTER TO A LAWYER FOR AN COMPANY AUDIT CLIENT\n\n(Letterhead of Client)\n\n(Date)\n\n(Name and Address of Lawyer)\n\nDear ...\n\nIn connection with the preparation and audit of the financial report of the company (and the following subsidiaries and/or divisions) for the reporting period ended (date) we request that you provide to this company, at our cost, the following information,\n\n    1 Confirmation that you are acting for the company (and the above-named subsidiaries and/or divisions) in relation to the matters mentioned below and that the directors’' description and estimates of the amounts of the financial settlement (including costs and disbursements) which might arise in relation to those matters are in your opinion reasonable.\n\n| Name of Company(subsidiary ordivision) | Directors'’Descriptionof Matter(includingcurrent status) | Directors’' Estimateof the Financial Settlement (inclusive of costs and disbursements) |\n| -------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n\n    2 Should you disagree with any of the information included in 1 above, please comment on the nature of your disagreement.\n    3 In addition to the above, a list of open files that you maintain in relation to the company (and the above mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions).\n    4 In relation to the matters identified under 2 and 3 above, we authorise you to discuss these matters with our auditor (name and address), if requested, and at our cost.\n  \n    It is understood that:\n    (a) the company (and the above-named subsidiaries and/or divisions) may have used other lawyers in certain matters;\n    (b) the information sought relates only to information relating to legal matters referred to your firm (including branches or subsidiaries) which were current at any time during the above-mentioned reporting period, or have arisen since the end of the reporting period and up to the date of your response;\n    (c) unless separately requested in writing, you are not responsible for keeping the auditors advised of any changes after the date of your reply;\n    (d) you are only required to respond on matters referred to you as lawyers for the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions), not on those within your knowledge solely because of the holding of any office as director, secretary or otherwise of the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions) by a consultant, partner or employee of your firm; and\n    (e) your reply is sought solely for the information of, and assistance to, this company in connection with the audit of, and report with respect to, the financial report of the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions) and will not be quoted or otherwise referred to in any financial report or related documents of the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions) nor will it be furnished to any governmental agency or other person, subject to specific legislative requirements, without the prior written consent of your firm.\n\nYour prompt assistance in this matter will be appreciated. If you are unable to confirm or provide the information requested above, please advise us and our auditor the reasons for any limitation or impediment to fulfilling this request.\n\nWould you please forward a signed copy of your reply directly to our auditors, (name) at (address), by (date).\n\nYours faithfully,\n\n(Signature of client)","sortOrder":19},{"sectionNumber":"EXAMPLE OF A REQUEST FOR A REPRESENTATIO","sectionType":"section","heading":"EXAMPLE OF A REQUEST FOR A REPRESENTATION LETTER TO A LAWYER FOR AN COMPANY AUDIT CLIENT","content":"##### EXAMPLE OF A REQUEST FOR A REPRESENTATION LETTER TO A LAWYER FOR AN COMPANY AUDIT CLIENT\n\n(Letterhead of Client)\n\n(Date)\n\n(Name and Address of Lawyer)\n\nDear ...\n\nIn connection with the preparation and audit of the financial report of the company (and the following subsidiaries and/or divisions) for the reporting period ended (date) we request that you provide to this company, at our cost, the following information,\n\n    1 Confirmation that you are acting for the company (and the above-named subsidiaries and/or divisions) in relation to the matters mentioned below and that the directors’' description and estimates of the amounts of the financial settlement (including costs and disbursements) which might arise in relation to those matters are in your opinion reasonable.\n\n| Name of Company(subsidiary ordivision) | Directors'’Descriptionof Matter(includingcurrent status) | Directors’' Estimateof the Financial Settlement (inclusive of costs and disbursements) |\n| -------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n\n    2 Should you disagree with any of the information included in 1 above, please comment on the nature of your disagreement.\n    3 In addition to the above, a list of open files that you maintain in relation to the company (and the above mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions).\n    4 In relation to the matters identified under 2 and 3 above, we authorise you to discuss these matters with our auditor (name and address), if requested, and at our cost.\n  \n    It is understood that:\n    (a) the company (and the above-named subsidiaries and/or divisions) may have used other lawyers in certain matters;\n    (b) the information sought relates only to information relating to legal matters referred to your firm (including branches or subsidiaries) which were current at any time during the above-mentioned reporting period, or have arisen since the end of the reporting period and up to the date of your response;\n    (c) unless separately requested in writing, you are not responsible for keeping the auditors advised of any changes after the date of your reply;\n    (d) you are only required to respond on matters referred to you as lawyers for the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions), not on those within your knowledge solely because of the holding of any office as director, secretary or otherwise of the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions) by a consultant, partner or employee of your firm; and\n    (e) your reply is sought solely for the information of, and assistance to, this company in connection with the audit of, and report with respect to, the financial report of the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions) and will not be quoted or otherwise referred to in any financial report or related documents of the company (and the above-mentioned subsidiaries and/or divisions) nor will it be furnished to any governmental agency or other person, subject to specific legislative requirements, without the prior written consent of your firm.\n\nYour prompt assistance in this matter will be appreciated. If you are unable to confirm or provide the information requested above, please advise us and our auditor the reasons for any limitation or impediment to fulfilling this request.\n\nWould you please forward a signed copy of your reply directly to our auditors, (name) at (address), by (date).\n\nYours faithfully,\n\n(Signature of client)","sortOrder":20}],"analysis":{"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":5,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"Compared with AUS 508 (2002), this Standard makes requirements mandatory by using 'shall' instead of 'should', clarifies explanatory guidance, and adds specific guidance and procedures for incomplete lawyer responses and for audits involving employee lawyers. It also introduces an appendix example representation letter. These changes formalise obligations and add procedural detail (see 'Main changes from AUS 508' in the source)."},"complexity_factors":["Cross-disciplinary judgement: auditors must evaluate legal matters without being legal experts (paras 10, 19).","Multiple parties and flows of information: management prepares requests, lawyers respond to auditors, and auditors may need direct discussions (paras 13, 22-25).","Privilege and confidentiality risk: lawyer responses can be limited by legal professional privilege (para 27(a)).","Conditional branching: different procedures required if lawyers don’t respond, respond incompletely, or disagree (paras 26-30, 31-32).","Interaction with other standards and statutes: links to ASA 620, ASA 330, ASA 230, ASA 701 and Corporations Act sections (paras 19, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32).","Documentation and timing requirements: specified content, timing close to audit report date, and record-keeping of alternative procedures (paras 15, 30, 33-34).","Reliance and substitution issues: guidance on using employee lawyers vs third-party lawyers and when one is not an adequate substitute (paras 18-21).","Potential audit-report consequences: unresolved disagreements or scope limitations can require emphasis or modified opinions (paras 24, 31-32)."],"plain_english_summary":"This Auditing Standard requires auditors to obtain sufficient evidence about material legal matters by identifying such matters, assessing probable financial consequences, and testing management’s accounting and disclosure. It requires auditors to request that management obtain representation letters from the entity’s lawyers (the company normally meets lawyers’ costs) and for lawyers to respond directly to the auditor. If lawyers do not reply, give limited information, or disagree with management, the auditor must perform alternative procedures and consider whether the auditor’s report should be modified."},"kimi_summary":{"_metrics":{"model":"kimi-k2.5","source":"moonshot-realtime","completionTokens":2159},"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":6,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The standard maintains the same core scope as its predecessor AUS 508 (2002), focusing on auditor enquiries regarding litigation and claims. While it introduces stricter mandatory language ('shall' instead of 'should') and additional guidance on handling incomplete responses, it does not materially expand beyond the original purpose of regulating audit evidence regarding legal matters."},"complexity_factors":["38 numbered paragraphs with nested sub-clauses and conditional logic","Cross-references to four other auditing standards (ASA 230, ASA 330, ASA 620, ASA 701)","Distinction between mandatory requirements (bold type) and explanatory guidance","Different treatment for employee lawyers versus third-party lawyers with primary responsibility tests","Multi-step escalation procedures for incomplete responses or disagreements between management and lawyers","Alternative audit procedures required when primary evidence is unavailable due to legal privilege or uncertainty"],"plain_english_summary":"This Auditing Standard requires auditors of companies reporting under the Corporations Act to obtain independent, reliable evidence about material legal claims and disputes that could affect the financial statements. It obliges management to secure written lawyer responses confirming the reasonableness of estimates and directs auditors to perform alternative procedures or modify their report if they can’t get sufficient assurance.\n\nIt affects auditors, company management, and both in‑house and external lawyers—and matters because legal claims can create material financial risk for users of financial reports."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/asa-508-enquiry-regarding-litigation-and-claims-april-2006","history":"/api/acts/asa-508-enquiry-regarding-litigation-and-claims-april-2006/history","analysis":"/api/acts/asa-508-enquiry-regarding-litigation-and-claims-april-2006/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/asa-508-enquiry-regarding-litigation-and-claims-april-2006/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/asa-508-enquiry-regarding-litigation-and-claims-april-2006/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/asa-508-enquiry-regarding-litigation-and-claims-april-2006/documents"}}