{"id":"advance-care-directives-act-2013","name":"Advance Care Directives Act 2013","slug":"advance-care-directives-act-2013","collection":"act","jurisdiction":"sa","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":31468,"registerId":"sa-advance-care-directives-act-2013-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-01","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Advance Care Directives Act 2013","content":"South Australia\nAdvance Care Directives Act 2013\nAn Act to enable a person to make decisions and give directions in relation to their future health care, residential and accommodation arrangements and personal affairs; to provide for the appointment of substitute decision‑makers to make such decisions on behalf of the person; to ensure that health care is delivered to the person in a manner consistent with their wishes and instructions; to facilitate the resolution of disputes relating to advance care directives; to provide protections for health practitioners and other persons giving effect to an advance care directive; and for other purposes.\n\nContents\nPart 1—Preliminary\n1\tShort title\n3\tInterpretation\n4\tReferences to provision of health care to include withdrawal etc of health care\n5\tReferences to particular forms of health care in advance care directives\n5A\tReferences to advance care directive to include certain digital copies\n6\tHealth practitioner cannot be compelled to provide particular health care\n7\tImpaired decision‑making capacity\n7A\tInteraction with Voluntary Assisted Dying Act\n8\tApplication of Act\n8A\tInteraction with other Acts and laws\nPart 2—Objects and principles\n9\tObjects\n10\tPrinciples\nPart 3—Advance care directives\nDivision 1—Advance care directives\n11\tGiving advance care directives\n12\tProvisions that cannot be included in advance care directives\n13\tAdvance care directive not to give power of attorney\n14\tGiving advance care directives where English not first language\n15\tRequirements for witnessing advance care directives\n16\tWhen advance care directives are in force\n17\tAdvance care directive revokes previous advance care directives\n18\tNo variation of advance care directive\n19\tBinding and non‑binding provisions\n20\tAdvance care directive has effect subject to its terms\nDivision 2—Substitute decision‑makers\n21\tRequirements in relation to appointment of substitute decision‑makers\n22\tSubstitute decision‑makers empowered separately and together etc\n23\tPowers of substitute decision‑maker\n24\tExercise of powers by substitute decision‑maker\n25\tSubstitute decision‑maker to give notice of decisions\n26\tSubstitute decision‑maker may obtain advice\n27\tSubstitute decision‑maker may renounce appointment\n28\tDeath of substitute decision‑maker does not affect validity of advance care directive\nDivision 3—Revoking advance care directives\nSubdivision 1—Revoking advance care directive where person competent\n29\tRevoking advance care directive where person competent\nSubdivision 2—Revoking advance care directive where person not competent\n30\tApplication of Subdivision\n31\tTribunal to be advised of wish for revocation\n32\tRevoking advance care directives where person not competent\nPart 4—Recognition of advance care directives from other jurisdictions\n33\tAdvance care directives from other jurisdictions\nPart 5—Giving effect to advance care directives\n34\tWhen things can happen under an advance care directive\n35\tSubstitute decision‑maker to give effect to advance care directive\n36\tHealth practitioners to give effect to advance care directives\n37\tConscientious objection\n38\tConsent etc taken to be that of person who gave advance care directive\n39\tConsent taken to be withdrawn in certain circumstances\nPart 6—Validity and limitation of liability\n40\tPresumption of validity\n41\tProtection from liability\n42\tValidity of acts etc under revoked or varied advance care directive\nPart 7—Dispute resolution, reviews and appeals\nDivision 1—Preliminary\n43\tInterpretation\n44\tApplication of Part\nDivision 2—Resolution of disputes by Public Advocate\n45\tResolution of disputes by Public Advocate\n46\tPublic Advocate may refer matter to Tribunal\n46A\tPublic Advocate may refer question of law to Supreme Court\nDivision 3—Resolution of disputes by Tribunal\n47\tTribunal to give priority to wishes of person who gave advance care directive\n48\tResolution of disputes by Tribunal\n49\tTribunal may refer matter to Public Advocate\n50\tFailing to comply with direction of Tribunal\n51\tOrders of Tribunal in relation to substitute decision‑makers\nDivision 4—Urgent review by Supreme Court of substitute decision‑maker's decision\n52\tUrgent review by Supreme Court\nDivision 5—Reviews and appeals\n53\tReviews and appeals\nPart 7A—Special provisions relating to Tribunal\n54\tTribunal must give notice of proceedings\n54A\tReasons for decisions\n54B\tRepresentation of person who is subject of proceedings\nPart 8—Offences\n55\tFalse or misleading statements\n56\tFraud, undue influence etc\nPart 9—Miscellaneous\n57\tGiving notice to substitute decision‑makers\n58\tProhibition of publication of reports of proceedings\n59\tService of documents\n60\tVictimisation\n61\tConfidentiality\n62\tReview of Act\n63\tRegulations\nSchedule 1—Transitional provisions\nPart 8—Transitional provisions\n32\tTransitional provisions relating to anticipatory directions under Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995\n33\tTransitional provisions relating to medical agents under Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995\n34\tTransitional provisions relating to other instruments continued under Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995\n35\tTransitional provisions relating to enduring guardians under Guardianship and Administration Act 1993\n36\tOnly 1 advance care directive to be created\n37\tDisputes\nLegislative history\n\nThe Parliament of South Australia enacts as follows:\nPart 1—Preliminary\n1—Short title\nThis Act may be cited as the Advance Care Directives Act 2013.\n3—Interpretation\n\t(1)\tIn this Act, unless the contrary intention appears—\nadvance care directive means an advance care directive given under this Act that is in force (and includes, where the context requires, a reference to the advance care directive form in relation to a particular advance care directive);\nadvance care directive form means the form for giving advance care directives approved by the Minister from time to time and published in the Gazette;\nbinding provision of an advance care directive—see section 19;\ndecision, of the Tribunal, has the same meaning as in the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013;\nhealth care means any care, service, procedure or treatment (including medical treatment) provided by, or under the supervision of, a health practitioner for the purpose of diagnosing, maintaining or treating a physical or mental condition of a person;\nNote—\nSee also section 4.\nhealth practitioner means a person who practises 1 or more of the following:\n\t(a)\ta health profession (within the meaning of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (South Australia));\n\t(b)\tany other profession or practice declared by the regulations to be included in the ambit of this definition;\nimpaired decision‑making capacity, in relation to a decision—see section 7;\ninternal review means a review under section 70 of the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013;\nlife sustaining measures has the same meaning as in the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995;\nmedical practitioner means a person registered under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law to practise in the medical profession (other than as a student);\nmedical treatment means the provision by a medical practitioner of physical, surgical or psychological therapy to a person (including the provision of such therapy for the purposes of preventing disease, restoring or replacing bodily function in the face of disease or injury or improving comfort and quality of life) and includes the prescription or supply of drugs;\nnon‑binding provision, of an advance care directive—see section 19;\nPublic Advocate means the person holding or acting in the office of Public Advocate under the Guardianship and Administration Act 1993;\nsubstitute decision‑maker, under a particular advance care directive, means a substitute decision‑maker appointed under Part 3 Division 2 or Part 7;\nTribunal means the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal established under the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.\n\t(2)\tFor the purposes of this Act, a reference to an act will be taken to include a reference to an attempt to do the act, and a refusal or omission to act.\n\t(3)\tFor the purposes of this Act, a reference to a decision made by a substitute decision‑maker appointed under an advance care directive will be taken to include a reference to an exercise of a power by the substitute decision‑maker under the advance care directive.\n\t(4)\tFor the purposes of this Act, a reference to a provision of an advance care directive will be taken to include a reference to a condition, instruction or direction of an advance care directive.\n4—References to provision of health care to include withdrawal etc of health care\nUnless the contrary intention appears, a reference in this Act to the provision of health care to a person will be taken to include a reference to the withdrawal, or withholding, of health care to the person (including, to avoid doubt, the withdrawal or withholding of life sustaining measures).\n5—References to particular forms of health care in advance care directives\nSubject to any provision of the advance care directive to the contrary, a reference in an advance care directive to particular health care will be taken to include a reference to any other health care that is of substantially the same kind, or that is only distinguishable on technical grounds not likely to be understood or appreciated by the person who gave the advance care directive.\n5A—References to advance care directive to include certain digital copies\nExcept where the contrary intention appears, a reference in this Act to an advance care directive (being an advance care directive form that has been completed and witnessed in accordance with this Act and by which a person has given an advance care directive) will be taken to include an electronic copy of the advance care directive of a kind prescribed by, or prepared in accordance with, the regulations.\n6—Health practitioner cannot be compelled to provide particular health care\n\t(1)\tNothing in this Act authorises the making of—\n\t(a)\ta provision of an advance care directive; or\n\t(b)\ta decision by a substitute decision‑maker under an advance care directive; or\n\t(c)\tan order made under Part 7,\nthat purports to compel a health practitioner to provide a particular form of health care to a person.\nNote—\nWhilst a person can indicate his or her wishes in respect of the health care he or she wishes to receive, ultimately the question of what form of health care should be provided to a patient is a matter for the health practitioner to decide (however, a person is entitled to refuse health care of any kind, or to require it to be stopped, including health care that saves or prolongs his or her life).\n\t(2)\tSubsection (1) does not apply to health care comprising the withdrawal, or withholding, of health care to the person.\n\t(3)\tA provision of an advance care directive, a decision of a substitute decision‑maker under an advance care directive or an order made under Part 7 is, to the extent that it contravenes subsection (1), void and of no effect.\n7—Impaired decision‑making capacity\n\t(1)\tFor the purposes of this Act, a person will be taken to have impaired decision‑making capacity in respect of a particular decision if—\n\t(a)\tthe person is not capable of—\n\t(i)\tunderstanding any information that may be relevant to the decision (including information relating to the consequences of making a particular decision); or\n\t(ii)\tretaining such information; or\n\t(iii)\tusing such information in the course of making the decision; or\n\t(iv)\tcommunicating their decision in any manner; or\n\t(b)\tthe person has satisfied any requirement in an advance care directive given by the person that sets out when the person is to be considered to have impaired decision‑making capacity (however described) in respect of a decision of the relevant kind.\n\t(2)\tFor the purposes of this Act—\n\t(a)\ta person will not be taken to be incapable of understanding information merely because the person is not able to understand matters of a technical or trivial nature; and\n\t(b)\ta person will not be taken to be incapable of retaining information merely because the person can only retain the information for a limited time; and\n\t(c)\ta person may fluctuate between having impaired decision‑making capacity and full decision‑making capacity; and\n\t(d)\ta person's decision‑making capacity will not be taken to be impaired merely because a decision made by the person results, or may result, in an adverse outcome for the person.\n7A—Interaction with Voluntary Assisted Dying Act\nExcept where expressly provided for, this Act does not apply in relation to medical treatment or other services consisting of, or given in the course of, the administration of a voluntary assisted dying substance, or any other medical treatment or other service relating to voluntary assisted dying, under the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2021.\n8—Application of Act\nThis Act applies within the State, and outside of the State to the full extent of the extraterritorial power of the Parliament.\n8A—Interaction with other Acts and laws\n\t(1)\tThis Act is in addition to, and does not derogate from, any other Act or law.\n\t(2)\tTo avoid doubt, a direction (however described) given by a person under another Act or law is not an advance care directive for the purposes of this or any other Act.\nPart 2—Objects and principles\n9—Objects\nThe objects of this Act include the following:\n\t(a)\tto enable competent adults to give directions about their future health care, residential and accommodation arrangements and personal affairs;\n\t(b)\tto enable competent adults to express their wishes and values in respect of health care, residential and accommodation arrangements and personal affairs, including by specifying outcomes or interventions that they wish to avoid;\n\t(c)\tto enable competent adults to allow decisions about their future health care, residential and accommodation arrangements and personal affairs to be made by another person on their behalf;\n\t(d)\tto ensure, as far as is reasonably practicable and appropriate, that health care that is provided to a person who has given an advance care directive accords with the person's directions, wishes and values;\n\t(e)\tto ensure that the directions, wishes and values of a person who has given an advance care directive are considered in dealing with the person's residential and accommodation arrangements and personal affairs;\n\t(f)\tto protect health practitioners and others giving effect to the directions, wishes and values of a person who has given an advance care directive;\n\t(g)\tto provide mechanisms for the resolution of disputes relating to decisions made on behalf of those who have given an advance care directive.\n10—Principles\nThe following principles must be taken into account in connection with the administration, operation and enforcement of this Act (including, to avoid doubt, the resolution of disputes under Part 7):\n\t(a)\tan advance care directive enables a competent adult to make decisions about their future health care, residential and accommodation arrangements and personal affairs either by stating their own wishes and instructions or through 1 or more substitute decision‑makers;\n\t(b)\ta competent adult can decide what constitutes quality of life and can express that in advance in an advance care directive;\n\t(c)\ta person is, in the absence of evidence or a law of the State to the contrary, to be presumed to have full decision‑making capacity in respect of decisions about their health care, residential and accommodation arrangements and personal affairs;\n\t(d)\ta person must be allowed to make their own decisions about their health care, residential and accommodation arrangements and personal affairs to the extent that they are able, and be supported to enable them to make such decisions for as long as they can;\n\t(e)\ta person can exercise their autonomy by making self‑determined decisions, delegating decision making to others, making collaborative decisions within a family or community, or a combination of any of these, according to a person's culture, background, history, spiritual or religious beliefs;\n\t(f)\tsubject to this Act, an advance care directive, and each substitute decision‑maker appointed under an advance care directive, has the same authority as the person who gave the advance care directive had when the person had full decision‑making capacity;\n\t(g)\ta decision made by a person on behalf of another in accordance with this Act—\n\t(i)\tmust, as far as is reasonably practicable, reflect the decision that the person would have made in the circumstances; and\n\t(ii)\tmust, in the absence of any specific instructions or expressed views of the person, be consistent with the proper care of the person and the protection of their interests; and\n\t(iii)\tmust not, as far as is reasonably practicable, restrict the basic rights and freedoms of the person;\n\t(h)\tin the event of a dispute arising in relation to an advance care directive, the wishes (whether expressed or implied) of the person who gave the advance care directive are of paramount importance and should, insofar as is reasonably practicable, be given effect;\n\t(i)\tsubject to this Act, in determining the wishes of a person who gave an advance care directive in relation to a particular matter, consideration may be given to—\n\t(i)\tany past wishes expressed by the person in relation to the matter; and\n\t(ii)\tthe person's values as displayed or expressed during the whole or any part of their life; and\n\t(iii)\tany other matter that is relevant in determining the wishes of the person in relation to the matter.\nPart 3—Advance care directives\nDivision 1—Advance care directives\n11—Giving advance care directives\n\t(1)\tA competent adult may give an advance care directive if the person—\n\t(a)\tunderstands what an advance care directive is; and\n\t(b)\tunderstands the consequences of giving an advance care directive.\n\t(2)\tSubject to this section, a person gives an advance care directive by—\n\t(a)\tcompleting any relevant sections of an advance care directive form in accordance with this Act and any instructions contained on that form, or causing any relevant sections to be so completed; and\nNote—\nAn advance care directive form must be the approved form—see the definition of advance care directive form in section 3(1).\n\t(b)\thaving the completed advance care directive form witnessed in accordance with this Act; and\n\t(c)\tcomplying with any other requirements set out in the regulations in relation to giving advance care directives.\n\t(3)\tSubject to this Act, an advance care directive can make such provision relating to the future health care, residential and accommodation matters and personal affairs of the person giving the advance care directive as the person thinks fit.\n\t(4)\tNothing in this Act authorises a person to give an advance care directive for or on behalf of another person.\nNote—\nA parent, for example, cannot give an advance care directive on behalf of his or her child.\n\t(5)\tAn advance care directive, or a provision of an advance care directive, is not invalid merely because—\n\t(a)\tthe person giving the advance care directive did not complete a particular section of the advance care directive form (other than a section specified in an instruction on the form as being a section that must be completed); or\n\t(b)\tthe person giving the advance care directive did not appoint a substitute decision‑maker; or\n\t(c)\tthe person giving the advance care directive was not fully informed in relation to each medical condition, or any other circumstance, to which the advance care directive relates; or\n\t(d)\tthe person giving the advance care directive did not seek legal or other professional advice in relation to the advance care directive; or\n\t(e)\tthe advance care directive contains a minor error (being an error that does not affect the ability to understand the wishes and instructions of the person who gave the advance care directive); or\nNote—\nThe type of error contemplated by this paragraph includes a misspelling or obsolete reference.\n\t(f)\tinstructions in the advance care directive are expressed in informal language rather than medical or technical terminology; or\n\t(g)\tthe person giving the advance care directive expressed their wishes in general terms rather than specific instructions, or that their wishes in relation to a particular matter need to be inferred from the advance care directive; or\n\t(h)\tinstructions in the advance care directive are based solely on religious, moral or social grounds.\n12—Provisions that cannot be included in advance care directives\n\t(1)\tSubject to this Act, an advance care directive cannot make provisions of the following kinds:\n\t(a)\ta provision—\n\t(i)\tthat is unlawful, or that would require an unlawful act to be performed; or\n\t(iii)\tthat would, if given effect, cause a health practitioner or other person to contravene a professional standard or code of conduct (however described) applying to the health practitioner or person;\n\t(b)\ta provision that comprises a refusal of mandatory medical treatment;\n\t(c)\tany other provision of a kind declared by the regulations to be within the ambit of this section.\n\t(1a)\tAn advance care directive cannot constitute a request for voluntary assisted dying (however described), however nothing in this subsection prevents a person from expressing their preferences or wishes in relation to voluntary assisted dying in an advance care directive.\n\t(2)\tFor the purposes of subsection (1), a reference to a professional standard or code of conduct does not include a reference to a standard or code of conduct prepared by or on behalf of a hospital, clinic, hospice, nursing home or any other place at which health care is provided to a person that regulates the provision of health care or other services at that place.\n\t(3)\tA provision of an advance care directive that contravenes subsection (1) is, to the extent of the contravention, void and of no effect.\n\t(4)\tIn this section—\nmandatory medical treatment means—\n\t(a)\tmedical treatment ordered under a community treatment order or an inpatient treatment order under the Mental Health Act 2009; or\n\t(ab)\tmedical treatment provided under section 56 of the Mental Health Act 2009; or\n\t(b)\tany other medical treatment of a kind prescribed by regulations for the purposes of this definition.\n13—Advance care directive not to give power of attorney\n\t(1)\tNothing in this Act authorises an advance care directive to have the effect of giving a power of attorney.\nNote—\nA power of attorney under the Powers of Attorney and Agency Act 1984 is required if the substitute decision‑maker is to deal with the financial and legal affairs of the person giving the advance care directive.\n\t(2)\tA provision of an advance care directive that purports to give a power of attorney is void and of no effect.\n14—Giving advance care directives where English not first language\n\t(1)\tThe following provisions apply where a person for whom English is not their first language wishes to give an advance care directive:\n\t(a)\tthe advance care directive may be given with the assistance of an interpreter in accordance with this section;\n\t(b)\tany information required under this Act to be given to the person in relation to the advance care directive must be given to the person through an interpreter in accordance with this section;\n\t(c)\tthe advance care directive form must be completed in English;\n\t(d)\tthe interpreter must complete the relevant section of the advance care directive form certifying that—\n\t(i)\tin their opinion, any information required under this Act to be given to the person giving the advance care directive was given to, and appeared to be understood by, the person; and\n\t(ii)\tthe information recorded in the advance care directive form accurately reproduces in English the original information and instructions of the person provided in the course of giving the advance care directive;\n\t(e)\tif an advance care directive form is completed in accordance with this section, the advance care directive will, for the purposes of this Act, be taken to have been given by the person.\n\t(2)\tFor the purposes of this Act, an interpreter who assists a person to give an advance care directive—\n\t(a)\tmust be 18 or more years of age; and\n\t(b)\tmust not have impaired decision‑making capacity in relation to a decision that is reasonably likely to be made in the course of such interpretation; and\n\t(c)\tmust comply with any other requirements set out in the regulations for the purposes of this paragraph.\n\t(3)\tHowever, a person cannot be an interpreter in relation to a particular advance care directive if—\n\t(a)\tthe person is appointed under the advance care directive as a substitute decision‑maker; or\n\t(b)\tthe person has a direct or indirect interest in the estate of the person giving the advance care directive (whether as a beneficiary of the person's will or otherwise); or\n\t(c)\tthe person is a health practitioner who is responsible (whether solely or with others) for the health care of the person giving the advance care directive; or\n\t(d)\tthe person occupies a position of authority in a hospital, hospice, nursing home or other facility at which the person giving the advance care directive resides.\n\t(4)\tTo avoid doubt, a person who is a suitable witness in relation to a particular advance care directive (being a person who is not prevented by subsection (2) or (3) from being an interpreter in relation to the advance care directive) may act as an interpreter under this section.\n\t(5)\tTo avoid doubt, nothing in subsection (2) or (3) affects the validity of an advance care directive given before the commencement of those subsections.\n15—Requirements for witnessing advance care directives\n\t(1)\tAn advance care directive will only be taken to have been witnessed in accordance with this Act if—\n\t(a)\tthe advance care directive form is witnessed by a suitable witness in accordance with the regulations; and\n\t(b)\tthe suitable witness completes the appropriate parts of the advance care directive form certifying that—\n\t(i)\tthe suitable witness gave to the person giving the advance care directive any information required by the regulations for the purposes of this section; and\n\t(ii)\tthe suitable witness explained to the person giving the advance care directive the legal effects of giving an advance care directive of the kind proposed; and\n\t(iii)\tin their opinion, the person giving the advance care directive appeared to understand the information and explanation given to them by the suitable witness under this paragraph; and\n\t(iv)\tin their opinion, the person giving the advance care directive did not appear to be acting under any form of duress or coercion; and\n\t(c)\tany other requirements set out in the regulations in relation to the witnessing of advance care directives have been complied with.\n\t(2)\tHowever, a person cannot be a suitable witness in relation to a particular advance care directive—\n\t(a)\tif the person is appointed under the advance care directive as a substitute decision‑maker; or\n\t(b)\tif the person has a direct or indirect interest in the estate of the person giving the advance care directive (whether as a beneficiary of the person's will or otherwise); or\n\t(c)\tif the person is a health practitioner who is responsible (whether solely or with others) for the health care of the person giving the advance care directive; or\n\t(d)\tif the person occupies a position of authority in a hospital, hospice, nursing home or other facility at which the person giving the advance care directive resides; or\n\t(e)\tin any other circumstances set out in the regulations in which a person cannot be a suitable witness in relation to a particular advance care directive.\n\t(3)\tFor the purposes of this section, a reference to duress or coercion in relation to a person giving an advance care directive includes a reference to duress or coercion due solely to a perception or mistake on the part of the person.\n\t(4)\tIn this section—\nsuitable witness means a person, or a class of persons, who satisfies any requirements prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this definition.\n16—When advance care directives are in force\n\t(1)\tAn advance care directive will be taken to be in force from the time that the advance care directive is witnessed in accordance with this Act.\n\t(2)\tSubject to this Act, an advance care directive remains in force—\n\t(a)\t—\n\t(i)\tif an expiry date is specified in the advance care directive—until that day; or\n\t(ii)\tif no expiry date is specified in the advance care directive—until it is revoked in accordance with this Act; or\n\t(b)\tuntil the death of the person who gave the advance care directive,\nwhichever occurs first.\n17—Advance care directive revokes previous advance care directives\n\t(1)\tSubject to this Act, if a person gives an advance care directive, any previous advance care directives given by the person are revoked.\n\t(2)\tA revocation of a previous advance care directive will be taken to have occurred at the time the later advance care directive is taken to be in force.\n18—No variation of advance care directive\nSubject to this Act, an advance care directive cannot be varied.\nNote—\nIf a person wishes to vary the terms of his or her advance care directive, he or she must prepare a new one in accordance with this Act. However, only a competent adult can give an advance care directive—see section 11.\nThere is, however, capacity for the Tribunal to vary an advance care directive by appointing another substitute decision‑maker in certain circumstances—see Part 7 Division 3.\n19—Binding and non‑binding provisions\n\t(1)\tSubject to this section, a provision of an advance care directive comprising a refusal of particular health care (whether express or implied) will, for the purposes of this Act, be taken to be a binding provision.\nNote—\nCertain provisions of an advance care directive refusing some forms of mandatory medical treatment are void—see section 12(1)(b).\n\t(1a)\tDespite any other provision of this Act, a provision of an advance care directive that purports to be a refusal of health care arising out of, or directly related to, the attempted suicide or self‑harm of the person who gave the advance care directive will be taken to be a non‑binding provision.\n\t(2)\tIf a binding provision of an advance care directive is expressed to apply, or to be binding, only in specified circumstances, the provision will be taken to be a binding provision only in respect of those circumstances.\n\t(3)\tAll other provisions of an advance care directive are non‑binding provisions.\n20—Advance care directive has effect subject to its terms\nSubject to this Act, and to any other Act or law, an advance care directive has effect according to its terms.\nDivision 2—Substitute decision‑makers\n21—Requirements in relation to appointment of substitute decision‑makers\n\t(1)\tSubject to this Act, a person giving an advance care directive may appoint such number of adults to be substitute decision‑makers in respect of the advance care directive as the person thinks fit.\nNote—\nNothing in this Act requires a substitute decision‑maker to be appointed under an advance care directive—a person may choose simply to give instructions in his or her advance care directive.\n\t(2)\tHowever, the following persons cannot be appointed or act as a substitute decision‑maker in relation to a particular advance care directive:\n\t(a)\ta person who is not competent;\n\t(b)\ta health practitioner who is responsible (whether solely or with others) for the health care of the person giving the advance care directive;\n\t(c)\ta paid carer of the person giving the advance care directive;\n\t(d)\tany other person of a class prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this section.\n\t(3)\tAn appointment of a substitute decision‑maker must comply with any other requirements set out in the regulations for the purposes of this section.\n\t(4)\tAn appointment in contravention of this section is void and of no effect.\n22—Substitute decision‑makers empowered separately and together etc\n\t(1)\tA person giving an advance care directive may, in relation to the appointment of substitute decision‑makers in respect of the advance care directive, impose such conditions on the exercise of powers or making of decisions by the substitute decision‑makers as the person thinks fit, including (without limiting this subsection) by—\n\t(a)\tappointing the substitute decision‑makers in order of precedence; or\n\t(b)\tlimiting specified powers or decisions that may be exercised or made under the advance care directive to a specified substitute decision‑maker or substitute decision‑makers; or\n\t(c)\tappointing substitute decision‑makers as alternative substitute decision‑makers and limiting their powers to where a specified substitute decision‑maker or substitute decision‑makers are not available.\n\t(2)\tSubject to this Act and to any provision of an advance care directive to the contrary, if a person giving an advance care directive appoints more than 1 substitute decision‑maker in respect of the advance care directive, the substitute decision‑makers are empowered separately and together to make decisions under the advance care directive.\n23—Powers of substitute decision‑maker\n\t(1)\tSubject to this Act and to any provision of the advance care directive, a substitute decision‑maker appointed under an advance care directive may make any decision that the person who gave the advance care directive could have lawfully made in respect of the following areas:\n\t(a)\thealth care (other than a kind of health care declared by the regulations to be excluded from the ambit of this paragraph);\n\t(b)\tresidential and accommodation arrangements;\n\t(c)\tpersonal affairs.\n\t(2)\tNothing in subsection (1) authorises a substitute decision‑maker to make a decision of a kind that requires the substitute decision‑maker to have been given the person's power of attorney unless the required power of attorney has in fact been given to the substitute decision‑maker.\nNote—\nA power of attorney cannot be given by an advance care directive—see section 13.\n\t(3)\tAn advance care directive does not authorise a substitute decision‑maker to perform functions that the person who gave the advance care directive has as a trustee or personal representative of another.\n\t(4)\tDespite any provision of an advance care directive to the contrary, an advance care directive does not authorise a substitute decision‑maker to refuse the following:\n\t(a)\tthe administration of drugs to relieve pain or distress;\n\t(b)\tthe natural provision of food and liquids by mouth.\n\t(5)\tDespite any provision of an advance care directive to the contrary, an advance care directive does not authorise a substitute decision-maker to make a decision, or to otherwise act in a manner, that is inconsistent with a request for voluntary assisted dying made by the person who gave the advance care directive.\n24—Exercise of powers by substitute decision‑maker\n\t(1)\tWithout limiting any other provision of this Act, a substitute decision‑maker may only make a decision under an advance care directive if—\n\t(a)\tthe substitute decision‑maker produces the advance care directive at the request of a health practitioner who is to provide health care in accordance with the decision; and\n\t(b)\tthe substitute decision‑maker is not prevented under this or any other Act or law from acting under the advance care directive; and\n\t(c)\tthe substitute decision‑maker is competent at the time the decision is made.\n\t(2)\tFor the purposes of this Act, a requirement that a substitute decision‑maker produce an advance care directive will be taken to be satisfied if—\n\t(a)\tthe substitute decision‑maker produces a document that has been certified, in accordance with the regulations, as a true copy of the advance care directive; or\n\t(b)\tthe substitute decision‑maker makes available a copy of the advance care directive in accordance with a scheme set out in the regulations in respect of electronic access to, or provision of, copies of advance care directives; or\n\t(c)\tthe health practitioner to whom the advance care directive is to be produced accesses an electronic copy of the advance care directive in accordance with any requirements set out in the regulations.\n25—Substitute decision‑maker to give notice of decisions\nIf a substitute decision‑maker makes a decision under the advance care directive, the substitute decision‑maker must take reasonable steps to notify each other substitute decision‑maker appointed under the advance care directive of the decision.\n26—Substitute decision‑maker may obtain advice\n\t(1)\tDespite any other Act or law, a substitute decision‑maker may obtain such advice (whether of a professional or technical nature or otherwise) as the substitute decision‑maker reasonably requires in relation to the exercise of their powers, or discharge of their responsibilities, under an advance care directive.\n\t(2)\tHowever, a substitute decision‑maker must have regard to, and seek to protect, the privacy of the person who gave the advance care directive when obtaining such advice.\n27—Substitute decision‑maker may renounce appointment\n\t(1)\tSubject to this section, a substitute decision‑maker appointed under an advance care directive may, by notice in writing given to the person who gave the advance care directive, renounce their appointment.\n\t(2)\tSubject to this Act and to any provision of the advance care directive to the contrary, the powers and responsibilities of another substitute decision‑maker appointed under an advance care directive are not affected merely because a substitute decision‑maker has renounced their appointment under subsection (1).\n\t(3)\tIf the sole substitute decision‑maker appointed under an advance care directive wishes to renounce their appointment during a period in which the person who gave the advance care directive is not competent, the appointment may only be renounced with the permission of the Tribunal.\nNote—\nSee also section 32 (Revocation of advance care directives where person is not competent etc) and section 51 (Orders of Tribunal in relation to substitute decision‑makers).\n28—Death of substitute decision‑maker does not affect validity of advance care directive\nThe death of a substitute decision‑maker appointed under an advance care directive does not, of itself, affect the validity of the advance care directive.\nDivision 3—Revoking advance care directives\nSubdivision 1—Revoking advance care directive where person competent\n29—Revoking advance care directive where person competent\n\t(1)\tA person who has given an advance care directive and who—\n\t(a)\tis competent; and\n\t(b)\tunderstands the consequences of revoking the advance care directive,\nmay revoke the advance care directive at any time.\n\t(2)\tAn advance care directive may only be revoked in the manner prescribed by the regulations.\n\t(3)\tOn revoking an advance care directive, the person must, as soon as is reasonably practicable—\n\t(a)\tadvise each substitute decision‑maker appointed under the advance care directive of the revocation; and\n\t(b)\ttake reasonable steps to notify each other person who has been given a copy of the advance care directive of the revocation.\nExample—\nSuch persons might include family members, hospitals, accommodation providers and health practitioners.\nSubdivision 2—Revoking advance care directive where person not competent\n30—Application of Subdivision\nThis Subdivision applies to a person who has given an advance care directive but who—\n\t(a)\tis not competent; or\n\t(b)\tdoes not appear to understand the consequences of revoking an advance care directive.\n31—Tribunal to be advised of wish for revocation\n\t(1)\tA person who becomes aware that a person to whom this Subdivision applies wishes, or may wish, to revoke an advance care directive must, as soon as is practicable and in accordance with any requirement set out in the regulations, advise the Tribunal of that fact.\n\t(2)\tThe Tribunal, on being advised under this section, may give any directions to specified persons or bodies that the Tribunal thinks necessary or desirable in the circumstances of the case.\n\t(3)\tA person who, without reasonable excuse, refuses or fails to comply with a direction under subsection (2) is guilty of an offence.\nMaximum penalty: $20 000 or imprisonment for 6 months.\n\t(4)\tIt is a defence to a charge of an offence against subsection (3) if the defendant proves that the defendant did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, that their conduct amounted to a failure to comply with the direction.\n\t(5)\tA health practitioner or other person who advises the Tribunal that a person wishes, or may wish, to revoke an advance care directive—\n\t(a)\tcannot, by virtue of doing so, be held to have breached any code of professional etiquette or ethics, or to have departed from any accepted form of professional conduct; and\n\t(b)\tinsofar as the person has acted in good faith, incurs no civil or criminal liability in respect of the advice.\n\t(6)\tFor the purposes of the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, a review under this section will be taken to come within the Tribunal's original jurisdiction.\n32—Revoking advance care directives where person not competent\n\t(1)\tAn advance care directive of a person to whom this Subdivision applies may only be revoked by the Tribunal in accordance with this section.\n\t(2)\tSubject to subsection (3), the Tribunal must revoke an advance care directive if—\n\t(a)\t—\n\t(i)\tthe person who gave the advance care directive, or a person acting on their behalf, applies to the Tribunal for the revocation in a manner and form determined by the Tribunal; or\n\t(ii)\tthe Tribunal is advised under section 31 of a person's wish to revoke an advance care directive; and\n\t(b)\tthe Tribunal (having made such inquiries as it thinks fit) is satisfied that—\n\t(i)\tthe person who gave the advance care directive understands the nature and consequences of the revocation; and\n\t(ii)\tthe revocation genuinely reflects the wishes of the person; and\n\t(iii)\tthe revocation is, in all the circumstances, appropriate.\n\t(3)\tIf an advance care directive expressly provides that the advance care directive is not to be revoked in the circumstances contemplated by this Subdivision, the Tribunal should not revoke the advance care directive unless satisfied that the current wishes of the person who gave the advance care directive indicate a conscious wish to override such a provision.\n\t(4)\tIf the Tribunal revokes an advance care directive under this section, the Tribunal—\n\t(a)\tmust advise each substitute decision‑maker appointed under the advance care directive of the revocation as soon as is reasonably practicable; and\n\t(c)\tmay give such advice and directions as the Tribunal considers necessary or desirable in the circumstances of the case.\nPart 4—Recognition of advance care directives from other jurisdictions\n33—Advance care directives from other jurisdictions\n\t(1)\tThe Governor may, by regulation, declare a class of instruments made under a corresponding law to be an interstate advance care directive.\n\t(2)\tSubject to this section—\n\t(a)\tfor the purposes of the laws of this State, an interstate advance care directive has effect as if it were an advance care directive given under this Act; and\n\t(b)\tthis Act (other than Part 3) applies to an interstate advance care directive as if it were an advance care directive given under this Act; and\n\t(c)\tthe powers and responsibilities of a substitute decision‑maker under the interstate advance care directive will be determined in accordance with the corresponding law under which the interstate advance care directive was given.\n\t(3)\tFor the purposes of this Act, a provision of an interstate advance care directive of a kind contemplated by section 6, 12(1) or 13 will be taken to be void and of no effect (whether or not the provision was able to be included in the interstate advance care directive in the jurisdiction in which it was made).\n\t(4)\tIn this section—\ncorresponding law means a law of the Commonwealth, or of another State or Territory, that is declared by the regulations to be a corresponding law for the purposes of this section.\nPart 5—Giving effect to advance care directives\n34—When things can happen under an advance care directive\n\t(1)\tA substitute decision‑maker may only make a decision under an advance care directive if, at the relevant time, the person who gave the advance care directive has impaired decision‑making capacity in respect of the decision.\n\t(2)\tA health practitioner may only provide health care pursuant to a consent granted under an advance care directive (whether by a substitute decision‑maker or otherwise) if, at the relevant time, the person who gave the advance care directive has impaired decision‑making capacity in respect of a decision relevant to the provision of the health care.\nNote—\nThis includes the withdrawal, or withholding the provision of, health care—see section 4.\n\t(3)\tNothing in this section prevents a provision of an advance care directive being taken into account when determining the wishes of the person who gave the advance care directive.\n35—Substitute decision‑maker to give effect to advance care directive\n\t(1)\tSubject to this Act, in making a decision under an advance care directive, a substitute decision‑maker—\n\t(a)\tmust, as far as is reasonably practicable—\n\t(i)\tgive effect to any instructions or directions expressed in the advance care directive; and\n\t(ii)\tseek to avoid any outcome or intervention that the person who gave the advance care directive would wish to be avoided (whether such wish is expressed or implied); and\n\t(iii)\tobtain, and have regard to, the wishes of the person who gave the advance care directive (whether such wishes are expressed or implied); and\n\t(iv)\tendeavour to make the decision in a manner that is consistent with the principles set out in section 10; and\n\t(b)\tmust make the decision that the substitute decision‑maker reasonably believes the person who gave the advance care directive would have made in the circumstances; and\n\t(c)\tmust act in good faith and with due diligence.\n\t(2)\tA failure to comply with this section does not, of itself, result in any civil or criminal liability on the part of the substitute decision‑maker.\n36—Health practitioners to give effect to advance care directives\n\t(1)\tSubject to this Act, a health practitioner who is providing, or is to provide, health care to a person who has given an advance care directive and who has impaired decision‑making capacity in respect of a decision that is required in relation to the health care—\n\t(a)\tmust comply with a binding provision of the advance care directive that relates to health care of the relevant kind; and\n\t(b)\tshould, as far as is reasonably practicable, comply with a non‑binding provision of the advance care directive that relates to health care of the relevant kind; and\n\t(c)\tmust, as far as is reasonably practicable, seek to avoid any outcome or intervention that the person who gave the advance care directive would wish to be avoided (whether such wish is expressed or implied); and\n\t(d)\tmust endeavour to provide the health care in a manner that is consistent with the principles set out in section 10.\nNote—\nThis includes the provision of emergency medical treatment—see Division 5 of Part 2 of the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995.\n\t(1a)\tSubsection (1)(a) does not apply in relation to a binding provision of an advance care directive to the extent that—\n\t(a)\tthe health practitioner reasonably suspects that the person has attempted suicide or self‑harmed; and\n\t(b)\tthe health practitioner is of the opinion that the provision of health care is reasonably necessary to save the life of the person.\n\t(1b)\tA health practitioner who, pursuant to subsection (1a), provides health care in contravention of a binding provision of an advance care directive must, as soon as reasonably practicable after doing so—\n\t(a)\tmake a written record setting out the information required by the regulations in relation to the provision of the health care; and\n\t(b)\tprovide a report in relation to the provision of the health care in accordance with the requirements set out in the regulations.\n\t(1c)\tSubsection (1)(b) does not apply in relation to a non‑binding provision of a kind referred to in section 19(1a).\n\t(1d)\tSubsection (1)(c) and (d) do not apply in relation to a binding provision of a kind referred to in subsection (1a), a non‑binding provision of a kind referred to in section 19(1a), or to health care of a kind referred to in subsection (1a)(b).\n\t(1e)\tWithout limiting subsections (1a), (1c) or (1d), but to avoid doubt, the effect of those subsections is as follows:\n\t(a)\ta health practitioner may disregard a provision of a person's advance care directive that is a refusal of health care if—\n\t(i)\tthe need for the health care arises out of the attempted suicide or self‑harm of the person; and\n\t(ii)\tthe health care is reasonably necessary to save the life of the person;\n\t(b)\tin such a case, the health practitioner—\n\t(i)\tmay nevertheless decide to comply with the person's refusal of health care in their advance care directive and not provide such health care to the person; or\nNote—\nSuch a decision would be subject to the health practitioner's usual professional standards.\n\t(ii)\tmay, if authorised to do so under another Act or law, provide health care to the person despite the person's refusal of the health care in their advance care directive if, and only if, the health care arises out of the attempted suicide or self‑harm and is reasonably necessary to save the life of the person;\nNote—\nSuch Acts would include the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 and the Mental Health Act 2009.\n\t(c)\tnothing in those subsections operates to authorise the health practitioner to provide health care without being authorised to do so under the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 or the Mental Health Act 2009 or any other Act or law;\nNote—\nThose Acts operate to deem consent to have been given, or to dispense with the need for consent, in specified circumstances.\n\t(d)\tthe person's refusal of health care in their advance care directive (for example, in the case of a general \"do not resuscitate\" provision) would continue to apply in relation to any health care that does not arise out of the attempted suicide or self‑harm, or that is not reasonably necessary to save the life of the person.\nExample—\nIf the person were to need stitches for a non‑life threatening laceration, the person's refusal of treatment would, even in the case of self‑harm, continue to apply.\n\t(2)\tDespite subsection (1), a health practitioner may refuse to comply with a provision of an advance care directive if the health practitioner believes on reasonable grounds that—\n\t(a)\tthe person who gave the advance care directive did not intend the provision to apply in the particular circumstances; or\n\t(b)\tthe provision does not reflect the current wishes of the person who gave the advance care directive.\nNote—\nThis subsection does not, however, authorise a health practitioner to provide health care. If health care is to be provided, consent must be given in accordance with the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995—see, for example, Part 2A of that Act.\n\t(3)\tDespite subsection (1), a health practitioner may refuse to comply with a provision of an advance care directive that specifies the kind of health care that the person who gave the advance care directive wishes to receive if such health care—\n\t(a)\tis not consistent with any relevant professional standards; or\n\t(b)\tdoes not reflect current standards of health care in the State.\n\t(4)\tSubsection (3) does not apply—\n\t(a)\tto, or in relation to, a binding provision of an advance care directive; or\n\t(b)\tif the specified health care comprises the withdrawal, or withholding, of health care to a person (including, to avoid doubt, the withdrawal or withholding of life‑sustaining measures).\nExample—\nAn example would be a \"do not resuscitate\" instruction in an advance care directive.\n\t(5)\tFor the purposes of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (South Australia) Act 2010 and the Health Practitioner National Law (South Australia), and for any other Act declared by the regulations to be included in the ambit of this subsection, a contravention of this section will be taken to amount to unprofessional conduct.\n37—Conscientious objection\nDespite any other provision of this Act, a health practitioner may refuse to comply with a provision of an advance care directive on conscientious grounds.\n38—Consent etc taken to be that of person who gave advance care directive\nFor the purposes of the law of the State, a consent to particular health care given or refused pursuant to an advance care directive—\n\t(a)\twill be taken to be the consent or refusal of consent (as the case requires) of the person who gave the advance care directive; and\n\t(b)\twill be taken to have the same effect for all purposes as if the person were capable of giving such consent.\n39—Consent taken to be withdrawn in certain circumstances\n\t(1)\tIf, at any time before particular health care is provided pursuant to a consent granted under an advance care directive (whether by a substitute decision‑maker or otherwise), the person who gave the advance care directive expressly or implicitly withdraws their consent to the health care, the consent will, for the purposes of the law of the State, be taken to have been withdrawn.\nNote—\nThe dispute resolution processes in Part 7 may also be available in such circumstances.\n\t(2)\tSubsection (1) does not apply in relation to particular health care, or health care of a particular kind—\n\t(a)\tif the advance care directive expressly excludes its operation; or\n\t(b)\tin any other circumstances prescribed by the regulations.\n\t(3)\tAny act or omission done or made in good faith, without negligence and in accordance with an advance care directive before consent was withdrawn under this section will be taken to be valid, and always to have been valid.\nPart 6—Validity and limitation of liability\n40—Presumption of validity\nA health practitioner, substitute decision‑maker or other person is entitled to presume that an apparently genuine advance care directive is valid and in force unless the person knew, or ought reasonably to have known, that the advance care directive was not valid or in force (as the case requires).\n41—Protection from liability\n\t(1)\tA health practitioner, substitute decision‑maker or other person incurs no criminal or civil liability for an act or omission done or made in good faith, without negligence and in accordance with, or purportedly in accordance with, an advance care directive.\n\t(2)\tFor the purposes of this section, a reference to the civil liability of a person includes a reference to liability arising under disciplinary proceedings or similar proceedings.\n42—Validity of acts etc under revoked or varied advance care directive\nSubject to this Act, the revocation or variation of an advance care directive under this Act does not affect the validity of any act done or decision made under the advance care directive before the revocation or variation.\nPart 7—Dispute resolution, reviews and appeals\nDivision 1—Preliminary\n43—Interpretation\nIn this Part—\neligible person, in respect of an advance care directive, means—\n\t(a)\tthe person who gave the advance care directive; and\n\t(b)\ta substitute decision‑maker appointed under the advance care directive; and\n\t(c)\ta health practitioner providing, or proposing to provide, health care to the person who gave the advance care directive; and\n\t(d)\tany other person who satisfies the Public Advocate or the Tribunal that the person has a proper interest in a particular matter relating to the advance care directive,\nand, for the purposes of section 48, includes each person who was a party to any mediation under Division 2 arising out of the matter.\n44—Application of Part\nThis Part applies to the following matters:\n\t(a)\tthe giving or revoking of an advance care directive;\n\t(b)\ta decision, or proposed decision, under an advance care directive;\n\t(c)\tthe provision, or proposed provision, of health care to a person who has given an advance care directive;\nNote—\nThis includes the withdrawal or withholding of health care—see section 4.\n\t(d)\tany other matter specified by the regulations for the purposes of this section.\nDivision 2—Resolution of disputes by Public Advocate\n45—Resolution of disputes by Public Advocate\n\t(1)\tThe Public Advocate may, on application by an eligible person in respect of an advance care directive or on their own initiative, provide preliminary assistance in resolving a matter to which this Part applies, including by—\n\t(a)\tensuring that the parties to the matter are fully aware of their rights and obligations; and\n\t(b)\tidentifying the issues (if any) that are in dispute between the parties; and\n\t(c)\tcanvassing options that may obviate the need for further proceedings; and\n\t(d)\twhere appropriate, facilitating full and open communication between the parties.\n\t(2)\tThe Public Advocate may, on application by an eligible person in respect of an advance care directive, mediate a matter to which this Part applies.\n\t(3)\tThe Public Advocate may refuse to determine an application under this section, or bring a mediation to an end at any time—\n\t(a)\tif, in the opinion of the Public Advocate, it is more appropriate that the matter be dealt with by the Tribunal; or\n\t(b)\tat the request of a party to the mediation.\n\t(4)\tEvidence of anything said or done in the course of a mediation under this section is not admissible in subsequent proceedings except by consent of all parties to the proceedings.\n\t(8)\tAn application under this section—\n\t(a)\tmust be made in a manner and form determined by the Public Advocate; and\n\t(b)\tmust be accompanied by such information as the Public Advocate may reasonably require; and\n\t(c)\tmust be accompanied by the prescribed fee.\n\t(9)\tAn application under this section may be determined by the Public Advocate despite the absence of any person who may be affected by the Public Advocate's decision.\n\t(10)\tThe Public Advocate has, for the purposes of this section, the same privileges and immunities as a member of the Tribunal under the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.\n\t(11)\tSubject to this Act, the Public Advocate may conduct proceedings under this section in such manner as the Public Advocate thinks fit.\n\t(13)\tThe regulations may make further provisions in relation to the operation of this section.\n46—Public Advocate may refer matter to Tribunal\n\t(1)\tIf the Public Advocate ends a mediation, or refuses to determine an application, under section 45 on the grounds that it is more appropriate that the matter be dealt with by the Tribunal, the Public Advocate may refer the matter to the Tribunal.\n\t(2)\tThe regulations may make further provision in respect of referrals under this section.\n46A—Public Advocate may refer question of law to Supreme Court\nThe Public Advocate may refer any question of law for the opinion of the Supreme Court.\nDivision 3—Resolution of disputes by Tribunal\n47—Tribunal to give priority to wishes of person who gave advance care directive\nWithout limiting Part 2, the Tribunal must, in performing a function or exercising a power under this Division—\n\t(a)\tseek, as far as is reasonably practicable, to give full effect to the wishes of the person who gave the relevant advance care directive.\n48—Resolution of disputes by Tribunal\n\t(1)\tAn eligible person in respect of an advance care directive may apply to the Tribunal for—\n\t(a)\ta review of a matter dealt with by the Public Advocate under section 45; or\n\t(b)\ta declaration or direction in relation to a matter to which this Part applies (including, to avoid doubt, a matter contemplated by section 45).\n\t(2)\tFor the purposes of the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013—\n\t(a)\ta review contemplated by subsection (1)(a) will be taken to come within the Tribunal's review jurisdiction; and\n\t(b)\ta declaration or direction contemplated by subsection (1)(b) will be taken to come within the Tribunal's original jurisdiction.\n\t(3)\tThe Tribunal may, on determining an application under this section—\n\t(a)\tin the case of a review of a matter dealt with by the Public Advocate under section 45—\n\t(i)\tconfirm, cancel or reverse a decision that is the subject of the review;\n\t(ii)\tconfirm, vary or revoke a declaration given under section 45; and\n\t(b)\tin any case—\n\t(i)\tmake any declarations that the Tribunal thinks necessary or desirable in the circumstances of the case; and\n\t(ii)\tgive any directions that the Tribunal thinks necessary or desirable in the circumstances of the case (including a direction that the provision of particular health care to a person be withdrawn or withheld); and\nNote—\nThe Tribunal cannot compel a health practitioner to provide particular health care to a patient—see section 6.\n\t(iii)\tgive any advice that the Tribunal considers necessary or desirable in the circumstances of the case.\n\t(4)\tThe Tribunal may vary or revoke a declaration or direction under this section.\n\t(5)\tThe person who gave the advance care directive to which proceedings under this section relate is (if the person is not the applicant) a party to the proceedings.\n\t(6)\tSection 51 of the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 does not apply to, or in relation to, proceedings under this section.\n\t(8)\tThe regulations may make further provisions in relation to proceedings under this section.\n49—Tribunal may refer matter to Public Advocate\n\t(1)\tIf the Tribunal is of the opinion that it is more appropriate that a particular application under section 48(1)(b) be dealt with by the Public Advocate, the Tribunal may refer the matter to the Public Advocate.\n\t(2)\tThe regulations may make further provision in respect of referrals under this section.\n50—Failing to comply with direction of Tribunal\n\t(1)\tSubject to this Act, a person who fails to comply with a direction of the Tribunal under section 48 is guilty of an offence.\nMaximum penalty: $20 000 or imprisonment for 6 months.\n\t(2)\tIt is a defence to a charge of an offence against subsection (1) if the defendant proves that the defendant did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, that their conduct amounted to a failure to comply with the relevant direction.\n51—Orders of Tribunal in relation to substitute decision‑makers\n\t(1)\tIf, of its own motion or on the application of an eligible person in respect of an advance care directive, the Tribunal is satisfied that a person appointed as a substitute decision‑maker under the advance care directive—\n\t(a)\tis a person who cannot be a substitute decision‑maker pursuant to section 21(2); or\n\t(b)\tis no longer willing to act as a substitute decision‑maker under the advance care directive; or\n\t(c)\thas been negligent in the exercise of their powers under the advance care directive; or\n\t(ca)\tis in such default in the exercise of the person's powers under the advance care directive that, in the opinion of the Tribunal, the person is not fit to continue as a substitute decision‑maker,\nthe Tribunal may—\n\t(d)\trevoke the appointment of the substitute decision‑maker; or\n\t(e)\tif the person who gave the advance care directive is competent—with the consent of the person, make any variation to the advance care directive the Tribunal thinks appropriate (including by appointing another substitute decision‑maker); or\n\t(f)\tif the person who gave the advance care directive is not competent, and if no other substitute decision‑maker was appointed under the advance care directive—revoke the advance care directive.\n\t(2)\tIf, on the application of the Public Advocate, the Tribunal is satisfied that, because of a change in the personal circumstances of—\n\t(a)\tthe person who gave the advance care directive; or\n\t(b)\ta substitute decision‑maker under the advance care directive,\nit is no longer appropriate that a particular person be a substitute decision‑maker under the advance care directive, the Tribunal may make any of the orders contemplated by subsection (1)(d), (e) or (f).\n\t(5)\tHowever, the Tribunal should not revoke an advance care directive under this section if there are provisions in the advance care directive that can continue to have effect despite the fact that there is no substitute decision‑maker appointed under the advance care directive.\nNote—\nSuch provisions include, for example, an expression of the wishes of the person who gave the advance care directive in respect of specified health care, or accommodation or personal matters.\nIn the circumstances contemplated by subsection (1)(f) of this section, the Tribunal may also make an order placing the person who gave the advance care directive under limited or full guardianship—see Part 4 Division 2 of the Guardianship and Administration Act 1993. If such an order is made, section 31A of that Act requires the guardian to seek to give effect to the instructions and wishes of the person as set out in the revoked advance care directive.\nDivision 4—Urgent review by Supreme Court of substitute decision‑maker's decision\n52—Urgent review by Supreme Court\n\t(1)\tThe Supreme Court may, on the application of—\n\t(a)\ta health practitioner responsible (whether solely or with others) for the health care of a person who has given an advance care directive; or\n\t(b)\tany person who has, in the opinion of the Court, a proper interest in the exercise of powers by the substitute decision‑maker,\nreview the decision of a substitute decision‑maker appointed under an advance care directive.\n\t(2)\tA review under this section—\n\t(a)\tis limited to ensuring that the substitute decision‑maker's decision is in accordance with the advance care directive and this Act; and\n\t(b)\tcannot be undertaken in respect of a decision to withdraw or withhold health care if the person who gave the advance care directive is in the advanced stages of an illness without any real prospect of recovery and the effect of the health care would be merely to prolong the person's life.\n\t(3)\tOn completion of a review, the Supreme Court may—\n\t(a)\tconfirm, cancel or reverse the decision of the substitute decision‑maker; and\n\t(b)\tmake such other orders, and give such advice and directions, as the Court thinks necessary or desirable in the circumstances of the case.\n\t(4)\tThe Supreme Court must conduct a review under this section as expeditiously as possible.\nDivision 5—Reviews and appeals\n53—Reviews and appeals\nThe following provisions operate in connection with the application of Part 5 of the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 in relation to this Act:\n\t(a)\ta decision of the Tribunal not to authorise publication of a report of proceedings before the Tribunal may not be the subject of an application for internal review;\n\t(b)\tsubject to paragraph (a), an application for internal review may be made by—\n\t(i)\tthe applicant in proceedings before the Tribunal in the exercise of its original jurisdiction (within the meaning of the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013) for the purposes of this Act; or\n\t(ii)\ta person to whom the proceedings relate (if not the applicant under paragraph (a)); or\n\t(iii)\tthe Public Advocate; or\n\t(iv)\tany person who presented evidence or material before, or made submissions to, the Tribunal in the relevant proceedings; or\n\t(v)\tany other person who satisfies the Tribunal that they have a proper interest in the matter;\n\t(c)\tthe person to whom an application for internal review relates (if the person is not the applicant) will be a party to those proceedings;\n\t(d)\tthe Tribunal may make an order for costs against a party to proceedings for internal review, but only if the Tribunal is satisfied that the institution of the proceedings, or the party's conduct in relation to the proceedings, was frivolous, vexatious or calculated to cause delay;\n\t(e)\tan appeal under section 71 of the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 must be instituted within 14 days—\n\t(i)\tafter the making of the decision to which the appeal relates; or\n\t(ii)\tafter being furnished with the reasons for that decision,\nwhichever is the later (but the Supreme Court may, if it is satisfied that it is just and reasonable in the circumstances to do so, dispense with the requirement that the appeal should be instituted within that period (even if the time for instituting the appeal has expired));\n\t(f)\tno order for costs may be made against an applicant in an appeal under section 71 of the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 if they are the person to whom the decision appealed against relates.\nPart 7A—Special provisions relating to Tribunal\n54—Tribunal must give notice of proceedings\n\t(1)\tTribunal must give the following persons reasonable notice of the time and place of the hearings of proceedings before the Tribunal:\n\t(a)\tthe applicant;\n\t(b)\tthe person to whom the proceedings relate;\n\t(c)\tthe Public Advocate;\n\t(d)\tsuch other persons as the Tribunal considers have a proper interest in the matter.\n\t(2)\tDespite subsection (1)—\n\t(a)\tthe Tribunal is not obliged to give notice of proceedings to a person if the person's whereabouts cannot, after reasonable enquiries, be ascertained; and\n\t(b)\tthe Tribunal may, if satisfied that urgent action is required in proceedings before the Tribunal, make an order (or any other decision) as a matter of urgency without complying with subsection (1), with effect for a period not exceeding 21 days as directed by the Tribunal.\n54A—Reasons for decisions\nThe Tribunal must, on request by a person who has a right of internal review of a decision of the Tribunal or who satisfies the Tribunal that they have a proper interest in the matter, furnish the person with a written statement of the Tribunal's reasons for the decision, but not—\n\t(a)\tif the request is made after the period for the review has expired; or\n\t(b)\tif a review has been instituted—after the review has been decided.\n54B—Representation of person who is subject of proceedings\n\t(1)\tA person who is the subject of proceedings before the Tribunal is entitled to appear before the Tribunal by—\n\t(a)\tthe Public Advocate; or\n\t(b)\texcept in the case of an internal review—by a recognised advocate.\n\t(2)\tSubsection (1) applies in addition to section 56(1) of the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.\n\t(3)\tIn this section—\nrecognised advocate means a person who is, by instrument in writing, recognised by the Tribunal as a person who is qualified to act as an advocate in proceedings before the Tribunal for the person to whom the proceedings relate.\nPart 8—Offences\n55—False or misleading statements\n\t(1)\tA person who knowingly makes a false or misleading statement in, or in relation to, an advance care directive is guilty of an offence.\nMaximum penalty: \n\t(a)\tif the defendant is a substitute decision‑maker appointed under the advance care directive—$20 000 or imprisonment for 2 years;\n\t(b)\tin any other case—$10 000.\n\t(2)\tA person who knowingly makes a false or misleading statement in relation to an attempt to give an advance care directive is guilty of an offence.\nMaximum penalty: $10 000.\n\t(3)\tFor the purposes of subsection (1), a reference to a substitute decision‑maker includes a reference to a person who is not but who was, at the relevant time, a substitute decision‑maker appointed under the advance care directive.\n56—Fraud, undue influence etc\n\t(1)\tA person who, by dishonesty or undue influence, induces another to give an advance care directive is guilty of an offence.\nMaximum penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.\n\t(2)\tA person who purports to act as a substitute decision‑maker appointed under an advance care directive knowing that—\n\t(a)\tthe advance care directive has been revoked; or\n\t(b)\tthe person is not a substitute decision‑maker appointed under the advance care directive,\nis guilty of an offence.\nMaximum penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.\n\t(3)\tIf a person is convicted or found guilty of an offence against this section, the court sentencing the person may, if satisfied it is appropriate to do so in the circumstances—\n\t(a)\trevoke the relevant advance care directive; or\n\t(b)\tif the person is a substitute decision‑maker appointed under the relevant advance care directive—revoke the person's appointment as a substitute decision‑maker; or\n\t(c)\tmake any other order the court thinks appropriate.\nPart 9—Miscellaneous\n57—Giving notice to substitute decision‑makers\n\t(1)\tIf a person or body is required under this or any other Act or law to give notice to a substitute decision‑maker, that requirement will be taken to be satisfied if the person gives such notice to—\n\t(a)\tif a particular substitute decision‑maker is specified in the advance care directive as being the person to whom such notice is to be given—that substitute decision‑maker; or\n\t(b)\tin any other case—the substitute decision‑maker who is appointed first in the advance care directive.\nNote—\nThis paragraph does not require a person to give notice to or otherwise contact a substitute decision‑maker, rather it applies where a provision of this Act or another Act requires such notice to be given.\n\t(2)\tIf the first‑appointed substitute decision‑maker is given notice in accordance with subsection (1)(b), that substitute decision‑maker must give each other substitute decision‑maker appointed under the advance care directive—\n\t(a)\tif the notice is a written notice—a copy of the notice; or\n\t(b)\tin any other case—information setting out the effect of the notice.\n58—Prohibition of publication of reports of proceedings\n\t(1)\tSubject to this section, a person must not publish a report of any proceedings under this Act.\nMaximum penalty: $10 000.\n\t(2)\tThe body or court before which proceedings under this Act are heard may, on application by a person who it is satisfied has a proper interest in the matter, authorise the publication of a report of those proceedings.\n\t(3)\tA person who publishes a report pursuant to an authorisation given under subsection (2) must not disclose any information in the report that identifies, or could tend to identify, the person to whom the proceedings relate.\nMaximum penalty: $10 000.\n\t(4)\tThis section does not apply if the person who gave the relevant advance care directive consents to the publication of the report or information.\n59—Service of documents\nA notice or document required or authorised to be given or sent to, or served on, a person for the purposes of this Act may—\n\t(a)\tbe given to the person personally; or\n\t(b)\tbe posted in an envelope addressed to the person—\n\t(i)\tat the person's last known address; or\n\t(ii)\tat the person's address for service; or\n\t(c)\tbe left for the person at the address for service with someone apparently over the age of 16 years; or\n\t(d)\tbe transmitted by fax or email to a fax number or email address provided by the person (in which case the notice or document will be taken to have been given or served at the time of transmission).\n60—Victimisation\n\t(1)\tA person commits an act of victimisation against another person (the victim) if the person causes detriment to the victim on the ground, or substantially on the ground, that the victim—\n\t(a)\thas made, or wishes to make an advance care directive; or\n\t(b)\tis a substitute decision‑maker appointed under an advance care directive; or\n\t(c)\tis otherwise involved in relation to an advance care directive.\n\t(2)\tAn act of victimisation under this Act may be dealt with—\n\t(a)\tas a tort; or\n\t(b)\tas if it were an act of victimisation under the Equal Opportunity Act 1984,\nbut, if the victim commences proceedings in a court seeking a remedy in tort, they cannot subsequently lodge a complaint under the Equal Opportunity Act 1984 and, conversely, if the victim lodges a complaint under that Act, they cannot subsequently commence proceedings in a court seeking a remedy in tort.\n\t(3)\tIf a complaint alleging an act of victimisation under this Act has been lodged with the Commissioner for Equal Opportunity and the Commissioner is of the opinion that the subject matter of the complaint has already been adequately dealt with by a competent authority, the Commissioner may decline to act on the complaint or to proceed further with action on the complaint.\n\t(4)\tIn this section—\ndetriment includes—\n\t(a)\tinjury, damage or loss; or\n\t(b)\tintimidation or harassment; or\n\t(c)\tdiscrimination, disadvantage or adverse treatment in relation to the victim's employment or business; or\n\t(d)\tthreats of reprisal.\n61—Confidentiality\n\t(1)\tA person engaged or formerly engaged in the administration of this Act must not divulge or communicate personal information obtained (whether by that person or otherwise) in the course of official duties except—\n\t(a)\tas required or authorised by or under this Act or any other Act or law; or\n\t(b)\twith the consent of the person to whom the information relates; or\n\t(c)\tin connection with the administration of this Act; or\n\t(d)\tas may be required to give effect to the provisions of an advance care directive to which the information relates; or\n\t(e)\tto an authority responsible under the law of a place outside this State, where the information is required for the proper administration of that law; or\n\t(f)\tto an agency or instrumentality of this State, the Commonwealth or another State or a Territory of the Commonwealth for the purposes of the proper performance of its functions.\nMaximum penalty: $10 000.\n\t(2)\tSubsection (1) does not prevent disclosure of statistical or other data that could not reasonably be expected to lead to the identification of any person to whom it relates.\n\t(3)\tInformation that has been disclosed under subsection (1) for a particular purpose must not be used for any other purpose by—\n\t(a)\tthe person to whom the information was disclosed; or\n\t(b)\tany other person who gains access to the information (whether properly or improperly and whether directly or indirectly) as a result of that disclosure.\nMaximum penalty: $10 000.\n62—Review of Act\n\t(1)\tThe Minister must cause a review of the operation of this Act to be conducted and a report on the results of the review to be submitted to the Minister.\n\t(2)\tThe review and the report must be completed before the fifth anniversary of the commencement of this Act.\n\t(3)\tThe Minister must cause a copy of the report submitted under subsection (1) to be laid before both Houses of Parliament within 6 sitting days after receiving the report.\n63—Regulations\n\t(1)\tThe Governor may make such regulations as are contemplated by, or necessary or expedient for the purposes of, this Act.\n\t(2)\tWithout limiting subsection (1), the regulations may—\n\t(a)\texempt (conditionally or unconditionally) a specified person or class of persons from a specified provision or provisions of this Act; and\n\t(b)\tprescribe fees in respect of any matter under this Act and their payment, recovery or waiver; and\n\t(c)\tprescribe fines, not exceeding $5 000, for offences against the regulations; and\n\t(d)\tmake provisions for the facilitation of proof of the commission of offences against the regulations; and\n\t(e)\tmake provisions of a saving or transitional nature.\n\t(3)\tThe regulations may—\n\t(a)\tbe of general application or vary in their application according to prescribed factors; and\n\t(b)\tprovide that a matter or thing in respect of which regulations may be made is to be determined according to the discretion of the Minister or a specified person or body.\nSchedule 1—Transitional provisions\nPart 8—Transitional provisions\n32—Transitional provisions relating to anticipatory directions under Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995\n\t(1)\tA direction given by a person under section 7 of the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 that is in force immediately before the commencement of clause 7 of this Schedule will, on the commencement of that clause, be taken to be an advance care directive given in accordance with this Act.\nNote—\nSee also clause 36.\n\t(2)\tA provision of such a direction of a kind contemplated by section 6 or 12(1) of this Act will be taken to be void and of no effect.\n\t(3)\tAn advance care directive contemplated by this clause—\n\t(a)\twill be taken to have been given by the person who gave the direction; and\n\t(b)\twill be taken to contain such provisions as may be necessary to give effect to the direction (but no other provision); and\n\t(c)\twill be taken to contain a provision limiting the circumstances in which the advance care directive has effect to the circumstances contemplated by section 7(1) of the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 (as in force immediately before the commencement of clause 7 of this Schedule).\nNote—\nThose circumstances are limited to where the person is in the terminal phase of a terminal illness, or in a persistent vegetative state, and is incapable of making decisions about medical treatment when the question of administering the treatment arises.\n\t(4)\tAny relevant condition or limitation contained in the direction will be taken to apply to an advance care directive contemplated by this section.\n\t(5)\tThe prescribed form by which the direction under section 7 of the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 was given will, for all purposes, be taken to be an advance care directive form.\n\t(6)\tA reference in any instrument or document to a direction under section 7 of the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 (however described) will be taken to be a reference to the advance care directive contemplated by this clause.\n33—Transitional provisions relating to medical agents under Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995\n\t(1)\tA medical power of attorney appointing an agent under section 8 of the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 that is in force immediately before the commencement of clause 7 of this Schedule will, on the commencement of that clause, be taken to be an advance care directive given in accordance with this Act.\nNote—\nSee also clause 36.\n\t(2)\tA provision of such a medical power of attorney of a kind contemplated by section 6 or 12(1) of this Act will be taken to be void and of no effect.\n\t(3)\tAn advance care directive contemplated by this clause—\n\t(a)\twill be taken to have been given by the person who gave the medical power of attorney; and\n\t(b)\twill be taken to appoint each agent appointed by the medical power of attorney as a substitute decision‑maker under the advance care directive; and\n\t(c)\twill be taken to contain such provisions as may be necessary to enable each substitute decision‑maker to make any decision the substitute decision‑maker could have made as the person's agent (but no other provision).\n\t(4)\tAny relevant condition or limitation contained in the medical power of attorney will be taken to apply to an advance care directive contemplated by this section.\n\t(5)\tThe prescribed form by which the medical power of attorney was given will, for all purposes, be taken to be an advance care directive form.\n\t(6)\tA reference in any instrument or document to a medical power of attorney or agent under section 8 of the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 (however described) will be taken to be a reference to the advance care directive or substitute decision‑maker contemplated by this clause (as the case requires).\n34—Transitional provisions relating to other instruments continued under Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995\n\t(1)\tA direction or enduring power of attorney continued in force pursuant to Schedule 3 of the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 and that is in force immediately before the commencement of this clause will, on the commencement of Part 2 of this Schedule, be taken to be an advance care directive given in accordance with this Act.\nNote—\nSee also clause 36.\n\t(2)\tA provision of such a direction or enduring power of attorney of a kind contemplated by section 6 or 12(1) of this Act will be taken to be void and of no effect.\n\t(3)\tAn advance care directive contemplated by this clause—\n\t(a)\twill be taken to have been given by the person who gave the direction or enduring power of attorney (as the case requires); and\n\t(b)\tin the case of an advance care directive related to a direction—will be taken to contain such provisions as may be necessary to give effect to the direction (but no other provision); and\n\t(c)\tin the case of an advance care directive related to an enduring power of attorney—will be taken to appoint each agent appointed by the enduring power of attorney as a substitute decision‑maker under the advance care directive; and\n\t(d)\twill be taken to contain such provisions as may be necessary to enable each substitute decision‑maker to make any decision the substitute decision‑maker could have made as the person's agent under the enduring power of attorney (but no other provision).\n\t(4)\tAny condition or limitation contained in the direction or enduring power of attorney (as the case requires) will be taken to apply to an advance care directive contemplated by this section.\n\t(5)\tAny instrument by which the direction or enduring power of attorney was given will, for all purposes, be taken to be an advance care directive form.\n\t(6)\tA reference in any instrument or document to a direction or enduring power of attorney to which this clause relates (however described) will be taken to be a reference to the advance care directive contemplated by this clause.\n35—Transitional provisions relating to enduring guardians under Guardianship and Administration Act 1993\n\t(1)\tAn instrument appointing an enduring guardian under section 25 of the Guardianship and Administration Act 1993 that is in force immediately before the commencement of clause 18 of this Schedule will, on the commencement of that clause, be taken to be an advance care directive given in accordance with this Act.\nNote—\nSee also clause 36.\n\t(2)\tA provision of such an instrument appointing an enduring guardian of a kind contemplated by section 6 or 12(1) of this Act will be taken to be void and of no effect.\n\t(3)\tAn advance care directive contemplated by this clause—\n\t(a)\twill be taken to have been given by the person who appointed the enduring guardian; and\n\t(b)\twill be taken to appoint each enduring guardian appointed by the instrument as a substitute decision‑maker under the advance care directive; and\n\t(c)\twill be taken to contain such provisions as may be necessary to enable each substitute decision‑maker to make any decision the substitute decision‑maker could have made as the person's enduring guardian (but no other provision).\n\t(4)\tAny condition or limitation contained in the instrument appointing the enduring guardian will be taken to apply to an advance care directive contemplated by this section.\n\t(5)\tThe instrument by which the enduring guardian was appointed will, for all purposes, be taken to be an advance care directive form.\n\t(6)\tA reference in any instrument or document to an enduring guardian appointed under section 25 of the Guardianship and Administration Act 1993 (however described) will be taken to be a reference to the advance care directive contemplated by this clause.\n36—Only 1 advance care directive to be created\n\t(1)\tIf 2 or more of clauses 32, 33, 34 or 35 apply in respect of a particular person, the person will, for the purposes of this or any other Act, be taken to have given 1 advance care directive containing, or subject to, the relevant provisions (in addition to any other applicable provisions under this Act).\n\t(2)\tIn this clause—\nrelevant provisions means—\n\t(a)\tif clause 32 applies in respect of the person—clause 32(2), (3) and (4); and\n\t(b)\tif clause 33 applies in respect of the person—clause 33(2), (3) and (4); and\n\t(c)\tif clause 34 applies in respect of the person—clause 34(2), (3) and (4); and\n\t(d)\tif clause 35 applies in respect of the person—clause 35(2), (3) and (4).\n37—Disputes\nA dispute arising out of the operation of this Schedule will be taken to be a matter to which Part 7 of this Act applies.\nLegislative history\nNotes\n\t•\tAmendments of this version that are uncommenced are not incorporated into the text.\n\t•\tPlease note—References in the legislation to other legislation or instruments or to titles of bodies or offices are not automatically updated as part of the program for the revision and publication of legislation and therefore may be obsolete.\n\t•\tEarlier versions of this Act (historical versions) are listed at the end of the legislative history.\n\t•\tFor further information relating to the Act and subordinate legislation made under the Act see the Index of South Australian Statutes or www.legislation.sa.gov.au.\nLegislation amended by principal Act\nThe Advance Care Directives Act 2013 amended the following:\nConsent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995\nCoroners Act 2003\nFair Work Act 1994\nGuardianship and Administration Act 1993\nHealth and Community Services Complaints Act 2004\nWills Act 1936\nPrincipal Act and amendments\nNew entries appear in bold.\nYear\nNo\nTitle\nAssent\nCommencement\n2013\n12\nAdvance Care Directives Act 2013 \n18.4.2013\n1.7.2014 (Gazette 6.2.2014 p546)\n2014\n26\nStatutes Amendment (SACAT) Act 2014\n11.12.2014\nPt 2 (ss 4—20)—29.3.2015 (Gazette 5.3.2015 p883)\n2016\n34\nMental Health (Review) Amendment Act 2016\n14.7.2016\nSch 1 (cl 1)—5.6.2017 (Gazette 30.5.2017 p1982)\n2017\n51\nStatutes Amendment (SACAT No 2) Act 2017\n28.11.2017\nPt 3 (ss 6 to 8)—14.12.2017 (Gazette 12.12.2017 p4960)\n2017\n70\nStatutes Amendment (Attorney-General's Portfolio No 3) Act 2017\n12.12.2017\nPt 2 (s 4)—12.12.2017: s 2(1)\n2021\n29\nVoluntary Assisted Dying Act 2021\n1.7.2021\nSch 1 (cll 2 to 4)—31.1.2023 (Gazette 11.8.2022 p2489)\n2023\n38\nAdvance Care Directives (Review) Amendment Act 2023\n7.12.2023\n1.3.2024 (Gazette 25.1.2024 p75)\n2025\n69\nStatutes Amendment (Health and Wellbeing) Act 2025\n4.12.2025\nPt 2 (ss 3 to 5)—uncommenced\nProvisions amended\nNew entries appear in bold.\nEntries that relate to provisions that have been deleted appear in italics.\nProvision\nHow varied\nCommencement\nLong title\namended under Legislation Revision and Publication Act 2002\n29.3.2015\nPt 1\n\n\ns 2\nomitted under Legislation Revision and Publication Act 2002\n29.3.2015\ns 3\n\n\ns 3(1)\n\n\ndecision\ninserted by 26/2014 s 4(1)\n29.3.2015\nGuardianship Board\ndeleted by 26/2014 s 4(2)\n29.3.2015\ninternal review\ninserted by 26/2014 s 4(3)\n29.3.2015\nTribunal\ninserted by 26/2014 s 4(4)\n29.3.2015\ns 5A\ninserted by 38/2023 s 3\n1.3.2024\ns 7\n\n\ns 7(1)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 7A\ninserted by 29/2021 Sch 1 cl 2\n31.1.2023\ns 8A\ninserted by 38/2023 s 4\n1.3.2024\ns 10\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 11\n\n\ns 11(1)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 11(3)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 11(5)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\nPt 3\n\n\ns 12\n\n\ns 12(1)\namended by 29/2021 Sch 1 cl 3(1)\n31.1.2023\n\n(a)(ii) deleted by 29/2021 Sch 1 cl 3(1)\n31.1.2023\ns 12(1a)\ninserted by 29/2021 Sch 1 cl 3(2)\n31.1.2023\ns 12(4)\n\n\nmandatory medical treatment\namended by 34/2016 Sch 1 cl 1\n5.6.2017\ns 14\n\n\ns 14(1)\namended by 38/2023 s 5(1), (2)\n1.3.2024\n\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 14(2)\nsubstituted by 38/2023 s 5(3)\n1.3.2024\ns 14(3)—(5)\ninserted by 38/2023 s 5(3)\n1.3.2024\ns 15\n\n\ns 15(1) and (2)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 19\n\n\ns 19(1a)\ninserted by 38/2023 s 6\n1.3.2024\ns 21\n\n\ns 21(1)\namended by 38/2023 s 7\n1.3.2024\ns 22\nsubstituted by 38/2023 s 8\n1.3.2024\ns 23\n\n\ns 23(5)\ninserted by 29/2021 Sch 1 cl 4\n31.1.2023\ns 24\n\n\ns 24(2)\nsubstituted by 38/2023 s 9\n1.3.2024\ns 25\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 26\n\n\ns 26(1)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 27\n\n\ns 27(1) and (2)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 27(3)\namended by 26/2014 s 5\n29.3.2015\n\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 31\n\n\ns 31(1) and (2)\namended by 26/2014 s 6(1)\n29.3.2015\ns 31(4)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 31(5)\namended by 26/2014 s 6(1)\n29.3.2015\n\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 31(6)\ninserted by 26/2014 s 6(2)\n29.3.2015\ns 32\n\n\ns 32(1)\namended by 26/2014 s 7(1)\n29.3.2015\ns 32(2)\namended by 26/2014 s 7(1)\n29.3.2015\n\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 32(3)\namended by 26/2014 s 7(1)\n29.3.2015\ns 32(4)\namended by 26/2014 s 7(1)\n29.3.2015\n\n(b) deleted by 26/2014 s 7(2)\n29.3.2015\nPt 5\n\n\ns 35\n\n\ns 35(1)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 36\n\n\ns 36(1a)—(1e)\ninserted by 38/2023 s 10(1)\n1.3.2024\ns 36(5)\namended by 38/2023 s 10(2)\n1.3.2024\ns 39\n\n\ns 39(1)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\nPt 6\n\n\ns 40\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\nPt 7\n\n\nPt 7 Div 1\n\n\ns 43\n\n\neligible person\namended by 51/2017 s 6\n14.12.2017\nPt 7 Div 2\n\n\ns 45\n\n\ns 45(1)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 45(3)\namended by 26/2014 s 8(1)\n29.3.2015\n\namended by 38/2023 s 11(1)\n1.3.2024\ns 45(5) and (6)\ndeleted by 38/2023 s 11(2)\n1.3.2024\ns 45(7)\namended by 26/2014 s 8(1)\n29.3.2015\n\ndeleted by 38/2023 s 11(2)\n1.3.2024\ns 45(10)\namended by 26/2014 s 8(1), (2)\n29.3.2015\ns 45(11)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 45(12)\ndeleted by 70/2017 s 4\n12.12.2017\ns 45(13)\namended by 38/2023 s 11(3)\n1.3.2024\ns 46\n\n\ns 46(1)\namended by 26/2014 s 9\n29.3.2015\ns 46A\ninserted by 26/2014 s 10\n29.3.2015\nPt 7 Div 3\n\n\nheading\nsubstituted by 26/2014 s 11\n29.3.2015\ns 47\namended by 26/2014 s 12(1)\n29.3.2015\n\n(b) deleted by 26/2014 s 12(2)\n29.3.2015\ns 48\n\n\ns 48(1)\namended by 26/2014 s 13(1)\n29.3.2015\ns 48(2)\nsubstituted by 26/2014 s 13(2)\n29.3.2015\ns 48(3) and (4)\namended by 26/2014 s 13(1)\n29.3.2015\ns 48(5)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 48(6)\nsubstituted by 26/2014 s 13(3)\n29.3.2015\ns 48(7)\ndeleted by 26/2014 s 13(3)\n29.3.2015\ns 48(9)\ndeleted by 26/2014 s 13(4)\n29.3.2015\ns 49\n\n\ns 49(1)\namended by 26/2014 s 14\n29.3.2015\ns 50\n\n\ns 50(1)\namended by 26/2014 s 15\n29.3.2015\ns 50(2)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 51\n\n\ns 51(1)\namended by 26/2014 s 16(1)\n29.3.2015\n\namended by 51/2017 s 7(1), (2)\n14.12.2017\n\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 51(2)\namended by 26/2014 s 16(1)\n29.3.2015\ns 51(3) and (4)\ndeleted by 26/2014 s 16(2)\n29.3.2015\ns 51(5)\namended by 26/2014 s 16(1)\n29.3.2015\nPt 7 Div 4\n\n\nheading\nsubstituted by 26/2014 s 17\n29.3.2015\nPt 7 Div 5\nsubstituted by 26/2014 s 18\n29.3.2015\ns 53\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\nPt 7A\ninserted by 26/2014 s 19\n29.3.2015\ns 54\n\n\ns 54(2)\namended by 51/2017 s 8\n14.12.2017\ns 54A\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\nPt 8\n\n\ns 56\n\n\ns 56(2)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\nPt 9\n\n\ns 57\n\n\ns 57(2)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 60\n\n\ns 60(1) and (2)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ns 62\n\n\ns 62(1)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\nSch 1\n\n\nPts 1—7\nomitted under Legislation Revision and Publication Act 2002\n29.3.2015\nPt 8\n\n\ncl 33\n\n\ncl 33(3)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ncl 34\n\n\ncl 34(3)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\ncl 35\n\n\ncl 35(3)\namended by 38/2023 Sch 1\n1.3.2024\nTransitional etc provisions associated with Act or amendments\nStatutes Amendment (SACAT) Act 2014\n20—Transitional provisions\n\t(1)\tIn this section—\nGuardianship Board means the Guardianship Board established under the Guardianship and Administration Act 1993;\nprincipal Act means the Advance Care Directives Act 2013;\nrelevant day means the day on which this Part comes into operation;\nTribunal means the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.\n\t(2)\tA right to make any application or referral, or to seek a review, under the principal Act with respect to any matter in existence before the relevant day, with the effect that the relevant proceedings would have been commenced before the Guardianship Board, will be exercised as if this Part had been in operation before the right arose, so that the relevant proceedings may be commenced instead before the Tribunal.\n\t(3)\tAny proceedings before the Guardianship Board under the principal Act immediately before the relevant day will, subject to such directions as the President of the Tribunal thinks fit, be transferred to the Tribunal where they may proceed as if they had been commenced before the Tribunal.\n\t(4)\tThe Tribunal may—\n\t(a)\treceive in evidence any transcript of evidence in proceedings before the Guardianship Board, and draw any conclusions of fact from that evidence that appear proper; and\n\t(b)\tadopt any findings or determinations of the Guardianship Board that may be relevant to proceedings before the Tribunal; and\n\t(c)\tadopt or make any decision (including a decision in the nature of a permission), direction or order in relation to proceedings before the Guardianship Board before the relevant day (including so as to make a decision or give a permission, direction or order, in relation to proceedings fully heard before the relevant day); and\n\t(d)\ttake other steps to promote or ensure the smoothest possible transition from 1 jurisdiction to another in connection with the operation of this section.\n\t(5)\tNothing in this section affects a right to appeal to the Administrative and Disciplinary Division of the District Court against a decision, direction or order of the Guardianship Board made or given before the relevant day.\nHistorical versions\n29.3.2015\n\n5.6.2017\n\n12.12.2017 (electronic only)\n\n14.12.2017\n\n31.1.2023\n\n","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"summary":{"complexity_score":1,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"Scope cannot be assessed — the actual text of the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 was not provided. The page returned was a website error page following a site migration on 24 March 2026, containing no legislative content."},"complexity_factors":["No legislative text was retrievable — the source URL returned a 'Page Not Found' error","The content provided is entirely website error and navigation boilerplate, not statutory text","Complexity cannot be meaningfully assessed without access to the actual Act","Score of 1 reflects absence of analysable content, not simplicity of the underlying law"],"plain_english_summary":"## ⚠️ Content Unavailable\n\nThe actual text of South Australia's **Advance Care Directives Act 2013** could not be retrieved — the legislation website returned a \"Page Not Found\" error, likely due to a website migration that occurred on **24 March 2026**.\n\n### What we know about this law from its title:\nAn **Advance Care Directive** is a legal document that lets you record your wishes about medical treatment *in advance* — so that if you ever become unable to speak for yourself (due to illness, injury, or incapacity), doctors and family members know what you want. South Australia's 2013 Act established the formal legal framework for these documents in SA.\n\n### What to do:\n- Visit [www.legislation.sa.gov.au](https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au) and search for \"Advance Care Directives Act 2013\" directly\n- Update any old bookmarks to the site\n- Email **OPCWeb@sa.gov.au** if you encounter errors\n\n> ⚠️ **No legal analysis can be reliably completed without access to the actual legislative text.** The fields below reflect this limitation."},"issue_detection":{"absurdities":[],"contradictions":[]},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The Act remains focused on enabling and regulating advance care directives and substitute decision‑makers. Subsequent amendments (electronic copies, interaction with the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act, updated witness/interpreter and Tribunal procedures) refine and expand implementation detail and dispute mechanisms but do not materially change the core purpose. The principal scope—documenting future health and related personal wishes, appointing substitutes, and providing dispute resolution—remains the same; most changes are elaborations, procedural clarifications and added exceptions rather than a substantive broadening of subject‑matter."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple cross‑references to other Acts (Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995, Mental Health Act 2009, Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2021, Guardianship and Administration Act 1993) increasing legal interaction points","Numerous conditional rules and exceptions (e.g. binding vs non‑binding provisions, exceptions for attempted suicide/self‑harm, practitioner conscience and professional standards)","Detailed procedural requirements delegated to regulations (electronic copies, suitable witnesses, certification, fees) creating reliance on subordinate instruments (s5A, s15, s24, s63)","Tribunal, Public Advocate and Supreme Court dispute‑resolution pathways with overlapping jurisdictions and referral powers (s45–52)","Several defined terms and statutory presumptions (s3, s40) that shift evidentiary burdens and practical decision‑making","Transitional provisions converting prior instruments into advance care directives and related conversion rules (Schedule 1)","Penalties and criminal offences (s50, s55–56) combined with broad protections from civil liability (s41) creating mixed legal incentives","Recent amendments (electronic recognition, interactions with VAD, revised witness/interpreter rules) that add layers of conditionality and implementation detail"],"plain_english_summary":"**What this law does (mechanics first)**\n\n- Allows a competent adult to record binding or non‑binding instructions about their future health care, residential/accommodation arrangements and personal affairs by completing an approved advance care directive form and having it witnessed (see s11, s15, s16).\n\n- Enables the person to appoint one or more substitute decision‑makers to make those decisions when the person later lacks decision‑making capacity (s21–24). Substitute decision‑makers act with the legal authority the person had while competent, subject to limits in the Act (s10(f), s23, s24).\n\n- Sets rules for when directives take effect (they are in force once properly witnessed (s16)), how they are revoked (by the person while competent (s29) or by the Tribunal if the person lacks competence (s31–32)), and treats a later directive as revoking earlier ones (s17).\n\n- Requires health practitioners to follow binding provisions of an advance care directive relating to health care where the person lacks decision‑making capacity, and to, so far as practicable, respect non‑binding provisions (s34–36). The Act expressly permits refusal to comply where compliance would contravene professional standards or fail to reflect current wishes, and allows conscientious objection by practitioners (s36(2)–(3), s37).\n\n- Provides dispute‑resolution routes: preliminary assistance and mediation by the Public Advocate (s45), review and binding declarations/directions by the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) (s48), and urgent review by the Supreme Court in limited circumstances (s52). The Tribunal must, as far as reasonably practicable, give priority to the wishes of the person who made the directive (s47).\n\n- Gives legal protections and presumptions to those acting under directives: presumptions of validity (s40) and immunity from civil/criminal liability for acts done in good faith and without negligence in accordance with (or purportedly in accordance with) a directive (s41). It also creates criminal offences for false or misleading statements and for undue influence or fraud in creating a directive (s55–56).\n\n- Recognises certain interstate directives by regulation (s33), and permits prescribed kinds of electronic copies to be treated as directives or valid copies (s5A, s24(2)). The Minister and Governor have regulatory powers to set form, fees, exemptions and procedural detail (s3, s63).\n\n- Limits: an advance care directive cannot give a power of attorney (financial/legal authority) (s13); it cannot lawfully require unlawful acts or require refusal of “mandatory medical treatment” (s12); and, except where expressly provided, it does not apply to the administration of voluntary assisted dying substances (s7A). The Act also allows health practitioners to provide life‑saving care contrary to a refusal in a directive where that care is necessary after attempted suicide or self‑harm (s36(1a)–(1e)).\n\n\n**Who it affects**\n\n- Competent adults who want to document future medical and personal preferences (s11).\n- Appointed substitute decision‑makers who will make decisions when the primary person lacks capacity (Part 3 Div 2).\n- Health practitioners and health services required to check, respect and, in some cases, act on directives (s36, s6, s37).\n- The Public Advocate, the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and the Supreme Court, which play roles in mediation, review and urgent judicial oversight (s45–52).\n- Interpreters and suitable witnesses involved in the making of directives (s14–15).\n\n\n**Why it matters (purpose claims and a practical test against trade‑offs and incentives)**\n\nThe Act’s stated purposes include enabling adults to record future health and personal wishes, to appoint substitutes, to ensure health care is delivered consistently with those wishes, to protect practitioners who follow directives and to provide dispute resolution mechanisms (s9). Examining those claims against concrete mechanisms in the Act shows the following practical points:\n\n- Autonomy mechanism: the Act gives legal force to written instructions and substitute decision‑makers (s11, s19, s23). This increases individual control over future decisions but creates a compliance task: directives must be on the approved form and correctly witnessed (s3, s11, s15), raising modest time and procedural costs for individuals and service providers.\n\n- Protection for third parties: the Act presumes directives are valid (s40) and shields good‑faith actors from liability (s41). That lowers legal risk for clinicians and substitute decision‑makers when acting on directives, but creates a reliance risk if a directive is outdated or ambiguous—resolved partly by Tribunal review routes (s48) and by health practitioner discretion where the provision appears inconsistent with current wishes or standards (s36(2)–(3)).\n\n- Limits on compulsion and professional standards: the Act cannot force a practitioner to provide particular health care (s6). This preserves clinician professional judgment (and consciences: s37) but can mean a patient’s specified preference in a directive may not be delivered if no willing or suitably skilled practitioner is available—translating into coordination costs (finding a practitioner or service willing to comply).\n\n- Oversight and dispute costs: the Public Advocate and Tribunal are established dispute‑resolution nodes (s45–48). These provide formal remedies but mean potential administrative and legal costs (fees, time, tribunal or court expenses) for parties and the public sector. The Act gives the Minister and Tribunal broad discretion (e.g. form, regs, referrals), which aids flexibility but concentrates implementation decisions in officials and tribunals (s63, s45, s46, s48).\n\n- Interaction with other regimes: the Act expressly preserves other laws, excludes directives about voluntary assisted dying (except to express preferences) (s7A, s12(1a)), and disallows an advance care directive from conferring a power of attorney (s13). That protects separation between health‑care choices and other legal authorities, but requires individuals who want financial or legal agency arrangements to use separate instruments (and incur the costs and complexity of those processes).\n\n- Compliance and practical burdens: witness and interpreter certification requirements (s14–15) try to reduce fraud and incapacity risk but add procedural steps. Regulations will fill in practicalities (electronic access, certification, fees; s5A, s24(2), s63), so real‑world ease of use depends on subordinate rules and administrative systems.\n\n\n**Who pays, who decides, and what behaviour changes**\n\n- Who pays: individuals will bear upfront time/possible fees to complete, witness and store directives; health services and clinicians bear administrative time to check and apply directives; tribunals and the Public Advocate bear public administration costs for mediation and reviews; legal costs may fall on parties in disputes (s45(8) notes prescribed fees, s63 allows fee regulation).\n\n- Who decides: the person making the directive sets content and appoints substitute decision‑makers (s11, s21–22); substitute decision‑makers and health practitioners make decisions when the person lacks capacity (s34–36); the Tribunal and courts resolve disputes and can revoke or vary appointments in prescribed circumstances (s48–52); the Minister and Governor decide forms and regulations (s3, s63).\n\n- Behavioural changes the law incentivises: more people may document wishes formally and appoint substitutes; substitute decision‑makers will need to keep directives available and to notify co‑appointees when making decisions (s24, s25); clinicians will develop checking and record‑keeping practices for directives and may seek to avoid legal risk by consulting Tribunal or following reporting rules where they override a directive for self‑harm reasons (s36(1b)).\n\n\n**Implementation risks, trade‑offs and concentrated vs diffuse effects**\n\n- Implementation risk: practical usefulness depends on accessible approved forms, electronic access arrangements and workable witness/interpreter arrangements (s3, s5A, s15). If regulations or administrative systems are slow to develop, uptake and clarity will suffer.\n\n- Trade‑offs: the Act balances individual autonomy against clinician discretion and public oversight. Protecting practitioners from liability (s41) reduces defensive medicine risk but increases reliance on the written directive; allowing conscientious objection (s37) preserves clinicians’ professional freedom but may frustrate patient expectations.\n\n- Concentrated benefits and diffuse costs: substitute decision‑makers and those seeking legal clarity gain strongly from Tribunal powers and presumptions of validity; costs (time, system administration, tribunal workload) are dispersed across the health system and public sector.\n\n\n**Key cross‑references to watch**\n\n- Interaction with Voluntary Assisted Dying Act and mental health/consent legislation affects when directives apply or are overridden (s7A, s36(1e), s12).\n- Regulations will supply many operational details (electronic copies, fees, classes of people excluded as witnesses or substitute decision‑makers, s5A, s15, s21, s63).\n\n\n**Practical takeaways**\n\n- If you want to ensure your future medical and accommodation preferences are respected, use the approved form, follow witness and interpreter requirements, and consider appointing substitute decision‑maker(s) (s11, s15, s21).\n- Appointing a substitute decision‑maker under this Act does not replace a financial power of attorney; that requires a separate instrument (s13).\n- Health practitioners may be lawfully excused from carrying out particular instructions in specified circumstances (s6, s36), and there are formal dispute and review paths if a directive is contested (s45–52)."},"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"A positive credit balance is required for all requests, including BYOK, so fallback providers remain available. Add credits at https://vercel.com/d?to=%2F%5Bteam%5D%2F%7E%2Fai%3Fmodal%3Dtop-up to continue.","source":"analysis-cron"},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":6,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The legislation has grown significantly beyond its original 2013 scope through amendments. Originally focused on advance care directives as a replacement for medical powers of attorney and anticipatory directions, it has expanded to: (1) accommodate the 2021 Voluntary Assisted Dying regime with specific carve-outs and interaction clauses; (2) incorporate digital/electronic directive recognition (section 5A); (3) add complex suicide/self-harm exceptions that override binding refusals (sections 19(1a), 36(1a-1e)); and (4) expand interpreter and accessibility requirements (section 14). The 2023 amendments in particular added substantial complexity around life-saving treatment overrides that were not in the original Act."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple overlapping jurisdictions: Original Guardianship Board functions transferred to SACAT in 2014, requiring transitional provisions and cross-references to the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013","Nested conditional logic in section 36 (health practitioner obligations) with 5 subsections (1a-1e) creating layered exceptions for suicide/self-harm scenarios","Extensive cross-referencing: References to Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995, Mental Health Act 2009, Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2021, Guardianship and Administration Act 1993, and Health Practitioner Regulation National Law","Dual pathways for revocation: Different processes depending on whether the person has impaired decision-making capacity (Part 3 Division 3) vs full capacity (section 29)","Multiple transitional provisions converting old instruments (medical powers of attorney, anticipatory directions, enduring guardianships) into new advance care directives (Schedule 1, clauses 32-36)","Defined terms with circular or conditional definitions (e.g., 'impaired decision-making capacity' in section 7 with 4 sub-elements plus self-defined triggers in directives)","Binding vs non-binding distinction (section 19) with automatic categorisation rules and explicit exclusions","Interaction clauses (sections 7A, 8A) carving out application of other legislation including voluntary assisted dying","Three-tier dispute resolution: Public Advocate mediation → Tribunal review → Supreme Court urgent review (Part 7)","Offence provisions with tiered penalties based on role (substitute decision-maker vs general person) and mental state (knowingly vs negligence standards)"],"plain_english_summary":"**What this law does:**\n\nThis Act lets competent adults in South Australia plan ahead for their future medical care and personal affairs. It creates a legal document called an **advance care directive** where you can:\n\n- **Give instructions** about what health care you do or don't want (including refusing life-sustaining treatment)\n- **Appoint substitute decision-makers** (trusted people who make decisions for you if you lose capacity)\n- **Express your values and wishes** about quality of life, accommodation, and personal matters\n\n**Who it affects:**\n\n- **Anyone aged 18+** with full decision-making capacity who wants to plan ahead\n- **Health practitioners** (doctors, nurses, etc.) who must follow binding instructions in a directive\n- **Substitute decision-makers** appointed by the person\n- **Family members** who may be involved in disputes\n\n**Key protections and limits:**\n\n- **Binding refusals**: If you refuse specific health care in your directive, health practitioners generally must follow this (with limited exceptions, such as attempted suicide/self-harm scenarios where life-saving care is needed)\n- **No forced treatment**: Health practitioners cannot be compelled to provide treatment they object to on clinical or conscientious grounds\n- **No power of attorney**: This Act doesn't cover financial decisions—you need separate documents for that\n- **Dispute resolution**: The Public Advocate and South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (SACAT) can resolve conflicts\n\n**Why it matters:**\n\nThis law ensures your autonomy (right to self-determination) is respected even if you later develop dementia, brain injury, or other conditions affecting decision-making. It protects health practitioners who act in good faith following your instructions and provides clear pathways to resolve family disagreements about your care.\n\n**Important recent updates:**\n- The Act now interacts with the **Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2021** (you can express preferences about VAD, but cannot request it through this directive)\n- **Digital copies** of directives are now recognised\n- Special rules apply where health care needs arise from **attempted suicide or self-harm**—binding refusals may be overridden to save life"}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/advance-care-directives-act-2013","history":"/api/acts/advance-care-directives-act-2013/history","analysis":"/api/acts/advance-care-directives-act-2013/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/advance-care-directives-act-2013/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/advance-care-directives-act-2013/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/advance-care-directives-act-2013/documents"}}